| Pages:
1
2 |
Mixe
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 2-6-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Synthesis of dichloromethane- question mark.
So DCM is out. Illegal to use, sell and hold in all of EU. Certainly not an ingredient anymore in any OTC products in northern Europe. Every purchase
illegal for a private individual without unobtainable licences.
Of course you could take your chances and order it anyway from some wonderful black market salesperson, but once you've had your shady chemicals
caught in customs more than twice you're on a watchlist. And nobody got time for that.
This calls for synthesis. I find one thread in this forum about it (maybe my Search Fu is weak though, I'll gladly be slapped on the hands), with
loosely held theoretical discussion about routes. All seem hard to accomplish for a happy home chemist, but not impossible.
Here is the thread
So the reason for a new thread: the old one was focused on just the theory of the synthesis, I'd like to discuss the very real practicality of it. Is
there anyone out there who've taken a stab at this and has some experience to share?
[Edited on 2021-12-12 by Mixe]
|
|
|
Bedlasky
International Hazard
Posts: 1242
Registered: 15-4-2019
Location: Period 5, group 6
Member Is Offline
Mood: Volatile
|
|
You can buy DCM from Poland legaly. My friend orded it few months ago without issues.
|
|
|
Mixe
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 2-6-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
No you cannot. Yes, you can probably order it, but receiving it is illegal in my country. And as long as the substance has to pass a border, you're
potentially in trouble. But this is NOT what the thread is about. It's about synthesis, not procurement.
[Edited on 2021-12-12 by Mixe]
|
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4618
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Forget about it. There isn’t a practical way for the amateur to synthesize DCM cleanly and economically. Use chloroform instead. If you think making
chloroform as a solvent is too expensive or too much work, then you have no business thinking about making DCM, because the DCM synthesis will be more
time intensive, expensive, and far more dangerous.
[Edited on 12-12-2021 by Texium]
|
|
|
Mixe
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 2-6-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hmmm, ok. I hear you. No, I absolutely do not think making chloroform is too big of a hassle. I've made it many times and have a good stock of it. But
DCM is not part of my collection for reasons stated above.
Still, would be interesting to hear about any practical experiences anyone might have of making it.
|
|
|
Fery
International Hazard
Posts: 1026
Registered: 27-8-2019
Location: Czechoslovakia
Member Is Offline
|
|
Yes it was this package:
https://sklep-chemland.pl/en/odczynniki-chemiczne/cz-d-a/dic...
|
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4618
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Wow! That's some remarkably cheap DCM. Pity that it probably wouldn't be practical to ship outside of Europe.
|
|
|
karolus28
Hazard to Self
Posts: 51
Registered: 14-4-2019
Location: EU's Brazil
Member Is Offline
Mood: zgrzyt
|
|
but chemland only sells reagents if you have a company right?
hadron scientific sells dcm too:
on allegro.pl(it's like polish ebay) https://allegro.pl/oferta/chlorek-metylenu-dichlorometan-cz-...
and their website: http://hadronscientific.pl/en/?s=Methylene+chloride
Hi, please read about exif data.
|
|
|
Tsjerk
International Hazard
Posts: 3032
Registered: 20-4-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mood
|
|
https://www.laboratoriumdiscounter.nl/nl/dichloormethaan-99....
Deoplosmiddelspecialist stil sells small quantities to customers with an intent of use.
Also, DCM can't be synthesized in any reasonable way.
[Edited on 12-12-2021 by Tsjerk]
|
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
There is another thread on making DCM from chloroform.
The overall yield from chloroform is good but you have to do it repeatedly to get those yields as conversion per run is in the 20% range.
The amount of work is much more than the cost of reagents.
Better off making isopropyl chloride which is easier and has a high single run yield.
The flammability of isopropyl chloride is higher but the work is a lot less.
Both methods can be done from zinc metal, hydrochloric acid and the substrate, chloroform and isopropyl chloride respectively.
The thread on chloroform to dcm:
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=78041&...
The thread on isopropyl chloride:
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=30180
Both threads have a good reference.
[Edited on 12-12-2021 by macckone]
|
|
|
Triflic Acid
Hazard to Others
Posts: 486
Registered: 27-9-2020
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slowly Oxidizing into Oblivion
|
|
Well, I have a particular idea for those who don't have access to chlorinated solvents, you could try getting a large glass reactor, filling it with
natural gas, and add TCCA. Leave this out in the sun, and after a few days, there should be a sizable quantity of mixed chlorinated solvents, which
should work for most purposes as a solvent. Something with a drain at the bottom and you should have an on-tap supply of chlorinated solvents.
There wasn't a fire, we just had an uncontrolled rapid oxidation event at the power plant.
