thors.lab
Hazard to Others
Posts: 103
Registered: 19-7-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Funky EIMS spectra -- help me interpret?
Hi,
This is for a lab assignment for university. We ran 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and EIMS on what is suspected to be 3-(4-chlorophenyl)propanoic acid. The NMRs
confirmed its identity and no impurities were seen. The EIMS however...
Here we have the EIMS for the product (3-(4-chlorophenyl)propanoic acid):
And here for the precursor (4-chlorocinnamic acid):
The precursor looks fine. I can't figure out what's going on with the product, though.
These spectra were produced by university technicians and I am sure my professors/TA's would have spotted if something was off.
Any help?
Thanks,
|
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2539
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
Wow, those spectra claim to be older than I am!
My best guess is that what you have is 3-phenylpropanoic acid. You lost the chlorine somewhere. Was this a hydrogenation?
Most of the fragments don't have chlorine (judging by M+2 peak intensity).
The fragment at 150 is 3-phenylpropanoic acid minus a hydrogen atom.
The fragment at 91 is C6H5-CH2.
If you had a chlorine still, you would expect to see a fragment at 125 and M+2 at 127, for C6H4Cl-CH2. This is present in the bottom spectrum but not
the top one. The lack of a parent ion around 184 is another clue.
Can you also post the NMR data?
[Edited on 2021-3-8 by Metacelsus]
|
|
|
thors.lab
Hazard to Others
Posts: 103
Registered: 19-7-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Metacelsus  | Wow, those spectra claim to be older than I am!
My best guess is that what you have is 3-phenylpropanoic acid. You lost the chlorine somewhere. Was this a hydrogenation?
Most of the fragments don't have chlorine (judging by M+2 peak intensity).
The fragment at 150 is 3-phenylpropanoic acid minus a hydrogen atom.
The fragment at 91 is C6H5-CH2.
If you had a chlorine still, you would expect to see a fragment at 125 and M+2 at 127, for C6H4Cl-CH2. This is present in the bottom spectrum but not
the top one. The lack of a parent ion around 184 is another clue.
Can you also post the NMR data?
[Edited on 2021-3-8 by Metacelsus] |
Didn't notice the date. It might actually be that old -- due to COVID we're doing online lab now, and I think they're just reusing old spectra from
previous years of doing this experiment.
Yes this was a hydrogenation of the cinnamic acid over Pd/C with ammonium formate.
Now that you mentioned it, the loss of chlorine actually makes sense. I wrote off that 2.5 on the spectra as just bad integration or possibly
impurity, but it's very likely the Cl got hydrogenated away!
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
