Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Baffled
|
|
Copper nitrates
Hi
The reasons dont matter but I ended up with a mix off nitric acid acid (it started out as 30% strengh) and sulphuric acid (96% and only a smallish
amount in the solution).
I decided rather than throw it away I would dissolve some of the huge amounts of waste copper wire I have, from there I would use electrolysis and
collect the fine copper powder that drops off one the electrodes.
I assumed I would get copper (i) nitrate and then copper sulphate. this is what happened.....................
I got a funny smell almost like chlorine or a swimming pool, it wasnt that strong, the copper in the solution had started to fiz small bubbles and the
solution gradualy went a deep blue, this morning the solution was still fizzing but had gone a deep green (Copper (ii) nitrate??), there seemed to
still be as much copper wire as when I started though ??
I added a tiny amount (15ml) 96% sulphuric acid and the solution went half deep blue and half lighter blue, one half looks like copper (i) nitrate and
the other half looks like copper sulphate.
Once the fizzing slow down again I will decant off and add more sulphuric acid, I will then try and use electrolysis to get my copper powder, I did
this with copper sulphate solution a few months back and got fine copper powder, this time I ll have a test tube under the electrode to catch it more
easily.
I still cant get pictures as I would love to post the colours of this, but why did it go from deep blue to deep green over night?
Dont ask me, I only know enough to be dangerous
|
|
|
CHRIS25
National Hazard
Posts: 951
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Ireland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I suspect, and bravely so I might add, that the green is copper sulphate. Cu3(SO4)(OH)4. Personally this makes sense to me (amateur speaking here)
seeing that you added a DILUTE nitric acid to the solution whereas the Sulphuric acid was concentrated, both are oxidizers and I would suspect that
the sulphuric acid won, so to speak, and produced copper sulphate, but not the expected blue, Green due to the binding of an Hydroxide molecule.
Anyway this would be my answer in a classroom. Happy to be corrected. (PS, the green patina on copper found away from the sea is not Necessarily
always a copper chloride or a copper carbonate as appears, it can be a copper sulphate)
[Edited on 29-12-2014 by CHRIS25]
‘Calcination… is such a Separation of Bodies by Fire, as makes ‘em easily reducible into Powder; and for that reason ‘tis call’d by some
Chymical Pulverization.’ (John Friend, Chymical Lectures London, 1712)
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. (William Penn 1644-1718)
The very nature of Random, Chance development precludes the existence of Order - strange that our organic and inorganic world is so well defined by
precision and law. (me)
|
|
|
Amos
International Hazard
Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
Mood: No
|
|
Anhydrous copper nitrate is greenish, so perhaps as the reaction has continued, all of the water available to hydrate the copper nitrate formed has
been used up? Yes, copper(II) sulfate will take priority as a salt of the stronger acid, but if you had more nitric acid than sulfuric acid present
then the majorit of the solvated anions are still nitrate and not sulfate. This also seems to make sense to me because you said the reaction won't
seem to continue further. Perhaps the solution is too saturated for the copper salts formed to come into solution and keep the reaction moving
forward?
|
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2539
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
The smell was probably nitrogen dioxide.
|
|
|
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Baffled
|
|
I added more sulphuric acid and it turned dark blue again, currently its starting to turn green and still loads of copper in the beaker so I will keep
going.
Very interesting. The sulphuric acid is 96% and I would say the nitric acid I added a little while ago is 50%.
The bubbles had slowed right down so I am guessing that the water was almost used up so that would make sense. in the end it wont really matter seeing
as soon as all the copper has dissolved (really surprised that there dosnt seem to be much copper used) I will add sulphuric acid to make sure its all
sulphate, then I will you electrolysis. Seems a bit mad I know but when I did it last time with weak copper sulphate I ended up with a very very fine
copper powder, its the copper powder I am after, yes I could get it other ways but this is really interesting watching the colours change.
It started really slow and nothing at all happened for around 2 hours! Then it started to slowly go blue, after a while it really took off and fizzed,
at the moment there are so many small bubbles it looks almost like a precipitate in the beaker but there isnt any, Its on the point of turning from
blue to green.
Way more fun than using a single acid lol.
The beaker is 1ltr so there is a fair amount of it, I put in loads of copper wire but even so I was expecting loads to have been used by now, maybe I
should try and use electrolysis while this is going on.
