Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2
Author: Subject: Eugenol
Sauron
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline

Mood: metastable

[*] posted on 18-10-2008 at 19:44


You are right. But safrole, isosafrole and piperonal are listed. I appreciate your posting the link so I could refresh my memory.

Piperonal(dehyde) = 3,4-methylenedioxybenzaldehyde while the safrole/isosafrole system are the isomeric propenyl compounds. As such it is obvious why DEA wants then under wraps.

Vanillin and eugenol are the 3-methoxy phenols of same series, i.e., vanillin is the aldehyde and eugenol the allyl compound.

ALL of these can be synthesized from phenol to catechol to guiacol and so on. For a speed course (no pun intended!) on why chemrox says all of these might be listed in the future, just see Rhodium, and its ilk.

Of course I am epistomologically certain that all those threads about these are due to innocent fascination with fragrance and flavor chemistry. Well, it is a fascinating subject.



[Edited on 19-10-2008 by Sauron]

flavors.jpg - 62kB




Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
kalacrow
Harmless
*




Posts: 38
Registered: 23-5-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 19-10-2008 at 00:35


Academic interest, yes :) It is frustrating though, that such useful precursors to so many legal, interesting things are listed. What really gets me is the restriction on Iodine. Man! So many useful compounds are unavailable, and nowadays you cant easily buy any chemicals as an individual.

I have my doubts that Vanillin will be listed, as well as Eugenol. They are both traded in HUGE quantities in the food service industries, and are (were) definitely not anything like as rare in use as safrole and piperonal. Besides, you'd have to be an actual Chemist to turn Vanillin or Eugenol into the MDxx or other drugs.. I think it would be a very rare cook who could do it. And anyone who is an actual chemist could get there from any one of numerous routes... you cant list ALL of them, or you'd break whole economies.

Even benzaldehyde is restricted. Eesh. I see its a meth precursor, but it smells so good!!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sauron
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline

Mood: metastable

[*] posted on 19-10-2008 at 00:55


Oh? Are they traded more than toluene, MEK, acetone, or MIBK? Because they are all listed and you coulkd put the trade in vanillin and eugenol (forget the others) into a pimple on the left buttock of any one of those.

Does it take a real chemist? If so there are lots of bent real chemists aren't there?




Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
zed
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2283
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline

Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord

[*] posted on 19-10-2008 at 03:07


Many of the listings are meant to target the International Heroin and Cocaine cartels.
The listed chemicals are completely easy to obtain inside the U.S.. I can buy most of them at my local hardware store.

Others listings are aimed specifically at illegal, drug production in the U.S..
Those chemicals may be difficult to obtain here.

To a certain extent, listing is based on threat assessment.

In recent times, those drugs deemed most harmful get the most attention, and the chemicals from which those drugs can most easily be made, get listed.

Coke/Crack....Heroin.....Meth.....PCP....? And then, a bunch of stuff that probably isn't a threat to end civilization as we know it.

Ecstasy and Mescaline are illegal, but making them from Eugenol or Vanillin, isn't exactly easy. And, at this point, Eugenol and Vanillin, are not listed. If sanity prevails, they will not be. X isn't really that big a problem, and Mescaline is a rare substance.

From some perspectives it appears that the DEA is actually becoming less-reactionary, rather than more-reactionary. Recently, they have been fairly slow to outlaw materials just because they appear to be somewhat psychedelic. And remarkably, in some cases they have chosen against prohibition.

The Feds have plenty of bigger problems to deal with.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sauron
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline

Mood: metastable

[*] posted on 19-10-2008 at 03:48


You are pretty new here, so you may not be aware that the management strongly discourages precisely this sort of discussion. I am not part of The Management. Just a friendly bit of advice.

I would be really curious as to why KMnO4 and NaMnO4 are all of a sudden listed.

But don't post a reply. PM me or email me.




Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
jarynth
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 76
Registered: 12-8-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 19-10-2008 at 04:33


Quote:
Originally posted by zed
I'm a bored, over-weight, middle-aged, ex-housewife.

You don't sound like a woman. You also purport yearlong experience in chemistry-related activities, but your posts reveal your naivete.

Quote:
Originally posted by zed
From some perspectives it appears that the DEA is actually becoming less-reactionary, rather than more-reactionary. Recently, they have been fairly slow to outlaw materials just because they appear to be somewhat psychedelic. And remarkably, in some cases they have chosen against prohibition.


