| Pages:
1
2 |
teodor
National Hazard
Posts: 876
Registered: 28-6-2019
Location: Heerenveen
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by MidLifeChemist  |
Everyone - since we are talking about various gases like HCN, H2S, HBr, etc. - I found this very interesting page which lists IDLH
values / estimates (Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health) for a large number of compounds. Like @itsallgoodjames mentioned, the level for ozone is
much lower than other gases mentioned in this thread.
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/idlh/intridl4.html
|
I just repeat what I said before - without additional study this table is totally misleading.
According to this table these compounds have approximately the same level of danger: Arsine, Bromine, Chlorine Dioxide, Iodine, Ketene, Nickel
Carbonyl, Ozone, Phosgene.
And, according to IDLH, any of them is 5-10 times more dangerous than fluorine.
I never heard about deadly accident of ozone poisoning in a home lab. But cases of deadly accidental poisoning with cyanide in a home lab are
well-known, probably the case of Alan Turing is the most notable one. The same with Ketene vs Phosgene. The latter have many souls on its account
while the former has virtually no reported cases.
Was one aware about 10 ppm OSHA PEL of acetic acid when he was making his salad? So, there is should be no difference to make it with iso-propyl
bromide or benzene next time, according to OSHA.
Edit: I personally often use this table as well as OSHA PEL to plan general order of my experiments. This allow me to postpone working with some
dangerous/nasty substances until I will have a better equipment/techniques. And I totally agree with what B(a)P said. One should study all available
information as much as possible and postpone doing those things his lab is not suitable yet.
[Edited on 2-12-2020 by teodor]
|
|
|
MidLifeChemist
Hazard to Others
Posts: 192
Registered: 4-7-2019
Location: West Coast USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: precipitatory
|
|
I think it is also interesting to look at industrial accidents, although it is true they are using chemicals at a much, much larger scale.
For example, there have been many deaths / accidents in the USA involving Na2S or NaHS. It helps remind me to be careful with my Sodium sulfide (I
have a 1lb bottle) and that mistakes can happen.
https://www.csb.gov/csb-releases-safety-bulletin-warning-of-...
And if you want to look at non-industrial accidents, I think death from trimethylsilyldiazomethane tops the list.
[Edited on 12/3/2020 by MidLifeChemist]
|
|
|
Piroz
Harmless
Posts: 19
Registered: 15-12-2020
Location: Poland
Member Is Offline
|
|
I had around 15ml of liquid N2O4/NO2 (I had because after months it destroyed jar cap 5 times and converted into iron nitrate, the rest in flasks
turned into blue liquid- maybe N2O3?), now I have few grams potassium cyanide, sodium cyanide, nickel sulfate and few others.
|
|
|
Cou
National Hazard
Posts: 958
Registered: 16-5-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad Scientist
|
|
The most toxic chemical I've handled is probably bromoethane.
|
|
|
vano
National Hazard
Posts: 661
Registered: 22-3-2019
Location: Georgia
Member Is Offline
|
|
The most toxic compound I had, was dimethylcadmium.
|
|
|
roXefeller
Hazard to Others
Posts: 463
Registered: 9-9-2013
Location: 13 Colonies
Member Is Offline
Mood: 220 221 whatever it takes
|
|
Anyone know what melgar likely died from? It looks like he probably unpacked some chemicals from storage shortly before his death.
One must forego the self to attain total spiritual creaminess and avoid the chewy chunks of degradation.
|
|
|
Bedlasky
International Hazard
Posts: 1239
Registered: 15-4-2019
Location: Period 5, group 6
Member Is Offline
Mood: Volatile
|
|
The most toxic compound I ever worked with is probably thallium nitrate (but as a dilute solution, I never worked with solid stuff).
