Pages:
1
2 |
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Hydrogen Generator
As a part of a GC/FID project i've been looking into methods to controllably produce hydrogen at a predictable rate, and with commonly available
materials.
Electrolysis of water was the obvious choice, as the rate of production would be proportional to the current density.
Unfortunately that was a bit feeble regarding the Rate of production, also too electricity-hungry per ml of H2 produced.
detaH suggested Al & NaOH so i gave it a try.
2g of NaOH was dissolved in 100ml of distilled water to make a 0.5 [M] solution.
Theoretically this works out to produce roughly 17ml of gas per 1ml of solution reacted with elemental Al. One advantage with this reaction is that
the only gas produced is Hydrogen,
A 100ml RBF was filled with 4g of Al chippings (a large excess).
To this, a vac adapter with a length of rubber tube was attached.
The open end of the tube was led into the bottom of an inverted water-filled 25ml measuring cylinder and the bottom of the cylinder was kept under the
level of water in a bath.
1ml of the NaOH solution was injected onto the Al though the rubber tube with a hypodermic syringe and the gas evolution rate measured at 30 second
intervals over a period of 8 minutes.
Amazingly the rate of production was fairly linear until it reached 11.5ml, at which point the production effectively stopped.
The shortfall could well be something simple, like not allowing enough time etc.
The reaction is fairly exothermic, so it will vary massively when scaled up, however the dilution of the NaOH could also mitigate that.
Has anyone any experience/suggestions regarding H2 production at a controllable rate, without using words like 'platinum electrode' or
'more power' ?
[Edited on 27-11-2017 by aga]
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
By heating Aluminum foil, Sodium carbonate (washing soda) and water?
[Edited on 27-11-2017 by Bert]
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
Chemetix
Hazard to Others
Posts: 375
Registered: 23-9-2016
Location: Oztrayleeyah
Member Is Offline
Mood: Wavering between lucidity and madness
|
|
Depends on availability but Ferrosilicon and NaOH was a classic H2 generator....Lot's of sodium silicate as a byproduct, if that is useful to you.
|
|
PirateDocBrown
National Hazard
Posts: 570
Registered: 27-11-2016
Location: Minnesota
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I just use zinc and HCl. Or electrolyze water.
|
|
NEMO-Chemistry
International Hazard
Posts: 1559
Registered: 29-5-2016
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Would need to be very pure and very dry, the FID is super sensitive. They sell a machine that is supposed to make hydrogen from air, many pro labs are
apparently using them for GC.
There is a GC forum, i dont remember all the details but this topic was discussed alot on there. The coils for a GC cost a fair bit. HP do software
for that is supposed to be the best GC software, however elmer perkins i think has a free version.
The best source of air for one is a dental compressor thats oil less, and an electronic bubble counter to set it up correctly. If using Hydrogen for
the carrier gas, its highly recommended to get a detector for the oven section.....
|
|
Reboot
Hazard to Others
Posts: 141
Registered: 8-8-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Let's say the goal is steady, consistent H2 production with minimal interference. I would probably try:
1. Sheets or plates of Al (since they will vary less in their available surface area as they are consumed), amalgamated with mercury or stannous
chloride or alloyed with gallium.
2. Placed in a large excess of near-boiling water (refluxing or allowed to boil off if moisture in your hydrogen gas isn't a problem.) That way you
can keep the temperature essentially constant, keeping the reaction rate from ramping up as heat is produced.
That should give a very steady rate of H2 evolution (at least until the Al was largely consumed and you started to get substantial losses of surface
area.)
|
|
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
The reaction of aluminum with an aqueous solution of alkali hydroxide really is the best. Aluminum is amphoteric, and will react with either three
units of an acid or one unit of a base to generate the same amount of hydrogen. All the common strong acids either form volatile gases (ie HCl) or
are reduced by aluminum (ie H2SO4) or form a ridiculously insoluble product that protects the metal from further reaction (H3PO4). With alkali
hydroxide solution, the only gas you need to worry about is water vapor.
