Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  ..  6    8    10
Author: Subject: Gun Propellants: Single, Double and Tripple based
Fulmen
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1716
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bored

[*] posted on 1-11-2015 at 14:02


Although I'm sure it's beneficial, absolute uniformity isn't required as long as it's bulk uniform (meaning that two charges will have approximately the same size distribution). Regular black powder is like this, it's powder that passes one mesh and is retained by another. And the range can be pretty large for certain powders.




We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bert
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".

[*] posted on 1-11-2015 at 16:51


If one reads the whole thread linked, it is obvious that uniform ballistics (or personal safety of the end users) is not achieved by this manufacturer!

Different loaded weights, no or very little grain size control, local gunsmith testifies that he sees lots of destroyed weapons due to the ammunition... That the ammo was not "Russian surplus" was discovered AFTER the users had frequent problems.

I suspect either this propellant was manufactured much as some of the "pizza cutter" grains earlier in this thread, or perhaps it may even be broken up high explosive shell filler, mining explosives or something else cheap, explosive and equally inappropriate that was to hand up by the Khyber Pass.

The OP of that thread did post a video of burning factory 7.62x39 stick powder and a sample of this "weed" powder as he names it. The burn rate of the improvised powder is way faster.

http://vid1270.photobucket.com/albums/jj613/zainulabdeen/IMG...

http://vid1270.photobucket.com/albums/jj613/zainulabdeen/fak...

I did ask some questions, but the original poster has some more pressing business of late. Staying alive, primarily. He's a government official in Pakistan, and some locals recently decided he needed to be abducted/murdered.

Be glad, those of you who live where propellant chemistry is an amusing hobby.

[Edited on 2-11-2015 by Bert]




Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:

1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.

Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).

View user's profile View All Posts By User
James Ikanov
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 81
Registered: 12-7-2015
Location: Alaska
Member Is Offline

Mood: Zen

[*] posted on 13-11-2015 at 11:56


Hopefully one might forgive my laziness for not reading the bulk of this thread, but one thing I've recently read about in another forum is specifically ball powder.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_propellant#Constituents

The wikipedia article on it offers some surprisingly specific details and it sounds plausible that some variety of it could be made with some difficulty at a hobbyist scale.

Perhaps a simple sealed container with two valves and a cap of some kind (cap for pouring in the syrup and all the additives, one valve for raising pressure, and one valve for slow venting) mounted onto something like a ceramicists stand could be used to induce the formation of the individual balls?

Not a very simple proposition, but I think it could be done with a bit of effort.


Edit: Oh, bother, it seems this may have already been mentioned.

[Edited on 13-11-2015 by James Ikanov]




“To do good work one must eat well, be well housed, have one's fling from time to time, smoke one's pipe, and drink one's coffee in peace” - Vincent Van Gogh
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Hennig Brand
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1284
Registered: 7-6-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-3-2016 at 09:22


Bert I know you are trying to keep people safe, so I will start by saying that much I respect. I am a little tired, however, of a world where in an attempt at complete safety so much of the good things have been taken away and even a great many lies are told.

Quote: Originally posted by Bert  
If one reads the whole thread linked, it is obvious that uniform ballistics (or personal safety of the end users) is not achieved by this manufacturer!

Different loaded weights, no or very little grain size control, local gunsmith testifies that he sees lots of destroyed weapons due to the ammunition... That the ammo was not "Russian surplus" was discovered AFTER the users had frequent problems.

I suspect either this propellant was manufactured much as some of the "pizza cutter" grains earlier in this thread, or perhaps it may even be broken up high explosive shell filler, mining explosives or something else cheap, explosive and equally inappropriate that was to hand up by the Khyber Pass.

The OP of that thread did post a video of burning factory 7.62x39 stick powder and a sample of this "weed" powder as he names it. The burn rate of the improvised powder is way faster.

http://vid1270.photobucket.com/albums/jj613/zainulabdeen/IMG...

http://vid1270.photobucket.com/albums/jj613/zainulabdeen/fak...