The most toxic things I have are:
Potassium dichromate
Small amount of mercury (elementar mercury isn't much toxic, it's very unreactive and evaporate incredibly slowly at room temperature, but it can be
easily converted in to toxic mercury compounds)
Sodium selenite
Vanadium pentoxide
Ammonium fluoride
Small amount of diethylenetriamine and his pentamethyl analogue
Diethyleneglykol
When I work with inorganic, I am comfortable to work with most of chemicals. I dare not to work with cyanides, asrenic and his compounds and
hydrofluoric acid (at least for now). I don't want to work with some very toxic gases like cynogen, HCN, PH3, AsH3, H2Se etc. But I am comfortable to
work with small amounts of H2S. I don't feel to make elementary bromine - honestly, I don't have good glasware and fumehood, so I simply cannot make
it. Bromine fumes like a hell and I live in housing estate, so this isn't good idea. If I really need some bromine, I'll make fresh bromine water just
before I'll need it. I do mostly inorganic, so water and KHSO4 or something like that isn't problem in most cases. I don't work with large amounts of
chlorine from the same reason - lack of good glassware for working with large amount of gases and living in housing estate.
I am not comfortable with working with some organic stuff, because I have just basic knowledge about organic chemistry. I also don't have space and
money for buying various apparatus, magnetic stirrers etc., so I am also very limited in this field. I also don't know where to buy lots of useful
organic chemicals, this is another problem.
[Edited on 1-1-2021 by Bedlasky]
|
|
|
vano
National Hazard
Posts: 661
Registered: 22-3-2019
Location: Georgia
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Bedlasky | The most toxic compound I ever worked with is probably thallium nitrate (but as a dilute solution, I never worked with solid stuff).
The most toxic things I have are:
Potassium dichromate
Small amount of mercury (elementar mercury isn't much toxic, it's very unreactive and evaporate incredibly slowly at room temperature, but it can be
easily converted in to toxic mercury compounds)
Sodium selenite
Vanadium pentoxide
Ammonium fluoride
Small amount of diethylenetriamine and his pentamethyl analogue
Diethyleneglykol
When I work with inorganic, I am comfortable to work with most of chemicals. I dare not to work with cyanides, asrenic and his compounds and
hydrofluoric acid (at least for now). I don't want to work with some very toxic gases like cynogen, HCN, PH3, AsH3, H2Se etc. But I am comfortable to
work with small amounts of H2S. I don't feel to make elementary bromine - honestly, I don't have good glasware and fumehood, so I simply cannot make
it. Bromine fumes like a hell and I live in housing estate, so this isn't good idea. If I really need some bromine, I'll make fresh bromine water just
before I'll need it. I do mostly inorganic, so water and KHSO4 or something like that isn't problem in most cases. I don't work with large amounts of
chlorine from the same reason - lack of good glassware for working with large amount of gases and living in housing estate.
I am not comfortable with working with some organic stuff, because I have just basic knowledge about organic chemistry. I also don't have space and
money for buying various apparatus, magnetic stirrers etc., so I am also very limited in this field. I also don't know where to buy lots of useful
organic chemicals, this is another problem.
[Edited on 1-1-2021 by Bedlasky] |
Potassium dichromate is often considered very dangerous. For some reason I never thought so, the main thing is not to inhale its dust. Dropping on the
hand and similar actions are acceptable to me or spilling the solution on the skin. Also I do not have fumehood so I'm forced to let everything go in
the atmosphere.
|
|
|
valeg96
Hazard to Others
Posts: 254
Registered: 6-4-2014
Location: Italy
Member Is Offline
Mood: Moodless
|
|
Potassium dichromate is banned at my university for educational use. Only research laboratories are allowed to use it.
Actually, anything with H340, H350 and H360 is banned within educational labs; they can be stored, but not used.
I'll leave it to your imagination to guess how sad some laboratories are. You got these professors who used to carry out synthetic labs where they
made azo dyes, Ni and Cr complexes, and all they can do now is soap making and Al salts, or oxalates.
|
|
|
vano
National Hazard
Posts: 661
Registered: 22-3-2019
Location: Georgia
Member Is Offline
|
|
Valeg it is very bad. I started studying at the university this year. It is considered to be the best university in my country, but I have not seen a
single flask yet. There were incredible reagents left in the school after the collapse of the Soviet Union. There are plenty of reagents, but I have
never seen any reaction, so I try to get as much compound as possible. I also find that chemistry around the world has become very weak. Compared to
old German and Soviet sources, after 20 centuries such large-scale studies in chemistry no longer took place. I can not understand why they want
compounds if dont use them. If I had the reagents that were in my school, I would now be a professor of practical chemistry 
|
|
|
Fyndium
International Hazard
Posts: 1192
Registered: 12-7-2020
Location: Not in USA
Member Is Offline
|
|
Btw, how are extremely toxic reagents like dimethylmercury handled in professional labs? In a negative pressure glove box? How do they decontaminate
the equipment after use?
|
|
|
medchemist
Harmless
Posts: 15
Registered: 10-7-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Fyndium | | Btw, how are extremely toxic reagents like dimethylmercury handled in professional labs? In a negative pressure glove box? How do they decontaminate
the equipment after use? |
One of my profs used to handle incredibly potent cytotoxic compounds that are used to make antibody-nanoparticle-cytotoxic type molecules that are
designed for targeted cancer chemotherapy.