One of the most convenient sources of reasonably pure aluminum is from large electrical cables, or electric fence wire. In this form, lengths of wire
can be placed into a narrow container with a few inches of alkaline solution at the bottom, and thus maintain a controlled output over a controlled
period of time. If your source is aluminum foil or aluminum serving trays, these can be twisted into rod shapes, to act in the same manner.
[Edited on 11/28/17 by Melgar]
The first step in the process of learning something is admitting that you don't know it already.
I'm givin' the spam shields max power at full warp, but they just dinna have the power! We're gonna have to evacuate to new forum software!
|
|
sclarenonz
Hazard to Self
Posts: 74
Registered: 13-12-2015
Location: BRASIL,oiapoque ,amapa
Member Is Offline
Mood: only the mission forget past
|
|
melgar you're right, but the big problem for me was to try to control the reaction, the aluminum ended and I had to add more aluminum, and I have to
put more sodium hydroxide solution that occupied me enough I chose the electrolysis of lead and rays because of the fact that I can spend hours
unoccupied, the beams of the motorcycles here in Brazil gave me a much more lasting result than the stainless steel. I made several generators to give
me a satisfactory amount of hydrogen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geS9OvT4-qU&t=39s
[Edited on 28-11-2017 by sclarenonz]
|
|
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
By "rays", I'm guessing you mean "spokes"? IIRC, those are usually made out of stainless steel. The choice of electrolyte is a lot more important
than the choice of electrode material though. Dilute sulfuric acid tends to be a popular choice because it's more electrically efficient. With
sodium bicarbonate, a lot of the hydrogen is generated from reducing sodium ions to sodium metal, then the sodium metal reacts with water. This
reaction produces a lot of waste heat.
You can control the aluminum reaction rate by changing the alkalinity of the solution it's dissolving in, or by using thicker lengths of aluminum with
less surface area.
The first step in the process of learning something is admitting that you don't know it already.
I'm givin' the spam shields max power at full warp, but they just dinna have the power! We're gonna have to evacuate to new forum software!
|
|
sclarenonz
Hazard to Self
Posts: 74
Registered: 13-12-2015
Location: BRASIL,oiapoque ,amapa
Member Is Offline
Mood: only the mission forget past
|
|
Thank you Melgar You're a genius, I was in doubt about bicarbonate and now you gave me the answer, I'm going to use baking soda in the electrolyser,
it's going to be interesting for me because I have a co2 generator made of limestone and muriatic acid and when it's bubbling in sodium hydroxide I
have bicarbonate again, but what do I do when I run out of NaOH solution, even if I have a thick aluminum I'll always be opening it to put more naoh,
what's the solution?
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Nice one Melgar.
i guess that the shape/surface area of the Al piece will also have an effect on production rate, so i'll experiment with that.
|
|
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
I guess the best solution will depend on whether you need to generate H2 in large quantities quickly, or at a low, controlled rate for a very long
time. I never really liked electrolysis reactions, because they're messy and hard to properly seal, so inevitably one of the wires will get its
copper exposed and there will be dirty transition metal salts in the liquid. Harder to make airtight too. With aluminum, you can add hydroxide
solution with an addition funnel, but since hydrogen isn't toxic, it's easier to just open the container and add the appropriate reagent when needed.
If your reaction can't have air in it, then just use an excess of aluminum and add hydroxide solution with an addition funnel. A small amount of
aluminum can generate a LOT of hydrogen.
If generating hydrogen is the goal, then it's important to have a lot of H+ ions in solution that can be reduced directly to elemental hydrogen.
Thus, acids are usually used. I guess sulfuric acid is usually used because it's cheap, but dilute phosphoric acid would probably be a better choice
for an amateur. It's less dangerous, and is less likely to dissolve something that you don't want it to dissolve. Phosphate salts are almost never
very soluble in water, so you can use a much wider range of electrode materials without having your electrolyte solution turn a grimy, opaque brown
immediately.
No matter what method you use, there will be something consumed, whether it's water or metal. And with electrolysis, you also have to figure out what
to do with the oxygen. If you use aluminum, then the oxygen just goes to oxidizing aluminum, with the hydrogen being released.
