Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: about the shaped charge
adammal
Harmless
*




Posts: 2
Registered: 2-10-2016
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 2-10-2016 at 04:47
about the shaped charge


Hello. How are you doing. I am a new member of this wonderful forum. Beginning thank you for giving valuable information for free. And so sorry if this topic is not in the exact place. I want to ask the people of expertise and experience questions about the shaped charges:
1. What is the best way for the formation of copper cone?
as example the metal spinning machine is a good way? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzL8RiacXwo
What are the other ways? and what is the difference between shear forming machine and metal spinning machine?
2. can you give me a reference to estimate the thickness of cone wall?
3. Assuming the existence of copper cone with angle of 42 and an external diameter of 130 mm and the existence of the subjects of theRDX and TNT. How it will penetrate according to a preliminary estimate of the iron?
Thanking you in advance.

waiting replay, With best wishes
View user's profile View All Posts By User
adammal
Harmless
*




Posts: 2
Registered: 2-10-2016
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 2-10-2016 at 21:53


61 Views without any replay? thank you brothers
View user's profile View All Posts By User
greenlight
National Hazard
****




Posts: 718
Registered: 3-11-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: Energetic

[*] posted on 2-10-2016 at 23:40


The answers to all your questions are in the unconventional shaped charges thread.

There is a pdf on electroforming copper cones which would be one of the best ways here: http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=14093

There is a pdf called optimized conical shaped charge design that has cone thickness to charge size and penetration ratios and a lot of other information. Just type it into google and it should be first result

Here is a page that can calculate penetration based on some known factors:
http://www.alternatewars.com/BBOW/Ballistics/Shaped_Charge_H...
Penetration tests would be better conducted on steel than iron as I found earlier in the shaped charges thread.

[Edited on 3-10-2016 by greenlight]




The only use for an atomic bomb is to keep somebody else from using one.
George Wald
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bert
Super Administrator
Thread Moved
3-10-2016 at 20:56
zed
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2281
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline

Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord

[*] posted on 5-10-2016 at 11:08


Shaped charges are shaped charges. IEDs are something else.

Copper cone IEDs are for penetrating armor, and killing people.

This is military/terrorist info.. Somebody assisted you? Too bad.

View user's profile View All Posts By User
Metacelsus
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2535
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble

[*] posted on 5-10-2016 at 13:57


I agree; the OP seems sketchy.



As below, so above.

My blog: https://denovo.substack.com
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top