Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: 1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocarbazole
Fery
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1015
Registered: 27-8-2019
Location: Czechoslovakia
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 13-11-2022 at 12:18
1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocarbazole


Initially I had these references:
https://sci-hub.wf/10.1021/ja01203a506

Attachment: ja01203a506.pdf (275kB)
This file has been downloaded 193 times

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFMQBruo5k0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaNA-K0skEs&t=281s

When everything was done, I found ultimate reference at:
http://orgsyn.org/demo.aspx?prep=CV4P0884
http://orgsyn.org/Content/pdfs/procedures/CV4P0884.pdf

Attachment: CV4P0884.pdf (317kB)
This file has been downloaded 201 times

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbazole
Quote:
A classic laboratory organic synthesis for carbazole is the Borsche-Drechsel cyclization. In the first step, phenylhydrazine is condensed with cyclohexanone to the corresponding imine. The second step is a hydrochloric acid-catalyzed rearrangement reaction and ring-closing reaction to tetrahydrocarbazole. In one modification, both steps are rolled into one by carrying out the reaction in acetic acid.


In this experiment the 1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocarbazole was prepared at 50 mmol scale which caused some challenges in comparison with 1 mol scale in the original method.

calculations:
cyclohexanone 4,9 g (50 mmol), M = 98,15 g/mol
phenylhydrazine 5,4 g (50 mmol), M = 108,14 g/mol
acetic acid 18 g

Into 50 ml round bottomed flask was added cyclohexanone 4,9 g (50 mmol), acetic acid 18,0 g and boiling stones. Liebig condenser was attached and the mixture was heated. When it started to reflux, during 1 hour was dropwise added phenylhydrazine 5,4 g (50 mmol) through the top of condenser (using 2 neck flask and dropping funnel would be more advanced but the simple design used here worked well too). Some solid precipitate formed in the bottom of condenser which melted after stopping cooling water circulation for a while. Then the reaction was refluxed for another 1 hour. Then it was allowed to cool down to room temperature (it started to crystallize very soon while still very hot) and overnight in a fridge at +4 C (acetic acid does not yet crystallize at +4 C as it contains some water from the reaction 50 mmol of H2O = 0,9 g H2O with 18,0 g acetic acid = 95% acetic acid).
The solid product was vacuum filtered using Buchner funnel and filter paper, the mass was quite thick and hard to get from the reaction flask, using wide ground glass joint flask is recommended (29/32 joint size was used), scraping the mass using glass rod and rinsing the flask with a little of water which was added to the funnel was necessary. The product was rinsed with a little of mixture of water + methanol 1:1 on the filter paper which improved its color.
The product was air dried for 2 weeks, smell of acetic acid in the beginning was observed which soon faded away, but the weight continued to decrease slowly for a long time. It really lasted so long, only after that long time the weight ceased to decrease and stayed stable for few days.
8,4 g of product obtained (yield 98%). 100% yield at 50 mmol scale = 8,56 g (M = 171.24 g/mol).
The crude product was recrystallized from 45 ml of methanol (it dissolved well in only 35 ml on boiling but after cooling down the crystalline mass was too thick so finally 45 ml of methanol was used by adding extra 10 ml to original 35 ml). Solution was cooled down slowly to room temperature and then to +4 C in fridge, crystals were vacuum filtered on sinter, washed with 5 ml cold methanol (+4 C) on sinter, air dried until stable weight during 3 days.
Yield 6,0 g = 70%.
m.p. 118-120 C (according literature the m.p. depends on the rapidness/slowness of heating)

Notes:
The stirring was not necessary as stated in the original method. Refluxing was enough. Adding boiling stones was necessary then.
Addition of phenylhydrazine through top of condenser avoided clogging of additional funnel stem, but some phenylhydrazine acetate crystallized in the condenser which had to be melted by temporarily stopping cooling water circulation through condenser. The weaker the reflux, the better (less phenylhydrazine acetate in the condenser and all the acid condenses in the bottom of condenser and not higher). It is recommended to use short and wide condenser, mounted as straightly as possible, dropping the phenylhydrazine through the middle of the condenser tube, not on its walls. A medicinal syringe was successfully used for that and it stayed in the top of the condenser for the whole addition and just pressing its piston to add phenylhydrazine drop by drop.
Mother liquor remaining after the recrystallization from methanol was boiled with activated charcoal but its color did not change significantly. It was only a test whether it was feasible to use activated charcoal during recrystallization. When using charcoal the filtration would require heated funnel at 1 mol scale so at 20 times smaller scale the product would certainly crystallize heavily during filtration so the charcoal was not used during recrystallization. Testing charcoal later even did not improve the color of mother liquor remaining after recrystallization so its usage seems to be not much advantageous. If you want to use charcoal anyway, use much more methanol and reduce its volume after filtering off the activated charcoal.