The first step in the process of learning something is admitting that you don't know it already.
I'm givin' the spam shields max power at full warp, but they just dinna have the power! We're gonna have to evacuate to new forum software!
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
I tried electrolysis and the amount of power required kinds a rules it out.
Having Oxygen as a side product isn't a good thing either from the BOOM point of view.
Al & NaOH works almost perfectly, just need to refine the cell to make it useful.
In any event i think it will need a mass-flow regulator to get the rate constant, which a GC will need.
Incidentally, the carrier gas and flame flow rates will be different, seeing as the FID needs the flame.
It came up in the discussion with deltaH that the exothermic nature of the Al/NaOH reaction could help heat the FID chamber, reducing the condensation
problem.
The 'column' will be (at least to start with) a length of copper pipe stuffed with silica gel beads.
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
Posts: 1324
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
I used Al + NaOH for a much more mundane purpose: filling balloons. I found three things: it was prone to thermal runaway, foaming, and there was
always a fine mist of NaOH along with the hydrogen.
I have also built a 4 cell electrolyser, from stacked stainless steel plate. Running 20A at about 10V it would sustain a flame on the end of a 25mm
tube.
[Edited on 29-11-2017 by Twospoons]
Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
What reaction conditions did you use ?
Al powder, chips, solid chunks ?
What NaOH did you use ? Solution or dry NaOH on the metal with water dripped on ?
Science doesn't happen by vagueness.
Details and data or it's like a fart in the breeze,
I'm being hard-ass on this because i actually want to Make a process, not just jibber-jabber about bollocks in the internet to make me feel better
about myself.
|
|
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
This setup works for producing a pretty constant H2 stream:
I'd take the three conductors out of a length of aluminum 240VAC cable, and use them at once. One rod/wire isn't really enough.
@aga: You might just be better off regulating the pressure via a needle valve or pressure regulator, then just have a large container that the H2 can
build up some pressure in to even the flow out.
Mist can be stopped with a wadded up piece of rag or a cotton ball. Then some desiccant system for vapor, which you'd need regardless.
[Edited on 11/29/17 by Melgar]
The first step in the process of learning something is admitting that you don't know it already.
I'm givin' the spam shields max power at full warp, but they just dinna have the power! We're gonna have to evacuate to new forum software!
|
|
zed
International Hazard
Posts: 2283
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord
|
|
I like hydrogen. Awesome commercial generators may be acquired on e-bay, used, for about a grand. The better ones produce 500 cc H2/min. Plenty.
That being said, they are used, and a grand is a lot of money.
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p23800...
Alternately, you can produce as much hydrogen gas as you need (short-term) and store it in an old glass, Alhambra type water bottle.
Have considered using Methanol/Magnesium to generate H2.
Products are H2 plus MgMethoxide. There after the Magnesium Methoxide, can be used for drying other solvents etc..
[Edited on 29-11-2017 by zed]
[Edited on 29-11-2017 by zed]
[Edited on 29-11-2017 by zed]
|
|
VSEPR_VOID
National Hazard
Posts: 719
Registered: 1-9-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fullerenes
|
|
Why not use aluminium powder instead of foil? There will be far more surface area for your reaction to occur.
Within cells interlinked
Within cells interlinked
Within cells interlinked
|
|
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
Because then all the hydrogen will be generated during a space of about five seconds, in the form of a foam that will erupt all over your workbench.
The first step in the process of learning something is admitting that you don't know it already.
I'm givin' the spam shields max power at full warp, but they just dinna have the power! We're gonna have to evacuate to new forum software!
|
|
sclarenonz
Hazard to Self
Posts: 74
Registered: 13-12-2015
Location: BRASIL,oiapoque ,amapa
Member Is Offline
Mood: only the mission forget past
|
|
I will put my context on the reaction of aluminum with sodium hydroxide
- I live in a wild country where instrustrialized raw materials cost a lot of money.
so I always try to recycle, to work to the extreme to get everything from scratch.
