OneEyedPyro
Hazard to Others
Posts: 280
Registered: 7-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Catalysts for NaNO3 black powder?
I've recently made some NaNO3 black powder but it's difficult to ignite and burns way slower than with KNO3 (unconfined at least). I've tried several
different ratios and so far the best was 70:15:15 but it's dirty, hit or miss to ignite in a flintlock and barely if any more powerful than with KNO3.
Getting to the point. I was wondering if there are any catalysts or reactive fuels that might bump up the sensitivity and burn rate, any ideas?
|
|
|
Rainwater
National Hazard
Posts: 949
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline
Mood: Break'n glass & kick'n a's
|
|
Sodium nitrate is deliquescent. Thats the main reason it is not used for this. Your powder is likly wet
[Edited on 7-1-2024 by Rainwater]
"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
|
|
|
OneEyedPyro
Hazard to Others
Posts: 280
Registered: 7-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Rainwater  | Sodium nitrate is deliquescent. Thats the main reason it is not used for this. Your powder is likly wet
[Edited on 7-1-2024 by Rainwater] |
It was recrystallized, dried at 110C for an hour and immediately placed in mason jars. The humidity is very low here inside during winter and it had
a very short time exposed to air during processing. I don't think its hygroscopicity is the issue but maybe.
|
|
|
Rainwater
National Hazard
Posts: 949
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline
Mood: Break'n glass & kick'n a's
|
|
I don't think that's hot enough to drive off water. NaNO3doesn'tt melt until about 300c. By increasing the heat while monitoring the
weight, you should reach a point where the weight no longer changes. Then you can be sure its dry
"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
|
|
|
Tsjerk
International Hazard
Posts: 3032
Registered: 20-4-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mood
|
|
Put it in a vacuum desiccator over something more hygroscopic than NaNO3, and over a lot more than the NaNO3 you have in your mixture.
|
|
|
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
Posts: 1419
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Tel Aviv University
Member Is Offline
Mood: old jew
|
|
Problem is not in huminidity, but in low reactivity NaNO3. You can try add 10% ascorbic acid. Or instead sulphur use 15% acorbic acid. Also you can
try add Fe2O3 3% into your done BP. Sodium BP has limited range of use. Generally...
If you rich, you can add nitrocellulose 7% under acetone / porridge and create new grains. It decrease hygroscopicity and increase senzibility on any
flame.
Development of primarily - secondary substances: CHP (2015) neutral CHP and Lithex (2022) Brightelite (2023) Nitrocelite and KC primer (2024) Diper
60 (2025)
|
|
|
OneEyedPyro
Hazard to Others
Posts: 280
Registered: 7-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov | Problem is not in huminidity, but in low reactivity NaNO3. You can try add 10% ascorbic acid. Or instead sulphur use 15% acorbic acid. Also you can
try add Fe2O3 3% into your done BP. Sodium BP has limited range of use. Generally...
If you rich, you can add nitrocellulose 7% under acetone / porridge and create new grains. It decrease hygroscopicity and increase senzibility on any
flame.
|
It's free flowing with no clumps even after sitting for a week or so, it certainly seems dry. NaNO3 just appears less willing to give up its oxygen
than KNO3, though I was under the impression that the sodium salt had a lower decomposition temperature.
Never thought of vitamin C as a sensitizer or reactive fuel but it's worth a try I suppose.
I had considered NC to coat the granules but I'm a bit nervous about pressure levels in black powder firearms. I think I'll load up some modern
smokeless powder cartridges and see how that goes first if I do use NC.
Thanks LL!
|
|
|
DennyDevHE77
Hazard to Others
Posts: 167
Registered: 15-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It's true, I've had flame retardant tubes burn 4 times longer (and less consistently) on sodium nitrate than on potassium nitrate. Moreover, even 20%
of sodium nitrate greatly reduced the burning rate of ordinary black powder
Would iron oxide work without organics? I thought it was added to fiber-based substances, like sorbitol, sucrose, etc.
[Edited on 8-1-2024 by DennyDevHE77]
|
|
|
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
Posts: 1419
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Tel Aviv University
Member Is Offline
Mood: old jew
|
|
DennyDevHE77.....Yes, the Fe2O3 increase burn effect sugars very effective. But since we are dealing with chemical experiments of all kinds, it is
possible to try Fe2O3 in BP as well. Even if the effect was zero. Simply, try it. Nothing dangerous.....
Development of primarily - secondary substances: CHP (2015) neutral CHP and Lithex (2022) Brightelite (2023) Nitrocelite and KC primer (2024) Diper
60 (2025)
|
|
|
Rainwater
National Hazard
Posts: 949
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline
Mood: Break'n glass & kick'n a's
|
|
reference
$$4KNO_3 + 7C + S \rightarrow 3CO_2 + 3CO +2N_2 + K_2CO_3 + K_2S$$
| Code: | T = 273.15 Kelvin
ΔH -1072.1897 kJ/mol
ΔS 1274.7753 J mol/K
ΔG -1420.3945 kJ/mol |
$$4NaNO_3 + 7C + S \rightarrow 3CO_2 + 3CO +2N_2 + Na_2CO_3 + Na_2S$$
| Code: | T = 273.15 Kelvin
ΔH -1149.5540 kJ/mol
ΔS 1314.5835 J mol/K
ΔG -1508.6325 kJ/mol |
My experience with these types of reactions is limited to 2 days a year, so go with what the good dr says. thermodynamics suggest the sodium variation
would release more energy per mole of product. This seams counterintuitive to me, that your experiment had a different result.
