Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2    4  
Author: Subject: Sodium Ethoxide and anhydrous EtOH
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-12-2013 at 13:36


Well, I haven't read this whole thread but I do remember there was a bit of commotion in the organics section re. a patent for the preparation of simple Na or K alkoxides, by dissolving the relevant hydroxide into the relevant alcohol and precipitating the alkoxide using pure acetone as anti-solvent:

http://www.google.com/patents/US1978647

Some in the organics section claim this works well for Na/K meth/ethoxides. Worth digging a little deeper for those interested, I think...

[Edited on 6-12-2013 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
madcedar
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 116
Registered: 10-9-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-12-2013 at 18:56


There is a valuable post by Nicodem near the start of this very thread. Here is the link. Rosco Bodine has provided the patent you mentioned in the very next post after Nicodem's. It turns out the sodium ethoxide is really easy to make with nothing more than sodium hydroxide, ethanol and acetone.

[Edited on 7-12-2013 by madcedar]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-12-2013 at 06:54


Quote: Originally posted by madcedar  
There is a valuable post by Nicodem near the start of this very thread. Here is the link. [Edited on 7-12-2013 by madcedar]


That closes the circle, thanks!




View user's profile View All Posts By User
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
*****




Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-12-2013 at 10:00


Quote: Originally posted by aliced25  
Here's an idea from left-field

Add some aluminium -

I'm thinking that the NaOH will react with any oxide/hydroxide to give the sodium aluminate IN the presence of water, while any water will react with any clean aluminium to give the aluminium hydroxide, while the ethanol would react with clean aluminium to give the aluminium hydroxide via metathesis of the formed alkoxide.

Just a thought, there's presumably any number of problems with it, just thinking and typing while I'm looking up something else in another tab;)


I believe Iodine may accelerate the reaction with Aluminum to remove water from the Ethanol before adding NaOH. My take on a possible reaction chain:

2 Al + 3 I2 --> 2 AlI3

but, in the presence of water, a hydrolysis occurs:

2 AlI3 + 6 H2O <--> 2 Al(OH)3 + 6 HI (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium_iodide )

removing some water. Also, with the newly created HI:

2 Al + 6 HI --> 2 AlI3 + 3 H2 (g) (see Wiki same link)

or, for all three reactions the net reaction is:

4 Al + 6 H2O + 3 I2 ----> 2 Al(OH)3 (s) + 3 H2 (g) + 2 AlI3

and, upon adding 6 more H2O to consume the formed 2 AlI3, per the first equation above:

4 Al + 12 H2O + 3 I2 ---> 4 Al(OH)3 (s) + 3 H2 (g) + 6 HI

and adding 2 more Al to remove the 6 HI, again per the 3rd equation above:

6 Al + 12 H2O + 3 I2 ---> 4 Al(OH)3 (s) + 6 H2 (g) + 2 AlI3

Note, the process can be repeated, but the quantities '3 I2' and '2 AlI3' will remain constant while the amounts of Al, H2O and H2 increase. As such, the Iodine may accelerate the reaction with Aluminum although not technically acting as a catalyst (only a small amount is required to initiate the reaction regardless of the amount of water, and only that initial Iodine is transformed). This analysis can also suggest the amount of Aluminum to employ to remove any water presence from the alcohol. It is best not to have an excess of Aluminum metal, as upon heating, even a nearly dry Ethanol will start to attack Al forming the alkoxide (see, for example, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979JChPh..71.1537E ). Also, note that when all the water is consumed, the chain breaks and the initial number of moles of Iodine added is now 2/3 as many moles of AlI3.

I recall reading about the use of HgCl2 to promote the reaction as well.
-------------------------------------

Now, your idea of using Aluminum and NaOH together would react as follows:

2 NaOH + 2 Al + 6 H2O --> 2 NaAl(OH)4 + 3 H2(g)

successfully removing water from the alcohol, but also introducing Sodium aluminate into the reaction.


[Edited on 7-12-2013 by AJKOER]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
*****




Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Enhanced

[*] posted on 7-12-2013 at 10:52


Quote: Originally posted by madcedar  
It turns out the sodium ethoxide is really easy to make with nothing more than sodium hydroxide, ethanol and acetone.


