John paul III
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 110
Registered: 28-4-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Nitroguanidine performance as a gun propellant
It is often cited that nitroguanidine is being used in triple-based smokeless powders because it allows to reduce temperature without reducing
pressure. That makes me wonder, if nitroguanidine could be used by itself as the only propellant? I suspect the reason it is not already is it would
lead to quick fouling of the barrel. However, would it be possible to use it as a 1:1 [regarding only propulsive power per volume] substitute for
modern powders?
|
|
Microtek
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 849
Registered: 23-9-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The energy content in nitroguanidine is not nearly as high as in nitrocellulose, so you wouldn't get the same power if you substituted 1:1.
NQ has an energy of explosion of ca. 2.5 kJ/g while NG is ca. 4.2 kJ/g (depending on exact decomposition products). NQ is slightly more dense than NG,
but only about 3%. If you compare to double base powders, the difference would only be more pronounced.
|
|
underground
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 699
Registered: 10-10-2013
Location: Europe
Member Is Offline
|
|
Nitroguanidine does not burn a lot in contact with fire like Ncellulose. I really doubt if just only Nguan is going to work.
|
|