MeshPL
Hazard to Others
Posts: 329
Registered: 20-4-2015
Location: Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Carbonate containing thermites
So I'm not really into pyrotechnics. But last video by Cody's Lab about copper thermite made me wonder "what if you put an easily decomposable
compound into such an energetic thermite? Would that make the thermite more dangerous due to high amount of gases being produced?"
So what coulb be such a compound?
I have some ideas. Ammonium carbonate and bicarbonate are one. There is also sodium bicarbonate. One could also add some kind of formate or oxalate.
Ammonium oxalate seems interesting. Oxalic acid itself may be a good idea too. Finally, we can add (basic) copper carbonate to the thermite. Or just
use Copper carbonate as the main ingredient.
The idea is that copper thermite is energetic but unlike typical explosive it does not produce hot, expanding gases, which is one of the most
dangerous things explosives do. We can add some compounds, which produce them when decomposed, however. Or we can use copper carbonate which shoul
react like that (I'm aware that CuCO3 is an idealisation):
3CuCO3 + 2Al --> 3Cu + Al2O3 + 3CO2
So if we added such a compounds to our thermite, we would make it produce some gases. But what would be the disadvantages? Well, such a compounds are
not very dense. Copper oxide has a density of about 6g/cm^3. Copper carbonate is about 3g/cm^3. What that means, such a thermite has a much lower
energy density and may not explode/react as fast as we want. When it comes to other compounds mentioned before, only oxalic acid and sodium
bicarbonate are above 2g/cm^3. So, basically , we would add a bunch of filler to our thermite.
All in all, would you rather I throw a regular Cu/Al containg bomb at you or would you rather I put some (how much?) gas producing filler inside?
Let's assume you want to survive. 
But seriously, is it a completly dumb idea?
Edit: Also what would happen if I made a thermite with something like iron carbonate or other carbonate instead of oxide?
[Edited on 18-6-2016 by MeshPL]
[Edited on 18-6-2016 by MeshPL]
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
"But seriously, is it a completly dumb idea?"
Yes.
The hot gases would spatter white hot stuff everywhere.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6325
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
There are plenty of thermites that produce gas and CuO/Al is one. The copper is given off as a gas in this case.
By using a carbonate instead of an oxide you will lower the energy density. This will slow the reaction down. You will need to do the calculations
but you might also get it into the realm of thermodynamic infeasibility.
You should try and see -- but don't go putting anything into a pipe bomb before you know its characteristics well and until you have your own
(guaranteed) deserted quarry and an excellent remote detonation system.
FTR, Extractions and Ire recently "liked" a nice thermite video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRSlGt26uUA
It shows the calculations you can do (although I have not checked his work.) It also illustrates that guessing at an outcome can leave you surprised.
Calculations first is a good way to go.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by MeshPL  |
But seriously, is it a completly dumb idea?
Edit: Also what would happen if I made a thermite with something like iron carbonate or other carbonate instead of oxide?
|
I wouldn't call it smart, no.
Adding fillers to thermites often turns them into fizzlers because of the heat sink effect.
Iron carbonate doesn't really exist.
|
|
|
MeshPL
Hazard to Others
Posts: 329
Registered: 20-4-2015
Location: Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Well, I don't really have the specific reagents needed to do tests... but I may eventually do some tests using reagents at school next term, since
there will be holidays very soon.
Yeah that's true copper is given of as a gas. But I think copper gas has enough energy to convert other stuff into more gases.
It would be nice to see which is the critical amount of filler. And it's effect on the reaction.
The idea of hot metal splattering everywhere sounds nice. But I'm afraid, that spalattering will be kinda slow.
And sure, no pipe bombs.
So, all in all, that is a rather dumb idea.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6325
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
I wouldn't call it a dumb idea. Some things are only found out by exploring ideas and experimentation.
Just stay safe.
I am not predicting you'll get anything more vigorous than a normal copper thermite. But it might eject reaction products further.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
And the point to that would be?
Something that doesn't allow any metal recovery but isn't really an explosive either.
[Edited on 18-6-2016 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6325
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
I didn't say there was a point to it. I was saying what I anticipated might happen. In other words, stand well back. The sparks might not be as hot
but they might possibly fly further. (Or they might not.)
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
Adding powdered Teflon to thermite is done industrially to "pressurize the effluent"- That is, blow white hot metal out of the reaction at high
speed... A purpose being, pyronoll metal piercing torch or similarly purposed linear cutting devices.
http://www.google.com/patents/US5372069
Some people want to use the hot reaction products to do work, rather than recover the reduced metals.
