Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1    3
Author: Subject: two times neodymium sulfate; different colors
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-7-2013 at 08:48


Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  
The problem is that with HCl you're severely limited in concentration (max. 37 w%). Concentrated HCl often doesn't even make a dent in oxides that have been calcined. That's the primary reason for using H2SO4 95 % (or better).
Have you ever tried a Soxhelet apparatus for this? Freshly distilled HCl wouldn't change the ultimate solubility, but it might increase the reaction rate.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-7-2013 at 12:05


Quote: Originally posted by watson.fawkes  
Have you ever tried a Soxhelet apparatus for this? Freshly distilled HCl wouldn't change the ultimate solubility, but it might increase the reaction rate.


I can see where you're coming from this: a solvent free of NdCl3 would marginally improve rate of dissolution. I doubt if the effect is worth deploying the Soxhlet extractor for it though...




View user's profile View All Posts By User
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 17-7-2013 at 02:35


Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  
I doubt if the effect is worth deploying the Soxhlet extractor for it though...
It might not be. Another thing that might be tried with one, however, would be to introduce gaseous HCl into an adapter at the lower end of the condenser. This would allow working with HCl of higher concentration. If the condenser is operating at sufficiently low temperature, it should keep fuming down to a minimum.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 17-7-2013 at 03:53


Hmmm... I think I'll stick to:

* treat oxide with hot, conc. H2SO4
* treat cooled sulphate with strong NH3, filter and wash filter cake
* dissolve Nd hydroxide in HCl, filter off any non-dissolved matter.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
woelen
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 8014
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: interested

[*] posted on 17-7-2013 at 04:33


This is another interesting observation. It really is strange that you need hot conc. H2SO4 to get your non-calcined oxide dissolved, while mine dissolves with just gentle heating in dilute 10% HCl or 2 M H2SO4. I even note formation of some heat when the Nd2O3 dissolves.



The art of wondering makes life worth living...
Want to wonder? Look at https://woelen.homescience.net
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 17-7-2013 at 06:52


Yes, it's strange. I only dried it in a glass beaker on a hot plate, full heat, while stirring. It was completely insoluble in HCl.

What do you think of the water loss in CaCl2 desiccator? I need to repeat that one.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Poppy
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 294
Registered: 3-11-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: † chemical zombie

[*] posted on 30-8-2013 at 14:47


Your results are incompatibly outrageous, my crystal samples, made by evaporation, showed color differences normally not seen with liquid or powdered samples.
Here follows the link of a similar event, for those not familiar with.
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=25501
Pic are going to come when the camera is ready.
You have bigger of a problem than you can handle apparently.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Poppy
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 294
Registered: 3-11-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: † chemical zombie

[*] posted on 1-9-2013 at 18:55


EDITED:
Sorry mister, for our delay, here comes therefore the mentioned images. The difference is unoticeable, and it comes to being the crystals are very hard, and perhaps what else one would have expected for having crystalizinng skills like that?

Grating you on showing, good moods to follow!

C ya Poppy





Nd001.JPG - 30kB Nd002.JPG - 21kB

[Edited on 9-3-2013 by Poppy]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bezaleel
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 444
Registered: 28-2-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: transitional

[*] posted on 2-9-2013 at 04:54


Poppy, in the poicture on the left I notice that you have various crystals that are _very_ light red, whereas you also have cystals in there that are normal red, i.e. normal with respect to what you would expect from Nd.

What's the size of these crystals? Are you sure you don't have any lanthanum mixed in your Nd?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 2-9-2013 at 05:32


That difference is not significant, IMHO. One photo is out of focus and the materials seem to be lit differently. Even the background is a slightly different hue in both photos.

To compare the colour of these materials much tighter control of the photographing conditions is needed, otherwise one is comparing apples and pears.

To conclude that this 'difference' may be due to an impurity at this point is simply not possible.

Quote: Originally posted by Poppy  
Sorry, for mister weith your deklqay, [...]


Huh?

[Edited on 2-9-2013 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Poppy
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 294
Registered: 3-11-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: † chemical zombie

[*] posted on 2-9-2013 at 13:54


Ops sorry, I used a translator which apparently showed some typing erros, and as I was not at home I had to go and forgot to check the spellings - what the hell is that ?!