But don't count your yields before they're weighed.




"You're going to be all right, kid...Everything's under control." Yossarian, to Snowden
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-12-2013 at 10:53


AJ:

It's not that simple.

Your second reaction, the hydrolysis, is an equilibrium reaction:

2 AlI3 + 6 H2O < --> 2 Al(OH)3 + 6 HI

Of AlI3 a hexahydrate can be prepared, indicating AlI3 and water can coexist to a degree. And the lower the concentration of AlI3, the less it hydrolyses.

In alkaline conditions, as 'aliced25' intended, it get even more complicated, because of the formation of iodide and iodate: 3 I2 + 6 OH- === > 5 I- + IO3(-) + 3 H2O and because in any case no free free H3O+ can exist. H3O+ is what causes your perceived reaction of HI with Al; not like you write it but in reality:

HI + H2O === > H3O+ + I-
Al + 3 H3O+ === > Al3+ + 3 H2O + 3/2 H2

In alkaline conditions, depending on [OH-] either mainly Al(OH)3 or mainly aluminate will form.

These are nonetheless silly ways to try an eliminate water.

[Edited on 7-12-2013 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
*****




Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-12-2013 at 11:25


Thanks Blogfast for the review.

I have corrected the hydrolysis reaction, but I believe my chain is still valid assuming the HI formed is not too dilute to attack the Aluminum effectively per the reaction:

2 Al + 6 HI --> 2 AlI3 + 3 H2 (g)

which would then push the hydrolysis reaction by consuming HI.

Well, at least, this is all my opinion as I have not performed this dehydration reaction myself. If effective, its relative merit would be accessibility (everyone has Al foil).

I also have made my comments clearer by noting that this dehydration step is prior to the addition of NaOH. The amount of Iodine is small so subsequent reactions with NaOH should not be of concern. I am not recommending an excess of Al, however, due to the introduction of NaAl(OH)4, which is soluble in alcohol (per Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_aluminate).

[Edited on 7-12-2013 by AJKOER]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-12-2013 at 12:34


Quote: Originally posted by AJKOER  
Thanks Blogfast for the review.

I have corrected the hydrolysis reaction, but I believe my chain is still valid assuming [...]


You'll need to test this hypothesis empirically first. Prepare some iodine water and add a (not too large) excess of Al foil to it. If it converts almost completely Al(OH)3 you're right.

Personally I don't think it will happen or that it will be a very slow boat to China.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-12-2013 at 06:01


Also, you really don't need iodine for it. Any old simple Al compound hydrolyses to some extent (assuming the anion is the conjugated base of a strong acid, just to keep things simple). That's because the [Al(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>3+</sup> ion reacts acidic:

[Al(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>3+</sup> + H<sub>2</sub>O < === > [Al(OH)(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>5</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> + H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup>

Subsequent steps of deprotonation would lead to Al(OH)3.

Solutions of said simple Al ionic compounds react acidic and would slowly dissolve Al metal, resulting in Al(OH)3 precipitation. Again, 'slowly' is the operative word here: the pH of these solutions is in the range 3 - 4 only.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sedit
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1939
Registered: 23-11-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: Manic Expressive

[*] posted on 10-12-2013 at 23:52


I know its derailed but shouldn't Aluminum be able to replace Phosphorus in the reduction of Benzylic alcohols using HI as long as there is enough Al present?




Knowledge is useless to useless people...

"I see a lot of patterns in our behavior as a nation that parallel a lot of other historical processes. The fall of Rome, the fall of Germany — the fall of the ruling country, the people who think they can do whatever they want without anybody else's consent. I've seen this story before."~Maynard James Keenan
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sedit
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1939
Registered: 23-11-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: Manic Expressive

[*] posted on 11-12-2013 at 17:31


I placed a small amount of I2 into a test tube with Aluminum shavings and H2O. At first there was a vigorous reaction which I quenched by placing it on an ice bath to ensure Iodine was not lost. Faint bubbles of Hydrogen where evolved from the Aluminum which slowly came to a stop. Heating brings these back so the hydrolysis reaction discussed above takes place at a very slow rate if heat is not applied.

