| Pages:
1
..
7
8
9
10
11
..
22 |
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6320
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
DeltaH, what a great find. That is just fascinating. I have downloaded a pdf version that I can peruse at my leisure.
I noticed that he mentioned addition of CuO improved things even further. I guess if you have access to CuSO4 and NaCO3 then CuO is an easy synthesis
from otc products -- that it if it is not otc itself.
I need to read carefully and thoroughly. After a quick skim my first thought was to tumble the beans/peanuts in MnO before starting. That stuff
sticks to everything. (Although, in the case of battery gunk it is more the graphite powder that sticks.) I never thought of soaking in KMnO4, but
that sounds promising too.
I have done a (mental) redesign of my spray system. I am still mulling over options for my redesigned furnace. Catalysts sound like a great idea and
there are a couple of options that can be tried. Sopermarket over the road doesn't stock soy beans but I am sure that I can find some. Failing that,
I can re-do the peanuts. Suddenly there are a whole lot of variables to play with.
Suddenly this whole thing jumped up a notch.
|
|
|
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline
Mood: Heavily protonated
|
|
Yeah I got lucky, but it was blogfast's suggestion of MnO2 that got me digging.
Tumbling sounds great, bashing with a propeller internally... even better.
My ten cents worth: I also suggest pre-cooling the flue gas through a water cooled condenser (if you have one) or simply a coiled pipe before feeding
to the cold water absorber. I also think this final absorber could simply be a vertical plastic pipe packed with crushed ice! The ice would melt
gradually (hence some precooling can economise on the speed of the melting) and would also have a nice big surface area. I'd make it a column if
possible and feed the flue gas from the bottom and tap off the acid from the bottom. The top of the column can be left open and fresh ice added
constantly as the level dips. This counter-current approach would maximise the concentration of the acid pulled from the bottom.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6320
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
I think I mentioned before that I have no experience of choosing a catalyst but obviously transition metals are the go and I follow blogfast's
reasoning on oxides. MnO2 was always going to be an obvious start point since it is so readily available.
I am not going to bash the beans. I want the air to be able to circulate around them easily during combustion. And I am trying to avoid having to
construct a whole lot of pumping and mechanical equipment.
I agree wholeheartedly on cooling the flue has and ideally the water spray too. I am not so sold on the crushed ice. I think it will inhibit gas
flow too much. And it won't provide the surface area of a fine spray. However, I can't see a simple way of active cooling with my modified design.
What I think I will do instead is go for a high volume of spray for both cooling and absorption and plan on some serious reduction once the dilute
acid is collected. It is summer here. My tank of rainwater is sitting at around 24°C and so is not that cold. But I expect some evaporative
cooling to occur as well so that is something.
The whole set-up will be ridiculously simple. But I am waiting on a couple of purchases to arrive before I make another attempt.
|
|
|
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline
Mood: Heavily protonated
|
|
Best of luck j_sum1, I'm really looking forward to your results!
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
j_sum1:
Don't use battery gunge though. It contains lots of graphite, a reducer. At a very minimum use pottery grade MnO2 or decent homemade.
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Would a bottle of Soy Sauce be of any use ?
http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/download/92538/81...
Page 4 says ~16.5g/kg Nitrogen.
|
|
|
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline
Mood: Heavily protonated
|
|
Save it for your sushi  One can also use dry lentils, which I assume is readily
available in grocery stores nearly everywhere, if soybeans aren't. Lentils are pretty high in protein, though not as high as soybean. Pound for pound,
soybean is the cheapest plant protein source AFAIK. A 100% protein is also not a good idea because it might be harder to combust, so I wouldn't use
protein powders like those that bodybuilders do, e.g. whey powder. I think legume beans are optimal for this type of experiment, be it soy or lentil
based. I know j_sum is a fan of peanuts, but they're pricey here. I always keep thinking forward in-case one of these crazy things
works and one would want to scale-up.
[Edited on 3-2-2015 by deltaH]
|
|
|
Hawkguy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 326
Registered: 10-10-2014
Location: British Columbia (Canada eh!)
Member Is Offline
Mood: Body is Ready
|
|
Is the challenge still on? If so it wouldn't be a bad idea to just make KNO3 via the french method, and H2SO4 by sulfur (tomato dust) burning [ S8 +
8O2 -> 8SO2, SO2 + H2O -> H2SO3, 2H2SO3 + O2 -> H2SO4]...
|
|
|
Hawkguy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 326
Registered: 10-10-2014
Location: British Columbia (Canada eh!)
