| Pages:
1
2 |
Jor
National Hazard
Posts: 950
Registered: 21-11-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
real problem pouring acids.
Today, I've encountered some real concerns.
When I want to pour a small amount (say 20mL) of nitric or acetic acid in a graduated cylinder, I get the acid on my skin, every time (Also when I
poured methanol, acetone, ethanol), because it will come down via the glass of the bottle. Even if I try to pour very quikly (when I do it to slow, It
WILL get on me), still some drops go down the glass. I do not know how to solve this. Any advice?
PS: My hydrochloric acid and sulphuric are no problem at all: they are in HDPE containers and they are very easy to handle.
|
|
|
YT2095
International Hazard
Posts: 1091
Registered: 31-5-2003
Location: Just left of Europe and down a bit.
Member Is Offline
Mood: within Nominal Parameters
|
|
time to invest in some Syringes / pipettes and fillers I think!
I trust you Always wear gloves and eye protection when doing this also?
\"In a world full of wonders mankind has managed to invent boredom\" - Death
Twinkies don\'t have a shelf life. They have a half-life! -Caine (a friend of mine)
|
|
|
Jor
National Hazard
Posts: 950
Registered: 21-11-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
yes, but still I will have to clean up the spills, wich takes time, and I will have to wash my gloves for a minute every time. I dont want pipettes
and stuff in my main stock, as that will contaminate.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8014
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Accept that while pouring liquids, there may be some spills along the outside of the test tube or beaker. I always pour acids IN the sink, which is
ceramic in my lab and is not attacked by the acids. If your sink is sensitive for this, then put a thin layer of water in it, and do the pouring above
that.
I alsways keep test tubes and the like in such a way, that no acid touches my hand/fingers. I even pour stuff like thionyl chloride in this way and I
always have one or two drops going along the outside of the test tube, but I never had a drop of this liquid touch my hand (and I also don't want
that, does not seem funny to me, as this stuff qickly reacts with water). I keep the test tube, or the beaker or erlenmeyer with two fingers and keep
it at an angle of 30 degrees, such that the lower part of the test tube is directed away from both fingers (sad, that I cannot easily draw it over
here) and in this position, pouring is not that bad. I also only have the liquid going along the test tube, and not going along the bottle from which
I pour the liquid.
I agree with you, that I do not want anything like a pipette or so in the stock liquid, due to contamination. I hate the idea of that. The only liquid
with which I do such things is with Br2. Br2 cannot be poured at all, because it forms a thin film of liquid on both the test tube (outside!) and the
bottle from which it is poured. So that's the only liquid, I use a pasteur pipette for, one kept aside, which only is used for Br2 and never cleaned
(the Br2 simply evaporates from it).
|
|
|
YT2095
International Hazard
Posts: 1091
Registered: 31-5-2003
Location: Just left of Europe and down a bit.
Member Is Offline
Mood: within Nominal Parameters
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by Jor
yes, but still I will have to clean up the spills, wich takes time, and I will have to wash my gloves for a minute every time. I dont want pipettes
and stuff in my main stock, as that will contaminate. |
I fail to see How it will contaminate?
and so what if it takes time, you should Never rush things in a Lab anyway, and Hygiene is always of utmost importance and never to be compromised on.
I use all glass pipettes here, and plastic disposable Syringes for not so aggressive chems.
never once had a problem with it.
\"In a world full of wonders mankind has managed to invent boredom\" - Death
Twinkies don\'t have a shelf life. They have a half-life! -Caine (a friend of mine)
|
|
|
Klute
International Hazard
Posts: 1378
Registered: 18-10-2006
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Simply use a glass rod applied on the neck of your bottle to direct the flow of liquid into your beaker/bottle/whatever. Then tilt the bottle
backwards before removing the rod from it's neck, so than no drops remain on the sides. No splashing or spills.
|
|
|
Jor
National Hazard
Posts: 950
Registered: 21-11-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by YT2095
| Quote: | Originally posted by Jor
yes, but still I will have to clean up the spills, wich takes time, and I will have to wash my gloves for a minute every time. I dont want pipettes
and stuff in my main stock, as that will contaminate. |
I fail to see How it will contaminate?
and so what if it takes time, you should Never rush things in a Lab anyway, and Hygiene is always of utmost importance and never to be compromised on.
I use all glass pipettes here, and plastic disposable Syringes for not so aggressive chems.
never once had a problem with it. |
Well it does contaminate for me, as I cannot completely clean my pipettes (don't want to throw away after use). I clean them by sucking op distilled
water a few times , and then let them dry.
And Klute, I will try the glass rod thing.
