sceptic
Harmless
Posts: 49
Registered: 7-6-2022
Location: Southern Africa
Member Is Offline
|
|
Cyanide periodic trends
Looking over the melting points for the alkali metal cyanides, I noticed that further down the alkali metal column they were, the higher the melting
point seemed to be. For example, lithium cyanide melts at 160 degrees Celsius, while sodium cyanide melts at 563.7 degrees, and potassium cyanide at
634.5 degrees.
I would have expected the trend to go in the opposite direction, since there should be stronger attraction between ions of the same charges when the
ionic radius is smaller. What would cause the cyanides to reverse this trend?
|
|
Yttrium2
Perpetual Question Machine
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1104
Registered: 7-2-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by sceptic ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Looking over the melting points for the alkali metal cyanides, I noticed that further down the alkali metal column they were, the higher the melting
point seemed to be. For example, lithium cyanide melts at 160 degrees Celsius, while sodium cyanide melts at 563.7 degrees, and potassium cyanide at
634.5 degrees.
I would have expected the trend to go in the opposite direction, since there should be stronger attraction between ions of the same charges when the
ionic radius is smaller. What would cause the cyanides to reverse this trend? |
melting point / boiling point go up as we move down and right on the periodic table? why? what trend?
care to elaborate on that second paragraph. is it ionic radius or atomic radius that you are thinking of, -- or both!?
Sounds like a General Chemistry question I would have been able to answer years ago. Perhaps I still could If I had my notes or references/book. -- I
really shouldn't have left them atop that mountain.
-- Too young to say the above!!
[Edited on 2/14/2023 by Yttrium2]
|
|
B(a)P
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1139
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Festive
|
|
It is an interesting observation, though it does not continue past potassium.
I noticed the same trend for azides some time ago and did a little research, but couldn't figure it out. I would be keen to hear an intelligent answer
on this.
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 4301
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
You can expect melting points to decrease as the size of the ions increases, just from a look at Coulomb's Law- larger ions gives a larger distance
between them, and therefore a weaker overall attraction.
However, this assumes that these ionic compounds have the same crystal structure. I'm pretty sure that NaCl and CsI, for example, have different
structures- the ions in NaCl are six-coordinate, whereas those in CsI are eight-coordinate. That's going to completely change the lattice energy
calculation.
Also, for a stable crystal, you want the ions to match in size. If you have a tiny cation rattling around in a space that would better fit a larger
one, that's going to muck up the lattice energy calculations as well.
I'm not sure if that qualifies as what B(a)P hopes for as an intelligent contribution, but I'll happily be corrected by someone more knowledgeable
than I.
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
B(a)P
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1139
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Festive
|
|
DraconicAcid your responce is well considered and you are clearly knowledgable on the topic, so for me it absolutely qualifies as an intelligent
contribution, thanks very much for the responce .
I had a similar line of thinking, but got stuck when looking further into it I discovered that sodium cyanide has the same crystal structure as sodium
chloride, as does potassium cyanide, so I would have expected the sodium/potassium chloride trend to match the sodium/potassium cyanide trend. Where I
ended up, and this is just a guess, is that for azides the bond between the alkali metal and the azide ion was much less ionic then the equivalent
alkali metal/halide bond and so therefore something else is at play.
|
|