But also having made my own BP before, the milling/mixing procedure proved to be the most important step. Its effects dominated other variables such
as the carbon source.
Assuming the OP's mixture is dry, and milled to perfection.
The melting point and decomposition temperature of the sodium salt is lower than that of the potassium one. But the sodium sulfide byproduct, has a
higher melting point higher than K2S. Meaning that everything points to the Na-BP should outperform the K-BP
How could this difference between the reactions be explained on paper?
[Edited on 9-1-2024 by Rainwater]
"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
|
|
|
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
Posts: 1419
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Tel Aviv University
Member Is Offline
Mood: old jew
|
|
A simple method for measuring the quality of ground BP:
Rub the dust between your fingers. No grain should be felt. The sensation must be the same as when you rub talcum powder between your fingers.
Whatever the calculation is on paper, sodium BP is always slower than potassium BP under the same conditions. And by approximately 30%. Another
significant variable value is the charcoal source. One of the highest burning rates is provided by the dry distillation of Frangula Alnus wood.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frangula_alnus
Development of primarily - secondary substances: CHP (2015) neutral CHP and Lithex (2022) Brightelite (2023) Nitrocelite and KC primer (2024) Diper
60 (2025)
|
|
|
DennyDevHE77
Hazard to Others
Posts: 167
Registered: 15-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I believe finely pelletized black powder on sodium nitrate exploded from a detonator primer may show good results.
|
|
|
OneEyedPyro
Hazard to Others
Posts: 280
Registered: 7-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The sodium salt has a lower melting point, boiling point, decomposition point and more oxygen content by mass or volume. I guess sometimes reality
doesn't match up with what you'd expect from a glance at the chemistry.
The answer can only lie in the combustion byproducts of NaNO3 BP having different physical properties, perhaps creating an insulating effect or
something similar which slows the transfer of heat through the powder.
When fired in a muzzleloader using 209 primers it worked fine and gave slightly higher peak velocities to the same volume of standard FFF BP but
resulted in a nearly identical average velocity due to a wider standard deviation. In a flintlock it was all over the place velocity wise.
NaNO3 flash powders can undergo DDT at milligram quantities if milled close to sub micron particle size. I've not found this to be true with KNO3. I'm
guessing the sulfur byproducts are the culprit, I'll try ascorbic acid in its place as LL suggested when I get around to it.
|
|
|
Rainwater
National Hazard
Posts: 949
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline
Mood: Break'n glass & kick'n a's
|
|
I think at the temperature and pressures involved, the formation of carbonate salts would be unlikely. Many times i've smelled NOx after a
day of shooting. Even my cleaning oil advertises it neturals acids to protect the rifling. I think the referenced chemical equations are too
inaccurate for a thermodynamics comparison.
"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
|
|
|
OneEyedPyro
Hazard to Others
Posts: 280
Registered: 7-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Rainwater | | I think at the temperature and pressures involved, the formation of carbonate salts would be unlikely. Many times i've smelled NOx after a
day of shooting. Even my cleaning oil advertises it neturals acids to protect the rifling. I think the referenced chemical equations are too
inaccurate for a thermodynamics comparison. |
As far as I know, carbonate is a considerable byproduct of BP
combustion.
The sodium and more importantly its respective byproducts are the only outliers compared to regular BP.
I'm not implying a chemically impeding effect but rather a physically impeding effect of those byproducts by slowing the thermal transfer rate.
Na and K are similar but different and their respective sulfates, sulfides plus whatever other sulfur related compounds formed in the chaos may have
considerably different physical properties.
I haven't really thought about it until recently and thus haven't really researched enough to say that with any certainty, just a hunch.
|
|
|
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
Posts: 1419
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Tel Aviv University
Member Is Offline
Mood: old jew
|
|
| Quote: |
NaNO3 flash powders can undergo DDT at milligram quantities if milled close to sub micron particle size. I've not found this to be true with KNO3. I'm
guessing the sulfur byproducts are the culprit, I'll try ascorbic acid in its place as LL suggested when I get around to it.
|
Sulphur has OB - 100. Vitamine C - 90.9. Thus replacement can be without counting OB. BP can be SN 70 C 15 AA 15 (mixture with OB - 20.7 on
CO2)....
Development of primarily - secondary substances: CHP (2015) neutral CHP and Lithex (2022) Brightelite (2023) Nitrocelite and KC primer (2024) Diper
60 (2025)
|
|
|
Rainwater
National Hazard
Posts: 949
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline
Mood: Break'n glass & kick'n a's
|
|
Sorry, i see how I worded that wrong. What i ment to suggest is that the initial conditions likly would not favor carbonate formation. During the
combustion phase of the reaction, temperatures can exceed the decomposition temperature of the carbonates producing oxides instead, at least
momentarily. Once the reaction is out of the barrel, pressures and tempatures alot less, the fine dispersion of oxides will quickly react with the CO2
and form carbonates.
"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
