Pages:
1
2 |
highpower48
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 98
Registered: 30-10-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sorry if this posts more th a once, was having an issue with the quick reply function
According to Macroscale and Microscale Organic Experiments by Williamson 4th edition.
Use calcium oxide for drying ethanol. If it's at least 95% is suggests using benzene.
|
|
Keras
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 847
Registered: 20-8-2018
Location: (48, 2)
Member Is Offline
|
|
Did someone already mention Calcium hydride? Calcium hydride sucks water and gives out hydrogen. It’s used as a desiccant. Wikipedia even states
it’s used with alcohols.
[Edited on 7-9-2018 by Keras]
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3634
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
Calcium hydride is neither cheap nor easily available,
Speculation only ... not tried
using a water absorbant/adsorbant material that can be re-used with no overall loss of ethanol such as bran or tapioca may be better overall
e.g. https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/research/2011/110913LadischT...
i.e. any ethanol retained by the fermentable material will be returned to the next fermentation.
I doubt that absolutely dry ethanol will be produced
but it would remove most of the water
requiring less of whatever agressive / expensive dehydration material is required.
|
|
nimgoldman
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 303
Registered: 11-6-2018
Member Is Offline
|
|
Thanks. I found the issue was that one have to reflux with CaO for full 12 hours or more OR leave CaO in alcohol for several days with occassional
swirling.
Then it should be distilled over CaO and only middle fraction is taken - no filtering.
Another possible issue was that my CaO was not freshly ignited and I don't know how long it sat in the container, it might picked up some moisture.
So I reverted to molecular sieves but I will give it a shot later.
|
|
Keras
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 847
Registered: 20-8-2018
Location: (48, 2)
Member Is Offline
|
|
I’d had a quick look this summer on Ebay and there was some chap in China selling that for a few bucks. But it seems to have gone away.
Why not use the more available and cheaper calcium carbide then? Water will be transformed into ethylene and you get slaked lime that you can easily
filter out.
|
|
nimgoldman
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 303
Registered: 11-6-2018
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Keras ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) |
I’d had a quick look this summer on Ebay and there was some chap in China selling that for a few bucks. But it seems to have gone away.
Why not use the more available and cheaper calcium carbide then? Water will be transformed into ethylene and you get slaked lime that you can easily
filter out. |
I haven't heard about using calcium carbide for drying ethanol. Do you have a source reference?
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
Commercial methods are:
Distilling 95% alcohol with benzene - not suitable for human consumption and requires a very high reflux ratio
Drying with molecular sieves - suitable for human consumption if sieves are food grade
Drying with CaO - if CaO is suitable for human consumption after distilling is suitable
Drying with cellulose - usually used for fuel grade - literally kiln dried corn cobs
For ultra dry use iodide activated magnesium as described in 'Purification of laboratory chemicals' by Armarego et al.
Also activated aluminum amalgam from the same source.
Potassium carbonate is the simplest and easiest with the least loss but it has to be pretty high percent to work. You can't use off the shelf vodka
or mash for salting out. There is another thread that covers getting it over 95%.
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=61746
|
|
Keras
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 847
Registered: 20-8-2018
Location: (48, 2)
Member Is Offline
|
|
No. This is a wild guess based on what everyone knows of calcium carbide reacting with water. Besides, if calcium hydride is used to suck water
(producing Ca(OH)2), why calcium carbide wouldn't work?
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 5109
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Carbide is used- but it's hazardous. Acetylene (Not ethylene, BTW) isn't nice stuff to work with.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2993231?seq=1#metadata_info_tab...
|
|
Keras
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 847
Registered: 20-8-2018
Location: (48, 2)
Member Is Offline
|
|
Agreed. As I said, it was a wild guess. I had considered the possibility of acetylene dissolving in alcohol, but didn't mention it.
