Hector
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 25-10-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
filtering dirty concentrated sulfuric acid
so i have made some dillute sulfuric acid by copper sulfate electrolysis. now i have boiled the solution to get that small amount of concentrate, but
it is dirty (probably from makeshift boiling chips that i used)
how or what do i filter it with that would survive the concentrated acid?
|
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
A porous glass frit can withstand concentrated sulfuric acid:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Fritted-Buchner-filter-funnel-500ml...
|
|
|
Texium
|
Thread Moved
29-10-2017 at 10:30 |
Hector
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 25-10-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
is there any other perhaps a bit cheaper alternative?
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
Smaller fritted funnel, perhaps ─ or if you'd concentrated the acid in an open pyrex dish, boiling chips wouldn't have been needed...
Gardeners rockwool works if done correctly; uncoated fibreglass is another option and Whatman papers will filter very dilute acid.
Use distilled water for dilution, if you do go that route.
BTW, what type anode did you use?
|
|
|
LearnedAmateur
National Hazard
Posts: 513
Registered: 30-3-2017
Location: Somewhere in the UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: Free Radical
|
|
That's a lot for a fritted filter.. I paid £10 for a 60mL filter with integrated vacuum port, shipped from China.
Aside from a fritted filter or funnel, you could pack some glass wool into a regular funnel. Won't be nearly as good but it should get some of the
larger particles out. If you've got the time, then let it sit for a few days to a week and then decant off the acid - any remaining
discolouration/visible contamination is due to a small amount of tiny particulates that would pass through a filter anyway and usually looks a lot
worse than it is.
In chemistry, sometimes the solution is the problem.
It’s been a while, but I’m not dead! Updated 7/1/2020. Shout out to Aga, we got along well.
|
|
|
XeonTheMGPony
International Hazard
Posts: 1640
Registered: 5-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
good plastic gas rated funnel and some fiber glass wool.
|
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
polypropylene funnel, glass wool and top it with water filter grade diatomaceous earth. Only trick is finding glass wool without binders.
|
|
|
Hector
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 25-10-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
i used a carbon rod. it gets pretty messy after long exposure
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
Graphite rod is cleaner and better than carbon ─ linseed-oil-impregnated graphite is better still...
Graphite is grey rather than black and sports a slight metallic sheen!
|
|
|
metalresearcher
National Hazard
Posts: 758
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Reactive
|
|
What a ripoff ! Most US sellers rip you off with brutally high shipping costs.
I purchased this one:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/500ml-Suction-Filtration-Device-Buc... for $48.50 and includes a hand operated vacuum pump to force the liquid through
the funnel. I tried it with water and wood ashes and it works very good !
But a simple plastic (PP) funnel with kaowool should work fine.
[Edited on 2017-11-1 by metalresearcher]
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by macckone  | | polypropylene funnel, glass wool and top it with water filter grade diatomaceous earth. Only trick is finding glass wool without binders.
|
The second time you use it, there are no binders.
|
|
|
Hector
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 25-10-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
i got the carbon rods from a battery, where do i get the graphite you mentioned?
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
Ye olde Ebay to the rescue with a man's anode...
|
|
|
RogueRose
International Hazard
Posts: 1593
Registered: 16-6-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Would using Diatomaceous earth work to filter out the very fine particles?
I had a mess of CuCl2 and very fine graphite in about 3 gallons of KCl solution. I used cotton swabs (flat square ones) rolled into a cylinder then
ran the liquid through it 3x. The first pass there was a lot of graphite left, second pass, there was a slight grey color, third pass it looked
crystal clear (24 inches deep and was clear to the bottom). The graphite builds up and removes more each layer, but it will slow down each pass.
I've used the same setup with H2SO4 at 30-40% concentration. The filter material turns into a solid mass clump as the acid dehydrates it, but it
holds up pretty well if the cotton cylinder is pressed into the neck of a funnel so it is wedged into it, especially at the bottom.
If trying any of this you have to wet the cotton before adding any liquid you want to filter or it may never soak through due to the compression (and
other issues probably).
|
|
|
LearnedAmateur
National Hazard
Posts: 513
Registered: 30-3-2017
Location: Somewhere in the UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: Free Radical
|
|
Diatomaceous earth should work, although I think that pure silica/crushed silica gel powder would be a lot better. DE can contain some metal oxides,
principally alumina and iron oxides which may interfere with some filtrations, so it's best to go with a brand specifically designed for filtration as
opposed to any old one off the shelf.
In chemistry, sometimes the solution is the problem.
It’s been a while, but I’m not dead! Updated 7/1/2020. Shout out to Aga, we got along well.
|
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
Good quality diatomaceous earth is practically pure silica. Metal oxides are
usually tested for because they stain pools if they are in the filter material.
You can buy sodium silicate and then treat it with hydrogen chloride gas.
That will yeild a very pure silica product after repeated washing with distilled
water as the only impurity will be sodium chloride but if you need sulfuric acid
that pure, you should probably distill it as the copper sulfate method is going
to leave more copper than the diatomaceous earth will contain iron.
Commerical sulphuric acid is likely to contain lead or iron or both dissolved
from the handling equipment.
PS. yes diatomaceous earth will filter extremely fine particles.
[Edited on 4-11-2017 by macckone]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