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
Bert
|
Thread Moved
19-6-2016 at 05:32 |
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Bert | Adding powdered Teflon to thermite is done industrially to "pressurize the effluent"- That is, blow white hot metal out of the reaction at high
speed... A purpose being, pyronoll metal piercing torch or similarly purposed linear cutting devices.
http://www.google.com/patents/US5372069
Some people want to use the hot reaction products to do work, rather than recover the reduced metals. |
In that case the Teflon is an active ingredient, oxidising the Mg or Al in a very exothermic reaction.
An SM thread on the subject:
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=16741
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
You would probably also get:
3CuCO3 + 6Al --> 3Cu + 3 Al2O3 + 3 C
It is already known that "moist" Fe2O3 (containing Fe(OH)3) gives troubles/danger with thermite since the H2O liberated as a gas forms at high
temperature H2 + O2 then Al takes the O2 and the H2 explodes afterwards into the air.
Same should happen with CuO (containing Cu(OH)2)
For the beauty of it you may try Cu(O2C-CO2) (Cu (II) oxalate)
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by PHILOU Zrealone |
It is already known that "moist" Fe2O3 (containing Fe(OH)3) gives troubles/danger with thermite since the H2O liberated as a gas forms at high
temperature H2 + O2 then Al takes the O2 and the H2 explodes afterwards into the air.
|
Got any references for that?
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
I am aware of various Teflon oxidized photo flash mixtures, this is not one.
The original cutting mixture was Aluminum powder/Iron oxides, plus some Nickel oxide to add further heat liberated by alloying the two metals- And a
small amount of PTFE powder, which certainly DOES react with some of the Al on decomposing, but also produces propellant gas.
https://books.google.com/books?id=AK8zAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA904&...
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Bert |
I am aware of various Teflon oxidized photo flash mixtures, this is not one.
The original cutting mixture was Aluminum powder/Iron oxides, plus some Nickel oxide to add further heat liberated by alloying the two metals- And a
small amount of PTFE powder, which certainly DOES react with some of the Al on decomposing, but also produces propellant gas.
|
I see.
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25 | | Quote: Originally posted by PHILOU Zrealone |
It is already known that "moist" Fe2O3 (containing Fe(OH)3) gives troubles/danger with thermite since the H2O liberated as a gas forms at high
temperature H2 + O2 then Al takes the O2 and the H2 explodes afterwards into the air.
|
Got any references for that? |
What "that"?
1°) Thermal decomposition of water (thermolysis) happens at elevated temperatures and water molecule split back into its atomic components H2 and O2.
It is very low yielding at ambiant T°, but increases with T° (about 3% at 2200°C and nearly 50% at 3000°C).
2 H2 + O2 --Ear--> 2 H2O + heat
2 H2O + heat --Ead--> 2 H2 + O2
Energy of activation of reaction (Ear) is much tinier than Energy of activation of decomposition (Ead) so when the system is at high T° Ear and Ead
are negligible vs the energetical state of the molécules (Energy System > Ead > Ear) so reaction happens in both sides at the time with a
theorical maximum at 50%.
2°) From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermite - Hazards
If, for some reason, thermite is contaminated with organics, hydrated oxides and other compounds able to produce gases upon heating
or reaction with thermite components, the reaction products may be sprayed.
Edit:
3°) From Abrstract https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245206622_A_kinetic...
"Systematic thermogravimetric measurements under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions were performed in order to characterize kinetically the
thermal dehydration and dehydroxylation processes. The dehydration of the bound water on the surface of γ-FeO(OH) observed at around 150°C obeyed
the first-order law with an apparent activation energy of about 100 kJ mol−1, being recognized as controlled by diffusional removal of evolved water
vapor through the stacking assemblage of plate-like crystalline powders. As for the hydrated γ-FeO(OH), the thermal dehydroxylation process at around
280°C, "
So Fe(OH)3, Fe(O)OH dehydrate at relatively low temperature...
[Edited on 20-6-2016 by PHILOU Zrealone]
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by PHILOU Zrealone |
1°) Thermal decomposition of water (thermolysis) happens at elevated temperatures and water molecule split back into its atomic components H2 and O2.
It is very low yielding at ambiant T°, but increases with T° (about 3% at 2200°C and nearly 50% at 3000°C).
2 H2 + O2 --Ear--> 2 H2O + heat
2 H2O + heat --Ead--> 2 H2 + O2
Energy of activation of reaction (Ear) is much tinier than Energy of activation of decomposition (Ead) so when the system is at high T° Ear and Ead
are negligible vs the energetical state of the molécules (Energy System > Ead > Ear) so reaction happens in both sides at the time with a
theorical maximum at 50%.
2°) From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermite - Hazards
If, for some reason, thermite is contaminated with organics, hydrated oxides and other compounds able to produce gases upon heating
or reaction with thermite components, the reaction products may be sprayed.
|
Those bits are well known and not disputed. But that moist thermites can cause secondary hydrogen explosions remains unproved speculation as far as
I'm concerned.
