FireLion3
Hazard to Others
Posts: 218
Registered: 11-1-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
What is the advantage of short path distillation over normal?
I've never heard of short path distillation until recently coming across youtube videos of people distilling cannabis oil. Upon further research it
seems that cannabis enthusiast almost exclusively use these. I'm not in the Cannabis industry myself, but it seems that many of the components of
cannabis oil are very easily able to be distilled in a normal vacuum distillation apparatus.
Reading the wikipedia page for Short Path Distillation, the only advantage I can glean from there is that it mentions Short Path is useful for
temperature sensitive compounds, because a vacuum is usually used... I fail to see how this is any different from a normal vacuum distillation.
There is the obvious advantage in that a short path apparatus is smaller and more convenient to handle. Wikipedia states that it is useful for
purifying small quantities of materials, however, I've seen many videos on youtube of people distilling relatively large amounts of cannabis oil with
these.
Does anyone have any knowledge about these?
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6334
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
https://www.sciencemadness.org/whisper/viewthread.php?tid=71...
and if my word is anything to go by, https://www.sciencemadness.org/whisper/viewthread.php?tid=71...
I think one of the attractions recently is availability and simplicity. If all you are doing is concentrating your hooch then something that is
one-piece and is currently flooding eBay is obviously an attractive option.
|
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
Short path works well for high boiling point temperature sensitive compounds that are distilled under vacuum. It reduces the length of time the
compound is at an elevated temperature. There is also less surface area to retain the compound which makes it good for small quantities.
|
|
|
FireLion3
Hazard to Others
Posts: 218
Registered: 11-1-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Are they basically just for the sake of convenience/compactness at the cost of separation/fraction efficiency?
I can definitely see how using one would take a lot of the hassle out of setting up a vacuum distillation, but beyond that I am at a loss.
|
|
|
Geocachmaster
Hazard to Others
Posts: 146
Registered: 5-3-2016
Location: Maine, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Corroded, just like my spatulas
|
|
I use short path distillation when:
The boiling point is pretty high (160+)
There is a small amount to distill and I want to minimize losses
I am feeling too lazy; it is very easy to set up
I don't use it when what I'm distilling is quite volatile, i.e. Acetone, methanol, diethyl ether and DCM (when I finally get some).
Edit: I also wouldn't use it for liquids with close boiling points, but then again you should be using fractional distillation if the boiling points
are close. The surface area between the boiling flask and stillhead isn't much less than for simple distillation, so separation shouldn't be too much
worse.
A short path condenser is very useful, and it's nice to have around if you can spare the money. It's not necisarry though, and I got by without one
for a while.
[Edited on 3/1/2017 by Geocachmaster]
|
|
|
Rhodanide
Hazard to Others
Posts: 348
Registered: 23-7-2015
Location: Ｔｈｅ ８０ｓ
Member Is Offline
Mood: That retro aesthetic
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by FireLion3  | I've never heard of short path distillation until recently coming across youtube videos of people distilling cannabis oil. Upon further research it
seems that cannabis enthusiast almost exclusively use these. I'm not in the Cannabis industry myself, but it seems that many of the components of
cannabis oil are very easily able to be distilled in a normal vacuum distillation apparatus.
Reading the wikipedia page for Short Path Distillation, the only advantage I can glean from there is that it mentions Short Path is useful for
temperature sensitive compounds, because a vacuum is usually used... I fail to see how this is any different from a normal vacuum distillation.
There is the obvious advantage in that a short path apparatus is smaller and more convenient to handle. Wikipedia states that it is useful for
purifying small quantities of materials, however, I've seen many videos on youtube of people distilling relatively large amounts of cannabis oil with
these.
Does anyone have any knowledge about these? |
Ahhh, the chemistry of "Weed" :]
|
|
|
FireLion3
Hazard to Others
Posts: 218
Registered: 11-1-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It's interesting because out of the many lab stores I've been to around the country, the ones in medical states always seem to very vocally advertise
their cannabis refining equipment, with whole sections of the store dedicated to glassware most commonly used by cannabis enthusiast. An interesting
yet unanticipated effect of medical marijuana... significantly more business for lab stores. Prior to the last 5-10 years, I have never heard of
anyone using laboratory equipment to refine their cannabis products, even in the early medical states.
[Edited on 2-3-2017 by FireLion3]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