Member Is Offline
Mood: Body is Ready
|
|
Last time I did that I failed, but that wasn't for lack of effort. Has anyone else succeeded through that method?
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6320
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Hawkguy  | | Is the challenge still on? If so it wouldn't be a bad idea to just make KNO3 via the french method, and H2SO4 by sulfur (tomato dust) burning [ S8 +
8O2 -> 8SO2, SO2 + H2O -> H2SO3, 2H2SO3 + O2 -> H2SO4]... |
I don't believe that pathway works.
The commercial process is to oxidise SO2 to SO3 in the presence of a vanadium pentoxide catalyst. Then that is converted to H2SO4 with water.
V2O5 means that it is no longer an otc process.
SO3 more than likely means that it is not a back yard process.
Others more knowledgeable than I am may provide a work around -- perhaps using H2O2. But if there is one, I am not aware of it.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6320
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25 | j_sum1:
Don't use battery gunge though. It contains lots of graphite, a reducer. At a very minimum use pottery grade MnO2 or decent homemade.
|
You're right. I hadn't been thinking of the graphite as a reducer. I do have pottery grade MnO2 so can use that. The thing is, I have also been
disassembling cells and attempting to purify the gunk -- with limited success. (Getting the Fe out is a bit of a dog.) Since I have large volumes of
the stuff I thought I might use it but I can see that the graphite will get in the way.
Pre-burning of the graphite is not likely to work either. Not unless I can get some kind of furnace with a stirred bed and filtered gas extraction to
contain the fines. I am not going there. Pottery grade it is.
|
|
|
deltaH
Dangerous source of unreferenced speculation
Posts: 1663
Registered: 30-9-2013
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline
Mood: Heavily protonated
|
|
I believe it was stated in that thesis that regular MnO2 doesn't work... you need to prepare it in an active form. His methods involve KMnO4. This is
sold in pharmacies in South Africa... though I haven't actually checked in the last 5 years if it's still so.
[Edited on 4-2-2015 by deltaH]
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Hawkguy | | Is the challenge still on? If so it wouldn't be a bad idea to just make KNO3 via the french method, and H2SO4 by sulfur (tomato dust) burning [ S8 +
8O2 -> 8SO2, SO2 + H2O -> H2SO3, 2H2SO3 + O2 -> H2SO4]... |
Yeah. It's still On - nobody Won it yet !
|
|
|
Shivachemist
Harmless
Posts: 30
Registered: 1-2-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
How about preparing Nitric acid from these compounds? Can you buy these from garden or agricultural supply store or from supermarket?
(i) Calcium nitrate (Norwegian saltpeter)
(iii) Hydrochloric acid (Muriatic acid)
(iii) Potassium or Sodium metabisulfite (Campden tablets)
(iv) Apparatus to dissolve gases (delivery tube)
|
|
|
plante1999
International Hazard
Posts: 1936
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad as a hatter
|
|
Not the first one.
|
|
|
Shivachemist
Harmless
Posts: 30
Registered: 1-2-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
oh darn, you can make both dilute sulfuric acid and dilute nitric acid by this method. Not sure about the concentration though, did not try to
concentrate it when I made it last time.
|
|
|
Pasrules
Hazard to Self
Posts: 78
Registered: 4-1-2015
Location: Yellow Cake Deposit
Member Is Offline
Mood: Lacking an S orbital
|
|
Firstly do not try to make this
Secondly do not try to make this
Any welder suppler will sell Acetylene for braising or cutting steel
Any art supplier will sell Silver nitrate for prints
As the "precipitate" falls out of solution nitric acid will be left behind.
Again do not try to make nitric acid by this method as it is highly dangerous.
Side note: When cleaning welds on stainless steel we use a compound called pickling paste/liquid it is a mixture of HF and HNO3. It doesn't follow the
rules of the challenge but try to separate it if you need nitric.
@Hawkguy don't try to burn tomato dust, we make that mixture at my workplace and one of the anti-biologicals ($30K a liter) in it is very dangerous
although i doubt you would get near enough of the stuff to cause injury.
