| Pages:
1
2 |
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Catalysts
Does a good quantum-based explanation exist describing how catalysts work ?
Google is having a day off.
|
|
|
Random
International Hazard
Posts: 1120
Registered: 7-5-2010
Location: In ur closet
Member Is Offline
Mood: Energetic
|
|
There is unstable product that decomposes again to reactant and usually two or more new molecules.
For example MnO2 gives unstable product that will decompose again to MnO2 and O2 with hydrogen peroxide.
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
hmm. Manganese dioxide and hydrogen peroxide making steam and oxygen.
Is that a catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide ?
If so, how does the rapid disassociation work at the ionic, electron, or quantum level ?
|
|
|
Random
International Hazard
Posts: 1120
Registered: 7-5-2010
Location: In ur closet
Member Is Offline
Mood: Energetic
|
|
It's not quantum physics that MnO2 gives unstable product but it's a matter of chemical property of that compound.
[Edited on 25-6-2014 by Random]
|
|
|
Paddywhacker
Hazard to Others
Posts: 478
Registered: 28-2-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The CNO cycle, where carbon acts as a catalyst, should be amenable to quantum analysis.
[Edited on 26-6-2014 by Paddywhacker]
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
CNO cycle inside a star ?
Wow ! thanks
[Edited on 26-6-2014 by aga]
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
aga:
In most cases of catalysis quantum mechanics needs to be invoked no more or no less than in catalyst-free reactions. It's all just chemistry. Start
understanding the basics of catalysis and much will be revealed.
The CNO cycle isn't chemistry of course. But carbon does act as a catalyst there. Not the greatest starting point for understanding chemical catalysis
though...
[Edited on 26-6-2014 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
arkoma
Redneck Overlord
Posts: 1763
Registered: 3-2-2014
Location: On a Big Blue Marble hurtling through space
Member Is Offline
Mood: украї́нська
|
|
oh Lord, you bass's got me GOOGLELOST* reading about nucleosynthesis
*googlelost=following interesting link after link after link
"We believe the knowledge and cultural heritage of mankind should be accessible to all people around the world, regardless of their wealth, social
status, nationality, citizenship, etc" z-lib
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
sure it isn't Googlinkistificated ?
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Seems that i totally misunderstood catalysis, in that the catalyst Does react, however the process ends up with the catalyst back in it's original
form.
Detritus here we come.
|
|
|
arkoma
Redneck Overlord
Posts: 1763
Registered: 3-2-2014
Location: On a Big Blue Marble hurtling through space
Member Is Offline
Mood: украї́нська
|
|
Hmm. MnO2 remains UNCHANGED when mixed with H2O2 I'm pretty sure. Now, the in "old school" Hydriodic acid/Red
phosporous reduction of ephedrine there is a "triangular" cycle. Heat breaks up HI, the free I combines with P, then gets hydrolysed back into HI and
P. When the reaction is over, the P is all still there but it DID take place in the reaction hence not a catalyst as I understand the term.
I think I got that right.
"We believe the knowledge and cultural heritage of mankind should be accessible to all people around the world, regardless of their wealth, social
status, nationality, citizenship, etc" z-lib
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
That is how i understood the term too : Catalyst does NOT take part in the reaction, yet accellerates the reaction.
Seems that it DOES react, yet ends up back in it's original form.
Begs the question tho, in an exhaust pipe, there is pressure pushing stuff out the tail-pipe, so anything that 'gets involved' in the reaction stands
a reasonable chance of being blown out the back, be it a gas, liquid or solid.
[Edited on 1-7-2014 by aga]
|
|
|
Zyklon-A
International Hazard
Posts: 1547
Registered: 26-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fluorine radical
|
|
arkoma, Are you sure that MnO2 remains unchanged in the decomposition of peroxides?
I have done the reaction quite a few times and it [MnO2] seems to be unsuitable in decomposing more peroxide afterwards.
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Is there a way to definitively tell if it's MnO2 afterwards ?
(a way available in a home lab)
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by aga  | Is there a way to definitively tell if it's MnO2 afterwards ?
(a way available in a home lab) |
Plenty of ways.
For instance, MnO2 is such a powerful oxidiser that it can oxidise chloride ions quantitatively:
MnO2(s) + 4 HCl(aq) === > MnCl2(aq) + Cl2(g) + 2 H2O(l)
This is in itself the basis for methods to determine the composition of MnO2 (and the basis of some chlorine generators).
It's well documented that MnO2 is often slightly deficient on oxygen, with respect to its theoretical formula.
[Edited on 1-7-2014 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Do what ?
MnO2 has less oxgen than the derived formula for MnO2 says it should ?
So it's MnO and MnO2 as a mixture or is that not possible ?
|
|
|
Zyklon-A
International Hazard
Posts: 1547
Registered: 26-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fluorine radical
|
|
You guys are making this more complicated than it needs to be.
Just weigh the oxide before and after.
No need to generate chlorine. BTW, that react takes a long time doesn't it? It starts off fast, giving off lots of chlorine, but then it slows way
down. You'll need to boil it in hydrochloric acid for a while to get the reaction to go to completion. Then you'll need to analysis how much chlorine
was produced, the whole process would be a pain in the chode.
