| Pages:
1
..
7
8
9 |
DrManhattan
Harmless
Posts: 32
Registered: 24-1-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yes, i use a copper sulfate solution to purify my acetylene. Without it my batch came out in match head sized chunks and black. Running it through the
copper sulfate solution changed it to off white/very light brown powder.
|
|
|
DrManhattan
Harmless
Posts: 32
Registered: 24-1-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I managed to find out why my caps were failing. I suspected that my SADS was not the problem so i made a cap minus the ETN and it fired fine. So i was
thinking that my ETN was the problem. I dissolved a gram in acetone and let it dry out. Once the acetone had evaporated i had nice crystals but they
were damp with some sort of liquid so i let it dry out for a few days till it was bone dry, assembled the cap and it fired fine. I guess the silver
acetylide was absorbing whatever the liquid was and making it very insensitive to initiation. Strange since the ETN was allowed to dry out for 3 weeks
and seemed to be totally dry.
|
|
|
markx
National Hazard
Posts: 646
Registered: 7-8-2003
Location: Northern kingdom
Member Is Offline
Mood: Very Jolly
|
|
I've recristallised with ethanol. Dissolve the maximum amount in near boiling EtOH over a water bath of course and then set to deep freeze to drop
out the product. The solution above the precipitate shall contain a lot of yellowish contaminants. Filter the batch and wash with distilled water.
Most of the contaminants shall be removed by the solution passing through the filter and the product left behind is of a very nice flaky appearance
with no noticeable impurities that could cause problems.
Exact science is a figment of imagination.......
|
|
|
FeedMe94
Hazard to Self
Posts: 87
Registered: 1-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by MineMan  | hmm
What LoL is proposing should certainly work, but the issue is if this goes of the primary is now 4-8 times more powerful resulting in some bad damage.
It is interesting, but LoL, CHP works fine.
75mg of SADS fails to kick off PETN sometimes... so this could be a real help to that. |
Well i know its an old post but... Today 85mg SADS failed to detonate hard hand pressed PETN. Should i try the KCLO3 mix ?
|
|
|
MineMan
International Hazard
Posts: 1004
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by FeedMe94 | | Quote: Originally posted by MineMan | hmm
What LoL is proposing should certainly work, but the issue is if this goes of the primary is now 4-8 times more powerful resulting in some bad damage.
It is interesting, but LoL, CHP works fine.
75mg of SADS fails to kick off PETN sometimes... so this could be a real help to that. |
Well i know its an old post but... Today 85mg SADS failed to detonate hard hand pressed PETN. Should i try the KCLO3 mix ? |
I like using KCLO4 instead. But yes. Add 30 percent. Just grind your KCLO4 as fine as possible. Secondly, use a renforcing cap. Davis describes the
glowing benefits of this...
It’s eseentially a strong plug above the primary.
|
|
|
FeedMe94
Hazard to Self
Posts: 87
Registered: 1-4-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
[/rquote]
I like using KCLO4 instead. But yes. Add 30 percent. Just grind your KCLO4 as fine as possible. Secondly, use a renforcing cap. Davis describes the
glowing benefits of this...
It’s eseentially a strong plug above the primary. [/rquote]
I have plenty KCLO4 so i will try it. Also i didnt have good plug above primary a bit of tissue paper to hold the visco fuse
|
|
|
XeonTheMGPony
International Hazard
Posts: 1640
Registered: 5-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by FeedMe94 | [/rquote]
I like using KCLO4 instead. But yes. Add 30 percent. Just grind your KCLO4 as fine as possible. Secondly, use a renforcing cap. Davis describes the
glowing benefits of this...
It’s eseentially a strong plug above the primary. [/rquote]
I have plenty KCLO4 so i will try it. Also i didnt have good plug above primary a bit of tissue paper to hold the visco fuse |
This is why I glue and crimp, you really really really need that to ensure good initiation when using non Azide primaries, it is a good guarantee and
performance enhancer.
If you have the capability Nitro Lacquer makes for a fast simple glue of relative fast drying time.
|
|
|
Vpatent357
Harmless
Posts: 22
Registered: 10-7-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Update Wiki - New method synthesis
"Instead of the conventional synthesis of passing acetylene gas through silver nitrate solution, a purer and whiter precipitate can be formed by
passing acetylene gas through acetone and adding the acetylene solution drop-wise to a dilute silver nitrate and nitric acid solution at ambient room
temperature."
Update Wikipedia
What do you think of that method for prepare SADS ?
[Edited on 19-6-2020 by Vpatent357]
Small blasting caps, fingers safe!
|
|
|
Belowzero
Hazard to Others
Posts: 173
Registered: 6-5-2020
Location: Member Is Offline
Member Is Offline
|
|
This could be interesting it would be much easier to control the particle size.
