Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2
Author: Subject: Methylation of phenols with Methyl Nitrate
panziandi
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 490
Registered: 3-10-2006
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bored

[*] posted on 9-4-2009 at 05:44


I added a solution of methyl nitrate in methanol to the reaction mixture, which was at a gentle reflux, addition of the methyl nitrate solution did not seem to produce any additional heat.

There shouldn't have been any free hydroxide in solution, I used a stoichiometeric quantity which should have reacted completely to form phenoxide, but I suppose hydrolysis could be an issue.

There was a large ppt, likely KNO3, and also there was significant product in the form of an emulsion when I poured it into NaOH solution. I lost product in a messy workup. Perhaps pouring the solution into a larger volume of water would have been more suited. Also, just an idea but it may be good to steam distil the products out of the reaction?

I would try methylating you hydroquinone in a methanol system using a 10% excess of methyl nitrate and refluxing for 4-6hrs. Try forming the phenoxide by adding the phenol to a solution of KOH methanol. You should use a protective atmosphere for using polyhydroxy phenols in alkaline conditions since they oxidise rapidly.





View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
smuv
National Hazard
****




Posts: 842
Registered: 2-5-2007
Member Is Offline

Mood: Jingoistic

[*] posted on 9-4-2009 at 07:34


Quote: Originally posted by panziandi  

I would try methylating you hydroquinone in a methanol system using a 10% excess of methyl nitrate and refluxing for 4-6hrs. Try forming the phenoxide by adding the phenol to a solution of KOH methanol. You should use a protective atmosphere for using polyhydroxy phenols in alkaline conditions since they oxidise rapidly.



This was by and large already attempted (see prev page); just w/ more alkylating agent and a longer reflux; of course if Nitrogen was available it would have been used. One mistake that was made though, was the 85% purity of KOH wasn't accounted for, therefore slightly less than 2eq of KOH were used in reality.

I do agree though, a steam distillation would be the way to go for larger scale runs, assuming the product is volatile w/ steam.




"Titanium tetrachloride…You sly temptress." --Walter Bishop
View user's profile View All Posts By User
smuv
National Hazard
****




Posts: 842
Registered: 2-5-2007
Member Is Offline

Mood: Jingoistic

[*] posted on 2-8-2009 at 12:53
A little late but...


I finally got around to taking an HNMR of the product from methylation of paracetamol. The product is indeed p-methoxy-acetanilide in good purity.


~7.4 - Ar-H (closest to amide) as well as N-H
7.24 - CHCl3
~6.8 - Ar-H
~3.8 - Acetyl protons
~2.1 Methyl

There is a slight impurity in the aromatic as well as some in the aliphatic regions however they are trivial. If someone wants to take a stab at identifying the impurities, be my guest.

Spectra:
Full
Aromatic




"Titanium tetrachloride…You sly temptress." --Walter Bishop
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
*******




Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-8-2009 at 00:09


All the peaks are consistent with the literature values except for the missing NH broad singlet at 7.14 ppm. There are some impurities signal at that place... maybe it is so broad that it just flattened (if you would have integrated, maybe we could see if it partially hides beneath the AA'XX' signals). The water signal is a bit far for CDCl3 where it is usually at about 1.5-1.6 ppm, but not extraordinarily far from where it is expected. Anyway, thanks for confirming and sharing the results of your methylation via MeONO2. It was an interesting read.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
smuv
National Hazard
****




Posts: 842
Registered: 2-5-2007
Member Is Offline

Mood: Jingoistic

[*] posted on 3-8-2009 at 19:32


Thanks.

I actually took a much better spectrum but was VERY rushed and only had time to print the aromatic region (and didn't save). In that spectrum the N-H peak is much clearer. By the time I got around to running the sample again a lot of the CDCl3 evaporated, I didn't bother refilling and ran the sample anyways, this is why the shim was so bad.

cleaner aromatic




"Titanium tetrachloride…You sly temptress." --Walter Bishop
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  2

  Go To Top