3DTOPO
Hazard to Self
Posts: 64
Registered: 14-2-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Multiple magnetrons in same faraday cage?
If one collects a plurality of magnetrons in a shared faraday cage; and provided the magnetrons are not operating at identical frequencies and phase;
will the energy by both the magnetrons be effectively (and safely) absorbed by a susceptor in said faraday cage?
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3721
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
with a plurality of asynchronous microwave sources in one Faraday cage
I would expect a lot will depend upon the luck (or design) of the physical layout,
it is possible for consumer magnetrons to synchronise with each other https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn10356-invention-micro...
or they may run completely independently, or some stochastic combination of the two.
In any case there will be times when all generators are briefly in phase,
so
if there is not enough of the susceptor material to make the 'Q' of the caged space low enough
I would expect electrical arcing in/on/around the magnetron anodes.
|
|
|
3DTOPO
Hazard to Self
Posts: 64
Registered: 14-2-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Interesting, thank you for the patent [20060208672] link.
It looks like they are pretty much just using a waveguide. A chart with and without the waveguide looks pretty similar - but the frequencies are more
spread out. So I assume that wouldn't be much of an issue if my goal is to just heat up a susceptor. Correct?
Is there anything I could do to adjust the 'Q' of the caged space to prevent arcing in the event there isn't enough susceptor present?
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3721
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
The usual solution is a glass of water per consumer microwave manuals
|
|
|
Texium
|
Thread Moved
22-11-2023 at 20:06 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