As expected the Iodine color was replaced by a clear solution with a faint brownish tinge presumably HI solution. The Aluminum has been very slightly etched after 24 hours so this is a painfully slow process if there is no heat applied.





Knowledge is useless to useless people...

"I see a lot of patterns in our behavior as a nation that parallel a lot of other historical processes. The fall of Rome, the fall of Germany — the fall of the ruling country, the people who think they can do whatever they want without anybody else's consent. I've seen this story before."~Maynard James Keenan
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Organikum
resurrected
*****




Posts: 2337
Registered: 12-10-2002
Location: Europe
Member Is Offline

Mood: frustrated

[*] posted on 12-12-2013 at 02:23


Quote: Originally posted by Sedit  
I know its derailed but shouldn't Aluminum be able to replace Phosphorus in the reduction of Benzylic alcohols using HI as long as there is enough Al present?

Not completely but for parts yes.
There is an old german reference where they substitute P with Al and other metals, IIRC tin gave best results but I am not really sure on the tin.
But it was translated by me and posted at the HIVE as a good way to reduce the amounts of P needed, but it was of course immediately shot down by WixardX who produced some completely nonsensical sermon on poisonous tin complexes which mighr form and kill everybody around. Something like this. Well the man also said that reductive aminations cannot be done in iron vessels for Hg reacting with the iron forming complexes (there must be some obsession on this, or more probably he just doesnt know what this is).

Anyways it is doable, Zn is said to be a possible metal to use by anonymous sources doing unspeakable things to benzylic alcohols over and over again. Horrible. Imagine, if they are not careful they might end up with illegal drugs! Not harmless high explosives but drugs! Drugs kill!

The article is sadly gone with the rest and only memories remain in my devastated brain (drugs, you know...) and most probably a copy on lugh´s harddrive which he may or may not be able and willing to dig up.

/ORG




Irgendwas is ja immer
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Waffles SS
Fighter
****




Posts: 998
Registered: 7-12-2009
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 13-1-2014 at 08:39


I tried to make sodium ethoxide by reaction of anhydrous ethanol with Sodium hydroxide.

I distilled mixture for bring out the Ethanol that make azetrope with water and added more anhydrous ethanol for pushing this reaction to right side.

NaOH + EtOH <==>NaOEt + H2O

I used 40gr(1 mole) NaOH and 92gr EtOH(2mole) also added 400 cc excess Ethanol for making azetrope with water but it seems no Ethoxide formed.

I checked density of distilled ethanol and that was 0.793(near dry ethanol)and also i added calcium oxide to it but temp didnt increase.
somebody has experience on this reaction?


DSC00071.JPG - 58kB
Setup

DSC00072.JPG - 74kB
Ethanol + Sodium hydroxide

DSC00073.JPG - 92kB
Color of mixture changed after some heating

DSC00074.JPG - 76kB
Small solid start to float on mixture

DSC00075.JPG - 76kB
more solid

DSC00076.JPG - 76kB
after adding all Ethanol

DSC00077.JPG - 75kB
when all of ethanol distilled



[Edited on 13-1-2014 by Waffles SS]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 13-1-2014 at 13:19


Waffles:

Have you tried the procedure that uses acetone as an anti-solvent to precipitate the NaOEt? See top of this page for patent and links. That appears to work well for short chain alkoxides.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
*******




Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 14-1-2014 at 10:18


Quote: Originally posted by Waffles SS  
I distilled mixture for bring out the Ethanol that make azetrope with water and added more anhydrous ethanol for pushing this reaction to right side.

The difference of bp between the azeotrope and pure ethanol is less than half Kelvin. There is no way you could quantitatively remove water with a distillation employing such an insignificant difference, not even if you used a distillation column. You would need to add toluene to make a ternary azeotrope with some significant bp difference and still you would need to apply a distillation column.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Waffles SS
Fighter
****




Posts: 998
Registered: 7-12-2009
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 14-1-2014 at 22:07


Quote: Originally posted by Nicodem  
Quote: Originally posted by Waffles SS  
I distilled mixture for bring out the Ethanol that make azetrope with water and added more anhydrous ethanol for pushing this reaction to right side.