[Edited on 20-6-2016 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25 | | Quote: Originally posted by PHILOU Zrealone |
1°) Thermal decomposition of water (thermolysis) happens at elevated temperatures and water molecule split back into its atomic components H2 and O2.
It is very low yielding at ambiant T°, but increases with T° (about 3% at 2200°C and nearly 50% at 3000°C).
2 H2 + O2 --Ear--> 2 H2O + heat
2 H2O + heat --Ead--> 2 H2 + O2
Energy of activation of reaction (Ear) is much tinier than Energy of activation of decomposition (Ead) so when the system is at high T° Ear and Ead
are negligible vs the energetical state of the molécules (Energy System > Ead > Ear) so reaction happens in both sides at the time with a
theorical maximum at 50%.
2°) From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermite - Hazards
If, for some reason, thermite is contaminated with organics, hydrated oxides and other compounds able to produce gases upon heating
or reaction with thermite components, the reaction products may be sprayed.
|
Those bits are well known and not disputed. But that moist thermites can cause secondary hydrogen explosions remains unproved speculation as far as
I'm concerned.
[Edited on 20-6-2016 by blogfast25] |
Ah OK got it.
I have trown a few drops of H2O on 3100°C overheated iron surface from acethylen/N2O blowtorch and it makes a nice explosion with a clearly visible
flame...
If following you no H2 and O2 are produced... where does the flame come from?
For the rest:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0038092X779...
"Hydrogen production from water utilizing solar heat at high temperatures ..."
They mention a low temperature acheived with...iron oxyde...but to be practical, you need to flash cool the product of reaction below the
explosion/inflamation T° of H2/O2 what is technically hard. This process would ensure the storage of solar energy into H2 with a good
yield...although I think electrolysis is much safer and higher yielding.
This is also interesting http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c08/e3-13-03-01.pdf
Especially the graphs of products of reaction at the end as the function of T°
But I'm a true believer    and open minded about sceptical people
So here another possible explanation:
Overheated Al powder and H2O stil produces Al2O3 and H2 at high temperature...this explains that ultrafine Al powder water gels are detonable...or
propellant (see ALICE tread).
So even if the decomposition of water into H2O doesn't happen stricto senso from the heat, it will from the heat of the Aluminium acting like Mg would
or an alcaline metal...
[Edited on 20-6-2016 by PHILOU Zrealone]
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
@Philou:
Again, that water can be thermally cracked and reacts with hot electropositive metals to form hydrogen and metal oxide is not in dispute here.
These would be necessary conditions needed to make happen what you claim. But are they also sufficient conditions?
That’s not clear when you look at the situation more closely.
Thermites ‘burn’ by means of a reaction front that propagates in spatial dimensions. For example, schematically in just one direction, the
reaction zone propagates in the x-direction:
Temperature gradients cause heat fluxes (the wider arrows) from the hottest to cooler zones, in particular to the unreacted zone (highest temperature
gradient). This is of course needed to make the reaction self-sustaining.
T is a function of both time and x, probably something like:
$$\frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=v(x)\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}+\kappa \frac{\partial^2T}{\partial x^2}+\frac{1}{\rho c_p}Q(x)$$
... a heat conduction advection equation where v(x) is the propagation speed of the reaction zone, kappa(x) the thermal diffusivity of the material
and Q(x) the heat generated by the reaction.
The point is though that the temperature profile of the unreacted zone could easily allow the water to evaporate off (at T<sub>w</sub>,
about 100 C), well below the temperatures needed to thermally crack the water or for it to react significantly with any hot metal.
[Edited on 20-6-2016 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25 | @Philou:
Again, that water can be thermally cracked and reacts with hot electropositive metals to form hydrogen and metal oxide is not in dispute here.
These would be necessary conditions needed to make happen what you claim. But are they also sufficient conditions?
That’s not clear when you look at the situation more closely.
Thermites ‘burn’ by means of a reaction front that propagates in spatial dimensions. For example, schematically in just one direction, the
reaction zone propagates in the x-direction:
Temperature gradients cause heat fluxes (the wider arrows) from the hottest to cooler zones, in particular to the unreacted zone (highest temperature
gradient). This is of course needed to make the reaction self-sustaining.
T is a function of both time and x, probably something like:
$$\frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=v(x)\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}+\kappa \frac{\partial^2T}{\partial x^2}+\frac{1}{\rho c_p}Q(x)$$
... a heat conduction advection equation where v(x) is the propagation speed of the reaction zone, kappa(x) the thermal diffusivity of the material
and Q(x) the heat generated by the reaction.
