| Pages:
1
2 |
welshwing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 6-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
welshwing's Thread of Many Questions
Do these harmless substances really create NaCN?
Hello, I am looking to make a very small amount of cyanide. I have all the safety precautions so nobody will get hurt, in the end I will dispose of
the cyanide by burying it in an isolated area inside of a thick glass bottle.
Here are the reactants I was going to use
Charcoal
Sodium carbonate
Cyanuric acid
Sodium carbonate + cyanuric acid = sodium cyanate
sodium cyante + charcoal = sodium cyanide
I think it's common sense sodium carbonate and charcoal aren't deadly, in small amounts (even sugar is deadly in large amounts). I checked and neither
sodium cyanate or cyanuric acid are deadly, then why/how do they create NaCN which is highly poisonous? It makes sense because burning charcoal
creates a fume as deadly as CN- but why????
[Edited on 6-1-2016 by welshwing]
[Edited on 3-2-2016 by zts16]
|
|
|
Bert
|
Thread Moved
6-1-2016 at 09:39 |
ParadoxChem126
Hazard to Others
Posts: 104
Registered: 5-4-2013
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It is not uncommon for "safe" chemicals to react to form toxic ones. The toxicity of a chemical is largely dependent on its structure and reactivity.
Cyanide happens to be an inhibitor to the cytochrome C oxidase, while its precursors are not. For this reason, it is more toxic.
I would not suggest experimenting with cyanide if you are new to hobby chemistry. Also, it would be much better to dispose of cyanide by chemically
destroying it. Alkaline bleach is capable of neutralizing cyanide, see the following link:
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=9146#p...
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=23
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
OK, it is also apparently true that harmful elements can combine to form safe, and at times, essential compounds for human life. Example, highly
reactive Sodium metal and poisonous Chlorine gas, forming salt.
But don't try this dangerous synthesis at home, very exothermic, but salt itself is considered safe. 
[Edited on 6-1-2016 by AJKOER]
|
|
|
welshwing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 6-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Is the bathroom fan enough to remove fumes?
I can't afford an expensive fume hood, I just need something to send the fumes outside where nobody will get hurt from them. The bathroom fan makes
the steam go away during a shower, is that good enough to remove chemical fumes?
If not what can I do? Making chemical reactions in my backyard will look suspicious to the neighbors. Would you suggest making one out of construction
paper that leads from the crucible to my window?
|
|
|
Detonationology
Hazard to Others
Posts: 362
Registered: 5-5-2015
Location: Deep South
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrophillic
|
|
No, no, no.
1. Many gasses produced in the lab are much too dense to be sucked out by a weak draft.
2. Many vapors produced in the lab are volatile and flammable. Typical fans produce sparks during operation.
3. Many gases produced in the lab are corrosive. The metal vent would likely rust very quickly.
Stick with outside for now. I have a fume hood that is in the process of being put up in my garage, and the outside isn' too bad.
“There are no differences but differences of degree between different degrees of difference and no difference.” ― William James
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
When it's your life at stake, you don't want to "cheap out" on safety.
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3692
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
After my recent round of experimets, in answer to "Is the bathroom fan enough to remove fumes?"
I say YES ... eventually
but definitely too slowly to protect you when reactions are not as gentle as you expect, to put it mildly
(e.g. reactions involving conc. HNO3 usually seem fairly inactive, until temperature rises
... then unbelievable quantities of gas with an evil shade of brown spew into the air, and you learn what NO2 smells like 
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
NO!
GO OUTSIDE!!! If the neighbors don't like what they see, build a lean-too.
Get a fire extinguisher too.
Don't injure or kill yourself, or your family.
How well can you handle setting fire to a paper or cardboard hood inside your home, along with ignition of any flammable chemicals you were working
with, mixed up with the now released toxic fumes you thought you were going to exhaust?
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
Boffis
International Hazard
Posts: 1867
Registered: 1-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I disagree with Detonationolgy's comment too.
