Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: hexanitroinositol
Trotsky
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 166
Registered: 6-2-2013
Location: US
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 17-3-2013 at 00:38
hexanitroinositol


I can find only one reference to this compound on this site, and only a brief mention at that. In addition, I have come across one brief paragraph from the 1930s regarding the simplicity and cheapness off the compound, saying that it was equal to nitroglycerin in properties, except it was a solid and do easier and safer to handle.

There must be some unannounced downside to it or it would have gained greater popularity, I believe.

Has anytime here any experience with the compound?
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
franklyn
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3026
Registered: 30-5-2006
Location: Da Big Apple
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 17-3-2013 at 08:17


It would not be nitro but rather nitrate same nomenclature as for glycerine
a nitro compound of this aliphatic ring would be a cyclohexane variant.

vulture cites two patent references submitted by
Mr. Anonymous , alias Rosco Bodine , here _
www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=890#pid8043

My own contribution , for actual hands on , read the posts following
www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=9201#pid10645...

_________________________________________


Search for Inositol on site here to get more hits.

.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Trotsky
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 166
Registered: 6-2-2013
Location: US
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-3-2013 at 22:43


Ah, yeah, that's how it was referred to in the document I read. That explains why I didn't see those threads when I searched.

Thanks!
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
AndersHoveland
Hazard to Other Members, due to repeated speculation and posting of untested highly dangerous procedures!
*****




Posts: 1986
Registered: 2-3-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-3-2013 at 22:56


Quote: Originally posted by Trotsky  
There must be some unannounced downside to it or it would have gained greater popularity

Perhaps low yields and impurities? These long chain sugar alcohols tend to be vulnerable to destructive oxidation. The initial product from the nitration might contain some partially nitrated oxidation products. The only way to purify the product would be crystallization (not really a feasible industrial route, for obvious reasons).

For those of you wanting more chemistry details, the central CH group in nitroglycerin is also vulnerable to oxidation, but if it does get oxidized it opens up the entire molecule to immediate oxidative destruction. Usually any by-products that are only partially oxidized are very soluble in the acids, so do not contaminate the product.

[Edited on 19-3-2013 by AndersHoveland]




I'm not saying let's go kill all the stupid people...I'm just saying lets remove all the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User

  Go To Top