| Pages:
1
2 |
xwinorb
Hazard to Others
Posts: 100
Registered: 9-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
To Isomeric_Fred :
I never got less than 55 % with the modified Leminger method. I never tried exactly the procedure as in the Rhodium page ( Leminger paper ). Can tell
you it works very well for the 2,5-DMBA, my latest was 75 %. If interested see my previous posts.
It DOES NOT works so well for 3,4,5-TMBA though, yields much lower. I would suggest acidic Al-Hg for this one.
I usually use batch sizes 20 g or so of the 2,5-DMBA, in a 2 l BF.
xw.
|
|
|
stoichiometric_steve
National Hazard
Posts: 827
Registered: 14-12-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: satyric
|
|
Something else that seems to be critical for a nice yield: keep the reaction hot and don't add the HCl too slowly, otherwise the Nitroso intermediate
will tautomerize to the Oxime and hydrolyze to the parent Carbonyl compound.
|
|
|
stoichiometric_steve
National Hazard
Posts: 827
Registered: 14-12-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: satyric
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Barium  | | I know of several members of the Hive who have successfully used my methods. Both well trained chemists and simple cooks. |
If you ever come back to read this:
Fuck you, Thomas Lillius
|
|
|
njl
National Hazard
Posts: 609
Registered: 26-11-2019
Location: under the sycamore tree
Member Is Offline
Mood: ambivalent
|
|
Yet another rollercoaster of a thread. Steve, what prep are you referring to in that 11/1/08 reply? I've been try a few variations on the SM thread
linked in the rhodium archive where HCl is added to the substrate in methanol, with zinc being added afterwards and the reaction being cooled.
|
|
|
stoichiometric_steve
National Hazard
Posts: 827
Registered: 14-12-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: satyric
|
|
Referring to the reduction of secondary nitro compounds with Zn/HCl.
You meant the Leminger variant, which is preferable for primary nitrostyrenes.
|
|
|
njl
National Hazard
Posts: 609
Registered: 26-11-2019
Location: under the sycamore tree
Member Is Offline
Mood: ambivalent
|
|
Right. Honestly the procedure calling for zinc held in suspension with the substrate and addition of the acid over time was much more convenient when
I tried it on nitrostyrenes and I did end up getting reasonable yields despite screwing up isolation. What about the kinetics makes the order of
addition more favorable for different substrates?
|
|
|
OrganicGuy
Harmless
Posts: 29
Registered: 23-2-2020
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by stoichiometric_steve | Yeah, i was wrong about the figures. Whatever those indians claimed, i don't believe them.
The Fe/HCl reduction (yielding ketones) works best at 100°C and 7:2:1 Fe:HCl:Nitroalkene, solvent water, vigorous stirring, and a dash of FeCl3.
| Quote: | Originally posted by Barium
What do you mean? Am I omitting details or what? |
I'm not sure what's wrong with some of your procedures, it could just as well be my fault. But as for your "really wet redfuctive amination", i know
of several people (who have the right kind of experience) having been unable to reproduce your claimed yields. The best i got myself was 10%.
| Quote: | Originally posted by Barium
Seeing you talking about dimeric products and silica gel makes me believe you are talking about the borohydride/EtOH/Dioxane reduction system
|
Nope, i do know my shit. The dimerization is also a problem here - Especially when making indoles the way these fellas did: Beer et al.,
J. Chem. Soc.; 1948, 1605-1609
BTW Barium, you probably never noticed how useful your water/toluene/PTC system is for reduction of secondary nitroalkenes. Your writeups and posts
left me with the impression that all you wanted is to avoid PTCs, despite the fact that there is no double bond reduction as simple as this. I applied
it to large scale batches and it is the best method - easy workup, reaction runs on its own, great yields, easily recycled solvent.
|
Bets results I had was with 5:2:1 if carbonyl iron powder, but with regular cheap 99% iron powder then I had best results with 12:2:1 eq of
Iron/Hcl/p2np.