First bathroom fans come in various sizes based on the cfm or cmm (ie cubic feet or meter/minute they will shift. The smaller sizes require a 4" duct
for which I used a length of waste water pipe set into the wall. The larger volume fans require 6" ducts but give much greater air flow volumes. The
maximum volume of air for a 4" duct is about 1.5 m3 per minute but with a 6" dusct you can get up to about 4 m3 per minute. If that isn't enough, holy
shit, how big is you fume hood? My fume hood has a volume of about 0.5 m3 and the fan shifts 1.2 m3/minute. This I have found to be quite adequate and
I work with N2O4, ether, alkali cyanides, hydrogen sulphide etc without any problems.
Most extractor fans sold in Europe and all that I have seen in the UK are axial inductive motor types so no sparks unless you f**k up the wiring.
Corrosion of the duct? No problem use PVC or ceramic waste water pipes, they are cheap and easier to work with than steel.
One thing I would say is that no matter how much flow through your fume hood you have its no good if gas generation exceeds this flow rate. Once again
there is no substitute for careful planning of your experiments. I recently carried out a synthesis with acetyl chloride in which all of the chlorine
is evolved as hydrogen chloride, a simple but carefully constructed gas scrubber absorbed all of this into water and none was release into the air.
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
I believe the OP meant he literally intended to work in an existing bathroom- And use the installed exhaust fan in lieu of setting up a proper hood.
About the worst idea I could think of, after working in his mother's kitchen. But I have seem ignorant people doing just that in far too many YouRube
videos...
Let's add link to this thread, regarding a couple of recently dead amateurs?
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
Detonationology
Hazard to Others
Posts: 362
Registered: 5-5-2015
Location: Deep South
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrophillic
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Boffis  | | ...the fan shifts 1.2 m3/minute. This I have found to be quite adequate and I work with N2O4, ether, alkali cyanides, hydrogen sulphide etc without
any problems. |
I find it rather hard to believe that such gasses could be readily removed from a lab area without any problems whatsoever. I often
find myself semi-conscious, nearly asphyxiated, gasping for fresh air subsequent to making a deposit of Taco Bell in the facilities, even with the fan
blower on. With that in mind, I would not conduct lab work in such a room containing even more noxious or toxic gasses.
[Edited on 1-7-2016 by Detonationology]
“There are no differences but differences of degree between different degrees of difference and no difference.” ― William James
|
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
I occasionally do run chemical reactions using a bathroom fan for ventilation, and they work well for many purposes, but I don't consider them
adequate for working with anything more dangerous than acetone.
1.5 m3/minute is not really adequate for doing most chemical reactions that are said to require a hood. I would consider 400 CFM (about 10 m3/minute)
adequate for any purpose unless the hood is very large or you're doing something extraordinarily dangerous.
[Edited on 7-1-2016 by JJay]
|
|
|
Starcruiser
Harmless
Posts: 18
Registered: 11-7-2015
Location: Orion Arm/Milky Way
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Simply using your bathroom, even with the fan employed, is not a good idea.
But a bathroom fan is ok for a small fume hood (mine is about 50x70x90 cm) as long as you do not make copious amounts of noxious fumes. Of course,
noxious / dangerous fumes should not be simply vented outside - think of other people too not just you (also, attracting attention is not something to
be desired). Scrubbers are a must before venting.
You can make a simple experiment to test your ventilation : light a small smoke bomb (about 2 g of a 60:30 KNO3 and sugar mixture). Take precautions,
try not to set your house on fire.
|
|
|
welshwing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 6-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Starcruiser | Simply using your bathroom, even with the fan employed, is not a good idea.
But a bathroom fan is ok for a small fume hood (mine is about 50x70x90 cm) as long as you do not make copious amounts of noxious fumes. Of course,
noxious / dangerous fumes should not be simply vented outside - think of other people too not just you (also, attracting attention is not something to
be desired). Scrubbers are a must before venting.
