AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Pan Rescue: The Case of Burnt Oatmeal
I experimented with an idea to remove the burnt-on food carbon from a stainless steel pan, which apparently more easily succeeded than I expected!
I wanted to focus on commonly available reagents and avoid, at least, starting with harsh/toxic compounds.
So, I just added 200 ml of dilute 3% household H2O2 and a few teaspoons of sea salt followed by heating to boil. Removed from heat with ongoing
stirring/scraping with a metal spoon (for less than 5 minutes). Apparent bubbling (H2O2 decomposition) and an odd smell that had a hint of chlorine.
The burnt-on carbon apparently was separating from steel less pan surface.
I suspect some underlying electrochemistry with the highly noble carbon remaining inert, but the surface of the pan undergoing anodic attack. The
result was an apparent path for the removal of the burnt-on carbon.
I recommend turning on the vent fan to remove the mild odor and any possible toxic compounds.
Note, even with subsequent scrubbing, still the presence of carbon spots, so not completely a clean/clear result (see pictures).
[Edited on 30-11-2019 by AJKOER]
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Pictures
[Edited on 30-11-2019 by AJKOER]
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
After the application of a plastic scrubbing pad, still some spots:
[Edited on 30-11-2019 by AJKOER]
[Edited on 30-11-2019 by AJKOER]
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
For those interested on the underlying chemistry, my thoughts on some possible interactions.
First, the creation of some solvated electrons from the presence of Fe, C and O2 in the presence of the NaCl functioning also as an electrolyte.
Then, a possible one-electron reduction of H2O2:
H2O2 + e- --> OH• + OH-
An electrochemical reaction:
Fe + ½ O2 + H+ --> Fe(2+) + OH-
Further with ferrous, H2O2 and O2 :
Fe(+2) = Fe(+3) + e-
O2 + e- = O2•-
O2•- + H+ = HO2• (pKa = 4.88)
HO2• + Fe(+2) + H+ → Fe(+3)+ H2O2
Fe(+2) + H2O2 → Fe(+3) + OH• + OH-
Further possible interaction with excess chloride:
OH• + Cl- = •OHCl-
At pH < 5:
•OHCl- --> OH- + •Cl
•Cl + •Cl --> Cl2 (in small amounts)
From:
Fe --> Fe(ll) + 2 e-
2 [ •Cl + e- = Cl- ]
-------------------------
Fe + 2 •Cl --> FeCl2
and likely more......
Bottom line, an active mix attacking the stainless steel surface facilitating the release of the carbon.
[Edited on 30-11-2019 by AJKOER]
|
|
|
B(a)P
International Hazard
Posts: 1139
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Festive
|
|
This is an amazing post and will definitely help in the justification of my next big lab purchase - chemistry cleans dishes!!
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4333
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
The carbon burnt to the bottom of the pot isn't pure carbon, but a mixture of carbon and high-carbon-content organic compounds. It's just as likely
that the peroxide is breaking down the organic molecules, thus allowing the carbon to be dislodged from the pot.
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by DraconicAcid  | | The carbon burnt to the bottom of the pot isn't pure carbon, but a mixture of carbon and high-carbon-content organic compounds. It's just as likely
that the peroxide is breaking down the organic molecules, thus allowing the carbon to be dislodged from the pot. |
This is a fair comment, but my personal experience in the process suggested to me that there was actually limited dissolving of the burnt-on carbon,
and much more of it just entering the solution as a particle suspension. However, I can see how radical activity would be enhanced by the presence of
high-carbon-content organic compounds, leading to dissolved organic matter.
From an electrochemistry viewpoint, increasing the surface area of carbon electrode/zone would be expected to increase the rate of anodic attack on
the metal pan surface.
So, I admit that there is likely, at least, some degree of a combined process resulting in the surface cleaning.