Passing the gas through directly gives amorphous chunks of different sizes which are somewhat annoying to handle.
Usually higher temperatures give better results but this would force the gas from the solution.
Surely this is less messy than the traditional method.
|
|
|
B(a)P
International Hazard
Posts: 1139
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Festive
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Vpatent357 | "Instead of the conventional synthesis of passing acetylene gas through silver nitrate solution, a purer and whiter precipitate can be formed by
passing acetylene gas through acetone and adding the acetylene solution drop-wise to a dilute silver nitrate and nitric acid solution at ambient room
temperature."
Update Wikipedia
What do you think of that method for prepare SADS ?
[Edited on 19-6-2020 by Vpatent357] |
I tried this method over the weekend. The resulting product was slightly off white with a very even and fine grain size. The yield was 96% based on
silver.
|
|
|
Belowzero
Hazard to Others
Posts: 173
Registered: 6-5-2020
Location: Member Is Offline
Member Is Offline
|
|
I tried the synthesis using dissolved acetylene in aceton.
5 grams of acetone was put in a test tube, the testtube was placed in water just above freezing.
A glass pipet was used to bubble the acetylene from a calciumcarbide/water generator, roughly 10 grams.
An attempt was made to weigh the disolved acetylene but my scale was unable to register the weight gained.
Partly due to the spilling of the acetone since the gas generator was hard to control.
.5 gram of silver nitrate was dissolved in 30 gram of boiling water and filtered since something contaminated my silvernitrate and went out of
solution.
The nitrate solution was allowed to cool just above room temperature roughly 35 degrees C.
The acetelyne/aceton solution was added to the silvernitrate solution in 3 steps and a white percipitate inmediately formed.
The SADS was transfered to a gravity filtration setup and washed with distilled water and a few ml of acetone.
Yield still has to be measured.
 
Improvements:
Drip the water into the acetylene generator for better flow control.
A washing bottle(s) to purify the acetylene.
Even this crude attempt results in a far better product than using the 'traditional' method.
The SADS is just slightly off-white, I'll follow up with pictures of the dry material.
[Edited on 26-6-2020 by Belowzero]
|
|
|
B(a)P
International Hazard
Posts: 1139
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Festive
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Belowzero |
5 grams of acetone was put in a test tube
Improvements:
Drip the water into the acetylene generator for better flow control.
A washing bottle(s) to purify the acetylene.
I'll follow up with pictures of the dry material
[Edited on 26-6-2020 by Belowzero] |
Nice write up thanks!
You could try using a measuring cylinder instead of a test tube to give you more freeboard.
I have good success slowing the generation of acetylene by adding I've instead of water to the carbide.
Please report back on your yield when your product is dry.
|
|
|
fdnjj6
Banned by request
Posts: 114
Registered: 20-2-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pissed
|
|
I have come up with a way better and cleaner synthesis during experimenting. I was frustrated with getting off colored SADS and began runing tests
altering temperature, different scrubbers, amount of acetylene, and time. This was using calcium carbide as the acetylene source. I recorded
everything and the hot solution resulted in very white SADS BUUUT they were in globs and covered in a black impurity.
My improved synthesis involves bubbling the acetylene into acetone which basically purifies it extremely well. Then I add the acetone/acetylene
solution drop wise with good stirring to the AgNO3 and HNO3 solution. A perfectly white precipitate forms. I have had other people on Reddit test it
out and they reported perfect results as well.
|
|
|
fdnjj6
Banned by request
Posts: 114
Registered: 20-2-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pissed
|
|
Damn it I did not see the other post already. I used the search option to find acetone and since he spelled it aceton, nothing popped up. I figured no
one mentioned it yet.
I'm not sure if he figured this out before me but I had figured this out and posted my results on just about every sub reddit I could find that does
explosives, months ago. I thought I was the first since no one had ever mentioned it on the internet and it was a discovery I made during my
experimentation. Based off of the replies I got on my post, it sounded like I was the first. I'm not sure though since something could've been hidden
or someone just never posted about it.
|
|
|
fdnjj6
Banned by request
Posts: 114
Registered: 20-2-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pissed
|
|
Sorry to spam but the yields I get are around 100% It is a very efficient reaction. I wash everything with water and acetone to let it dry faster. A
day later and it's ready for use in ETN/SADS detonators. It needs to be completely dry. Even samples that look dry often don't detonate properly or at
all.
|
|
|
B(a)P
International Hazard
Posts: 1139
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Festive
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by fdnjj6 | Damn it I did not see the other post already. I used the search option to find acetone and since he spelled it aceton, nothing popped up. I figured no
one mentioned it yet.