You can make a simple experiment to test your ventilation : light a small smoke bomb (about 2 g of a 60:30 KNO3 and sugar mixture). Take precautions,
try not to set your house on fire.
|
Are you suggesting it isn't safe to create carbon monoxide outside near houses (like in my backyard)? Because neighbors grill and that releases the
deadly fume, I would think doing it in the open air wouldn't be harmful to anyone.
I only thought of the bathroom because of how quickly it removes steam, and I would've done it if the response here was positive but I never
considered actually doing it without feedback from here.
[Edited on 7-1-2016 by welshwing]
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
A bathroom fan is what i have in my tiny fume hood.
The fume cupboard is in the middle of nowhere with the nearest neighbour 400m away.
So far it has done OK.
On a couple of occasions it was not powerful enough to remove the sheer volume of nasty gas i was producing at the time.
Mostly it has been OK.
The fume hood design & fan power depend entirely on what gasses you expect to produce, where you are, and if you want to survive.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by aga | A bathroom fan is what i have in my tiny fume hood.
The fume cupboard is in the middle of nowhere with the nearest neighbour 400m away.
So far it has done OK.
|
Even in a professional fume cabinet overall air through-flow isn't very high as that wouldn't be practical either. So it's a question of balance
between cabinet size and ventilator fan power.
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
The main thing is to Calculate how much gas your intended reaction could produce, and plan accordingly.
As a general rule i use 22.4 Litres for every mol that could be produced, then hang the gas mask near the door or not, just in case the fan
is not powerful enough.
There is really no excuse for Not Knowing when all the information is already available, either by 10 seconds googling or by asking here.
|
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
According to Prudent Practices in the Laboratory: Handling and Disposal of Chemicals, the usual fume hood face velocity should be 80-100 fpm, although 100-120
fpm should be used if handling exceptionally toxic substances or if circumstances that affect fume hood performance exist
|
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by aga | The main thing is to Calculate how much gas your intended reaction could produce, and plan accordingly.
As a general rule i use 22.4 Litres for every mol that could be produced, then hang the gas mask near the door or not, just in case the fan
is not powerful enough.
There is really no excuse for Not Knowing when all the information is already available, either by 10 seconds googling or by asking here.
|
It's probably a good idea to have a respirator nearby in case the power goes out.
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
| Quote: | | hang the gas mask near the door or not, just in case the fan is not powerful enough. |
It's probably an even BETTER idea to just wear the fracking mask (WITH the appropriate cartridges) from the get-go if you've got anything really nasty
going on and are working indoors with improvised equipment and a home made air extraction system.
Oh yeah, and to use fresh cartridges. Because absorptive or reactive filter media have only so much capacity, and will crap up with stray stuff from
the atmosphere between uses if not carefully stored.
Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it
that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).
|
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Yeah, if you're making phosgene or atomizing nickel carbonyl, you'll want to have your mask on already even if working in the hood.
You can occasionally get away with working indoors with less dangerous but harmful substances with a mask, but it's considered hazardous and should be
done only when necessary.
|
|
|
welshwing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 6-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Can I use a porcelain cup and piece of glass as a crucible?
If I do something that a porcelain crucible is preferred, can I just use a small porcelain cream cup instead of buying the crucible?
Also, would it be okay to use any piece of glass to cover it, so I can see the reaction while it is happening?
|
|
|
welshwing
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 6-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Can I use a portable Bunsen Burner, one that can be taken anywhere?
My family doesn't want me burning stuff in the house though I made a fume hood. I understand but not even in the backyard is okay, so how do cope?
Can you recommend to me a Bunsen Burner that has the fuel supply attached to it so you can carry it around everywhere?
|
|
|
Great
Harmless
Posts: 34
Registered: 8-2-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Where are you located? Lots of places here sell portable butane burners and stoves.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
