hechz
Harmless
Posts: 1
Registered: 7-10-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Stoichiometry question: Al₂S₃+6H₂O→2Al(OH)₃+3H₂S
Al₂S₃+6H₂O→2Al(OH)₃+3H₂S
Concerning the above reaction I am asked what mass of Al(OH)₃ will be produced when 14.2g of Al₂S₃is fully reacted.
My first step was to convert the mass to the count of moles.
14.2g
----------------- = 0.115 mol of Al₂S₃
123.177g/mol
Then I determine the number of moles of the product, using the coefficients of the balanced equation:
⎛ 2 mol/Al(OH)₃ ⎞
0.115 mol/Al₂S₃⎜ ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ⎟ = 0.23
mol/Al(OH)₃
⎝ 1
mol/AlS₃ ⎠
0.23(78.006)=17.94g/Al(OH)₃
The textbook answer key states the answer as 14.7g/Al(OH)₃
I am failing to see wherein my error lies.
[Edited on 8-10-2009 by hechz]
[Edited on 8-10-2009 by hechz]
|
|
psychokinetic
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 558
Registered: 30-8-2009
Location: Nouveau Sheepelande.
Member Is Offline
Mood: Constantly missing equilibrium
|
|
Ugh, I tried for you but I got 12.96g ![:P](./images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Sorry, I'll keep trying.
“If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found
the object of his search.
I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety per cent of his labor.”
-Tesla
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 7998
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
14.2 grams of Al2S3 is not 0.115 mol, but 0.0946 mol. With this info you should be able to find your mistake.
|
|
Alkyrisk
Harmless
Posts: 6
Registered: 15-11-2009
Location: Transilvania
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Molar mass for Al2S3 is 150.158 g/mol. Why? because
26.982 x 2 = 53.964
32.065 x 3 = 96.195
150.159 - 123.177(your hypothetical molar mass) =
????...??? exactly 26.982 (What these numbers mean? This is the question!)
|
|
Nicodem
Super Moderator
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I don't know what kind of acrobatic arithmetics you are doing above and I'm not going to search for where you made a mistake but I think Woelen
already pointed it out. Instead of using numbers which leads to confusion, use variables instead. Like this way:
m[Al(OH)3] = M[Al(OH)3] * 2 * m[Al2S3] / M[Al2S3]
When m[Al2S3] = 14.2 g then m[Al(OH)3] = 14.75 g just like your textbook claims!
|
|
Alkyrisk
Harmless
Posts: 6
Registered: 15-11-2009
Location: Transilvania
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I want to find the origin of mistake. He took only one aluminium molecule instead 2.
M Al2S3 = 150.158, M (AlS3) = 123.177. The confusion may be derived from my acrobatic poor english.
|
|