The difference of bp between the azeotrope and pure ethanol is less than half Kelvin. There is no way you could quantitatively remove water with a distillation employing such an insignificant difference, not even if you used a distillation column. You would need to add toluene to make a ternary azeotrope with some significant bp difference and still you would need to apply a distillation column.


How much toluene is needed?can you send picture of your suggested system?just i add distillation column?

Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  
Waffles:

Have you tried the procedure that uses acetone as an anti-solvent to precipitate the NaOEt? See top of this page for patent and links. That appears to work well for short chain alkoxides.


I tried it before.
I reflux 1mole KOH with 2 mole EtOH for 3 hours and then i added anhydrous acetone but i got no precipitate

View user's profile View All Posts By User
Metacelsus
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2539
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble

[*] posted on 15-1-2014 at 08:25


You don't need to reflux; just make sure all the KOH dissolves. I would suggest making a saturated solution.



As below, so above.

My blog: https://denovo.substack.com
View user's profile View All Posts By User
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2787
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: Big

[*] posted on 3-4-2019 at 12:01


When I discovered this thread, I, like everyone else, thought it was a huge breakthrough in the preparation of NaOEt. After all, NaOH is much easier to obtain and cheaper than Na metal. However, the method has not been successfully applied very often, and the use of Na is still preferred.

I think this is all related to the difficulty of working with anhydrous NaOH. The dry powder is very hygroscopic and easily dispersed; it will burn your eyes and skin; and it must be dried at red heat. Anhydrous pellet NaOH, as used in the patent, is virtually impossible to prepare without specialized equipment.

Therefore, it is desirable to replicate the method without using anhydrous NaOH. I was inspired by the reaction:

Ca(OH)2 + Na2CO3 >> CaCO3 + 2 NaOH

Unlike NaOH, Ca(OH)2 is not hygroscopic and is much less caustic. Na2CO3 is still very hygroscopic, but it can be dried at lower temperatures and does not saponify human skin. In order to prevent caking, I suggest the following protocol:

A suspension of one equivalent powdered Ca(OH)2 in freshly dried (eg MgSO4) ethanol is mixed with a suspension of 1.5 equivalents anhydrous Na2CO3 in dried ethanol and stirred for several hours in a sealed jar or under nitrogen (NaOEt reacts with O2/CO2), filtered, and the filtrate is treated with acetone to yield, hopefully, a precipitate of NaOEt.




Quote: Originally posted by bnull  
you can always buy new equipment but can't buy new fingers.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
SWIM
National Hazard
****




Posts: 970
Registered: 3-9-2017
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 3-4-2019 at 17:43


Quote: Originally posted by clearly_not_atara  
When I discovered this thread, I, like everyone else, thought it was a huge breakthrough in the preparation of NaOEt. After all, NaOH is much easier to obtain and cheaper than Na metal. However, the method has not been successfully applied very often, and the use of Na is still preferred.

I think this is all related to the difficulty of working with anhydrous NaOH. The dry powder is very hygroscopic and easily dispersed; it will burn your eyes and skin; and it must be dried at red heat. Anhydrous pellet NaOH, as used in the patent, is virtually impossible to prepare without specialized equipment.

Therefore, it is desirable to replicate the method without using anhydrous NaOH. I was inspired by the reaction:

Ca(OH)2 + Na2CO3 >> CaCO3 + 2 NaOH

Unlike NaOH, Ca(OH)2 is not hygroscopic and is much less caustic. Na2CO3 is still very hygroscopic, but it can be dried at lower temperatures and does not saponify human skin. In order to prevent caking, I suggest the following protocol:

A suspension of one equivalent powdered Ca(OH)2 in freshly dried (eg MgSO4) ethanol is mixed with a suspension of 1.5 equivalents anhydrous Na2CO3 in dried ethanol and stirred for several hours in a sealed jar or under nitrogen (NaOEt reacts with O2/CO2), filtered, and the filtrate is treated with acetone to yield, hopefully, a precipitate of NaOEt.