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Zyklon-A | | done the reaction quite a few times and it [MnO2] seems to be unsuitable in decomposing more peroxide afterwards. |
Er, you said that, and grabbed my attention.
Are you now saying that it's a Weighing error ?
I dearly hope not.
[Edited on 1-7-2014 by aga]
|
|
|
Zyklon-A
International Hazard
Posts: 1547
Registered: 26-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fluorine radical
|
|
A weighing error? Who said that?
|
|
|
arkoma
Redneck Overlord
Posts: 1763
Registered: 3-2-2014
Location: On a Big Blue Marble hurtling through space
Member Is Offline
Mood: украї́нська
|
|
Please READ my posts; I said PRETTY SURE
Same S.N.A.F.U. in "chemophobia". The label did NOT claim the oxygen was carcinogenic, but the combustion products of the oxygen. Sheesh. Slow down
and read.
edit
| Quote: | The manganese dioxide is not consumed in the reaction, and thus may be recovered unchanged, and re-used indefinitely. Accordingly, manganese dioxide
catalyses this reaction.[4]
[4] Richard I. Masel “Chemical Kinetics and Catalysis” Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2001. ISBN 0-471-24197-0. |
So yeah, I am PRETTY SURE
[Edited on 7-1-2014 by arkoma]
"We believe the knowledge and cultural heritage of mankind should be accessible to all people around the world, regardless of their wealth, social
status, nationality, citizenship, etc" z-lib
|
|
|
kavu
Hazard to Others
Posts: 207
Registered: 11-9-2011
Location: Scandinavia
Member Is Offline
Mood: To understand is to synthesize
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Random | | It's not quantum physics that MnO2 gives unstable product but it's a matter of chemical property of that compound. |
First of all, quantum mechanics define ALL reactions. Chemical properties are inherently quantum mechanical in nature. Catalysts work by allowing a
reaction to proceed through a pathway that has a small activation energy. This means that a catalyst binds to starting materials
A + Cat ⇌ A-Cat
In A-Cat system A is activated to further react with other compounds. This activation is a result of higher nucleo/electrophilicity induced by the
binding to the catalyst. Basically in A-Cat system the energies (and thus shapes) of HOMO and LUMO orbitals are different from pure A. If the catalyst
is chosen carefully this shape and energy deformation will allow further reaction with compound B (for example LUMO activation makes Nu attacks
easier). This leads to formation of compound A-B and, depending on the system, the catalyst is released at this stage or at a later stage.
A-Cat + B ⇌ A-B + Cat
or
A-Cat + B ⇌ A-B-Cat ⇌ A-B + Cat
Catalysts aren't perfect, they degrade over time (as they are involved in chemical reactions). Usually this is accounted by measuring turnover
numbers, roughly speaking how many cycles a catalyst can stay active.
[Edited on 2-7-2014 by kavu]
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Zyklon-A | You guys are making this more complicated than it needs to be.
Just weigh the oxide before and after.
No need to generate chlorine. BTW, that react takes a long time doesn't it? It starts off fast, giving off lots of chlorine, but then it slows way
down. You'll need to boil it in hydrochloric acid for a while to get the reaction to go to completion. Then you'll need to analysis how much chlorine
was produced, the whole process would be a pain in the chode. |
No, it's a simple way to demonstrate your catalyst remains unchanged. That after you've used it as a catalyst for H2O2 decomposition it still oxidises
chloride ions in acid medium.
The reaction is no different from any other in terms of kinetics. Use an excess HCl to keep reaction rate high. Not complicated. Nor do you have to
generate vast amounts of chlorine: use only a few mg of MnO2.
As regards 'simple' weighing that would work but in practice isn't as easy as it sounds. The material would have to be quantitatively collected, dried
and accurately weighed.
Yes, but it's close to MnO2 (like MnOx with x = 1.995 or thereabouts, it can vary from one product to another). Presumably a small amount of the Mn is
not in oxidation state IV. Considering it's not the most stable of compounds and very eager to oxidise stuff, perhaps that should come as no great
surprise.
[Edited on 2-7-2014 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Groovy.
Thanks to you all for getting stuck into this.
So: a Catalyst IS involved with the reaction it catalyses, however it ends up back in it's original state at the end.
I was taught otherwise, and could not see any way that was possible.
So no special Magic happens with catalysts, just that the Route is altered.
Thanks to You, i have learned something.
@Zyklon: claiming that the catalyst was unsuitable to do the same thing again suggested some error somewhere, and i guessed at weighing.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Aga:
To see the most amazing bag of catalysts, have a look in the mirror. All living systems use enzymes as biocatalysts and these catalyse the most
incredible metabolic reactions (and at low temperature too!) imaginable.
For instance Glycosis, the conversion of glucose to pyruvate and the first step in the fermentation of sugar to ethanol, uses some 10 different
enzymes to achieve that complex chemical reaction(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycolysis#mediaviewer/File:Gly...
Enzymes make our man made catalysts look like dumb, blunt, boring instruments.
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
I checked the mirror, and there was just an ugly bag of mostly-water.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
