Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2
Author: Subject: Wired Magazine has an article about Amateur Chemistry
digaman
Harmless
*




Posts: 9
Registered: 30-5-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 31-5-2006 at 08:38


Thanks so much, guys. I appreciate it. And yes, the scan does have the pretty pictures. :)

I was a science geek when I was a kid -- I had chemistry sets, I worshipped the Edmund Scientific catalog, and I collected minerals (I know, all wimpy stuff compared to what you guys do [smile]!) -- so I have a soft spot in my heart for home experimentation and self-education in science, which I believe is our birthright. I am also married to a science teacher.

I really, really appreciate you guys posting the link to other forums. Thanks so much. If you feel comfortable doing so, I would also encourage anyone to write a letter to the editor of Wired about the article. Letters to the editor carry a lot of weight in determining future coverage of similar subjects. The address is rants@wiredmag.com.

Thanks!

Steve
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ramiel
Vicious like a ferret
***




Posts: 484
Registered: 19-8-2002
Location: Room at the Back, Australia
Member Is Offline

Mood: Semi-demented

[*] posted on 31-5-2006 at 09:28


"“A lot of schools don’t have chemistry labs anymore,” explains CEF educational coordinator Laurel Brent. “We want to give kids lessons that tie in to their real-world experiences without having them deal with a lot of strange chemicals in bottles that have big long names.”"

And that person calls themselves an educator! I really find that attude repugnant, don't you think?
Anger... Rising...




Caveat Orator
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
lordmagnus
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 92
Registered: 10-1-2006
Location: Webster, TX
Member Is Offline

Mood: No longer annoyed ( I found a new girlfriend)

[*] posted on 31-5-2006 at 14:46


Yeah, this sucks. Luckily I don't work with chemicals that would show up on the WATCHED list, although I have enough lab equipment to get myself into trouble here in texas, I have all sorts of distillation columns, condensers, glassware, etc.



I\'ll kill a man in a fair fight, or if I think he is gonna start a fair fight, or if he\'s bothrn me allot, or if I am getin payed good, or probably over a good woman.

-Jayne Cobb (Serenity)

View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
neutrino
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1583
Registered: 20-8-2004
Location: USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: oscillating

[*] posted on 1-6-2006 at 02:27


>“We want to give kids lessons that tie in to their real-world experiences without having them deal with a lot of strange chemicals in bottles that have big long names.”

Then who will work with those strange chemicals and discover new things? Oh right, the Chinese and the Indians. And politicians still wonder why America is falling behind...




View user's profile View All Posts By User
panoptic
Harmless
*




Posts: 10
Registered: 3-5-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 1-6-2006 at 10:20
Slashdotted...


... by a degree of separation, or so.

Here.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DeAdFX
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 339
Registered: 1-7-2005
Location: Brothel
Member Is Offline

Mood: @%&$ing hardcore baby

[*] posted on 1-6-2006 at 14:59


Hey guys if we practice green chemistry we can enjoy chemistry while combating against the terrorists. ITS A WIN WIN LOLOL...[/sarcastic post] Sweet jesus who thought of this bullshit. Well I guess if we appease the enviromental terrorists then we don't have to worry about them blowing up an evil corporation. Makes sense.


Quoted from http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2002/jul/tec...

Green chemistry can be patriotic, according to a widely publicized new book by the National Research Council, a private nonprofit organization. “If we make fewer toxic products, use milder manufacturing conditions, and produce less toxic waste, we reduce the opportunities for terrorists,” according to Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism. Accordingly, the book urges that scientists in government, academia, and industry “strive to identify research directions that could lead to safer, intrinsically secure, economically viable chemical processes and procedures that are valuable for our long-term sustainability.” For more information, go to www.nap.edu/catalog/10415.html?onpi_newsdoc062402.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Organikum
resurrected
*****




Posts: 2337
Registered: 12-10-2002
Location: Europe
Member Is Offline

Mood: frustrated

[*] posted on 1-6-2006 at 15:22


Quote:
Originally posted by rogue chemist
It is pretty novel to actually meet (albeit online) the person who wrote such a good article. Keep up the good work! What made you choose to do an article on amateur chemistry? You must have some interest in it(perhaps a closet chemist yourself;)?)

Perhaps some sort of a follow up article sometime?


(But my scan has all the pretty pictures:P)
The article was positive but nothing more, it was not even halfway well researched or the author would have known that aerogels were by no way developed by the NASA for example.
We are so starved that we tend to give applause to the anything whats not directly offending.