I did ask some questions, but the original poster has some more pressing business of late. Staying alive, primarily. He's a government official in Pakistan, and some locals recently decided he needed to be abducted/murdered.

Be glad, those of you who live where propellant chemistry is an amusing hobby.

[Edited on 2-11-2015 by Bert]


I haven't spent much time reading this thread since I took a break from propellant research and experimentation. The last few posts needed some discussion some time ago.

Bert posted the following link on the last page of this thread, which showed pictures and discussed damage done by what was described as homemade propellant in Pakistan.

http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=518568...


I am a bit insulted actually to be compared to this. I did good research I think and was honest about the limitations and shortcomings of the propellants I made. We know very little actually about what these Pakistani loaders/reloaders were using for propellant. We do know by looking at the first few pictures that they couldn't even be bothered to make the loads even approximately consistent in weight which means that scales were likely not used at all when loading, which is actually the easy part, so what does that likely say about everything else done by them.(?) Although the grain size and shape actually don't look terrible to me, the huge variance in color between many of the grains suggests to me that the composition is likely not consistent as well (poor mixing or different materials altogether in different grains?).

Without intentionally trying to be inflammatory, I have to say that it is true I know only a little about reloading, but I do know about basic physics/ballistics and chemistry and engineering. I have also known many people who spent a lifetime shooting rifle and handgun as a sport and who reloaded and most actually knew very very little about the science of propellant manufacture from what I saw. They knew how to consult a reloading manual and read the numbers off the bottles of propellant and use the reloading equipment for the most part. Many also knew a lot about spreading old wives tales about drops of NG falling to the ground and leveling a whole building and about how dangerous and impossible it is to make ones own propellant. Most people, even those who use guns a lot, don't look objectively into propellant manufacture in much depth! It is an obscure topic, with at least 1000x more false, or at least very vague, information floating around than good information.


Points to consider for the homemade propellant in this thread:

1. Greater efforts should be put into making a more suitable grain type (cylindrical rather than flake probably), with consistent particle size, especially if it will be used in large rifle. At the very least flake size should be consistent and of suitable dimensions for the caliber.

2. Stability needs to be examined more, if it will be stored for long and especially if stored in quantity and especially if stored sealed.

Actually, unless storage was a big issue, number one is the only one that really concerns me to a large extent. Composition is also very important but it can be easily controlled. Actually particle shape and size likely can be easily controlled too once a little more effort is put into working a process out. As I said before, it would be hard to match high quality commercial powder without a lot of knowledge and work, but something serviceable and safe could be done, especially by those scientifically inclined, in my opinion.


[Edited on 20-3-2016 by Hennig Brand]




"A risk-free world is a very dull world, one from which we are apt to learn little of consequence." -Geerat Vermeij
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bert
Super Administrator
Thread Topped
27-10-2016 at 18:57
Bert
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".

[*] posted on 27-10-2016 at 18:59


I lost track of this thread, a year or more back, some thought it worth stickying and giving a more fitting name.



Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:

1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.

Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).

View user's profile View All Posts By User
Jimbo Jones
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 102
Registered: 15-10-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 28-10-2016 at 01:51


Quote: Originally posted by Bert  
In at least one place, the manufacture of improvised powder IS regularly done: Khyber pass!

http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=518568...

Found this posted by a Pakistani of another forum I'm a member of, with pictures of re-manufactured 7.62X39 rounds using spent cases with home made bullet, primer and POWDER. They are NOT careful reloaders nor accomplished powder makers...