Said cytotoxic compounds were so potent that less a milligram would likely be fatal.
He said they used a glovebox but I'm not sure if it was neg pressure, but there were very stringent measures taken in their handling, particularly in
decontamination.
As for dimethylmercury there's the added danger of it's volatility, so negative pressure is a bad idea here as it'll cause more to evaporate. I would
think that it is largely handled diluted in a suitable solvent and syringed from bottle to flask to minimise vapours from escaping and using certain
gloves as it is able to permeate many materials but this is a guess, I have never, and will never, use that stuff.
|
|
|
Xanax
Hazard to Self
Posts: 54
Registered: 28-8-2003
Location: Sweden
Member Is Offline
Mood: Curious
|
|
I extracted ricin and abrin from beans in my kitchen. Began to vomiting blood, and had bloody faeces. Think it's a few milligram is deadly dose.
|
|
|
Fyndium
International Hazard
Posts: 1192
Registered: 12-7-2020
Location: Not in USA
Member Is Offline
|
|
Extracted ricin in my kitchen? Sounds like a premise of a detective story.
| Quote: Originally posted by medchemist | | As for dimethylmercury there's the added danger of it's volatility, so negative pressure is a bad idea here as it'll cause more to evaporate.
|
Do you say that sub-millibar negative pressure would increase it's volatility to a substantial degree?
|
|
|
Fantasma4500
International Hazard
Posts: 1681
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline
Mood: dangerously practical
|
|
reading toxicity based on lethal dose is silly imo. ive tried being poisoned with fluorides (through welding smoke) and its quite nasty stuff. but
theres so many places you get exposed to it, its an accumulative poison. mercury would def be the worst of accumulative poisons causing very rapid and
irreversible brain damage, i believe exactly mercury is what killed my grandmother through faulty medicinal practices. just metallic mercury particles
inserted near growing brain neurons will cause them to collapse roughly 3 times as fast as they grow, "2 drops of organic mercury" video sheds light
on how nightmarish it really is. i do have half a kg of mercury that i keep locked up however. i also have some lead acetate i keep locked up along
with the mercury
i also have a bottle of potassium chlorochromate, it constantly generates chlorine gas from the HCl in there, so if youre in for that kind of a
rollercoaster you can have a try, cranking it open my buddy called it "instant swimming pool"
i also have some vials of ammonium sulfide, H2S is super toxic.
seeing selenium compounds is listed as toxic, i have H2SeO4 that i ironically use to avoid mercury toxicity
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
The most dangerous chemicals are those you don't know you have. I had a fun experience with carbon that might be mentionable.
I bought some bone char for some experiments that didn't work; the package said 0-16-0 (NPK) as though it was sold as a soil amendment, but it wasn't
sold to me in that way, and it didn't come to me from that seller on the label. (neither party offers any charcoal now) Now I considered it for
decolorizing (gallic acid from nutgalls) because of the somewhat granular size. It didn't work for decolorizing either. Maybe it ought to be washed
with HCl...fwoosh...instant H2S...A truly staggering amount of gas, bubbling out for a long time too. There is absolutely no indication that this
isn't virgin charcoal otherwise. H2S is fine when you're expecting it...
It seems that this is spent carbon which had been used to desulfurize something somewhere. No one wants to admit this for some reason.
I've mentioned a similar experience with pottery grade BaCO3 which was in fact *heavily* contaminated with BaS.
[Edited on 27-6-2021 by S.C. Wack]
|
|
|
Mateo_swe
National Hazard
Posts: 541
Registered: 24-8-2019
Location: Within EU
Member Is Offline
|
|
Is Ozone really that bad as said earlier in this thread?