The smell I wasnt expecting, its really chlorine like but I dont see how
Dont ask me, I only know enough to be dangerous
|
|
|
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Baffled
|
|
Copper nitrate advice
Hi
I mentioned in another thread making copper nitrate crystals and trying to actually grow one to a large size. I have 50% and 30% nitric acid here,
which should I use and how dilute should I make it to get some decent copper nitrate to start with, I am looking at making around 1-1.5 ltrs of it to
start with then I will put in a desiccator to get a seed crystal and take it from there.
The aim is to get as large a crystal as I can grow over 6 weeks
Dont ask me, I only know enough to be dangerous
|
|
|
gdflp
Super Moderator
Posts: 1320
Registered: 14-2-2014
Location: NY, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Staring at code
|
|
Copper(I) nitrate doesn't exist for very long, the cation is immediately oxidized to copper(II) by the anion. And the only oxidizer present strong
enough to oxidize the copper was nitric acid, I don't believe sulfuric acid is a strong enough oxidizer to oxidize copper. My guess is that
initially, since 30% nitric acid won't dissolve copper very quickly, only a small number of copper ions were in solution and there was enough water
present to hydrate them. As the reaction continued however, more and more copper(II) ions came into solution and there wasn't enough water to complex
with them, hence the solution turned green as it does when a piece of copper is added to conc. nitric acid. Finally, when the sulfuric acid was
added, the greater number of sulfate ions formed an equilibrium of copper sulfate, overwhelming the green color and turning the solution blue. I have
no idea why two layers formed, other than you didn't mix the solution well enough when you added the sulfuric acid. Were the layers immiscible?
[Edited on 12-29-2014 by gdflp]
|
|
|
CHRIS25
National Hazard
Posts: 951
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Ireland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I would use 50% without doubt. Conc nitric is 16 M roughly, I just used an 8 M on 32 g of cleaned copper. That took approx 20/30 minutes to
dissolve. It just so happens that 8 M is 50%. You do not want to add water, risk of OH in the solution as you evaporate. Plus use ratio 4 mol Acid
to 1 mol copper. You will get a lot, seriously a lot of brown fumes for about 10 minutes, after which it will die down. Anything here help?
‘Calcination… is such a Separation of Bodies by Fire, as makes ‘em easily reducible into Powder; and for that reason ‘tis call’d by some
Chymical Pulverization.’ (John Friend, Chymical Lectures London, 1712)
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. (William Penn 1644-1718)
The very nature of Random, Chance development precludes the existence of Order - strange that our organic and inorganic world is so well defined by
precision and law. (me)
|
|
|
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Baffled
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by CHRIS25  | | I would use 50% without doubt. Conc nitric is 16 M roughly, I just used an 8 M on 32 g of cleaned copper. That took approx 20/30 minutes to
dissolve. It just so happens that 8 M is 50%. You do not want to add water, risk of OH in the solution as you evaporate. Plus use ratio 4 mol Acid
to 1 mol copper. You will get a lot, seriously a lot of brown fumes for about 10 minutes, after which it will die down. Anything here help?
|
Yes thanks alot, it might also explain some the odd results from my other experiment,
Dont ask me, I only know enough to be dangerous
|
|
|
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Baffled
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by gdflp | Copper(I) nitrate doesn't exist for very long, the cation is immediately oxidized to copper(II) by the anion. And the only oxidizer present strong
enough to oxidize the copper was nitric acid, I don't believe sulfuric acid is a strong enough oxidizer to oxidize copper. My guess is that
initially, since 30% nitric acid won't dissolve copper very quickly, only a small number of copper ions were in solution and there was enough water
present to hydrate them. As the reaction continued however, more and more copper(II) ions came into solution and there wasn't enough water to complex
with them, hence the solution turned green as it does when a piece of copper is added to conc. nitric acid. Finally, when the sulfuric acid was
added, the greater number of sulfate ions formed an equilibrium of copper sulfate, overwhelming the green color and turning the solution blue. I have
no idea why two layers formed, other than you didn't mix the solution well enough when you added the sulfuric acid. Were the layers immiscible?
[Edited on 12-29-2014 by gdflp] |
Yes the layers mixed, whats more odd is even after 24 hours the copper hasnt dissolved, there are streams of small bubbles coming off the copper to
the point that you cant really see inside the beaker! but the colour goes from green to blue and back again, I am starting to wonder if the copper
somehow regenerates back onto the wire??