[Edited on 1-11-2015 by Bert]


Looks like crashed Cordite or similar propellant of that type. I highly doubt that someone will invest so much effort to produce it from the basic ingredients.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Hennig Brand
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1284
Registered: 7-6-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-2-2017 at 07:06


I picked up a nice Italian stainless steel pasta maker at a thrift store for about $20. I only fully appreciated how well it would work for making nearly uniform flake propellant once I had it in my hands and examined it. The one I got either didn't have or was missing the spaghetti attachment, but it does have an attachment which can make two different, appropriately sized strips (different widths) and the set of rollers with adjustable spacing of course. Maybe I will crank out some propellant with uniform particle size in the near future (pun intended). ;)



"A risk-free world is a very dull world, one from which we are apt to learn little of consequence." -Geerat Vermeij
View user's profile View All Posts By User
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic

[*] posted on 18-2-2017 at 12:59


Quote: Originally posted by Hennig Brand  
I picked up a nice Italian stainless steel pasta maker at a thrift store for about $20. I only fully appreciated how well it would work for making nearly uniform flake propellant once I had it in my hands and examined it. The one I got either didn't have or was missing the spaghetti attachment, but it does have an attachment which can make two different, appropriately sized strips (different widths) and the set of rollers with adjustable spacing of course. Maybe I will crank out some propellant with uniform particle size in the near future (pun intended). ;)

Nice idea and inspiration...
I also have one, but never thought to use it for that purpose...so thank you.




PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)

"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Hennig Brand
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1284
Registered: 7-6-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 19-2-2017 at 02:41


Very welcome. The pasta maker idea was mentioned by Bert and one or two others IIRC earlier in this thread, but I was more focused on other aspects of manufacture at the time and was still developing an understanding of the significance of particle size and shape.



"A risk-free world is a very dull world, one from which we are apt to learn little of consequence." -Geerat Vermeij
View user's profile View All Posts By User
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic

[*] posted on 19-2-2017 at 05:45


It has to be devoted to that process ...
otherwise it must be cleaned thoroughtly unless we want cardio-pastas :D;):P:) (nitric esters you know...)




PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)

"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Hennig Brand
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1284
Registered: 7-6-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 26-7-2017 at 01:42


A little lowering of my blood pressure is sometimes welcome ;)

Ok, I was thinking about safe testing of homemade propellants. Obviously the low tech methods of starting with a small caliber overly build single shot rifle with a strong mechanism such as a tough .22 cal. is a good first move, as well as starting with a light propellant load and gradually and cautiously increasing while looking for signs of excessive pressure (there are normally at least a couple). However, it looks as though modern strain gauges and computers and readily available, or easily made software, would allow us to actually measure chamber/barrel pressure and graph the pressure curve for the firing event.

First article found while googling attached.

Attachment: Instrumenting your rifle.pdf (804kB)
This file has been downloaded 1159 times


[Edited on 26-7-2017 by Hennig Brand]




"A risk-free world is a very dull world, one from which we are apt to learn little of consequence." -Geerat Vermeij
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fulmen
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1716
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bored

[*] posted on 26-7-2017 at 05:07


I'm very fond of my old Pressure Trace unit, in fact I find it hard to develop loads without it. Definitely one of the better routes to go.

The simpler one is a standard rifle and a long rope. Measuring either pressure ring or case head expansion won't give as much info as the PT but it should provide usable data.

You should also check out QuickLoad, it's a very useful load simulator that can help you characterize your powders.

BTW, flake powder isn't the worst geometry to work with. Depending on the dimensions it should be fairly neutral burning, and if you sandwich a slow composition between two layers of a faster one you should be able to achieve progressive performance.

