Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Cs and atomic clock
allbatros
Harmless
*




Posts: 8
Registered: 8-11-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-11-2006 at 13:11
Cs and atomic clock


Do you know that the isotope Cs-137 used for atomick clock (the freuqency of Cs-137)?

What u think about Cs or other elements which used for atomic clock :)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
12AX7
Post Harlot
*****




Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline

Mood: informative

[*] posted on 8-11-2006 at 13:57


137 is rather radioactive.

Cs (and to a lesser extent, Rb) are capable of making very accurate clocks yes.

Tim




Seven Transistor Labs LLC http://seventransistorlabs.com/
Electronic Design, from Concept to Layout.
Need engineering assistance? Drop me a message!
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
Jdurg
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 220
Registered: 10-6-2006
Location: Connecticut, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-11-2006 at 14:46


Quote:
Originally posted by allbatros
Do you know that the isotope Cs-137 used for atomick clock (the freuqency of Cs-137)?

What u think about Cs or other elements which used for atomic clock :)

Just so you know, your statement there is well..... wrong. ;) The isotope of cesium used in atomic clocks is Cs-133 which is quite stable and not radioactive. The definition of the second is based upon a certain number of cycles of light absorbed by a Cs-133 atom and not Cs-137.




\"A real fart is beefy, has a density greater than or equal to the air surrounding it, consists of the unmistakable scent of broccoli, and usually requires wiping afterwards.\"
http://maddox.xmission.com.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Twospoons
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1324
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline

Mood: A trace of hope...

[*] posted on 8-11-2006 at 16:51


Typical accuracy is in the region of 1 part in 10^14 for Cs clocks.
Best quartz oscillator I could produce while working at Rakon was accurate to 2 in 10^11 (over -30C to +70C). Rubidium clocks are around 1 in 10^13 IIRC.




Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
View user's profile View All Posts By User
allbatros
Harmless
*




Posts: 8
Registered: 8-11-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-11-2006 at 05:46


In first half of this year, I think it was in Physical Review, scientist built the more precise atomic clock of the only one atom Hg. His accuaracy is 1 s delay in 400 * 10<sup>6</sub>.

And yes u right, Cs-133 :)

My mistake :D :P
View user's profile View All Posts By User
_1v4_
Harmless
*




Posts: 8
Registered: 9-11-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-12-2006 at 05:45


Ofc I knew :) Cs-133 is used because of his frequency (9,192,631,770Hz).
The time unit, second, is defined as "the duration of 9,192,631,770 cycles of microwave light absorbed or emitted by the hyperfine transition of cesium-133 atoms in their ground state undisturbed by external fields".
It is used 'cause its verry accurate (one second in 1,400,000 years, if I recall it correctly?).
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top