I am at a complete loss as to why the copper is still there looking almost as good as when I put it in!
Is they anyway hydroxide could be formed like this? it was mentioned in another thread and I have added water to this one, at the moment its in the
process of going a deep green. I must try and get a pic of this its really amazing to watch the amount of bubles of being produced and yet very little
copper being used up.
Dont ask me, I only know enough to be dangerous
|
|
|
Bert
|
Threads Merged
29-12-2014 at 10:52 |
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
Let's merge threads to make it a little easier to understand all this-
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
CHRIS25
National Hazard
Posts: 951
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Ireland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Excuse the interjection, but since anhydrous copper nitrate was mentioned I thought I would post this image to ask what the turquoise green is. Now I
have read that anhydrous can not be made by gentle heating of the copper nitrate solution, which is what I have just finished doing, I have 111 g of
perfectly deep blue copper nitrate, probably the tri or hexahydrate, but off-centre from where the candle was directing its heat this blue-green very
hard solid perfectly round crust had formed about one inch diameter. The whole perimeter was the expected blue hydrate, but this piece was rock
solid. My immediate thought was anhydrous, because of the colour. But it can not be right? Unfortunately I had broken the piece up before realising
this thread otherwise I would have photographed it as it was in the beaker. The photo has not done justice to how much green there was, a lot more
than what you see here.
Yep, the green is a copper hydroxide, or more accurately copper nitrate with (OH). It was insoluble in water breaking down into lime green particles.
So that means that the rest of my copper nitrate is probably trihydrate since expected yield and actual yield with 3H2O calculated in are very close.
[Edited on 29-12-2014 by CHRIS25]
‘Calcination… is such a Separation of Bodies by Fire, as makes ‘em easily reducible into Powder; and for that reason ‘tis call’d by some
Chymical Pulverization.’ (John Friend, Chymical Lectures London, 1712)
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. (William Penn 1644-1718)
The very nature of Random, Chance development precludes the existence of Order - strange that our organic and inorganic world is so well defined by
precision and law. (me)
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I've heard of a copper tribasic nitrate, Cu(NO3)2.3Cu(OH)2 and this could be it or similar. Copper nitrate hydrate doesn't like excessive heating.
Just separate the blue from the green and you're good to go with the blue.
To know with certainty which hydrate (tri or hexa) it is, you'll have to use your favourite titration method. 
[Edited on 29-12-2014 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
CHRIS25
National Hazard
Posts: 951
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Ireland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yes I agree I should have written the formula you wrote this is what I meant actually. I have separated it from the rest, but I had to keep heating to
guarantee a product without 20 water attached to it, only lost 11 g anyway. My favourite titration method, you mean the one that kept not
working... still have to re-do those, keeping getting side-tracked with too much
reading.
‘Calcination… is such a Separation of Bodies by Fire, as makes ‘em easily reducible into Powder; and for that reason ‘tis call’d by some
Chymical Pulverization.’ (John Friend, Chymical Lectures London, 1712)
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. (William Penn 1644-1718)
The very nature of Random, Chance development precludes the existence of Order - strange that our organic and inorganic world is so well defined by
precision and law. (me)
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This would be a good opportunity to use that method (that works perfectly, trust me  ) because your nitrate is a pure substance.
Assume it's the hexahydrate, as a hypothesis. Based on that prepare accurately a 0.1 M Cu<sup>2+</sup> solution from your nitrate. Titrate
with KI and sodium thiosulphate (starch indicator).
If found molarity is 0.1 M, it's the hexahydrate.
If the product was pure trihydrate, the molarity found would theoretically be 0.122 M.
[Edited on 29-12-2014 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Baffled
|
|
I am going to take a pic in the morning, I have separated some the liquid out, it stopped fizzing and was green in colour but still almost all copper
still present, I added a little more nitric acid with some water added and it turned dark blue, I have also added added more water and nitric acid to
the one with copper in and there isnt much fizzing, my guess is if I add more sulphuric it will start up again, but first I am going to use
electrolysis on the small portion I have separated and see what happens.
I am also going to stop messing in the morning and make some copper nitrate and other copper compounds before I go and get charged!!