[Edited on 26-7-17 by Fulmen]




We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nitrosio
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 57
Registered: 31-3-2018
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 24-4-2020 at 21:17


http://pyrobin.com/files/Nitrocellulose%20Industry.pdf
http://pyrobin.com/files/Nitrocellulose%20Industry2.pdf
View user's profile View All Posts By User
B(a)P
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1139
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline

Mood: Festive

[*] posted on 24-4-2020 at 23:14


Quote: Originally posted by Nitrosio  
http://pyrobin.com/files/Nitrocellulose%20Industry.pdf
http://pyrobin.com/files/Nitrocellulose%20Industry2.pdf

Brilliant, thanks for sharing!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nitrosio
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 57
Registered: 31-3-2018
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 25-6-2021 at 03:02


Attachment: Normgas.pdf (16kB)
This file has been downloaded 513 times

[Edited on 25-6-2021 by Nitrosio]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nitrosio
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 57
Registered: 31-3-2018
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 25-6-2021 at 05:13


Attachment: Polymere Sprengstoffe2.pdf (14kB)
This file has been downloaded 474 times
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nitrosio
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 57
Registered: 31-3-2018
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 25-6-2021 at 14:48


Sorry: [C3H2(O-NO2)2] 162.06g OB:-9.87% N:17.29% 692l/kg
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nitrosio
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 57
Registered: 31-3-2018
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 28-6-2021 at 01:29
Korrektur


Attachment: Polymere Sprengstoffe2.pdf (14kB)
This file has been downloaded 454 times
View user's profile View All Posts By User
specialactivitieSK
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 94
Registered: 21-10-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 26-8-2021 at 01:07


How much solvent should contain Smokeless Powder mass by pressing to cordite or shotgun pellets.

And whats better as solvent, acetone or mix ether with ethanol ? Thx.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Alkoholvergiftung
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 177
Registered: 12-7-2018
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 26-8-2021 at 21:58


60-70% the wight of the guncutton are solvent. But bevore you need 30% of wight alkohol to prefent clumping. you can use aceton or an mix of 30/70% ethanol,ethylacetat. source : "Das rauchlose Pulver". For mono Propelant.
The mix was knead together in an machine used for dough making at last one hour.

"for the preperation of Cordit are used 65 parts dry guncutton in form of pressed cylinders 11,2cm high and 7,5 wide they are superficial mixed with 30 parts nitroglycerin and than pressed througt an copper sieve. The raw mass goes to an dough making machine that is filled with 2/3 aceton. After the starting the knead process the remaining aceton (73 parts total) is gradually filled in. After 3 1/2 hours knead time 5 parts Vaseline is added and the machine runs another 3 1/2 hours."

[Edited on 27-8-2021 by Alkoholvergiftung]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
specialactivitieSK
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 94
Registered: 21-10-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 27-8-2021 at 10:47


DEGDN lamels powder, first try with acetone.
Acetone is to quickly for drying, bubbles are there, may be vacuum is a solution for acetone or I try slower ethylacetate or ether, ethanol mix.
Must find technique for porous lamel powder.

2021-08-27-20-38-00.jpg - 1.1MB 2021-08-27-20-38-50.jpg - 528kB 2021-08-27-20-39-15.jpg - 1.1MB 2021-08-27-20-40-18.jpg - 856kB 2021-08-27-20-39-53.jpg - 886kB

[Edited on 27-8-2021 by specialactivitieSK]

[Edited on 27-8-2021 by specialactivitieSK]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Alkoholvergiftung
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 177
Registered: 12-7-2018
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 27-8-2021 at 21:07


Maybe more solvent. The Book stated first 1 to 1 mix guncutton solvent. 60 to 70% are engouh for production (Industrial).
View user's profile View All Posts By User
specialactivitieSK
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 94
Registered: 21-10-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 27-8-2021 at 23:51


So I used much more acetone. Its better but still Not enough.

2021-08-28-09-49-32.jpg - 1.2MB
View user's profile View All Posts By User
specialactivitieSK
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 94
Registered: 21-10-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 28-8-2021 at 01:58


Explosia reloading manual

https://www.google.com/search?q=explosia+reloading+manual&am...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Alkoholvergiftung
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 177
Registered: 12-7-2018
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 28-8-2021 at 02:57


They used rolling to highend desteny and to squez out the bubbles bevore they made the noodels.May be an way. Have you tested your powder?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  ..  6    8    10

  Go To Top