I mean ozone generators sold just specify nobody should not be in the room while the unit is running and one should open a window after to air out the
ozone smell.
I have done lot of experimentation with high voltage and tesla coils in the past where the ozone smell was strong when running the high voltage.
I didnt feel any bad effects breathing the air even it did smell ozone.
|
|
|
Bedlasky
International Hazard
Posts: 1239
Registered: 15-4-2019
Location: Period 5, group 6
Member Is Offline
Mood: Volatile
|
|
I had lung pain maybe one hour after breathing air with relatively low concentration of ozone.
|
|
|
Mateo_swe
National Hazard
Posts: 541
Registered: 24-8-2019
Location: Within EU
Member Is Offline
|
|
Very strange i didnt get the same effects.
I know ozone smells at very low concentrations but i must have got some when being in that room playing with high voltage.
Maybe the concentrations are lower than one think as low concentrations also smell.
Wikipedia says as little as 0.1 ppm in air smells.
It also says:
All portable indoor air cleaning devices sold in California must be certified by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). To be certified, air
cleaners must be tested for electrical safety and ozone emissions, and meet an ozone emission concentration limit of 0.050 parts per million.
Thats extremly low levels.
Im going to try an homemade ozone generator in some chemistry experiments (i know peroxides and explosion risks) and the Ozone generator unit is
specified at 48 grams/hour.
If ozone levels over 0.050 parts per million is dangerous i will be dead just turning this device on for a couple of seconds.
Maybe one must be in high concentrations for a long time for it to be that dangerous as they say.
Also ozone decomposes fast in temperatures over 0°C, at least in solutions.
I wonder why there isnt more regulations and warnings if ozone is this dangerous as stated in many places.
Is the dangerous ozone levels set way too low or what?
Anyone know?
|
|
|
Belowzero
Hazard to Others
Posts: 173
Registered: 6-5-2020
Location: Member Is Offline
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quite often those limits are set very low, the chemical industry is one such example.
Also it is quite a different if this exposure is continous and permanent, quite different from incidental exposure with the proper precautions.
Smoke from burning wood is also quite unhealty, daily exposure to high concentrations will shorten your lifespan.
A couple whiffs every now and then is probably not measurable.
|
|
|
Fyndium
International Hazard
Posts: 1192
Registered: 12-7-2020
Location: Not in USA
Member Is Offline
|
|
Occupational exposure is never comparable to occasional and rare exposure. Workforce can be exposed to the materials for 8-12 hours a day, 5-7 days a
week around the year. Hence, even decimal ppm concentrations can cause exposure to quite significant amounts over the year, for every whiff you intake
few nanograms or so, but over the year you easily get grams of it in your body.
This is why I first look LD50, LC50 and known carcinogenic and biopersistent aspects, because they give a much better idea how careful you have to be.
Also, looking into perspective, some time ago I realized I treated sodium cyanide as an ultra-dangerous superpoison that I used excessive safety gear,
but then I once handled a powder in free room air without any protection that had three times lower LD50. It was considered toxic without lasting
effects (unless fatal) and it did not have any major warning signs like NFPA blue 4, but the actual LD50 surprised me.
|
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
NO2, Chlorine, Chloroacetone, H2S, SO3, Ozone, Ketene, Benzene, Mercury Nitrate, Mercury Acetate, lots of other stuff.
I try to avoid Dioxin and PCBs and Neurotoxins like Organophosphates and organo-mercury compounds.
It all comes down to what you can safely deal with and how worried you are about long term exposure.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6320
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Online
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
Probably uranyl acetate is my most dangerous. But it is pretty tame sitting in its jar.
|
|
|
Mateo_swe
National Hazard
Posts: 541
Registered: 24-8-2019
Location: Within EU
Member Is Offline
|
|
Lets say you want to do some reactions in your home lab that call for using one of the more high toxic compounds.
One can get one of these 3M 6800-type Full Face Respirator masks (or the Chinese copies) and attach different filters to them.
The filters are for different categories of chemicals like organic vapours, acid compounds, ammonia type compounds etc...
The Chinese copies are just about 40Euros, quite cheap for a life insurance.
But do these work good and is it safe if a accident happen and im wearing one of these?
Do any of you use such masks?
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
