CHRIS25
National Hazard
Posts: 951
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Ireland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Efflorescence: testing the salt on the walls
An aquaintance of mine showed me around his restored 19th century tower today and pointed out the problem with white stuff on the walls all over the
place, it is efflorescence. I said I would look into it and took a sample back home for testing to see if I could identify which of many salts it
could be.
I saw it as a brand new challenge for me to take an unknown chemical and go to work on something I have no experience with. I would like to run my
methods and results by you in case I have missed something or done something wrong, or can be corrected on perhaps testing things in a different
order:
Sample of white stuff placed in dilute HCl - bubbled vigorously
confirms the anion to be carbonate.
Sample placed in NaOH - Dissolved, but went milky white, possibly Calcium or Sodium
Potassium Ferricyanide - no change in colour, no Iron present
Placed in Sodium carbonate solution - white precipitate, but not on surface of solution, spread around inside it, not clumped together. Confirms this
to be the Sodium cation and not Calcium.
Problem with above is that the tower is perched on a cliff, and after some research I read that Alkali chlorides and sulphates are most likely in the
efflorescence due to the salt sea and air? Furthermore I could not do a flame test, each time I tried, the substance melted into an extremely tough
solid within seconds.
At the moment I can not think of other tests for the cation.
‘Calcination… is such a Separation of Bodies by Fire, as makes ‘em easily reducible into Powder; and for that reason ‘tis call’d by some
Chymical Pulverization.’ (John Friend, Chymical Lectures London, 1712)
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. (William Penn 1644-1718)
The very nature of Random, Chance development precludes the existence of Order - strange that our organic and inorganic world is so well defined by
precision and law. (me)
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
See if you can sprinkle some of the powder into the flame rather than a spoonful.
|
|
|
CHRIS25
National Hazard
Posts: 951
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Ireland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yep, that did'nt work, burnt my finger and the flame went out, tried a few times. Maybe I should taste it!
Ok, I sprinkled some into the wax and lit a second candle for comparison. The flame with the substance is a persistent bright orange around the
central flame of the wick. This confirms Na and not Ca.
[Edited on 20-11-2014 by CHRIS25]
‘Calcination… is such a Separation of Bodies by Fire, as makes ‘em easily reducible into Powder; and for that reason ‘tis call’d by some
Chymical Pulverization.’ (John Friend, Chymical Lectures London, 1712)
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. (William Penn 1644-1718)
The very nature of Random, Chance development precludes the existence of Order - strange that our organic and inorganic world is so well defined by
precision and law. (me)
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Lol !
Sprinkle Less, and use a spatula maybe, or asbestos fingers.
Given it's on the coast, with plenty of NaCl knocking about, would Na not be the most likely candidate for cation ?
Does your stuff dissolve in water ?
If so, is it acidic or basic, strong or weak ?
Never ever taste any unknown chemical yourself.
The accepted best practice is to recruit 10 street urchins and get them to taste it in case it is poisonous.
10 is a convenient number for the LD50 calculations.
|
|
|
CHRIS25
National Hazard
Posts: 951
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Ireland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sodium carbonate seems a good contender here judging by the tests. Just the above though, what I wrote in my first post: Problem with above is that
the tower is perched on a cliff, and after some research I read that Alkali chlorides and sulphates are most likely in the efflorescence due to the
salt sea and air? I'm against cruelty to urchins. (see edited previous post though).
‘Calcination… is such a Separation of Bodies by Fire, as makes ‘em easily reducible into Powder; and for that reason ‘tis call’d by some
Chymical Pulverization.’ (John Friend, Chymical Lectures London, 1712)
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. (William Penn 1644-1718)
The very nature of Random, Chance development precludes the existence of Order - strange that our organic and inorganic world is so well defined by
precision and law. (me)
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Don't All carbonates give orange flame test spectra ?
|
|
|
CHRIS25
National Hazard
Posts: 951
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Ireland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yes, but being that this was scraped off the wall and its consistency is more like snow-flakes, it is not the same as placing granules or crystals of
the stuff into a flame. since I know this is a carbonate, it only remained for me to identify the cation. And calcium is a distinct orange red, this
was a yellow orange, but clearly orange.
‘Calcination… is such a Separation of Bodies by Fire, as makes ‘em easily reducible into Powder; and for that reason ‘tis call’d by some
Chymical Pulverization.’ (John Friend, Chymical Lectures London, 1712)
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. (William Penn 1644-1718)
The very nature of Random, Chance development precludes the existence of Order - strange that our organic and inorganic world is so well defined by
precision and law. (me)
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This
"Placed in Sodium carbonate solution - white precipitate, but not on surface of solution, spread around inside it, not clumped together. Confirms this
to be the Sodium cation and not Calcium." does not make sense.
What would the precipitate be?
The last time I analysed a sample of efflorescence like this it was magnesium sulphate.
That would give a ppt with Na2CO3.
However it wouldn't bubble with dilute acid.
of course, yours could be something else (and is probably impure anyway)
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Someone correct me if i got this wrong, but would sodium carbonate AND calcium carbonate both give an orange flame test result ?
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1379
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
A 19th century tower in Ireland sounds like the perfect place for a mad scientist lab.
Was this found at ground level by any chance? then it may well be saltpeter (potassium nitrate), which is known to accumulate on the walls of old
buildings when nitrate-rich ground water permeates the wall and evaporates on the inside.
Calcium chloride has been used as an additive to mortar to accelerate its setting, especially in cold weather.
Sodium emission is very dominant. Even very small amounts of it will yield a yellow flame, masking the color of many non-sodium salts that could be
present (and may make up the larger part of your substance).