[Edited on 30-11-2019 by AJKOER]
|
|
|
Vomaturge
Hazard to Others
Posts: 286
Registered: 21-1-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: thermodynamic
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by AJKOER | | Quote: Originally posted by DraconicAcid | | The carbon burnt to the bottom of the pot isn't pure carbon, but a mixture of carbon and high-carbon-content organic compounds. It's just as likely
that the peroxide is breaking down the organic molecules, thus allowing the carbon to be dislodged from the pot. |
This is a fair comment, but my personal experience in the process suggested to me that there was actually limited dissolving of the burnt-on carbon,
and much more of it just entering the solution as a particle suspension. However, I can see how radical activity would be enhanced by the presence of
high-carbon-content organic compounds, leading to dissolved organic matter.
From an electrochemistry viewpoint, increasing the surface area of carbon electrode/zone would be expected to increase the rate of anodic attack on
the metal pan surface.
So, I admit that there is likely, at least, some degree of a combined process resulting in the surface cleaning.
[Edited on 30-11-2019 by AJKOER] |
If you have a way to estimate the total molarity and oxidation states of iron, nickel ( ) chromium ( ), etc which are supposedly now in solution, and also
measure the concentration of your hydrogen peroxide both BEFORE and AFTER being used to clean the pan, then you'll know for sure how much went into
dissolving the stainless steel and how much went into dissolving/re-hydrating the organics so they could be cleared off, along with the more pure
carbon which is extremely soft and brittle and needs the other layer to adhere..
I'm not saying such a task is easy, or even that I would be able to do it, but AJKOER claims need extraordinary proof.
If all that hydrogen peroxide was consumed in dissolving stainless steel, and there is now a proportional amount of heavy metal ions in
solution, make sure you wash the pan very well the normal way before using it again.
|
|
|
Ubya
International Hazard
Posts: 1247
Registered: 23-11-2017
Location: Rome-Italy
Member Is Offline
Mood: I'm a maddo scientisto!!!
|
|
| Quote: |
measure the concentration of your hydrogen peroxide both BEFORE and AFTER being used to clean the pan, then you'll know for sure how much went into
dissolving the stainless steel and how much went into dissolving/re-hydrating the organics so they could be cleared off, along with the more pure
carbon which is extremely soft and brittle and needs the other layer to adhere.. |
oi oi wait there, that looks like the scientific method, something AJOKER doesn't comprehend. speculation is the key word, why testing an hypothesis
if you can speculate as truth?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
feel free to correct my grammar, or any mistakes i make
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4333
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by AJKOER | | This is a fair comment, but my personal experience in the process suggested to me that there was actually limited dissolving of the burnt-on carbon,
and much more of it just entering the solution as a particle suspension. |
You can't tell me that you can tell by visual inspection how much of the charred mass was carbon and how much of it was black organic material of
indefinite composition. Even if only a very minor portion of the charred material dissolves, that will soften the mass and lead it to being suspended
particles that are easier to remove.
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
G-Coupled
Hazard to Others
Posts: 287
Registered: 9-3-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slightly triturated
|
|
Has anyone tried Sodium Metasilicate as a cleaner for grease/fat/cooking residues?
It's supposed to form a 'very basic' solution with water which sounds good for the job.
[Edited on 1-12-2019 by G-Coupled]
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by DraconicAcid | ....
You can't tell me that you can tell by visual inspection how much of the charred mass was carbon and how much of it was black organic material of
indefinite composition. Even if only a very minor portion of the charred material dissolves, that will soften the mass and lead it to being suspended
particles that are easier to remove. |
Actually, my relative estimate is that there was more particle mass (as I was scrapping continuously with the metal spoon forming particles) than
dissolved organic material present.
As to whether the cleaning is primarily due to loosening as a consequence of surface anodic reaction or from softening of the organic carbon, is, in
my opinion, to be opined upon by others who are presented with a cooking accident.
One should also first try just boiling water and scrapping, as that alone may be better than expected. If not, proceed to the household 3% H2O2 (which
is acidic) with added sea salt process.
[Edited on 1-12-2019 by AJKOER]
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4333
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
Did you try it without the salt? Or did you just assume that it had to be there for your imagined free radical pathway?