[Edited on 11-2-2015 by Pasrules]
Atropine, Bicarb, Calcium.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Pasrules |
As the "precipitate" falls out of solution nitric acid will be left behind.
Again do not try to make nitric acid by this method as it is highly dangerous. |
Dangerous? Dangerous to your bank account, that's certainly true!
| Quote: Originally posted by Pasrules | | Side note: When cleaning welds on stainless steel we use a compound called pickling paste/liquid it is a mixture of HF and HNO3.
|
You talk about danger but have no problem removing HF from such a solution?
| Quote: Originally posted by Pasrules | | @Hawkguy don't try to burn tomato dust, we make that mixture at my workplace and one of the anti-biologicals ($30K a liter) in it is very dangerous
although i doubt you would get near enough of the stuff to cause injury. |
A slightly contradictory statement, I feel. What is this mystery 'anti-biological' anyway?
|
|
|
Pasrules
Hazard to Self
Posts: 78
Registered: 4-1-2015
Location: Yellow Cake Deposit
Member Is Offline
Mood: Lacking an S orbital
|
|
To retort
I choose the most expensive route to discourage people from trying it.
I am not experienced in dealing with gaseous HF nor do I expect anybody to attempt to separate pickling paste. It is just another source that somebody
may not of thought of even tho it is against the rules of the challenge.
The anti-biological is actually an insecticide but the name escaped me at the time.
We use spinosad in Yates tomato dust which by MSDS is harmless but in the quantities I work with a single drop on the skin can take years for the
affected area to recover. However for the concentration in the packet the evolving sulfur dioxide is more dangerous.
MSDS: http://msds.orica.com/pdf/shess-en-cds-D010-000000021922.pdf
Atropine, Bicarb, Calcium.
|
|
|
Loptr
International Hazard
Posts: 1348
Registered: 20-5-2014
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Grateful
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Pasrules | To retort
I choose the most expensive route to discourage people from trying it.
I am not experienced in dealing with gaseous HF nor do I expect anybody to attempt to separate pickling paste. It is just another source that somebody
may not of thought of even tho it is against the rules of the challenge.
The anti-biological is actually an insecticide but the name escaped me at the time.
We use spinosad in Yates tomato dust which by MSDS is harmless but in the quantities I work with a single drop on the skin can take years for the
affected area to recover. However for the concentration in the packet the evolving sulfur dioxide is more dangerous.
MSDS: http://msds.orica.com/pdf/shess-en-cds-D010-000000021922.pdf
|
I have seen tomato dust that is just sulfur. It doesn't necessarily have any of the other compounds mentioned in the MSDS.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6320
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
And my tomato dust is copper oxychloride. No wonder I was confused.
|
|
|
Romain
Hazard to Self
Posts: 63
Registered: 23-12-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Crystallized
|
|
Hey, I just recently found out where to acquire 55 gallons/210 litres polyethylene drums and I thought they would make a great scrubber/dissolution
vessel to produce nitric acid. All you would need to do would be to fill the drum with water (say 10 litres, that's about 3 cm of liquid at the bottom
of the drum) and put a ultrasonic fogger inside the drum.
Then, any nitrogen dioxide pumped into the drum via a tube would react with the fog an make nitric acid.
Because the vessel is so large, the nitrogen dioxide spends a lot of time in it and is converted more efficiently to nitric acid. The ultrasonic
fogger could be coated in a nitric acid resistant substance, or one could settle with low concentrations.
An drum with a detachable lid is probably more suited for this use, to easily recover the nitric acid at the bottom of the drum.
One disadvantage of this scrubber is that you end up with 200 litres of nitrogen dioxide (even though dilute) which needs to be completely dissolved
before retrieving the nitric acid. For this reason the drum should only be opened outside (Or in your fume hood if it's large enough...).
Anyway, just an idea.
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Ultrasonic Fogger !
Sounds great.
Where on Ebay do i get one ?
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6320
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
Already thunka that one. And I used to have a fogger too... until it broke. What I don't have is a large plastic drum. My next attempt is probably two
weeks away and I promise lots of mist.
|
|
|
CuReUS
National Hazard
Posts: 928
Registered: 9-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Romain |
Then, any nitrogen dioxide pumped into the drum via a tube would react with the fog an make nitric acid.
|
and from where will the NO2 come?
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
..
7
8
9
10
11
..
22 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
