metalresearcher
National Hazard
Posts: 758
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Reactive
|
|
Is potassium 40 ever isolated ?
This isotope, occurring only 1:8600 in natural K, is slightly radioactive.
Is it ever isolated, like isolating deuterium(-oxide) from water ? Obviously not in an amateur lab, but a professional nuclear physics lab like in
Dubna.
Our body contains 20mg of K-40, equivalent to a pearl with a diameter of 3.5mm.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5127
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
You can buy it.
https://www.isotopes.gov/catalog/product.php?element=Potassi...
I imagine you would need deep pockets.
|
|
|
metalresearcher
National Hazard
Posts: 758
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Reactive
|
|
The K-40 sold by isotopes.gov is only 3-4% pure, so not well isolated. So I think that it is technically not possible or only with very hight tech
equipment in nanogram quantities.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5127
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I don't know how they get it to 4%, but if they took the stuff that's 4% and ran it through the same process again repeatedly I'm sure they could end
up with a high purity material.
Also, if you are prepared to accept microscopic quantities then anyone running an ICP/MS analysis of potassium will separate out the 40 mass unit
isotope.
But they won't keep it separate.
If you had enough money you could certainly get pure (ish) 40K.
Why do you ask?
|
|
|
SWIM
National Hazard
Posts: 970
Registered: 3-9-2017
Member Is Offline
|
|
Worst case scenario it still ought to be easier than separating Uranium isotopes. (less relative mass difference than potassium isotopes)
We sure do lot of that, and we get those to well over 90% purity.
I bet the 4% is 4% because that's high enough for whatever purpose it's generally used for. Isotopic tagging maybe? making radioactive sports drinks?
who knows?
Well actually probably quite a few people here know, but I'm not one of them.
[Edited on 10-9-2017 by SWIM]
|
|
|
metalresearcher
National Hazard
Posts: 758
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Reactive
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by unionised  | I don't know how they get it to 4%, but if they took the stuff that's 4% and ran it through the same process again repeatedly I'm sure they could end
up with a high purity material.
Also, if you are prepared to accept microscopic quantities then anyone running an ICP/MS analysis of potassium will separate out the 40 mass unit
isotope.
But they won't keep it separate.
If you had enough money you could certainly get pure (ish) 40K.
Why do you ask? |
Just for curiosity, I am not interested buying anything.
But in natural K, the K-40 is between K-39 (94%) and K-41 (6%), so the tiny amount of K-40 (1/8600) must be hard to isolate.
Or first isolate pure K-39 and then separate the remaining K-40 and 41 which is then in a ratio (100/6) * 1/8600 which is about 1:500.
Again, not suitable for an amateur lab.
[Edited on 2017-9-10 by metalresearcher]
|
|
|
Felab
Hazard to Self
Posts: 76
Registered: 9-11-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: :dooM
|
|
A way to purify K40 would be taking advantage of the diferent rates of difussion of the diferent isotopes (K40 would difuse a bit slower than K39 due
to its greater mass).
Of course it would be slow and very tedious but certainly doable ( Cody's Lab attempted to do so but failed miserably)
Another methode that works (although being very energy intensive) is to submit a stream of charged atoms of a mix of K isotopes to a magnetic field in
a vacuum. The K40 atoms have a greater inercia than the K39 and therefore deflect less. This would only produce a few miligrams though but of a very
high purity.
[Edited on 12-3-2019 by Felab]
|
|
|
Ubya
International Hazard
Posts: 1247
Registered: 23-11-2017
Location: Rome-Italy
Member Is Offline
Mood: I'm a maddo scientisto!!!
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by SWIM | Worst case scenario it still ought to be easier than separating Uranium isotopes. (less relative mass difference than potassium isotopes)
We sure do lot of that, and we get those to well over 90% purity.
|
well K-40 is only 0.012% of the total potassium, while U-235 is 0.75%, 62 times more abundant.
it's not as easy as
| Quote: |
took the stuff that's 4% and ran it through the same process again repeatedly
|
, to enrich uranium we already need thousands of centrifuges in series, and not all countries are able of
such thing, so imagine doing the same for K-40, an isotope not even as important as uranium.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
feel free to correct my grammar, or any mistakes i make
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Vomaturge
Hazard to Others
Posts: 286
Registered: 21-1-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: thermodynamic
|
|
Potassium 41 has been isolated, in gram quantities, but it's not radioactive, it's far more abundant, and the process is still expensive.
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1379
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
To go from 0.014 to 4% take a lot more work than to go from 4% to 90+%, because you only have process much smaller amounts.
So putting it through the same process becomes progressively easier.
For Uranium, that is why a stockpile of lowish enriched uranium, say 20%, is a concern. It can be enriched to HEU very quickly.
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