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
The answer is in threads titled "making dichloromethane" and "Reduction of an alcoholic solution of chloroform by zink and hydrochloric acid to yield
dcm ?" It's not likely that anyone has tried it because it's a bit pointless.
|
|
|
Mixe
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 2-6-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This was interesting and sounds doable. Only problem is separating the resulting mix of chloroform and dcm ... or did I misread something?
|
|
|
Mixe
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 2-6-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Well there's something. If nothing else, this thread turned out to be a great "polish chemsources"-repository. I love it. Keep'em coming.
|
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
Mixe,
The boiling points of chloroform and dichloromethane are sufficiently different that it isn't hard to separate.
They do not form an azeotrope.
The production procedure outlined in the paper boils off the DCM as it is formed which helps drive the reaction.
the science company in denver has DCM for sale again at exorbitant rates due to new regulations.
It is the same price for 4 liters as 500ml.
Ground shipping only, US only.
|
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4618
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Triflic Acid  | | Well, I have a particular idea for those who don't have access to chlorinated solvents, you could try getting a large glass reactor, filling it with
natural gas, and add TCCA. Leave this out in the sun, and after a few days, there should be a sizable quantity of mixed chlorinated solvents, which
should work for most purposes as a solvent. Something with a drain at the bottom and you should have an on-tap supply of chlorinated solvents.
|
How about next time you have a “particular idea” you think twice before blurting it out? Because that
particular idea is trash for so many reasons…
|
|
|
Triflic Acid
Hazard to Others
Posts: 486
Registered: 27-9-2020
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slowly Oxidizing into Oblivion
|
|
and what is so bad about it?
There wasn't a fire, we just had an uncontrolled rapid oxidation event at the power plant.
|
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2799
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
This paper mentions that 2,2-dichloromalonic acid diethyl ester can be obtained by direct chlorination of diethyl malonate:
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01150a151
Rather than reduction with LAH, proceeding to hydrolysis and decarboxylation will give DCM. Diethyl malonate may be commercially available depending
on your location.
This is only likely to be useful if you want DCM as a reagent; in those cases, I'd be curious to see whether you can obtain dibromomethane as well.
| Quote: Originally posted by macckone |
Better off making isopropyl chloride which is easier and has a high single run yield.
The flammability of isopropyl chloride is higher but the work is a lot less. |
It's a shame that we don't have more information on precisely how and when iPrCl can substitute for DCM. For example, I'm guessing you can dissolve
amines in it without much risk of alkylation.
In some cases, you might prefer to simply make diethyl ether.
|
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
clearly_not_atara,
isopropyl chloride is more reactive than DCM, especially in the gas phase.
But is still a chlorocarbon, it will react with very strong acids (fuming sulfuric) and strong bases, but so will DCM.
It can react with water or alcohol to form isopropanol or ether correspondingly at high temperatures (which would require pressure).
|
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4618
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Let's see... filling a glass container with flammable gas and an oxidizing
agent is already a not so great idea. Additionally, your "sizable quantity" of chlorinated solvents is not so sizable, because 1 mole of methane at
atmospheric pressure will fill about 22.4 liters, while 1 mole of chloroform is only 78 mL. So even if you had a 23 liter container for this, your
maximum yield if you somehow managed to react 100% of your natural gas, and assume that your natural gas is pure methane, and that it will be fully
converted to chloroform, will yield a pitiful 78 mL, which would be much easier to make by the haloform process. You'd have to engineer some kind of
flow process for it to approach practicality. Leaving a pile of TCCA out in the sun is also not a very efficient method for generating chlorine gas.
In fact, I don't know if that works at all...
And that's not even touching on the fact that natural gas intentionally contains thiols, which would contaminate your product with sulfur containing
nastiness.
And in the end, at best you would have a mixture of chloromethanes contaminated with smaller amounts of chloroethanes and chloropropanes with
variable boiling points and reactivity, which is inferior to a pure solvent.
Go try it if you're still confident and want to prove me wrong. Otherwise, think twice before posting more poorly thought out, idealistic armchair
chemistry.
|
|
|
SaccharinSlayer157
Harmless
Posts: 26
Registered: 1-10-2020
Location: Near Cou?
Member Is Offline
Mood: Resisting the urge to build a ketene lamp
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Texium | | Quote: Originally posted by Triflic Acid | | Well, I have a particular idea for those who don't have access to chlorinated solvents, you could try getting a large glass reactor, filling it with
natural gas, and add TCCA. Leave this out in the sun, and after a few days, there should be a sizable quantity of mixed chlorinated solvents, which
should work for most purposes as a solvent. Something with a drain at the bottom and you should have an on-tap supply of chlorinated solvents.
|
How about next time you have a “particular idea” you think twice before blurting it out? Because that
particular idea is trash for so many reasons… |
| Quote: Originally posted by Texium | Let's see... filling a glass container with flammable gas and an oxidizing
agent is already a not so great idea. Additionally, your "sizable quantity" of chlorinated solvents is not so sizable, because 1 mole of methane at
atmospheric pressure will fill about 22.4 liters, while 1 mole of chloroform is only 78 mL. So even if you had a 23 liter container for this, your
maximum yield if you somehow managed to react 100% of your natural gas, and assume that your natural gas is pure methane, and that it will be fully
converted to chloroform, will yield a pitiful 78 mL, which would be much easier to make by the haloform process. You'd have to engineer some kind of
flow process for it to approach practicality. Leaving a pile of TCCA out in the sun is also not a very efficient method for generating chlorine gas.