Especially acetone is a bitch to pour without spilling. But thats no concern.
|
|
|
SecretSquirrel
Hazard to Self
Posts: 71
Registered: 16-4-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If you rinse the pipettes 4-5 times with tap water and then once more with distilled water, they should be sufficiently clean. Of course the chemical
must be miscible with water. That's what I did when doing some qualitative analysis and I never had a false positive or negative reaction.
If you are still worried about contaminating your chemicals get some disposable PE pipettes and use each with its own solvent.
[Edited on 4-2-2008 by SecretSquirrel]
[Edited on 4-2-2008 by SecretSquirrel]
|
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
Posts: 1324
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
Why not keep a pipette specifically for each chemical you need to dispense? No contamination that way.
I always use a glass pipette, with a rubber squeeze bulb for my acid. No choice really - ever tried to pour a few ml from a 10 litre bottle of
nitric?
[Edited on 5-2-2008 by Twospoons]
Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
|
|
|
chloric1
International Hazard
Posts: 1141
Registered: 8-10-2003
Location: GroupVII of the periodic table
Member Is Offline
Mood: Stoichiometrically Balanced
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by Klute
Simply use a glass rod applied on the neck of your bottle to direct the flow of liquid into your beaker/bottle/whatever. Then tilt the bottle
backwards before removing the rod from it's neck, so than no drops remain on the sides. No splashing or spills. |
This guy has the best and simplest answer! I discovered this myself in a chemistry book from 1960. Not something mentioned in modern text from what
I have seen
This same book gave me ideas on improvised steam baths as well.
I use the glass rod technique alot. Not just for corrosives but fragrances. When I make soap and I don't want to spill my expensive fragrances, I
use the rod to dispense by odorous components. It is easy to use down to 5 or 7ml of fluid.
Fellow molecular manipulator
|
|
|
MadHatter
International Hazard
Posts: 1339
Registered: 9-7-2004
Location: Maine
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enjoying retirement
|
|
Funnel
Like Woelen said, in the sink for openers - especially with acids ! I also like a small glass
or plastic funnel for slightly larger amounts.
From opening of NCIS New Orleans - It goes a BOOM ! BOOM ! BOOM ! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !
|
|
|
not_important
International Hazard
Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Plastic trays or shallow plastic tubs are useful when pouring corrosives. You can ignore minor spills for a bit, simple spritz drips off the
container into the trays, and neutralise spills right in the tray.
As already said, funnels are good for keeping drips off the glassware being poured into, a glass rod is useful for reducing incidents of drips and
dribbles, and dedicated pipetts and pour rods is a good way around contamination worries.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8014
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
The glass rod method also is new to me, and I will certainly try that.
Another suggestion for Jor. Don't work directly from your stock containers. If you have e.g. 1 liter of conc. nitric acid, then take 50 to 100 ml and
put that in a separate small glass bottle with a narrow neck (using a funnel). Work from this small bottle. You could use pipettes from this small
bottle. If by accident there is some contamination, then at least you did not spoil your entire stock. I use this practice. I think I now have more
than 100 small bottles which contain only tens of ml of liquid or several grams of solids and I use these. It works more conveniently, allows for safe
(off-site) storage of bulk materials and I do not need to open the large containers every time (good for air-sensitive chemicals).
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
It (stirring rod) doesn't always work perfectly. This seems to have something to do with the vagaries of the edges of certain bottles or perhaps the
brain/world interface.
If you want to look very unprofessional like me, have a sacrificial rag around the mouth (of the bottle) when pouring nasty things to catch that drop
that always seems to get away.
|
|
|
microcosmicus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 287
Registered: 31-12-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: spin up
|
|
If you are going to pour your acid from the stock container to another bottle as
suggested above, you can solve two problems at once by using a bottle which
has a pipette built into the cap. That way, there is no worry of remembering which
pipette goes with which chemical since they are automatically stored together.
http://www.hometrainingtools.com/catalog/chemistry/glassware...
http://store01.prostores.com/servlet/thescienceshop/the-1981...
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8014
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
I know that kind of droppers, but my experience with them is not really good. These things are made for medicine purposes and I once had such a bottle
with nitric acid. The soft plastic cap was eaten away in a few days. It became brittle. I also used such a bottle for chloroform. The chloroform was
gone in a few weeks (I must admit, it was a hot period in summer, but even then...). I only use these for pH indicator solutions now, which easily can
be dripped in other liquids.
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I typically use the glass rod method, and for beakers and certain flasks when pouring cooperative liquids you can even do it one handed (I'll see if I
can post a picture of the technique when I get home).
Taking small quantities of certain liquids and solids out of the stock container and storing them in appropriate smaller containers is probably my
favorite method. However, it's very important to label them carefully (I always date every vial, bottle, etc. also... just to be
sure). With liquids, make sure the label won't get washed away or bleached--sometimes a layer of clear packing tape is all it takes.