But best of all works 5:2:1 with zinc/acetic acid 98%/p2np. Reaction time only 30-40 min
|
|
|
Corrosive Joeseph
National Hazard
Posts: 915
Registered: 17-5-2015
Location: The Other Place
Member Is Offline
Mood: Cyclic
|
|
Hey OG, you got any actual yields for that.....?
/CJ
Being well adjusted to a sick society is no measure of one's mental health
|
|
|
RustyShackleford
Hazard to Others
Posts: 200
Registered: 10-12-2020
Location: Northern Europe
Member Is Offline
|
|
Zn/HCl aint so bad to extract if you just add a large excess of hydroxide to re-dissolve the zinc.
|
|
|
stoichiometric_steve
National Hazard
Posts: 827
Registered: 14-12-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: satyric
|
|
I'd like to know the exact conditions for this procedure, would you be so kind to share them?
|
|
|
OrganicGuy
Harmless
Posts: 29
Registered: 23-2-2020
Member Is Offline
|
|
yes I can do it in a week when I'm home at my computer, but check this doc. I've seen you had a lot of good posts here & there, so you'll figure
it out yourself by then 
Attachment: AUS amphetamine.pdf (1.9MB)
This file has been downloaded 1979 times
|
|
|
stoichiometric_steve
National Hazard
Posts: 827
Registered: 14-12-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: satyric
|
|
You probably misread that document. There is no mention whatsoever of any yield that high.
|
|
|
OrganicGuy
Harmless
Posts: 29
Registered: 23-2-2020
Member Is Offline
|
|
What yield?, I didn't mentioned how much yield I had, I only stated "the best yield I had was with..." and not how much
The percentage 98 and 99 is purity of iron and concentration of the acetic acid and has nothng to to with yields.
|
|
|
OrganicGuy
Harmless
Posts: 29
Registered: 23-2-2020
Member Is Offline
|
|
During the yrs I have also understood that because a certain document says so and so, doesn't mean you will have the same yield. I have seen many fake
indian documents claiming excellent yields, but when running it exactly the same conditions I got half. And I have seen documents where I had better
yield than they got after some experimentation. A document or journal is not static information, experimentation is always recommended
|
|
|
stoichiometric_steve
National Hazard
Posts: 827
Registered: 14-12-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: satyric
|
|
I stand corrected, i misread. I thought the 98% stood for yield. But the actual yield of the procedure is absolute shit.
|
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2800
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
Interesting that a key here seems to be a fast addition and high temp. It seems more often "difficult" reactions call for exactly the opposite. Maybe
the reason this rxn is so famously unreliable is that people optimize for the wrong thing.
|
|
|
ChemichaelRXN
Hazard to Others
Posts: 103
Registered: 7-10-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Universal Eye
|
|
If the reaction works ok, you can extract it with chloroform 1.49g/ml instead of toluene 0.865g/ml, which may form emulsion easier than chloroform
would.
You are the same perception looking out, from the same elements around the universe.
You are everything to be anything to begin with.
Https://you-are.space
Https://syntharise.com
|
|
|
OrganicGuy
Harmless
Posts: 29
Registered: 23-2-2020
Member Is Offline
|
|
If using the iron method, then the carbonyl and reduced/electrolytic iron powder gave yields better than regulare cheap iron powder (80-85%). For the
zinc/GAA method, with electrolytic zinc powder I had 75-80% and with cheap zinc below 70%, however the short reaction time is preferable to me since I
value family time. It also depends of course of the nitroalkene purity, AFAIK that's of highest concern when talking yields in these methods. Crap in
crap out...
The most recent doc I had is this attached. It's indian though, but seems worth checking out. Good luck to you with the yield
Attachment: Fe_HCl_MeOH.pdf (435kB)
This file has been downloaded 622 times
|
|
|
stoichiometric_steve
National Hazard
Posts: 827
Registered: 14-12-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: satyric
|
|
No worries my little dude, i had awesome yields with electrolytic iron powder.
750ml H2O
200g Fe
1 mol Nitroalkene
2.5g FeCl3
650ml HCl conc.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
