Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: interesting additions to PEA?
oxidativeamination
Harmless
*




Posts: 12
Registered: 8-4-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

smile.gif posted on 8-4-2011 at 22:00
interesting additions to PEA?


thoughts have come to mind, if one were to take such a mesmerizingly close to usefull molecule as phenylethylamine and wanted to say add a halogen to the para position on the ring, how will this likely affect its biological activity and metabolism? would this perhaps increase half-life? add to effect profile? and does anyone think that this would be possible without deamination/halogenation/reamination?
forgive me as i sound as if i'm asking to be spoon fed although believe me i have searched and the relevant information does not exist...
this is all merely speculation anyways..
although in my opinion quite an interesting subject.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bolt
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 188
Registered: 26-3-2007
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-4-2011 at 23:25


Most of the para-halogen amphetamines are quite toxic. 4-F amphetamine is by far the least toxic. Would the toxicity of these compounds be extended to the desmethyl versions? I don't know, but the possibility is probable.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
*******




Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-4-2011 at 00:04


Quote: Originally posted by oxidativeamination  
forgive me as i sound as if i'm asking to be spoon fed although believe me i have searched and the relevant information does not exist...

You searched and found that relevant information does not exist? Either you are a good liar or your literature searching abilities suck. In both cases, you should know that referenceless threads should be opened in the Beginnings section. If you start from no reference, you start from the beginning, kind of obvious.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
Thread Moved
9-4-2011 at 00:04
oxidativeamination
Harmless
*




Posts: 12
Registered: 8-4-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-4-2011 at 00:16


^my apologies nicodem, perhaps my literature searching abilities do indeed suck.. didn't realise that referenceless posts were resricted to beginnings. been reading the forum for some time though never noted such a case.
i'll do as any dog put in its place and have a better look then shall i. ;)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
*******




Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 9-4-2011 at 00:34


Quote: Originally posted by oxidativeamination  
perhaps my literature searching abilities do indeed suck..

Indeed they do.

ortho- and para-chlorination: Org. Biomol. Chem., 2006, 4, 2716-2723. DOI:10.1039/B605010G

As for the bromination and iodination, protecting group chemistry needs to be applied, e.g. for iodination: Biochemistry, 2009, 48 (4), pp 688–698. DOI: 10.1021/bi8019977 (the reasons for N-protection have been already discussed on this forum, so improve your searching skills)

Bonus reference about nitration: Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1953, 75, 2069-2072.




…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)

Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
oxidativeamination
Harmless
*




Posts: 12
Registered: 8-4-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 10-4-2011 at 21:16


thankyou for the references nicodem much appreciated. would you agree with bolt about the toxicity of the para-halogenenated PEA's?
my only real argument for saying they wouldn't be nuerotoxic is that the 2,5-dimethoxy para halogenated PEA's dont seem to be excessively nuerotoxic.. at least nothing like PMA.
can you see anything wrong with this rationalization? or would the 2,5 methoxy groups have some effect of taming the molecules nuerotoxicity??? that question seems absurd considering that these methoxy's should make it more toxic no?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sedit
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1939
Registered: 23-11-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: Manic Expressive

[*] posted on 10-4-2011 at 21:46


The first thing that comes to mind is the bulk added buy the 2-5 substitutes will cause it to not interact with the same proteins it might have otherwise.

""that question seems absurd considering that these methoxy's should make it more toxic no?""

No.. matter of fact I would be more convinced they are whats inhibiting the toxic effects.





Knowledge is useless to useless people...

"I see a lot of patterns in our behavior as a nation that parallel a lot of other historical processes. The fall of Rome, the fall of Germany — the fall of the ruling country, the people who think they can do whatever they want without anybody else's consent. I've seen this story before."~Maynard James Keenan
View user's profile View All Posts By User
jon
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 459
Registered: 11-1-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: paranoid distrustful apprehensive

[*] posted on 11-4-2011 at 16:39


yeah the electron shells of the halogens direct the methoxy groups to perpendicular angles (to the halogen) that's why those 4 sub dimethoxys show a distinct change in pharmacology.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
oxidativeamination
Harmless
*




Posts: 12
Registered: 8-4-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 11-4-2011 at 21:48


i've also read in another forum, that N-aceytlation of PEA could be achieved by simply titrating the freebase to the acetate salt followed by distillation of the salt.

i thought that to achieve N-acetylation of primary amines one would have to reflux them with glacial acetic acid and acetaldehyde.

people on this forum were speculating that the addition of the N-acetyl group would increase resistance to MAO-B/A on first pass. anyone think this actually contains some validity?

i do suppose that after acetylation it is no longer a mono-amine.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top