Also this article
[Edited on 11-9-2018 by Keras]
|
|
CaptainPike
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 68
Registered: 21-12-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by RogueRose ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) |
[…]
I finally tried anhydrous copper sulfate and had excellent success. The thing about using CuSO4 instead of something like K2CO3 is the hydrates that
are formed with CuSO4 - which is a pentahydrate instead of a monohydrate - it can accept 5x the water per molecule compared to potassium carbonate.
It also has the great characteristic of changing color to tell you when it is "full" (hydrated).
[…]
|
I liked this. I haven't used it yet for drying ethanol, but I did bake some down to at least the dihydrate in a conventional oven – white powder.
Here's the MSDS for the one I bought:
ZEP ROOT KILL MSDS
|
|
nimgoldman
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 303
Registered: 11-6-2018
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Herr Haber ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Quote: Originally posted by Deathunter88 ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) |
Now, I recommend the OP revisit molecular sieves. If you're losing too much ethanol from using them on a liter scale, then you are adding way too much
or you are using something other than the 3A type, and ethanol is getting adsorbed into them alongside water. 10-20% by weight is plenty, just enough
to cover the bottom of the container with an even layer (1-2cm). |
Same thought here.
Maybe OP's sieves are of questionnable quality ?
[Edited on 9-3-2018 by Texium (zts16)] |
These are 3A sieves from a reputable vendor (Carl Roth). They were very expensive. I have reactivated them beforehand (4 hours at 250 °C and 100 mbar
of vacuum).
I used 5 grams of sieves per gram of water. Lower sieves:water ratio resulted in incomplete drying (the resulting alcohol was 97-98%).
Last time I used 5:1 ratio, lost 100 ml of ethanol (from liter of solution) and still got only 98%, not 99%.
I don't know why this process is so lossy...
[Edited on 14-9-2018 by nimgoldman]
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
5g per 1g of water is about right. Seives absorb 20% of their weight. 3a should not absorb alcohol, even 4a should not. Alcohol is about 5a. There
should be about 45ml of water in 1000ml of azeotropic and 250g of seives should absorb that. Is your alcohol actually azeotropic?
|
|
nimgoldman
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 303
Registered: 11-6-2018
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by macckone ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | 5g per 1g of water is about right. Seives absorb 20% of their weight. 3a should not absorb alcohol, even 4a should not. Alcohol is about 5a. There
should be about 45ml of water in 1000ml of azeotropic and 250g of seives should absorb that. Is your alcohol actually azeotropic?
|
Now I am unfortunately never able to get above 93.5-94% even with multiple distillations with a 60 cm Vigreux column.
I use 2L heating mantle with a thermometer probe and usually have to heat the solution to 79-81 °C to push the vapours up to the still head.
I tried insulating the column but it does not help much if at all.
Unfortunately the heating mantle sometimes go crazy and has a hard time keeping a constant temperature.
Overall the distillation is extremely slow, like 1 drop per 2 seconds. I don't know if it should be that way. If I make it quicker, like 1-2 drops per
second, then the resulting alcohol is only up to 94%.
|
|
Fyndium
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1192
Registered: 12-7-2020
Location: Not in USA
Member Is Offline
|
|
So, about that portand cement..
Has anyone actually tried it or know of a successful use for dehydrating ethanol with it?
|
|
digga
Harmless
Posts: 41
Registered: 11-6-2018
Member Is Offline
|
|
Tapioca. It is used industrially to dry ethanol.
|
|
pneumatician
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 409
Registered: 27-5-2013
Location: Magonia
Member Is Offline
Mood: ■■■■■■■■■■ INRI ■■■■■■■■■■ ** Igne Natura Renovatur Integra **
|
|
What you call "dry etanol" or "100% eta." is what a alcoholometer say, pure obvious :-)
in reality when you get 98, 99, 100% etanol is only a primitive standard measure far from real dry etanol. The 100% etanol continue contain more than
60% of water, so pure etanol in an alcoholometer need to say something like 160% :-)
no more, no less.
|
|
Pages:
1
2 |