Dont ask me, I only know enough to be dangerous
|
|
|
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Baffled
|
|
I might have found a way to get some pics on tomorrow, I took some the blue solution and put to one side, I also added 50ml conc nitric to the large
beaker with copper metal in and another 15ml of conc sulphuric acid, the bubbles started again and it went cloudy with no brown gas but it did get the
chlorine like smell (not exactly like swimming pools but close) over night it changed again from the deep blue to the emerald green, I will take pics
of both and see what you think it is.
I guess the next step is to put a little of both solutions in a desiccator and see what crystals form, maybe I can get an idea of what it is from the
shape of the crystals? I am sure the deep blue is copper nitrate so that should be easy as the crystals once out the desiccator should absorb water
and go mushy while if its copper sulphate they shouldnt do this.
The green one I am guessing at the following......................
If its copper (i) nitrate then again the crystal should take water and go mushy and probably blue?
If its copper (I) sulphate then the crystal should stay as it is??
There is still plenty of copper wire in the beaker and at no point has a brown gas been off. It probably isnt interesting to most people but I am
totally amazed by this as it hasnt done anything I was expecting it to do.
One last question .....................
Will copper asprinate form crystals? I am after a crystal collection and that would make a good addition
Dont ask me, I only know enough to be dangerous
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Little_Ghost_again | If its copper (i) nitrate then again the crystal should take water and go mushy and probably blue?
If its copper (I) sulphate then the crystal should stay as it is??
|
In both cases copper(II) salts will form, not copper(I) which is very prone to oxidation to (II).
|
|
|
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Baffled
|
|
So copper (II) can also be deep emerald green then? Unless I guess one has gone to copper oxide ?????
I am really tied up but do have some pics to get posted and do have some the green stuff in the desiccator, I am using sodium chloride with rice mixed
in under the bowel with the solution in (cheap and was to hand) so its a bit slow evaporating
Dont ask me, I only know enough to be dangerous
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4355
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Online
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
Yes- particularly if there is chloride present. Copper(I) salts are generally white unless impure (apart from the oxide, which is red).
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Baffled
|
|
Nothing to report so far, solutions in desiccator and very very slowly the solution level is dropping, no crystals yet and I didnt heat or boil off
any solution first.
I am also using salt and rice (heated up on a coal fire first to dry out) as the desiccant so it will be slow. The deep blue one looks like it may
have a tiny crystal forming but hard to tell through the glass, the desiccator is starting to form a vacuum so I guess its heading the right way.
Dont ask me, I only know enough to be dangerous
|
|
|
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Baffled
|
|
so finally a update and some pics, the pics are not great sorry about that!
The beaker has been left on the window sill all this time and not touched, there is till copper in there and now some deep blue crystals on the bottom
that are stuck fast, the strange bit is the colour of the liquid and the fact there seems to be be a white powder in the solution on top of the
crystals.
The white stuff that looks like the outside of the beaker is dirty is in fact on the inside glass of the beaker.
The solution I put in the desiccator has produced blue crystals that when exposed to air see to melt a bit, I had to take the lid off shoot the pics
quick and put the lid back on. There are some green very small crystals (no idea what they are), there is one large crystal in the bowl but every time
I change the desiccant it melts a bit and takes a few weeks to grow again.
I honestly thought the solution would be dry by now. In the beginning I had water condensation droplets inside the desiccator, I am not sure if you
can see it in the pics but now the droplets are a blue colour!! I havnt splashed anything its something thats only happened in the last few weeks
hence why I decided to post an update. It likely I will empty the beaker and try and somehow get the crystals out, I dont see much point carrying on
with this. The beaker still gives off small bubbles.
 
Dont ask me, I only know enough to be dangerous
|
|
|
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Baffled
|
|
A couple of more close up pics
 
Dont ask me, I only know enough to be dangerous
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Should have photoshopped out the flower petals before doing the Zoom on the same image.
Devil is always in the details.
|
|
|
Little_Ghost_again
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 16-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Baffled
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by aga | Should have photoshopped out the flower petals before doing the Zoom on the same image.
Devil is always in the details. |
dont you like the petals? it was an old bowl re purposed for crystallizing .
The pics were a screen shot but they dont seen to come out as big on here so I zoomed in and did another capture.
I cant get the colour balance right with this camera, I might try the jpeg option next time and see if it gives a more accurate colour.
On my screen they dont look as blue as they do when you actually see them.
Dont ask me, I only know enough to be dangerous
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