I'm not sure if he figured this out before me but I had figured this out and posted my results on just about every sub reddit I could find that does
explosives, months ago. I thought I was the first since no one had ever mentioned it on the internet and it was a discovery I made during my
experimentation. Based off of the replies I got on my post, it sounded like I was the first. I'm not sure though since something could've been hidden
or someone just never posted about it. |
I think that @Vpatent357 found the method on Wikipedia, rather than developing it themselves.
Out of interest have you compared performance between SADS from the acetylene dissolved in acetone method vs SADS from the more tradition method? I
have found that generally it appears the same, but this is just based on some pretty subjective very small scale testing. When I find a spare day I
intend to make some caps with SADS, some from the acetone method and some from the more traditional method. I plan to detonate them on a witness plate
to make sure the performance is comparable before I use it to initiate a secondary.
|
|
|
fdnjj6
Banned by request
Posts: 114
Registered: 20-2-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pissed
|
|
Haha funnily enough I was the one to edit that section in as soon as I figured it out. I was so ecstatic to have finally discovered something I
thought no one had before and so I posted it everywhere I could. I had forgotten that I edited it on wikipedia as well. I should see if I can add it
to the sciencemadness wiki as well. If you find my post on Reddit under the explosionandfire subreddit you'll see it was posted in April. If you go to
the Wikipedia article you'll see the last edit was in April. I was the one who made the last edit which was where I added in the pure white part.
Since I am not a professional and that was (what I believe to be) my own discovery, I didn't add any references. Hence, the big section in the middle
of the article with 0 references.
EDIT: I just added my username to the article. I don't know if that's supposed to be done but that way it gives some more credibility since it was
initially lacking any references of some sort.
Regarding your post, I didn't see much of a difference. In my initial attempts at making SADS I formed more SA than SADS due to lack to nitric acid
and so it didn't form the double salt completely. There I was able to see a lot more carbon left over and it was weaker. Besides that there were no
differences besides purity/color.
I believe that the light sensitivity had decreased a fair bit but it still was light sensitive. The main difference really was just color and purity.
There were no more black or tan silver salts forming from acetylene impurities. From a technical perspective, since more SADS is there due to lack of
impurities you would yield more energy but I think that the power difference is negligible.
[Edited on 28-7-2020 by fdnjj6]
[Edited on 28-7-2020 by fdnjj6]
|
|
|
dangerous amateur
Hazard to Others
Posts: 148
Registered: 8-7-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The thread is very long, so please forgive me if i overlooked these informations.
I wonder if the amount of surplus acid in the solution is crucial to succes, or has an influence on the results?
Most data points to some a 32% acid solution.
I'm asking because I would like to use silver nitrate, which I have plenty in stock.
Is there any reason why some people prefer silver over its nitrate?
Also since HNO3 is no so easily available these days, I like to save mine as good as possible. Just imagine you have to use the Birkeland process some
time in future. What a mess... Nothing to waste here 
So - is such a strong solution really necessary to obtain proper results?
Second question:
Considering markxs mixture with KClO3:
Is there a mixing technique that has proven effective?
It's been a while since I worked with DS but I rember it to have a tendency to from granules, or at least little agglomerations... To mix this
perfectly homogenous with KClO3 in dry state should be quite enerving.
Careful diapering, squezing...
Or would you rather use a wet process and break the resulting lumps afterwards?
My KClO3 contains a little silicon dioxide based anticake, maybe that helps a little...
|
|
|
markx
National Hazard
Posts: 646
Registered: 7-8-2003
Location: Northern kingdom
Member Is Offline
Mood: Very Jolly
|
|
Acid content in the reaction mixture does have an effect upon the properties of the resulting ds. Higher acid content yields a more energetic product,
but temperature control is the most critical parameter. Agglomeration of the product is quite normal, but is easily reversed if product was made under
optimal conditions of acidity and temperature. Stronger granulation suggests not optimal reaction conditions....I’ve observed it happening if the
temperature “sweet spot” was intentinally missed towards higher values. Manipulating any mixes of primaries is quite unnerving and requires a lot
of care towards safety measures. I would suggest to use a wet process with a easily evaporated solvent like alcohol. And do not go overboard with the
homogenisation....the reinforcing effects of the oxydiser are clearly observable with less than perfect mixing.
Exact science is a figment of imagination.......
|
|
|
dangerous amateur
Hazard to Others
Posts: 148
Registered: 8-7-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks for sharing your experience markx.
Yes I know that acid content has some influence, but I hoped to save a little of that precious forbidden stuff.