Referring to the images, one was picked useing TL bulbs and the other was taken on the shine of a flurescent tube. there is no great difference, and sunlight doesn't do different on them. They are 5mm - 9mm wide, mostly, and all of them showed this cube like shape, with stritiations visible in all sides. Cool, but I really think Woelen's original samples are fairly contaminated.
I used extra sulfuric acid in the motherliquor whereby the crystal where recrystalized, so now the crystal should be pretty pure.
Sorry, my camera can't handle zooming closer than that.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
phlogiston
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1379
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline

Mood: pyrophoric

[*] posted on 2-9-2013 at 16:47


It would be best if you could take a picture of both of your samples of crystals in a single picture (and therefore under one set of lighting conditions).

<i>PS.</i> please double-check you spelling, Poppy. Your English is good enough. Just get the spelling right, otherwise some words become ambiguous.




-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Poppy
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 294
Registered: 3-11-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: † chemical zombie

[*] posted on 2-9-2013 at 17:27


Quote: Originally posted by phlogiston  
It would be best if you could take a picture of both of your samples of crystals in a single picture (and therefore under one set of lighting conditions).

The crystals are the very same exact sample!
Woelen's vials are showing an unacceptable color pattern and most pictures of the dimmie's sulphate posted here in the forums seems to appear as a different sort of shape. Also, maybe they didn't grow large enough perhaps.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
woelen
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 8014
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline

Mood: interested

[*] posted on 2-9-2013 at 22:42


If these crystals are 5 to 9 mm size, then I think that they only contain Nd-sulfate at low concentration (especially the crystals in the left picture). They almost look like crystals of a colorless salt, in which some Nd-ions are mixed. I would expect crystals of such a large size to be MUCH less transparent. My reddish crystals are as transparent, but they only have sizes of 0.5 to 1.0 mm.



The art of wondering makes life worth living...
Want to wonder? Look at https://woelen.homescience.net
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Poppy
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 294
Registered: 3-11-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: † chemical zombie

[*] posted on 3-9-2013 at 14:58


This can't be! Check the thread on neodimium and you 'll see my yiled was already cut down by the sake of purification, and I steped through the oxide first, so iron contamination could go above 5% in the first crop. Its the third time I'm crystallizing the thing, and only sulfuric was added as a booster.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-9-2013 at 10:26


Quote: Originally posted by Poppy  
Cool, but I really think Woelen's original samples are fairly contaminated.



Not 'cool'. Tests upthread show contamination (other REs) to be an UNLIKELY cause of the difference in colour (woelen's samples).

See here:

http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=24851&...

[Edited on 4-9-2013 by blogfast25]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Poppy
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 294
Registered: 3-11-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: † chemical zombie

[*] posted on 5-9-2013 at 15:30


K I'll redissolve the crystals and precipitate them with Na2CO3 and NaOH mixture, because I think the evolution of CO2 may fasten the neutralisation rather than with solely water as product, boil in this basic medium for 1h, then remake the crystals.
My Nd2O3 oxide may have contained some NdCl3 as bfsser has pointed out.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Wizzard
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 337
Registered: 22-3-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-9-2013 at 07:11


How about I fan the flames, here?

To the left, my Neodymium Sulfate from a "modern" batch - Neodymium magnets made this decade. They have a purple/rosy color. These are from my previous large batch.

To the right, Neodymium Sulfate from a set of VERY old Neodymium magnets - From the early 90s. They are a beautiful amethyst purple. This is a partial batch, I have some more coming out of the solution.

http://imgur.com/PMcePZM Lighting is LED (Cell phone flash)

The only difference, aside from the age of the magnet's date of manufacture, is the method used to grow the crystals - They were both isolated with heat swing, but the amethyst purple crystals were grown at room temperature (20*C), the rosy crystals at elevated (50+*C) temperature.

I am going to try to regrow the remaining batch of the amethyst neodymium at elevated temperature, see how they come out.

[Edited on 9-7-2013 by Wizzard]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1    3

  Go To Top