Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Exploding toroidal votices
Morgan
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1673
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 11-4-2013 at 19:13
Exploding toroidal votices


As a demonstration, might it be possible to fill a smoke ring shooter with the diaphram or piston pulled back, cocked and loaded, with hydrogen and chlorine and have the vortex shot out traveling a distance to an ultraviolet source detonating say 15 feet away? I thought about hydrogen being so light that a cover over the hole would have to be in place until the instant you fired it. Then too as hydrogen would want to climb, it might work best aimed straight up or at some upward angle. Smoke rings can travel amazingly fast with not that much effort.
It seems like this could work or have some probability of success. I don't know if the hydrogen and chlorine would stay together in the swirl, being a different mass one heavier and one lighter than air. Maybe you could make the launcher mix "rich or lean" to offset/fine tune any impending imbalance.
Vortices are nice and so are hydrogen/chlorine reactions, I just thought it would be illustrative to combine the two.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NN82GoBG98s

"Extraordinary and beautiful examples of toroidal vortices"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHyTOcfF99o
View user's profile View All Posts By User
neptunium
National Hazard
****




Posts: 987
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 11-4-2013 at 21:01


interesting ... so you would like to fire a ring of H2 and Cl2 in air? i ve notice that all vortices are stable when the medium is a differente material than the ring itself...

air in water (or gas)
dust in air
water mist in air
etc...

never seen a liquid vortice in another liquide or a gas in another gas...what do you think?

it would seem pretty hard to keep Hydrogen and chlorine together in air i guess..maybe with Bromine?

[Edited on 12-4-2013 by neptunium]




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
confused
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 244
Registered: 17-3-2013
Location: Singapore
Member Is Offline

Mood: tired

[*] posted on 12-4-2013 at 03:37


dont think that the gases would stay together due to the different densities of the gases...but i may be wrong
How strong would the vortex be?
I for one would not like bromine vortexes being shot across the lab:D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Morgan
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1673
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 12-4-2013 at 08:47


Instead of using the UV light source as a downrange initiator with H2/Cl2 maybe something as simple as a very small pile of 1% Pt on alumina set as a target and you fire a hydrogen vortex at it. I've a 4 ounce bottle of the talc-like stuff, more than enough, and it only takes a small amount. Depending on the distance and entrainment of air in the torus, that might work too. Hydrogen/air mixtures are fairly impressive.
With the hydrogen/chlorine "vortex time bombs" you could start out small, making a little 3 centimeter diameter launcher aimed out a sunny window or something. By varying the suddeness of the pulse, the swirling mass might make it several feet intact before dilution or demixing.
One time I tried some of the Pt powder in a finger pump sprayer containing methanol. I swirled the bottle and sprayed some of the mist into the air but it didn't work. It seemed the wetted catalyst powder didn't dry fast enough when sprayed with methanol, maybe a more forceful atomizing device would have had a chance.
Surely there's something you could contrive to make an exquisite demonstration. Once you've seen or done most of the popular classroom demonstrations, you kind of long for something new.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
12AX7
Post Harlot
*****




Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline

Mood: informative

[*] posted on 12-4-2013 at 09:28


Oooh, ooh.

Fire one cannon with the H2/Cl2 mixture. Simultaneously fire another cannon with aerosolized Pt:Al2O3, so the vortices collide. :D

I would also suggest a regular gas with wide explosive range, like H2 or CH4. It should pick up enough O2 to ignite by the time it passes a more mundane ignition source, say, a candle or electrical spark.

Tim




Seven Transistor Labs LLC http://seventransistorlabs.com/
Electronic Design, from Concept to Layout.
Need engineering assistance? Drop me a message!
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
Morgan
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1673
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 12-4-2013 at 09:54


Yes, a hypergolic collision would be amusing. That's interesting about using a dust devil vortex of Pt/alumina. Maybe the dust vortex/initiator could be small and the bomb vortex large, the diorama presented as an impending head on collision - the smaller launched from one side of the room , the larger from the other slowly set off on their lumbering journey. Maybe ear muffs would be in order.
Realistically though, you wouldn't want to breathe Pt particles or the chlorine so maybe you could demonstrate it on a small scale inside a long acrylic case or such.
Hydrogen/oxygen or hydrogen entrained with air directed at a platinum catalyst sponge wired down/suspended might work, designed like the little elements inside Pt catalyst lighters that use methanol. I would expect some fine tuning efforts to get it right. Or maybe it would just fall in your lap. ha
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJk8ijAUCiI

An outdoor experiment
Another variation would be to collide a hydrogen torus into chlorine ring on a calm, sunny morning. I wonder how that would go?

And then there are other exotic fuels and oxidizers out there that become hypergolic when mixed.

[Edited on 12-4-2013 by Morgan]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sedit
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1939
Registered: 23-11-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: Manic Expressive

[*] posted on 12-4-2013 at 10:58


http://youtu.be/IyAyd4WnvhU

The idea of something like this being able to also explode is something interesting to say the least. I wounder if the military has ever attempted anything of this sort.









Knowledge is useless to useless people...

"I see a lot of patterns in our behavior as a nation that parallel a lot of other historical processes. The fall of Rome, the fall of Germany — the fall of the ruling country, the people who think they can do whatever they want without anybody else's consent. I've seen this story before."~Maynard James Keenan
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Morgan
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1673
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 12-4-2013 at 11:05


A zirconium powder torus would be dazzling if you could pull it off.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Morgan
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1673
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-4-2013 at 10:25


If this were the case, it might be easier or a variation on a theme making hydrogen and oxygen and then adding a small amount of chlorine, a three-way effect.
I recall that accident where several H2/O2 balloons were put in a large plastic garbage bag for later use which created static and a sudden awareness. So I wonder if a diaphramed smoke ring launcher would have any chance of "going off" if used with chlorine/hydrogen mixes? Just to be on the safe side, at least it would be something to keep in mind if there was any chance of making static.

"The Photosensitized Explosion of Hydrogen and Oxygen by Chlorine."
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/95863?uid=3739600&...

Sunlight creating static.
"On the Moon, there is no rubbing. The dust is electrostatically charged by the Sun in two different ways: by sunlight itself and by charged particles flowing out from the Sun (the solar wind)."
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2005/30...
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top