/ORG




Irgendwas is ja immer
View user's profile View All Posts By User
neutrino
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1583
Registered: 20-8-2004
Location: USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: oscillating

[*] posted on 1-6-2006 at 16:52


The important things are that

1. The article was in a positive tone.
2. The article was read by a large audience.

That second one is rare nowadays in conjunction with the first one. Mostly we talk about the state of chemistry but only a few people read our discussions. A significant number of people is reading this.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
*****




Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline

Mood: crystalline

[*] posted on 1-6-2006 at 17:07


Who is reading wired? I never heard of it until this article.
Is it a popular magazine in the States?

Similar articles ought to be written here in Europe, where controls are even more stringent.. while yet a disproportionately large number of people pursue such hobbies, in my circles, I know a number of Dads/parents who essentially passed on their hobbies to their kids... I suppose it's a historical thing, because Germany was for some time the forerunner of chemistry, and such experimentation used to be quite a normal thing to do for a clever kid while growing up. So sad that this is becoming increasingly difficult here, all in the name of public safety.
Similar to music I suppose, in Germany, it is common that people play an instrument, and this is not really class-associated... not so in the UK, or US (where it's hard to find people that are able to read music in the common populace). Once again, Germany produced a large number of great composers, so probably this explains why this culture of playing music persists to this day.




Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
The_Davster
A pnictogen
*******




Posts: 2861
Registered: 18-11-2003
Member Is Offline

Mood: .

[*] posted on 1-6-2006 at 17:33


Yeah wired is a pretty common magazine in the US and in Canada(although to a lesser extent). Although it does get read by more of the technically inclined than by the general populace. I had never read an issue of it until I heard about this article.

Jeez, I am trying to read through the slashdot discussion, what the hell type of board software is that? Rather confusing in my opinion. Links everywhere to the same posts...

Organikum, yes it was positive, the good effects of such an article are not affected by whether or not the author got the inventor of areogels correct.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
chromium
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 284
Registered: 27-6-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: reactive

[*] posted on 1-6-2006 at 22:40


Quote:

Organikum, yes it was positive, the good effects of such an article are not affected by whether or not the author got the inventor of areogels correct.


Absolutely agree with rogue chemist. This was very good article especially if compared to that bs what is writen to fight against hobby chemistry. Yet that bs works even more for sole reason that its repeated again and again.

[Edited on 2-6-2006 by chromium]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
digaman
Harmless
*




Posts: 9
Registered: 30-5-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 2-6-2006 at 04:58


Chemoleo, Wired has over 500,000 subscribers in the United States and Europe, and there are a lot of newsstand sales on top of that. Organikum is quite right that I goofed about the inventor of aerogel -- that's the one outright error that others have pointed out too. Organikum, please do provide pointers to other articles about chemistry in the mainstream press that you believe are truly worthy of your applause; I'd love to read them.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
joeflsts
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 226
Registered: 14-1-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 2-6-2006 at 06:11


This article touches on many issues. Education today isn't about excellence it is about teaching at a level that is acceptable at all levels of comphrension. So essentially for one to "stand-out" they must not participate in public schooling or they run the risk of learning at a sub-standard level. There are exeptions but that is becoming the anolomy and not the norm.

When I was a child I was absorded by chemistry. In fact it was my dream to become a chemist after grade school. In my basement I had a lab that would make some of today's school chemistry labs look like a joke. When I left school and entered the military all that was left behind.

20 years later I find myself, once again, very interested in amateur chemistry. It is a bit easier now that I'm older and able to obtain some items that as child were unreachable. But even as an adult, with all the freedoms that I'm supposed to have, I have to deal with government agencies that feel they need them to protect me.

When you really, and I mean really, examine the issues that we face you begin to realize that in the course of asking our government to protect us, we have given up something that is essential for our ability to experiment... Freedom.

So to be honest the blame rests on our desire to be protected and not recognize that the only person that should hold the ultimate responsbility for individual protection is the individual and not some government agency with a desire to secure the next years budget allocation.