The DEA has no decisional power on the legislative processes that lead to the regulation of chemicals. It merely enforces the appropriate policies, although it does have some leeway in choosing which paths to pursue and which to ignore. Due to the mass of information continually gathered during its operations, it understandably has some influence on the legislators as well.

You seem to have a grasp of drug-related issues in chemistry but apparently don't see the difference in tenor between the various lists of precursors, or within one list. I highly doubt your local hardware store sells methylenedioxyphenyl derivatives by the pound, or even just acetic anhydride (same list as acetone).

[Edited on 19-10-2008 by jarynth]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sauron
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline

Mood: metastable

[*] posted on 19-10-2008 at 06:47


jarynth, please see my last post above. Polverone does not want drugs-policy debates, period. Not even civil ones. He has closed perfectly couteous threads containing exchanges just like this. Please, if you want to discuss this with zed, take it private. I would encourage you to delete this last post and I will do same. I don't want to see this thread locked. I doubt you want to either, but that's where it is headed if you don't cease and desist.



Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
smuv
National Hazard
****




Posts: 842
Registered: 2-5-2007
Member Is Offline

Mood: Jingoistic

[*] posted on 19-10-2008 at 19:33


KMnO4 b/c of 2-[methylamino]-1-phenylpropan-1-one; I cant remember the trivial name for this.

It is also used in the processing of cocaine.

IIRC some time ago, people were very worried about how easily ephedrines can be oxidized into fairly powerful stimulants.

Bah, mdma from vanillan and eugenol I'll pass! You can probably make piperonal from catechol with higher yields than you can make it from vanillan. But it doesn't matter, where there's money and guns precursors will always be diverted.




"Titanium tetrachloride…You sly temptress." --Walter Bishop
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Polverone
Now celebrating 21 years of madness
*********




Posts: 3186
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: The Sunny Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline

Mood: Waiting for spring

[*] posted on 20-10-2008 at 12:18


Please do not use this thread, or any other thread really, for broad discussions of drug policy. If you're not here to discuss eugenol, this is the wrong thread.



PGP Key and corresponding e-mail address
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
chemrox
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2961
Registered: 18-1-2007
Location: UTM
Member Is Offline

Mood: LaGrangian

[*] posted on 20-10-2008 at 13:38


@Sauron, nice images how did you make them? what sw?



"When you let the dumbasses vote you end up with populism followed by autocracy and getting back is a bitch." Plato (sort of)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sauron
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline

Mood: metastable

[*] posted on 20-10-2008 at 15:01


MDL ISIS, then Export as jpg. That actually generates a wmf. Then Photoshop to reduce the image size, and convert to jpg. In the course of that the image gets nice and bold. Dunno why. It is normal, thin faint lines on screen in ISIS and as a wmf.

Just renaming the wmf as a jpg of course works but as I have to reduce size, better to do both in PS and be done with it.

ISISDraw is free, always has been, though MDL no longer gives away the AutoNom plugin like they used to.

I like this a lot better than ChemDraw, Chemsketch etc.

It also had a plugin to interface directly with AccuModel but now AccuModel is dead and out of business. Oh well. They had an undisclosed 5 yr limit on my academic license, I guess they don't approve of perpetual students.

[Edited on 21-10-2008 by Sauron]




Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
*****




Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-11-2008 at 16:39


I recently purchased a 1 Ounce bottle of "Eugenol, U.S.P." from an online source. The bottle is obviously old, and is from Magnus, Mabee & Reynard Inc. The bottle contained a dark brown viscous liquid, but it reeks of eugenol. Unfortunately, because the bottle had a linerless cap, it leaked during shipment. I have two questions.

First, what type of liner should the cap of the new bottle have? Would polypropylene or polyethylene be suitable? (I noticed that the foam packing materials surrounding the bottle had partially dissolved.)

Second, what should I do to purify this (preferably in high yield)? It should be a clear to faintly yellow viscous liquid, correct? I'm guessing that what I have is basically an unpurified clove extract. I'm considering steam distillation, but is there a better method or anything I should do in addition to the distillation? Column chromatography, pelletized Norrit, liquid-liquid extraction (for me, ethers are not an option as solvents)? I am concerned that following steam distillation, I will be unable to get a high-yield extraction of the eugenol without an ether solvent.

[Edited on 11/6/08 by bfesser]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
pantone159
National Hazard
****




Posts: 590
Registered: 27-6-2006
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: desperate for shade

[*] posted on 6-11-2008 at 20:32


I would think steam distillation. Eugenol is soluble in DCM, do you have that?
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
*****




Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-11-2008 at 10:45


No, I don't have DCM.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  2

  Go To Top