Stirred for several hours?
That sounds awfully fast for such low solubility.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fyndium
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1192
Registered: 12-7-2020
Location: Not in USA
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 18-3-2021 at 13:24


Quote: Originally posted by Organikum  
A sep-funnel or anything else with an outlet (faucet) at the bottom is filled to 1/3rd with NaOH pellets and filled full with EtOH of 92% or of higher concentration (preferred). This sits for at least half an hour and then about 1/4th of the liquid at the bottom is withdraw very slowly. Then the rest is withdraw. This rest consists of EtOH which contains sodium ethoxide. Distilled to yield anhydrous EtOH, sodium ethoxide is left back which can be used to dry more EtOH so desired.
If the alcohol is pre-dried with anhydrous CuSO4 which was dehydrated at 300°C+ much less NaOH is needed. This pre-drying takes time though, the longer the better in special if no stirring is applied.
If the ethoxide is whats desired the alcohol should be left in the vessel for longer time, if bigger amounts are wanted it is favorable to withdraw alcohol/ethoxide from top and water/NaOH/alc from bottom and to refill alcohol. This is an almost continous process then.

Tried and true.


I used some NaOH to distill my wiper fluid ethanol, which was +80C to start with, and it appeared to me that it came over pretty much anhydrous. Apparently, NaOH/Ethoxide is able to hold a lot of water behind.

Supposedly, pre-drying the ethanol with MgSO4 would reduce the need.

Last time I stripped some fluid, I measured it was about 90% with ABV meter. I did this without NaOH, as I thought it might not be necessary and to save some expensive NaOH. It seems that if I want less watery EtOH, I'll need to use it anyway.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
artemov
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 181
Registered: 22-8-2018
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 18-3-2021 at 19:54


Quote: Originally posted by Fyndium  

I used some NaOH to distill my wiper fluid ethanol, which was +80C to start with, and it appeared to me that it came over pretty much anhydrous. Apparently, NaOH/Ethoxide is able to hold a lot of water behind.

Supposedly, pre-drying the ethanol with MgSO4 would reduce the need.


Does distilling ethanol with NaOH damage boro glassware?
I need some anhydrous ethanol from ethanol contaminated with some water and ethyl acetate, thinking of using NaOH to get rid of the latter two, but I dun want to damage my precious glassware :P

Cheers.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Texium
Administrator
********




Posts: 4580
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline

Mood: PhD candidate!

[*] posted on 18-3-2021 at 21:02


Quote: Originally posted by artemov  
Does distilling ethanol with NaOH damage boro glassware?
I need some anhydrous ethanol from ethanol contaminated with some water and ethyl acetate, thinking of using NaOH to get rid of the latter two, but I dun want to damage my precious glassware :P
Unfortunately it can. I have a flask that I distilled ethanol out of over NaOH, and it has a ring around the circumference of the inside, where I guess some of the NaOH was deposited and etched the glass. It's harmless, but it certainly isn't aesthetically pleasing... my only 2 liter round bottom too.



Come check out the Official Sciencemadness Wiki
They're not really active right now, but here's my YouTube channel and my blog.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Fyndium
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1192
Registered: 12-7-2020
Location: Not in USA
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-3-2021 at 11:52


I have distilled ethanol many times with NaOH and never had etched glassware. I have used silicone oil and CaCl2 baths to heat them, though - direct heating methods can cause hotspots which will make NaOH eat glass at the end of the distillation, and when liquid is splashed to the walls. With baths, maximum surface temperature can never exceed the temp of the bath, which is around 100-120C with CaCl2 and 130-150C with oil, due to lower thermal conductivity.

I got a frozen joint though, which caused me a loss of one 3n 1L rbf and a stillhead. Thou rest in peace in the graveyard of experimentalism and amateur chemistry.

But, to the topic. I couldn't wait for my lab and did some rudimentary tests with my own boka-fractionated, polished and diluted 40ABV vodka and NaOH.