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
CHRIS25
National Hazard
Posts: 951
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Ireland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Ah well, not enough chemistry studying or experience really then to work this one out. By the way it is on a cliff very exposed, and it a renovated
living space with heating. I was pretty certain it was carbonate though. But solubility is difficult to determine in water since it weighs like a
feather and just putting in a sample in water and seeing it dissolve does not mean that it is soluble, since 1g per 100g water would be considered an
insoluble substance.
‘Calcination… is such a Separation of Bodies by Fire, as makes ‘em easily reducible into Powder; and for that reason ‘tis call’d by some
Chymical Pulverization.’ (John Friend, Chymical Lectures London, 1712)
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. (William Penn 1644-1718)
The very nature of Random, Chance development precludes the existence of Order - strange that our organic and inorganic world is so well defined by
precision and law. (me)
|
|
|
IrC
International Hazard
Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline
Mood: Discovering
|
|
"efflorescence due to the salt sea and air"
Gets my vote unless for many years bats have been crapping all over the walls, which would be the previous nitrate suggestion on steroids as opposed
to the ground water theory. If the walls have a hollow space going up for all you know many decades of guano could be filling them in from just below
the roof area. Drawn out towards the drier inner surface of the walls through repeatedly moist mortar with a combination of chemical reactions taking
place over time. A combination of sea salt laden air, mortar, and bat induced nitrates making a mix of chemical reactions possible.
I also wonder if any good ghost stories go along with the tower.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
|
|
|
jock88
National Hazard
Posts: 505
Registered: 13-12-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I seen something similar in an old cattle house. Fluffy stuff coming out of a cement wall. I was sure it was KNO3 but when mixed with some charcoal it
did not burn.
Perhaps it and old Napoleonic tower. The British built them on the coast of Ireland to keep an eye on Napoleon. (At least he wasn't firing rockets at
the moon).
And yes a round tower is the IDEAL mad science lab. Just don't try to piss in the corner as it can be very confusing.........
[Edited on 21-11-2014 by jock88]
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
For a flame test you'll need to dissolve the stuff in the smallest amount of HCl possible. Add drops of the solution to the flame, from a Pt wire,
preferably. You need a hot, clean Bunsen flame and darkness (preferably). If there is sodium you'll see it very clearly but it will outshine
everything else and you'd need a decent spectroscope to see any other lines.
Most likely the sample will contain Na, Ca, Mg and traces of others.
Check for sulphates with barium nitrate or chloride.
[Edited on 21-11-2014 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
Artemus Gordon
Hazard to Others
Posts: 178
Registered: 1-8-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  | For a flame test you'll need to dissolve the stuff in the smallest amount of HCl possible. Add drops of the solution to the flame, from a Pt wire,
preferably. You need a hot, clean Bunsen flame and darkness (preferably). If there is sodium you'll see it very clearly but it will outshine
everything else and you'd need a decent spectroscope to see any other lines.
Most likely the sample will contain Na, Ca, Mg and traces of others.
Check for sulphates with barium nitrate or chloride.
[Edited on 21-11-2014 by blogfast25] |
The method I've read in a number of books is to have a small loop (a few millimeters in diameter) of Pt or nichrome wire, and to dip the loop in clean
HCl to both clean the loop and to wet it. Then touch the loop to your (dry) sample to pick up a few particles, and hold that in the flame. A piece of
cobalt blue glass can be used to filter out the almost unavoidable yellow color from sodium.
I have done this, and it works pretty well, although of course it is sometimes hard to tell what the specific color is. I'd say it works best if you
can narrow down your cation list of possibilities to only 2 or 3 choices.
|
|
|
CHRIS25
National Hazard
Posts: 951
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Ireland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thankyou for the tips on how to do this properly.
‘Calcination… is such a Separation of Bodies by Fire, as makes ‘em easily reducible into Powder; and for that reason ‘tis call’d by some
Chymical Pulverization.’ (John Friend, Chymical Lectures London, 1712)
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. (William Penn 1644-1718)
The very nature of Random, Chance development precludes the existence of Order - strange that our organic and inorganic world is so well defined by
precision and law. (me)
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by CHRIS25 |
Placed in Sodium carbonate solution - white precipitate, but not on surface of solution, spread around inside it, not clumped together. Confirms this
to be the Sodium cation and not Calcium.
|
I'm still waiting for someone to explain why sodium carbonate would give a precipitate with sodium carbonate.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
In principle that works but the intensity of any other element has to be very high to actually see it that way. As a 'filter,' a simple CD-R based
hand held spectrometer works better but even with that tool it isn't easy, unless your sample is highly concentrated in whatever specific element. On
top of that, atom excitation by Bunsen really only works on a very limited number of elements.
|
|
|
CHRIS25
National Hazard
Posts: 951
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Ireland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by unionised | | Quote: Originally posted by CHRIS25 |
Placed in Sodium carbonate solution - white precipitate, but not on surface of solution, spread around inside it, not clumped together. Confirms this
to be the Sodium cation and not Calcium.
|
I'm still waiting for someone to explain why sodium carbonate would give a precipitate with sodium carbonate. |
Some reactions work differently in Ireland
‘Calcination… is such a Separation of Bodies by Fire, as makes ‘em easily reducible into Powder; and for that reason ‘tis call’d by some
Chymical Pulverization.’ (John Friend, Chymical Lectures London, 1712)
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. (William Penn 1644-1718)
The very nature of Random, Chance development precludes the existence of Order - strange that our organic and inorganic world is so well defined by
precision and law. (me)
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
