Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Anammox - Cold packs and ammonium nitrate problem
treasurefish
Harmless
*




Posts: 3
Registered: 16-8-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

shocked.gif posted on 16-8-2006 at 12:41
Anammox - Cold packs and ammonium nitrate problem


With regards to the “Cold-Pack” endothermic reaction:

NH4NO3 (s) -> NH4+(aq) + NO3-(aq)
H = +28.1 kJ/mol

Why doesn’t the reaction continue to the following step and instead produce tons of heat?

5NH4+ + 3NO3- -> 4N2 + 9H2O + 2H+
H = -1483 kJ/mol

I saw this reaction listed in the review notes for a chemistry course at: http://www.howard.edu/ceacs/Departments/Civil/cglass/Env.Mic...

I'm thinking that since water molecules are polar, there is a strong attraction of water molecules to both cations and anions through the charge-dipole intermolecular interaction. Doing a review on the internet (keyword: anammox), it seems that sub-sea bacteria perform this denitrification function, but is there any way to make this happen chemically?

If a catalyst or the right activation temperature was determined, then the reaction should continue without any further additional inputs due to the exothermic potential. Right? Is there a catalyst that can get this started? What activation energy would be required?


Thank you.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
12AX7
Post Harlot
*****




Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline

Mood: informative

[*] posted on 16-8-2006 at 14:06


For one, the reaction isn't stoichiometric with NH4+.NO3-, which is 1:1, not 5:3. Even so, the 3/5ths that would react (oh, and the two H+ left would end up as HNO3, since 2NO3- wouldn't be used) as such would rather react as N2H4O3 > N2O + 2H2O, which occurs something above the melting point of AN.

Biology can assemble and dissassemble N2, NH4+, NO2- and NO3-, but water alone can't do it. Bacteria use very specialized pathways to perform these reactions (and thanks to evolution, they do it very efficiently), but in bulk, you aren't going to get either until you heat the heck out of the AN, or detonate it (not easily done).

In short, it takes too much energy to break up the stable, symmetrical NH4+ and NO3- molecules so the O's can combine with the H's and the N's with each other.

And for that matter, you ought to ask why AN doesn't spontaneously decompose on its own -- there's no reason water need be involved in your combustion reaction; it's an ionic solid, and indeed the NH4+ and NO3- groups are closer together than they ever are in solution.

Tim




Seven Transistor Labs LLC http://seventransistorlabs.com/
Electronic Design, from Concept to Layout.
Need engineering assistance? Drop me a message!
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
*****




Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline

Mood: crystalline

[*] posted on 16-8-2006 at 14:35


Well the reverse reaction takes place in the Haber Bosch process:

NH3 + H2O + O2 --> NO2, NO + NH3 + O2 + H2O --> NH4NO3 etc .

The catalyst is Pt (hot), and if you run the reaction with surplus NH3, you do indeed get ammonium nitrate. The reaction is even self-sustaining, doesn't require outside heat.
The activation energy is what separates the reactants from the products. Pt just lowers it.

Anyway, your reaction is no different to asking, why doesn't sugar C6H12O6 instantaneously combust, in fact why not most organic oxyen-containing compounds? They don't again due to the activation energy. At high temp, in a closed container, sugar will decompose, essentially burn with itself to produce water, carbon, CO , and tar products.




Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
treasurefish
Harmless
*




Posts: 3
Registered: 16-8-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-8-2006 at 18:31


12AX7 and Chemoleo - thank you for your time - I appreciate your patience with me.

I am eager to find a reaction that uses cheap reactants to generate lots of heat and N2, and maybe some H2O and H+. Basically hot denitrification. It would be best if it did not involve metals and did not create any other "waste" products. It doesn't matter if it is "high energy," but having this quality wouldn't hurt either.

My next idea is: NH4+ + NO2- → N2 + 2H2O
The reaction rate should be fast (2.7 x 10-4/s x [NH4+][NO2-]), exothermic (-107 kcal/mol), and spontaneous (-112 kcal/mol). Seems like the best of worlds to me - how can I find out what the necessary conditions are to make it happen? Any experience out there?

Since NO2- is perishable in the form of nitrous acid, I've read that NaNO2 is a good vehicle. If so, is there a good companion for NH4 as well?

I'm sure these questions are very simple for a lot of folks out there, but this is truly the only forum where the simple-minded are rewarded with genious responses. Sounds like a good ad - heh?:cool:

[Edited on 17-8-2006 by treasurefish]

[Edited on 17-8-2006 by treasurefish]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
*******




Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-8-2006 at 20:46


That reaction was used as a simple laboratory source for N2. If I remember corectly a solution of NaNO2 was slowly introduced with a addition funnel to a solution of NH4Cl in the flask (at room T). The evolved N2 was then dried and used for whatever aplication.
You should be able to find details in Vogel's or some other books on practical chemistry. But I don't think the reaction mixture heats much if at all. The enthalpy you provided is quite low and you should calculate the free energy (deltaG) to see if any heat is produced at all at the room temperature.




…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)

Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
not_important
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3873
Registered: 21-7-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 17-8-2006 at 02:02


For a more extreme case of activation energy getting in the way, consider this:

NH4(+) => {some step we're going to ignore} => He + N(+) + 26.7 MeV

This would give you hot nitrogen 8-)

Because of activation energy we have a solid planet instead of a cloud of hot, dirty helium. It also means that it really hard to threaten a city with distruction by means of a bottle of mineral water.

More seriously, how hot is 'hot'? Not creating much of anything but N2 would be tricky, water is the obvious byproduct to be expected - how much of it is 'OK'?


Here's a bit more detailed ammonium nitrite reaction

http://www.uq.edu.au/_School_Science_Lessons/UNChemLesson.ht...

http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~chem122/Lab122/propgases/index.h...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
treasurefish
Harmless
*




Posts: 3
Registered: 16-8-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-8-2006 at 12:00
Thank you Nicodem and Not_Important!


You guys set me off on the right direction!

Take care.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top