the beginning, cyclohexanone + acetic acid in RBF with wide ground glass joint, boiling stones (5 small brown glass balls) in the flask

IMG_20221024_155406_9.jpg - 115kB



after addition of first few drops of phenylhydrazine

IMG_20221024_165710_6.jpg - 74kB



after addition of all phenylhydrazine during 1 hour

IMG_20221024_175902_3.jpg - 91kB



after 1 h of reflux and removing from heating mantle the product started to crystallize immediately, the amount of acetic acid is at the edge, even in the first picture just after removing from heating mantle there was already a little of crystallized product, in the last picture the content in the flask was completely solidified

IMG_20221024_190756_3.jpg - 79kB IMG_20221024_191139_9.jpg - 76kB IMG_20221024_191414_9.jpg - 102kB IMG_20221024_191425_6.jpg - 74kB IMG_20221024_191851_3.jpg - 95kB IMG_20221024_195447_0.jpg - 56kB



vacuum filtration, rinsing the product with a little of mixture of water+methanol 1:1 on filter paper improved its color (second picture)

IMG_20221025_081300_6.jpg - 54kB IMG_20221025_082831_7.jpg - 43kB



air drying the product for 2 weeks

IMG_20221025_090431_7.jpg - 94kB IMG_20221110_123046_2.jpg - 47kB



recrystallization from methanol (45 ml used although it dissolved in minimal amount of 35 ml)

IMG_20221110_145158_6.jpg - 45kB



vacuum filtration on sinter (methanol has low b.p. and partly evaporates at reduced pressure so filtering very cold mass is recommended)

IMG_20221110_181621_2.jpg - 73kB



air dried final product

IMG_20221113_174322_4.jpg - 89kB

[Edited on 13-11-2022 by Fery]
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Boffis
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1867
Registered: 1-5-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 13-11-2022 at 13:38


@ Fery; nice write-up once again. Any particular reason why you chose tetrahydrocarbazole as your target? Can it be dehydrogenated to carbazole?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fery
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1015
Registered: 27-8-2019
Location: Czechoslovakia
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 13-11-2022 at 21:25


Hi Boffis, the experiment was for the beauty of chemistry, to synthesize some heterocycle. Of course I will try the dehydrogenation, just I would like to avoid Pb3O4 and try something else.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Boffis
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1867
Registered: 1-5-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 21-11-2022 at 11:57


Quote: Originally posted by Fery  
Hi Boffis, the experiment was for the beauty of chemistry, to synthesize some heterocycle. Of course I will try the dehydrogenation, just I would like to avoid Pb3O4 and try something else.


Yep, sometimes its just got to be done because you can!!

By the way how is the dehydrogenation going?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fery
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1015
Registered: 27-8-2019
Location: Czechoslovakia
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 21-11-2022 at 21:14


Hi Boffis, so far I already got the required Pd on C catalyst. The hydrogenation reaction catalysed by Pd is reversible, so the same catalyst which is usually used for hydrogenation could be used also for dehydrogenation. It just requires some high boiling solvent for reflux, p-cymene (b.p. 177 C) or mesitylene (b.p. 165 C). I have only cumene at hand right now (b.p. 152 C) so the reaction would run at lower temperature reflux and its speed would be somewhat slower. But better than xylene (b.p. 138-144 C).
https://sci-hub.wf/10.1021/ed054p383
Btw I have one question: The catalyst is usually wetted (I suppose water). Water should not be good as it would reduce b.p. of the solvent and thus slow down the reaction. So should I remove the water? If yes then how? Air drying which would last few hours or 1 day - wouldn't air poison the catalyst? Adding a little of methanol or acetone and then air drying in few minutes - risk of igniting vapors of flammable solvent? Moreover the man I bought the catalyst from, does not have more info than it is 10% Pd on C and it is from a lab from a chem factory. So not sure whether it was not already used or not...

[Edited on 22-11-2022 by Fery]
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Texium
Administrator
********




Posts: 4580
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline

Mood: PhD candidate!

[*] posted on 22-11-2022 at 09:43


Nice, carbazole synthesis is something I wanted to do a long time ago but never got around to, so I find myself once again living vicariously through your syntheses!

Assuming you only need to use 5 mol% or less of your catalyst, the amount of water used to wet it should be negligible, and not affect the boiling point of your mixture too much. I would just go for it and not worry about it.




Come check out the Official Sciencemadness Wiki
They're not really active right now, but here's my YouTube channel and my blog.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User

  Go To Top