In this question, only the generators can be made with plastic bottles of soft drinks and pasting the hoses that I found on the old irons of old cars
with homemade glue: formaldehyde (distillation of wood) with urea (urine), I tried to put in the plastic aluminum, it melted completely, so I put the
bottle of beer, it warmed so much that the bottom broke and the hose melted, so I put less sodium hydroxide, the reaction slowed, but I had to open
the bottle, the most viable was bottles of 5 liters, I really liked the result, but my question is:
it is possible to make a reaction of aluminum and hydroxide and plastic bottles
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Yes, but this reaction produces a lot of heat.
If you run the reaction too fast or too big a scale, the bottle will melt.
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Melgar | ... You might just be better off regulating the pressure via a needle valve or pressure regulator, then just have a large container that the H2 can
build up some pressure in to even the flow out. |
Definitely some kind of pressure regulator, or rather mass-flow regulator will be needed.
It'd be nice to get the production rate close to the required rate to avoif having to build up a big reserve of explosive gas !
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8014
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
What rate do you require? With electrolysis you produce appr. 0.2 ml per second with a current of 1 A. Voltage required for electrolysis of a
NaOH-solution (using copper wire for both anode and cathode, e.g. cheap thick loudspeaker wire) is about 4.5 volts, the copper does not dissolve, also
at the anode it remains good and oxygen is produced. Power requirements are only 5W for 0.2 ml per second.
With H2SO4, NaCl and other ionized substances the copper at the anode dissolves, hence the specific choice of NaOH (or KOH).
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
It's only about 3ml/minute required, but that depends 100% on being able to make a column with a tiny internal diameter of 0.32mm
Chances are that it will be much bigger, so a significantly higher rate might be needed.
I found a table of recommended carrier gas flow rates, which is where that figure was calculated from :-
Gas cm/sec
H 45
He 34
N 12
Hydrogen will also be needed in much higher quantities to produce the flame for the FID.
|
|
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by aga | Definitely some kind of pressure regulator, or rather mass-flow regulator will be needed.
It'd be nice to get the production rate close to the required rate to avoif having to build up a big reserve of explosive gas !
|
You can always use a pressure-release valve, but it's my experience that hydrogen is very good at escaping vessels, and will rarely build up
significant pressure in a homemade apparatus. It's also the lightest gas that exists, and dissipates very quickly.
Quote: | it is possible to make a reaction of aluminum and hydroxide and plastic bottles |
Yes, but you have to be patient. First, allow the NaOH to dissolve in the water, and allow the water to cool to room temperature. Next, find
aluminum with a low surface area. I'm sure you can scavenge aluminum rods, lengths of tubing. If you can find any thick electrical cables that
nobody's collected for scrap yet, those are probably aluminum as well. If you're in a rural area, do farmers use electric fences for their animals?
If so, the ones for enclosing large land areas (rather than just a small pasture) are usually pretty thick aluminum, and you can usually find short
lengths of wire along the fence, from when animals escaped and broke the fence and the farmer had to fix it.
If you can't find anything with a low enough surface area, you might have to melt it down and recast it into ingots, but that's pretty easy. Also,
note that the reaction will gradually generate heat at a higher and higher rate for the first ten minutes or so. This is because dissolving the
passivating oxide layer is not very exothermic, but once all the oxide layer is dissolved away, the oxidization of the underlying aluminum metal is
VERY exothermic!
Quote: | With H2SO4, NaCl and other ionized substances the copper at the anode dissolves, hence the specific choice of NaOH (or KOH). |
NaOH is very wasteful because of the competing metal reduction reaction, that also generates hydrogen but at a much lower efficiency. Dilute
phosphoric acid would be the best choice for amateurs, I think, because like NaOH, it won't really attack most electrode materials.
[Edited on 11/29/17 by Melgar]
The first step in the process of learning something is admitting that you don't know it already.
I'm givin' the spam shields max power at full warp, but they just dinna have the power! We're gonna have to evacuate to new forum software!
|
|
Pages:
1
2 |