I first added a small amount of vodka, and added NaOH pellets and stirred, until separate layers were formed.

funnel1.jpg - 86kB

Then I added more, between 200-250mL, and added more NaOH and stirred, and the liquid heated up a lot, but not too much to handle the funnel. I kept adding NaOH little by little, until layers were separated. They formed bubbles and the boundary closed in just as in any biphasic extraction. The activated carbon residue used to polish the distillate can be clearly seen at the boundary.

funnel2.jpg - 91kB

The extracted upper layer was at first attempted to drain into a tube for ABV meter, but it had a pinhole, which caused a little leak. Actual measuring cylinder was dug through the rubble, and the ABV measurement and volumetric measurement were conducted. The ABV reported pretty much exactly 0ABV, but I hardly believe the alcohol layer would have been the bottom layer, as the upper layer had a very burning alcoholic odor, but the ABV meter is very sensitive and the most likely explanation is dissolved NaOH, ethoxide and other stuff. The total collected volume was 86.5mL as seen, which checks in the ballpark with the input alcohol, at 40ABV by rough calculation and dilution.

The amount of NaOH required is a lot, but not hefty, and obviously as this was 40ABV, the required amount would be inherently larger than when separating azeotropic product.

It should be distilled and remeasured to see if the resulting product is closer to anhydrous ethanol, but at least the very clear layer separation caught my curiosity if ethanol can be salted out from water with NaOH to make actual close-anhydrous ethanol.

Btw, the OP's funnel concept works for the part that it does form a layer close to the edge of the NaOH pellet mass - but the NaOH will completely clog the funnel and form a cone-shaped conglomerate that is very hard to break down and will prevent draining any liquid, even when poked with piano wire from the drainhead. Instead, just adding ethanol to funnel and adding NaOH pellets and shaking until layer separation occurs could be a more viable option. I have currently a batch of azeo EtOH stirring over MgSO4/CaSO4, and I'll probably strip a sample to see if any desiccation has been occured, and if not, I will do a full-scale treat on the batch and see what the resulting product will be. It is likely I'll do it anyway, because I'm running out of ethanol and simply treating the wiper fluid directly with mass of NaOH will both destroy MEK, detergents and additives and keep the residual water, so pretty decent ethanol should be able to be stripped directly off it.

For the record, I have stripped several batches of ethanol from this wiper fluid product. It consists of azeotropic ethanol, denaturants, detergents and additives to enhance the welfare of automobiles, aka crap that NaOH eats for breakfast. I double distilled this stuff, first directly and then with NaOH, although I only used 4% per weight mostly to kill MEK, I remember getting readings over 100ABV with the warm condensate, so apparently most of the water was also left behind. Using more, up to 10% per weight could be even more efficient, but in the long run it would be nice to find the spot at when the returns do not increase anymore and the rest is wasted as ethoxide.

[Edited on 20-3-2021 by Fyndium]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
artemov
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 181
Registered: 22-8-2018
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-3-2021 at 22:16


Quote: Originally posted by Texium (zts16)  
It's harmless, but it certainly isn't aesthetically pleasing


It's harmless right? I only have 3 rbfs, so I use them for everything, including boiling and concentrating sulfuric acid :P
View user's profile View All Posts By User
artemov
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 181
Registered: 22-8-2018
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-3-2021 at 22:23


Quote: Originally posted by Fyndium  

Btw, the OP's funnel concept works for the part that it does form a layer close to the edge of the NaOH pellet mass - but the NaOH will completely clog the funnel and form a cone-shaped conglomerate that is very hard to break down and will prevent draining any liquid, even when poked with piano wire from the drainhead. Instead, just adding ethanol to funnel and adding NaOH pellets and shaking until layer separation occurs could be a more viable option.
[Edited on 20-3-2021 by Fyndium]


I need some sodium ethoxide in ethanol for my barbituric acid synthesis, so I am thinking of trying OP's/your method:
In a small beaker add 1/3 by volume NaOH, then fill almost to the brim with near anhydrous ethanol, stir, seal, wait for a day or two, then slowly syringe off the top layer.

The top layer is mainly sodium ethoxide in ethanol I hope?

[Edited on 21-3-2021 by artemov]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  2    4  

  Go To Top