metalresearcher
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 737
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Reactive
|
|
Why are odd elements rarer that even elements ?
On this image on Wikipedia, I noticed that almist *all* odd elements are considerably rarer than even ones.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Elements_abundance-b...
Except Beryllium (4, even) is very rare, even compared to the odd neighbors Lithium (3) and Boron (5).
Another issue : these two elements are also rare compared to other elements of the second row.
Why ?
|
|
Metallophile
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 82
Registered: 23-3-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I know that elements 3, 4, and 5 are rare because they are not created in stellar cores. Fusion goes H -> He -> C, and skips right over those
three.
|
|
EthidiumBromide
Harmless
Posts: 42
Registered: 27-9-2020
Member Is Offline
Mood: Effervescent
|
|
I'm not sure if I'm entirely correct on this, but I recall that it's a general trend that nuclei with odd numbers of protons tend to be less stable.
This is evidenced by certain facts, such as monoisotopic elements (elements with only one stable isotope) are exclusively odd-numbered elements (one
exception: beryllium), and odd numbered elements generally have less stable isotopes that even numbered elements. And the formation of odd numbered
elements by fusion within stars is also a rarer event than the formation of even-numbered elements.
Perhaps someone else will come along and provide more concrete and reliable information. I don't know the explanation of this phenomenon as physics is
not my strong side. But if anything, maybe it could guide you in the right direction for researching this subject.
[Edited on 18-10-2020 by EthidiumBromide]
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 4298
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
I have a vague feeling that this could probably be explained by the existence of nuclear orbitals, but I've never looked into nuclear physics deeply
enough to know more about these orbitals than that they exist.
(Although I get the feeling that a joker will be along to explain it in terms of radical pathways soon enough.)
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2725
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
Nucleons in nuclei pair up in spin up/down pairs similarly to electrons in orbitals (because they're fermions). So the most stable nuclei usually have
even numbers of nucleons, and with the exception of lithium-6, boron-10 and nitrogen-14, it is basically always more stable to have an even number of
protons with an even number of neutrons than a maybe more favorable proton/neutron ratio with odd numbers of both.
As such e.g. sodium-22 decays to neon and aluminium-26 decays to magnesium while magnesium-24 and silicon-28 are stable. A nucleus with an odd number
of protons is generally only stable with an even number of neutrons and also a favorable proton:neutron ratio. Iron has four stable isotopes, cobalt
one, nickel five and copper two, et cetera.
|
|
Maurice VD 37
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 66
Registered: 31-12-2018
Member Is Offline
|
|
On the other hand, Beryllium-8 is so unstable, that it does not exist longer than the duration of the collision between two alpha particles (helions).
Why is it so ? Beryllium-8 has an even number of protons and neutrons, and even a doubly even number of protons and neutrons. It must be super stable.
And still it does not exist. Why ?
|
|
chornedsnorkack
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 553
Registered: 16-2-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by clearly_not_atara ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Nucleons in nuclei pair up in spin up/down pairs similarly to electrons in orbitals (because they're fermions). So the most stable nuclei usually have
even numbers of nucleons, and with the exception of lithium-6, boron-10 and nitrogen-14, it is basically always more stable to have an even number of
protons with an even number of neutrons than a maybe more favorable proton/neutron ratio with odd numbers of both. |
And hydrogen-2.
Of the other natural odd-odd nuclei, Ta-180 does not decay at all, V-50 very slowly and La-138, Lu-176 and K-40 slowly.
Be-8 is unstable not because it is particularly unstable but because He-4 is super stable. For the same reason there is no bound nucleus with mass 5.
|
|
Mateo_swe
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 526
Registered: 24-8-2019
Location: Within EU
Member Is Offline
|
|
Cant this be related to the electron shells?
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 4298
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
The nucleons do exist in shells, which are similar to the electron shells, but unrelated.
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|