So it has to be 30%.
| Quote: |
I would suggest to use a wet process with a easily evaporated solvent like alcohol |
A solvent? Or rather a temporary phlegmatizer?
My choice would be isopropanol. This is not likely to dissolve a lot chlorate.
Still, to exactly measure the right amount, I cannot reduce the batches so much. It has to be 1g, I cannot scale smaller amounts with precision.
[Edited on 7-9-2020 by dangerous amateur]
|
|
|
markx
National Hazard
Posts: 646
Registered: 7-8-2003
Location: Northern kingdom
Member Is Offline
Mood: Very Jolly
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by dangerous amateur | Thanks for sharing your experience markx.
Yes I know that acid content has some influence, but I hoped to save a little of that precious forbidden stuff.
So it has to be 30%.
| Quote: |
I would suggest to use a wet process with a easily evaporated solvent like alcohol |
A solvent? Or rather a temporary phlegmatizer?
My choice would be isopropanol. This is not likely to dissolve a lot chlorate.
Still, to exactly measure the right amount, I cannot reduce the batches so much. It has to be 1g, I cannot scale smaller amounts with precision.
[Edited on 7-9-2020 by dangerous amateur] |
You can experiment with lesser acid content while still exercising temperature control to see if this has a deterioratory effect upon the vigor of the
product.
Yes the "solvent" is more of a phlegmatizer if (per)chlorate is used as the sole dopant. Not so much if nitro(ester) compounds are used for the doping
purposes. Would not suggest the latter though.....as impressive as the mix is, it still poses a devastating risk upon one's safety. And the
sensitivity + stability aspects are rather unknown.
Please try to keep the amounts that you intend to mix as small as possible. One gram range does not nearly qualify as small scale. There are very
satisfactory electronic milligram range scales available and their price is ridiculously low. It would be a good idea to invest in one, if further
experimentation in such a field is the goal.
Exact science is a figment of imagination.......
|
|
|
dangerous amateur
Hazard to Others
Posts: 148
Registered: 8-7-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Actually I have a scale with a 1mg resolution. Thats definitely not 1mg precision though.
edit: my scale is very similar to yours. I dont say it's impossible, but I would say forget about the 1mg digit...
100mg + 25mg should be doable, but the margin of error from batch to batch will be considerably.
I believe I could pretect myself adequately, but I hate to have to explain the bang.
Say - what is in your experience the lower limit for reliable initiation of not to hard pressed (lets assume a density of something like 1,1 - 1,2)
ETN or PETN?
I had failures with ca 150mg, but that was a long time ago when I did not monitor everything so closely...
From the experience shared in this thread I would use at least 150mg...
Another question:
What is your experience with decomposing DS, especially with long term storage, and when in contact with ETN or KClO3:
How easy is the acid liberated, and if it is, what will it do - especially considering auto-ignitions or the like.
Storage stability is one thing, safety is another...
I do not intent to store anything longer than necessary, but you never know.
My feeling is to separete the ETN/PETN somehow from the DS...
[Edited on 8-9-2020 by dangerous amateur]
[Edited on 8-9-2020 by dangerous amateur]
|
|
|
markx
National Hazard
Posts: 646
Registered: 7-8-2003
Location: Northern kingdom
Member Is Offline
Mood: Very Jolly
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by dangerous amateur |
Say - what is in your experience the lower limit for reliable initiation of not to hard pressed (lets assume a density of something like 1,1 - 1,2)
ETN or PETN?
I had failures with ca 150mg, but that was a long time ago when I did not monitor everything so closely...
From the experience shared in this thread I would use at least 150mg...
Another question:
What is your experience with decomposing DS, especially with long term storage, and when in contact with ETN or KClO3:
How easy is the acid liberated, and if it is, what will it do - especially considering auto-ignitions or the like.
Storage stability is one thing, safety is another...
I do not intent to store anything longer than necessary, but you never know.
My feeling is to separete the ETN/PETN somehow from the DS...
[Edited on 8-9-2020 by dangerous amateur]
[Edited on 8-9-2020 by dangerous amateur] |
Depends on a lot of factors and the actual construction of the energetic train. I've had repeated success with as little as 40mg DS, but on the other
hand straying from the successful combination regarding any parameters or components can land you in a zone where 150mg is not enough. So I would say
use whatever combination works for you. There is really no universal baseline to rely on regarding amounts.
DS seems not to like storage when it is mixed with any additives. Visual darkening proceeds faster even in dark. But in the pure form and kept damp,
dark and cool....a few years seems a breeze.
Exact science is a figment of imagination.......
|
|
|
dangerous amateur
Hazard to Others
Posts: 148
Registered: 8-7-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I'll have to experiment...
Thank you very much for your insight 
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
..
7
8
9 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
