Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Half reaction you want is not listed, but...
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
*****




Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: Heavily protonated

[*] posted on 17-10-2013 at 02:23
Half reaction you want is not listed, but...


Often an electrochemical half reaction you require is not readily available, but it looks like you can construct it by a combination of other half reactions that are in order to determine the correct half reaction potential.

I will be using wiki's table of standard electrode potentials

I want to determine the standard half reaction potential for the reduction of bromate to bromide ions in basic aqueous media:

BrO3-(aq) + 3H2O(l) + 6e- <=> Br-(aq) + 6OH-(aq) E = ??

Okay, a quick look through the table shows that this reaction is not listed, however, you can find the following that are:

(i) 2 BrO3-(aq) + 12 H+(aq) + 10 e- <=> Br2(l) + 6 H2O(l) E = +1.48V
(ii) Br2(l) + 2 e- <=> 2 Br-(aq) E = +1.066V
(iii) 2H2O(l) + 2 e- <=> H2(g) + 2 OH-(aq) E = −0.8277V
(iv) H2(g) <=> 2 H+(aq) + 2 e- E = 0.0000V

EDIT: Now, as pointed out by DraconicAcid:

dG = nFE which means that you need to multiple by the number of electrons when you add reactions' E and then divide by the equation's new number of electrons.

So we can add (i) + (ii) and divide the result by 2 to get:

(v)  BrO3-(aq) + 6H+(aq) + 6e- <=> Br-(aq) + 3H2O(l)

E = (1.48V*10+1.066*2)/12 = +1.411V

Note, I divided by 12 electrons, not six, because the addition yields a 12 electron system. After this I divide straight through by 2 to simplify the equation, but this doesn't affect E.

By summing 3*(iii) and (v):
(vi) BrO3-(aq) + 3H2O + 6H+ + 12e- <=> Br-(aq) + 3H2(g) + 6OH-
E = (1.411V*6-0.8277V*6)/12 = 0.29165V

Finally (vi) + 3(iv) yields:

BrO3-(aq) + 3H2O(l) + 6e- <=> 2Br-(aq) + 6OH-(aq)

E = (0.29165V*12 + 0V)/6 = 0.5833V

So final E = +0.583V

/EDIT

Is my thing correct? Thanks

[Edited on 17-10-2013 by deltaH]




Mind your step or step your mind. Website: www.ideashack.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 4334
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline

Mood: Semi-victorious.

[*] posted on 17-10-2013 at 08:04


The E values are not additive; deltaG is additive. Since deltaG = -nFE, you have to multiply the potentials by the number of electrons before you add, and then divide by the number of electrons when you're done.



Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
*****




Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: Heavily protonated

[*] posted on 17-10-2013 at 08:29


Quote:
The E values are not additive; deltaG is additive. Since deltaG = -nFE, you have to multiply the potentials by the number of electrons before you add, and then divide by the number of electrons when you're done.
Thanks for that DraconicAcid I have made the changes as you suggested, have a look at the edit on the origional post, is this now correct?

Thanks for your help again, much appreciated!

[Edited on 17-10-2013 by deltaH]




Mind your step or step your mind. Website: www.ideashack.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
*****




Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: Heavily protonated

[*] posted on 17-10-2013 at 22:21


In my potassium ferrate(VI) synthesis thread, I use the previously determined half reaction for bromate as well as the half potential for oxidising Fe3O4 (magnetite) to FeO4(2-) in basic media. For completeness and as a second example, I will include the calculation by summation of the latter here as well:

Half reaction required: Fe3O4(s) + 16OH- <=> 3FeO4(2-) + 8H2O + 10e- E = ??

I can look up the following half reactions from wiki's table of standard electrode potentials:

(i) Fe3O4(s) + 8H+ +8e- <=> 3Fe(s) + 4H2O E = +0.085
(ii) Fe(s) <=> Fe3+ + 3e- E = +0.04V
(iii) 3Fe3+ + 12H2O <=> 3FeO4(2-) + 9e- + 24H+ E = -2.2V
(iv) 2H2O(l) + 2 e- <=> H2(g) + 2 OH-(aq) E = -0.8277V
(v) H2(g) <=> 2 H+(aq) + 2 e- E = 0.0000V

(i) + 3*(ii) = (vi):
(vi) Fe3O4(s) + 8H+ <=> 3Fe3+ + e- + 4H2O
E = (0.085V*8 + 0.04V*9)/1=+1.04V

(vi) + (iii) = (vii):
(vii) Fe3O4(s) + 8H2O <=> 3FeO4(2-) + 16H+ + 10e-
E = (1.04V*1 -2.2V*9)/10 = -2.096V

(vii) + (8*(iv) turned around) = (viii)
(viii) Fe3O4(s) + 8H2 + 16OH- <=> 3FeO4(2-) + 16H+ + 8H2O + 26e-
E = (-2.096V*10 + 0.8277V*16)/26 = -0.297V

(viii) + 8*(v) = ANSWER:
ANSWER: Fe3O4(s) + 16OH- <=> 3FeO4(2-) + 8H2O + 10e-
E = (-0.297V*26 + 0V)/10 = -0.772V

[Edited on 18-10-2013 by deltaH]




Mind your step or step your mind. Website: www.ideashack.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
The_Davster
A pnictogen
*******




Posts: 2861
Registered: 18-11-2003
Member Is Offline

Mood: .

[*] posted on 17-10-2013 at 22:48


Also, check the BIG list of half reactions:
http://www.efunda.com/materials/corrosion/electrochem_list.c...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
*****




Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: Heavily protonated

[*] posted on 17-10-2013 at 23:40


Thanks The_Davster



Mind your step or step your mind. Website: www.ideashack.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User

  Go To Top