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
G-Coupled
Hazard to Others
Posts: 287
Registered: 9-3-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slightly triturated
|
|
Piranha Solution - Go Big or Go Home!
[Edited on 1-12-2019 by G-Coupled]
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
No, I viewed the experiment as a one-shot deal.
For me, the presence of the noble carbon and the stainless steel in an aqueous mix, could in my speculation, benefit from some electrochemistry, which
suggests the use of NaCl. With electrons and added H2O2, especially in the presence of Fe, Fenton chemistry is likely adding some radical activity.
A suspension of carbon, by itself, could provide a local surface concentration of electrons. The latter may assist in recycling any transition
metal(s) engaged in a fenton reaction. The latter views are advanced and complex by nature, hence my opening electrochemical perspective.
Also, I should cite my prior comments on SM at https://www.sciencemadness.org/whisper/viewthread.php?tid=15... to quote:
"Apparently, burnt vegetables in contact with air and food acids can convert chlorine bleach to ClO3- (in place of IO3- here) and boom, as I noted
previously on SM:
"Carbon produced by accidentally burning vegetables is also a source of radicals especially in a pan (of Al or Fe?) with boiling bleach. In fact,
there is a report in Bretherick on an explosion occurring by someone trying to clean a pot with burnt vegetables on boiling with NaOCl, and forgetting
it was on the stove! An accidentally revealed chlorate route!"
So the unsafe idea of using boiling bleach to attack burnt carbon has been around, likely due to some success. My thought was to substitute safer H2O2
and remove the chlorate explosion part! The incidental creation of chlorate, by the way, suggests to me possible radical activity leading to higher
chlorate yield, which would produce an explosion worthy of reporting in the literature.
[Edited on 1-12-2019 by AJKOER]
|
|
|
stoichiometric_steve
National Hazard
Posts: 827
Registered: 14-12-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: satyric
|
|
I think NaOH should have done the job just as well, without attacking the metal too much.
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Perhaps as effective but with no possible discoloring?
And then, there is the safety issue (burns).
Leaving a pot loaded with lye laying around in the kitchen does not impress me as wise either.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I'm told that, if you leave the pan outside, the local slugs will eat the burnt on food.
AJKOER will presumably construe this as a free radical reaction.
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by unionised | I'm told that, if you leave the pan outside, the local slugs will eat the burnt on food.
AJKOER will presumably construe this as a free radical reaction. |
Provide a FREE lunch for slugs, what a RADICAL idea resulting in a welcomed REACTION, I suspect.
[Edited on 1-12-2019 by AJKOER]
|
|
|
G-Coupled
Hazard to Others
Posts: 287
Registered: 9-3-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slightly triturated
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by AJKOER | | Quote: Originally posted by unionised | I'm told that, if you leave the pan outside, the local slugs will eat the burnt on food.
AJKOER will presumably construe this as a free radical reaction. |
Provide a FREE lunch for slugs, what a RADICAL idea resulting in a welcomed REACTION, I suspect. |
Your username is an anagram of 'A JOKER'.
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4333
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
I just assumed he had mis-typed it.
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Jokes aside, there is nothing funny about people putting their roasting pans in the trash because they believe that the pans cannot be cleaned!
Per this site https://cleanmyspace.com/clean-food-off-a-burnt-pot-or-pan/ the provided remedies include boiling water with added NaHCO3 or NaCl and a
pre-treatment with vinegar.
A review of my reaction mechanics suggests that adding NaHCO3 at some point may be of assistance due to the formation of the carbonate radical:
•OH + HCO3- = H2O + •CO3-
While the carbonate radical is less powerful than the hydroxyl radical, it has two other advantages. First, it possesses a longer half-life and it is
a more selective. In particular, it will attack some compounds (and not others) and can, depending on the organic compound present, actually produce
better results!
So, adding Baking Soda could be advantageous if available, although I am not sure if starting with a mix containing NaHCO3 is best as alkaline H2O2 is
more readily decomposed.
[Edited on 2-12-2019 by AJKOER]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