Also, 'Hello!' to everyone. (I've been reading for a couple days, but haven't posted until now.)
|
|
|
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Here's a bad picture of the one-handed method. Just rest the glass rod accross the diameter of the container, with a shorter length sticking off of
the side you plan to pour from. Hold the glass rod with slight pressure from your index finger and pour. If you're using a beaker, rest one end of
the glass rod in the pour spout as shown.
<img src="http://www.medievalsiege.net/bfesser/images/chem/pouring_technique.jpg" />
Also be sure you're wearing appropriate gloves for whatever you're working with.
[Edited on 2/10/08 by bfesser]
|
|
|
Jor
National Hazard
Posts: 950
Registered: 21-11-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sorry for the bump.
I advice you all really (if you didnt already have them) to buy pouring-rings (I translated straight out of dutch, so might be wrong translation). You
put them on the outside of the bottle where the liquid comes out. They direct the flow of the liquid perfectly. Havent had any spills yet, when using
them. This is how they look (icase you guys dont understand what i mean with pouring-rings):
http://www.pegelsoft.nl/index1.html?target=p1389.html
|
|
|
jrmathis
Harmless
Posts: 5
Registered: 7-7-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: Sciency! 
|
|
I've been having the exact same problem, in fact I had a HCl spill the other day. I imagine the only thing scarier than an acid spill is an
explosion/fire. Luckily, I didn't panic. I simply grabbed the baking soda and neutralized the mess.
I'll most definitely try the glass rod trick!
|
|
|
Panache
International Hazard
Posts: 1290
Registered: 18-10-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: Instead of being my deliverance, she had a resemblance to a Kat named Frankenstein
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by Jor
| Quote: | Originally posted by YT2095
| Quote: | Originally posted by Jor
yes, but still I will have to clean up the spills, wich takes time, and I will have to wash my gloves for a minute every time. I dont want pipettes
and stuff in my main stock, as that will contaminate. |
I fail to see How it will contaminate?
and so what if it takes time, you should Never rush things in a Lab anyway, and Hygiene is always of utmost importance and never to be compromised on.
I use all glass pipettes here, and plastic disposable Syringes for not so aggressive chems.
never once had a problem with it. |
Well it does contaminate for me, as I cannot completely clean my pipettes (don't want to throw away after use). I clean them by sucking op distilled
water a few times , and then let them dry.
|
This reminds me of an argument i had with an analytical chemist one day. I asked her if she was comfortable making a cup of tea in a beaker she had
just cleaned ready for anyalytical work. She said she was not. I thought this absolutely ridiculous, what confidence do you have in your anaylsis
then. She replied that something may leach into the tea that would not otherwise leach into her solutions. We were in an elevator, a stranger then
interjected
'in which case you should wash everything with tea then'
If chemists can't be confident of being able to clean something when its important who can, there is no-one else, maybe we should pray.
I don't buy that contamination bit unless its a technique to protect yourself from yourself, knowing at times that you may take shortcuts on cleaning?
In this case yes.
|
|
|
crazyboy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 436
Registered: 31-1-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: Marginally insane
|
|
| Quote: |
This reminds me of an argument i had with an analytical chemist one day. I asked her if she was comfortable making a cup of tea in a beaker she had
just cleaned ready for anyalytical work. She said she was not. I thought this absolutely ridiculous, what confidence do you have in your anaylsis
then. |
Hmmm well I do like to get my glass very clean but I have had things stain it pretty good potassium permanganate does that pretty well but for the
most part I wouldn't mind eating food out of labware.
I actualy think it would be a cool kitchen. Fry my eggs on a hotplate, boil my water in a RB flask in a heating mantle then use it to make my vacuum
filtered coffee while magnetically stirring in the sugar.
|
|
|
ShadowWarrior4444
Hazard to Others
Posts: 226
Registered: 25-4-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: Sunlight on a pure white wall.
|
|
To avoid contamination I generally like to pour whatever liquid it is into another beaker first, then pipette from there.
Occasionally, if it is something particularly annoying to pour (like HF,) I'll assign it a large pipette that is only to be used for moving that
liquid from the main to a smaller beaker, other pipettes are then used to move the liquid from the beaker to the reaction.
|
|
|
dann2
International Hazard
Posts: 1523
Registered: 31-1-2007
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
When transferring Bromine from a Teflon coated bottle into a smaller bottle the glass rod trick will not work. The Br is actually repelled by the
glass rod.
Why is that.
Would it be that Br has very high surface tension.
Would the glass rod trick work for Mercury?
Dann2
|
|
|
barley81
Hazard to Others
Posts: 481
Registered: 9-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The glass rod certainly does not work for mercury. The meniscus of mercury is convex. Mercury does not stick to anything except some metals.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