In fact, I don't know if that works at all...
And that's not even touching on the fact that natural gas intentionally contains thiols, which would contaminate your product with sulfur containing
nastiness.
And in the end, at best you would have a mixture of chloromethanes contaminated with smaller amounts of chloroethanes and chloropropanes with
variable boiling points and reactivity, which is inferior to a pure solvent.
Go try it if you're still confident and want to prove me wrong. Otherwise, think twice before posting more poorly thought out, idealistic armchair
chemistry. |
Wow, I had absolutely no idea Tex was such a massive jerk. I guess I'll stop expecting constructive criticism from admins and instead start being
afraid to post my questions and ideas out of fear of being ridiculed. So much for "Amateur" and "Experimentalistic"
[Edited on 21-12-2021 by SaccharinSlayer157]
|
|
|
Fery
International Hazard
Posts: 1026
Registered: 27-8-2019
Location: Czechoslovakia
Member Is Offline
|
|
Hi SaccharinSlayer157 you are welcome to post interesting ideas and experiments. We then usually discuss here whether it is worth to try that idea /
route or whether there is better / safer / higher yielding route in home labs.
|
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4618
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by SaccharinSlayer157 | | Wow, I had absolutely no idea Tex was such a massive jerk. I guess I'll stop expecting constructive criticism from admins and instead start being
afraid to post my questions and ideas out of fear of being ridiculed. So much for "Amateur" and "Experimentalistic" |
I’ll admit, I was rather harsh, and could have worded those posts better. However, this is not the first time that TriflicAcid has
posted speculative ideas that are not well thought out and easy to find flaws in with only cursory research, so it really frustrated me when I saw him
doing it again.
If he had actually tried this idea and posted about his results, or made it clear that he had considered some of the pitfalls and wanted to brainstorm
workarounds, that would be amateur experimentalism, and I would happily offer constructive ideas. Blurting out an idea that popped
into your head 30 seconds ago without considering any of the potential problems with it is not amateur experimentalism. That is
armchair chemistry. I think the thing that bothered me most about that particular post was that he made it sound so easy. He wasn’t asking if it
might work, he basically said “Here’s an idea, three easy steps and you’ve got chlorinated solvents on tap!” No references, no calculations,
no precedent whatsoever, just blind confidence. Most of AJKOER’s posts are just as confoundingly misguided, but at least he tries to back
up his claims with references, even though they are often only tangentially related.
It is not my intent to scare anyone away from posting here. Obviously creative ideas are welcome, and there are vastly different experience levels
here, so some ideas that seem creative and exciting to some may not be to others. What matters though is that it’s clear that you did some research
before you posted it. If there’s multiple threads already about your idea that you clearly haven’t read, or the answer to your question can be
quickly found by a Google search or two, you haven’t done your due diligence, and frankly deserve a bit of ridicule. It’s not our job to do all
the research on an idea you just posted on a whim. Giving good answers and constructive criticism requires time and effort, so if that’s what you
want, just make sure you’ve put time and effort into your own post.
|
|
|
SaccharinSlayer157
Harmless
Posts: 26
Registered: 1-10-2020
Location: Near Cou?
Member Is Offline
Mood: Resisting the urge to build a ketene lamp
|
|
I'LL admit, I was kind of harsh too. I didn't mean to start name calling and I'm sure Tex isn't actually a "Massive Jerk". I just got a bit emotional
because I'm often times in the same situation as Triflic Acid, thinking I have a great idea without immediately noticing crucial flaws. I'm sure it
gets very frustrating as a regular SM user with a lot of chemistry knowledge seeing beginners say stupid stuff sometimes. I just
think its important to realize that the way much more knowledgeable users respond directly impacts how comfortable beginners are posting anything at
all. It's really cool how this was all kept reasonably respectful and cordial though, I was half way expecting to get banned or something!  Sorry that I was a bit hostile at first, I shouldn't have been. Now I'll stop
derailing this thread and go mind my business somewhere else!
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6333
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
This truly is a remarkable site. 
On topic. If I was tasked with making DCM, I would have no idea where to start.
Actually, not quite true. I would start with reading. And orobably finish there too.
It is great to see some truly maverick ideas because every now and yhen there is an element of genius to them. Great also to see the dumb stuff get
shot down in flames. Because this is no hobby to have a blind spot. And it is good to be confronted again and again with fundanental principles, basic
procedural matters, and safety considerations.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