The point is though that the temperature profile of the unreacted zone could easily allow the water to evaporate off (at T<sub>w</sub>,
about 100 C), well below the temperatures needed to thermally crack the water or for it to react significantly with any hot metal.
[Edited on 20-6-2016 by blogfast25] |
The cracking and crackling recombination explosion occurs almost instantaneously as compared to the typical reaction time of the thermite...there
should be no delay H2 and O2 is a detonating mix so when slighly cooled and in contact with a hot spot it recombines immediately.
True that such an event is hard to prove because the witnesses leaves the crash site during the incident  .
On an energitical level nothing should distinguish H2O explosion by vapourisation vs H2O vapourisation (explosion) then decomposition into H2 and O2
and recombination into H2O...
Sole solution to cut the debate is a good spectroscopic photographic device proving the presence of H2 into the burning flame/melt.
I don't have that .
Or a filmed carefull comparative study of the mechanical work of
-Fe2O3/Al thermite vs Fe2O3/Fe(OH)3/Al thermite
-CuO/Al thermite vs CuO/Cu(OH)2/Al thermite
With the very same ingredients and overal the same amounts of Al/Fe and Al/Cu.
The 1D idealisation is maybe good for an horizontal cigarette burning of low diameter. Nice equation and graph by the way!
In 3D, you have also to play with:
-heat flux going upside from air bubbles (gaps into the initial powder) (density gradient)
-radiative heat flow all direction with efficiency depending on heat capacity of the various medias (air, Al, Fe2O3, Fe, Al2O3, H2O(g)).
-sparkling propagation upside and outside (downside is too resistant)
-flowing of denser metal going downside (density gradient)
-the mather contraction creating gaps/cavities that collapse allowing unreacted powder to fall downside
-convection of the molten metal and flux (liquid Fe2O3/Al2O3)
-coalescence of gases, liquid flux, molten metal
All this is just way to complicated to put into simple equations.
Reality is much more chaotic
[Edited on 20-6-2016 by PHILOU Zrealone]
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If we can successfully model something like Rayleigh–Bénard convection we can probably also model temperature gradients in a thermite mixture. The question is really not 'can it be done?' but
rather 'is it worth doing?', which in the thermite case I'd say is 'No'.
In summary, I'd be far more convinced by your claims if they were accompanied by good old direct evidence.
[Edited on 20-6-2016 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
mayko
International Hazard
Posts: 1218
Registered: 17-1-2013
Location: Carrboro, NC
Member Is Offline
Mood: anomalous (Euclid class)
|
|
I wouldn't call it a thermite, but I was surprised to discover that sodium carbonate can act as an oxidizer; mixed with magnesium powder, it produces
an impressive flare. Potassium carbonate is also used in "yellow powder":
http://www.amateurpyro.com/forums/topic/755-yellow-powder/
I just tried out a mixture of 5.5 g basic copper carbonate and 4.5 g Mg powder (ie, a 33% excess of Mg to O). Ignited with Mg ribbon, it flared up,
much tamer than CuO thermite. The flame was bright but had no particular color. What was most striking was this purple-red residue it left on the
ceramic I ignited the mixture on, presumably a thin deposit of copper:
al-khemie is not a terrorist organization
"Chemicals, chemicals... I need chemicals!" - George Hayduke
"Wubbalubba dub-dub!" - Rick Sanchez
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by mayko | What was most striking was this purple-red residue it left on the ceramic I ignited the mixture on, presumably a thin deposit of copper:
|
Probably. Scrape some off and test with nitric acid?
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
As some inexpensive metals can react with steam to liberate H2, I speculate that a thermite mix with some kind of inserted funnels (possibly porous)
containing a metal hydrate or hydroxide (that would liberate its H2O at a higher temperature) might be interesting (but likely unsafe due to
sputtering) to test out.
I recently read a patent that could recycle Cl2 in a reaction chain by heating CuCl2 + a metal. This could serve here as a high temperature chlorine
source to replace oxygen.
More generally, porous funnels consisting of chemical mix upon contact with steam could be a source of a highly flammable gas cloud that could
detonate subsequently with atmospheric oxygen (a thermobaric explosion, yes extremely unsafe).
Those with more knowledge of explosives noted for their rapid hot gas production could also be included in the design.
However, as we are talking about items that could serve potentially as tools of terror as well, I think a rather vague outline is in order along with
a lot more obtuse theory.
------------------------------------
Note, the prior theoretical comments concerning sustainability of the thermite mix and propagation dynamics is made more complex by my suggestion of
funnel zones (of various sizes and external material compositions) forming a heterogeneous reaction system.
Note, if my funnel structure totally dissipated at the commencement of the thermite, one would have, in effect, a non-homogenuous thermite reaction
mix.
[Edited on 24-6-2016 by AJKOER]
[Edited on 24-6-2016 by AJKOER]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
