roXefeller
Hazard to Others
Posts: 463
Registered: 9-9-2013
Location: 13 Colonies
Member Is Offline
Mood: 220 221 whatever it takes
|
|
Polarity and condensation physics
I was quizzing my daughter the other day on science and one question was draw a water molecule and label it. I made sure she understood the V-shape
was important to get right in the drawing because almost all of the physical properties we know of water come from the polarity and van-der-waals
forces. I drew a CO2 molecule as comparison, which has no polarity and is a gas at RT for example. It got me thinking about other nonpolar chemicals
and why the distinction. For instance, propane, similar to ethanol but nonpolar and a gas at RT. Great. Why does this break down at higher
molecular weights, say octane, which is liquid, albeit volatile, while something super jeavylike uranium hexafluoride is a gas. I know there are
almost no van der waals forces on the UF6, but there shouldnt be many for octane either. A little explanation?
One must forego the self to attain total spiritual creaminess and avoid the chewy chunks of degradation.
|
|
|
Bedlasky
International Hazard
Posts: 1243
Registered: 15-4-2019
Location: Period 5, group 6
Member Is Offline
Mood: Volatile
|
|
Octane is longer than propane, have more C-H bonds, there is more space for van der Walls forces than in propane.
UF6 is clearly non-polar molecule. Bonds are highly polar, but sum of dipol moments is zero because of its structure. Forces keeping molecules
together are small, this is reason why it is gas at RT. UF4 is solid, because it is a polar molecule.
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4357
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
UF4 will have a lot more ionic character, and that's why its a solid at RT. A tetrahedral UF4 would be just as non-polar as the octahedral UF6.
Don't disregard the strength of London dispersion forces. The higher the mass of the molecule, the more electrons there are, and the more polarizable
the molecule is (and thus, the stronger the London forces).
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
Bedlasky
International Hazard
Posts: 1243
Registered: 15-4-2019
Location: Period 5, group 6
Member Is Offline
Mood: Volatile
|
|
Tetrahedral UF4? No way. Lets consider that you have UF4 in gaseous state - - > divided to single molecules. Single UF4 molecule have pyramidal
(and not tetrahedral) shape because of lone pair electrons (uranium have six valence electrons). So it's definitely polar.
[Edited on 14-1-2021 by Bedlasky]
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4357
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
Lone pairs? In a d or f subshell? Not a chance.
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
Bedlasky
International Hazard
Posts: 1243
Registered: 15-4-2019
Location: Period 5, group 6
Member Is Offline
Mood: Volatile
|
|
Sorry, my fault.
https://sci-hub.se/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...
So why it is UF4 more ionic than UF6? And why electrons in d and f shell can't be lone pairs?
[Edited on 14-1-2021 by Bedlasky]
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4357
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
I'm not sure I could say why d and f electrons don't act as lone pairs in the same way that p or sp hybrid electrons do. I just know that they don't.
That's why [MX4] systems (such as FeCl4(-) or CoCl4(2-) ions) are tetrahedral, regardless of how many d electrons the metal has (unless they have 8,
in which case they might be square planar, but that still doesn't work for VSEPR).
UF6 will be more covalent than UF4 because the uranium(VI) ion is smaller and more highly charged than the uranium(IV) ion- it is much more
polarizing, so it can force the fluoride ion to share electrons (i.e., covalently bond). It's the same reason that SnCl2 acts like a typical ionic
compound (water soluble solid, forms conducting solutions), and SnCl4 is a typical molecular compound (liquid, soluble in CCl4, forms non-conducting
solutions).
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
roXefeller
Hazard to Others
Posts: 463
Registered: 9-9-2013
Location: 13 Colonies
Member Is Offline
Mood: 220 221 whatever it takes
|
|
I get why octane is liquid while propane isn't. Those are two separate comparisons. My question was why octane starts to develop polarity? It's
heavier than propane obviously. But uf6 is way heavier than all of that.
Took a quick peek at the Wikipedia article for London dispersion forces. I think that answers my question best. The forces and the dipoles aren't
static but can rearrange instantaneously in different modes to produce an overall condensed nature.
| Quote: |
The effects of London dispersion forces are most obvious in systems that are very non-polar (e.g., that lack ionic bonds), such as hydrocarbons and
highly symmetric molecules like bromine (Br2, a liquid at room temperature) or iodine (I2, a solid at room temperature).
...
Larger and heavier atoms and molecules exhibit stronger dispersion forces than smaller and lighter ones.
|
[Edited on 14-1-2021 by roXefeller]
One must forego the self to attain total spiritual creaminess and avoid the chewy chunks of degradation.
|
|
|
chornedsnorkack
National Hazard
Posts: 564
Registered: 16-2-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Uranium hexafluoride is NOT a gas. It is a solid that sublimes at +56 Celsius.
The heaviest gas is actually tungsten hexafluoride - boils at +17 Celsius.
When a molecule has no polarity, the examples include noble gas atoms, and diatomic molecules.
The strength of London forces depends, for one, on the number of electrons. So look at noble gas series
He - 4 K
Ne - 27 K
Ar - 87 K
Kr - 121 K
Xe - 166 K
Rn - 211 K
When the number of electron is equal, consider how strongly the electrons are held. He and H2 have each 2 electrons, yet boiling points He - 4 K; H2 -
20 K. The one concentrated nucleus of He holds the electrons more tightly.
Now compare the hydro- and fluorocarbon series:
CH4 - -162 C - CF4 - -128 C
C2H6 - -88 C - C2F6 - -78 C
C3H8 - -42 C - C3F8 - -36 C
n-C4H10 - 0 C - n-C4F10 - -2 C
n-C5H12 - +36 C - n-C5F12 - +28 C
F has more electrons than H, but holds them more strongly. Going from methane to heavier fluorocarbons, for small molecules the smallness of H
prevails, for bigger the low polarizability of F. Which is why the nonpolar fluorides are volatile.
The reason UF4 is less volatile than UF6 is the same "CF2" is less volatile than CF4. Since UF4 is "unsaturated" compared to UF6, it polymerizes (into
crystals).
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