Joe
View user's profile View All Posts By User
UniversalSolvent
Harmless
*




Posts: 17
Registered: 2-6-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 2-6-2006 at 16:37


I'm sending a letter to Wired's editor; as a subscriber, I'd like to see this covered more, maybe it'll spread to other publications.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
digaman
Harmless
*




Posts: 9
Registered: 30-5-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 2-6-2006 at 18:34


Thanks, Universal. Jon Carroll, a columnist from the <i>San Francisco Chronicle</i>, picked up on the story today, so that's a little more chemistry awareness trickling into the mainstream:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/ar...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
I am a fish
undersea enforcer
****




Posts: 600
Registered: 16-1-2003
Location: Bath, United Kingdom
Member Is Offline

Mood: Ichthyoidal

[*] posted on 3-6-2006 at 11:05


Quote:
Originally posted by Ramiel
"“A lot of schools don’t have chemistry labs anymore,” explains CEF educational coordinator Laurel Brent. “We want to give kids lessons that tie in to their real-world experiences without having them deal with a lot of strange chemicals in bottles that have big long names.”"

And that person calls themselves an educator! I really find that attude repugnant, don't you think?
Anger... Rising...


It's absolutely disgusting. The whole point of education is to expand people's horizons. Her attitude is also extremely offensive to the children; it's a 21st century equivalent of telling them not to get ideas above their station.

I imagine this fear of "big long names" is also contrary to what the kids want. Young children are naturally drawn to what's hidden, mysterious and beyond the realm of everyday experience. If they're told that everything is made of atoms, they'll want to know what atoms are made out of, and then what protons are made of, and then what quarks are made of, and so on. However, such matters don't "tie in to their real-world experiences", and so they'll be denied this information.




1f `/0u (4|\\| |234d 7|-|15, `/0u |234||`/ |\\|33d 70 937 0u7 /\\/\\0|23.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
joeflsts
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 226
Registered: 14-1-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-6-2006 at 16:56


Quote:
Originally posted by I am a fish
Quote:
Originally posted by Ramiel
"“A lot of schools don’t have chemistry labs anymore,” explains CEF educational coordinator Laurel Brent. “We want to give kids lessons that tie in to their real-world experiences without having them deal with a lot of strange chemicals in bottles that have big long names.”"

And that person calls themselves an educator! I really find that attude repugnant, don't you think?
Anger... Rising...


It's absolutely disgusting. The whole point of education is to expand people's horizons. Her attitude is also extremely offensive to the children; it's a 21st century equivalent of telling them not to get ideas above their station.

I imagine this fear of "big long names" is also contrary to what the kids want. Young children are naturally drawn to what's hidden, mysterious and beyond the realm of everyday experience. If they're told that everything is made of atoms, they'll want to know what atoms are made out of, and then what protons are made of, and then what quarks are made of, and so on. However, such matters don't "tie in to their real-world experiences", and so they'll be denied this information.


My wife is still fuming over her comment. I can't imagine how this person was determined fit to participate in education.

Joe
View user's profile View All Posts By User
leu
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 368
Registered: 13-10-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-6-2006 at 18:11


Quote:
I can't imagine how this person was determined fit to participate in education.


This person is merely repeating the nanny state party line, otherwise known as Oligarchical Collectivism; which is growing as fast as fear can be induced within the population by the use of mass media :P

[Edited on 4-6-2006 by leu]




Chemistry is our Covalent Bond
View user's profile View All Posts By User
HNO3
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 211
Registered: 10-11-2004
Location: America
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-6-2006 at 19:11


"scientifically useful compounds as liquid iodine"

Iodine is not liquid, but I liked the article. Great Job!




\"In the beginning, God...\" Wait a minute, God doesn\'t exist!!!!!!!!!! \"OK, in the beginning, ummm, hydrogen...\" Wait a minute, what about the laws of thermodynamics? \"OK, in the beginning, ummm.....UMMMMM, what\'s left to choose from?
View user's profile View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
UniversalSolvent
Harmless
*




Posts: 17
Registered: 2-6-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-6-2006 at 07:17


Quote:
Originally posted by HNO3
"scientifically useful compounds as liquid iodine"

Iodine is not liquid, but I liked the article. Great Job!


He probably meant tincture, it's really hard to get in certain areas because of meth production.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
digaman
Harmless
*




Posts: 9
Registered: 30-5-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-6-2006 at 08:14


Tincture of iodine, which is common in many households (as opposed to solid iodine, which is rare outside of chemistry) is listed on hundreds of meth-watch websites as "liquid iodine," which was the point.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
digaman
Harmless
*




Posts: 9
Registered: 30-5-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-6-2006 at 08:15


And thanks!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
UniversalSolvent
Harmless
*




Posts: 17
Registered: 2-6-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-6-2006 at 10:20


Quote:
Originally posted by digaman
And thanks!
No problem.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  2

  Go To Top