ficolas
Hazard to Others
Posts: 146
Registered: 14-5-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
When looking for competent scientific articles
Whenever im interested in contrasting something about popular belief that seems pretty fake to me (Or finding trustable information or whatever), I
just google it, but very often, the results are wikipedia, or shitty articles from blogs that give ignorant tips. This is happening quite often, as I
am becoming quite sceptical (And it seems to be making me wiser, I used to belive some bullshit when I was younger).
Finding competent articles seem to be a hard task, so I wanted to ask here to see if somebody could give me some tips for looking for competent
information.
And also, to complain about it (even thought its not going to change anything  )
about it because its quite annoying. This may not be exactly a topic suited for the forum... sorry if that is right, just send it straight to
detritus. Im getting quite pesimist about this topic for some reason.
|
|
|
morganbw
National Hazard
Posts: 561
Registered: 23-11-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If you have a specific question, perhaps ask. There are several members here who can supply you with a scientific paper or to point you toward a
thread that will give you a good overview on what you are interested in.
The info found in this forum is quite astounding. No single individual here knows all but as a collective it is pretty amazing.
If you need the secret of life, perhaps this is the wrong place, ask specific questions that pertain to chemistry.
|
|
|
ficolas
Hazard to Others
Posts: 146
Registered: 14-5-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I will! 
Im loving this forum, and its comunity so far, and hopefully in the future I will be able to contribute more, when I get proper studies.
But sometimes its something that isnt really important, for example the other day, somebody told me that certain food had numerous beneficts to
health, so I went to google it, and I found mostly blogs saying that it was true, and after some time I finally found a proper and kinda recent
article saying that it could have some, but not completelly demostrated. Im wont ask something like that, its not that important, and trying to find
infoemation by myself before asking is always good, no need to disturb other people (Specially when having spent some time arround certain comunities
in the internet where people dont treat others that good when they ask questions, however sciencemadness seems to be completelly different )
|
|
|
gregxy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 421
Registered: 26-5-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Almost any scientific topic has a peer reviewed journal devoted to it. Start with those. For medical stuff try pubmed, the government data base of
articles.
For fringe topic (aliens in Roswell) good luck. You can't believe photos or video "evidence" any more.
|
|
|
Richard3050
Harmless
Posts: 17
Registered: 20-3-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by gregxy  | Almost any scientific topic has a peer reviewed journal devoted to it. Start with those. For medical stuff try pubmed, the government data base of
articles.
For fringe topic (aliens in Roswell) good luck. You can't believe photos or video "evidence" any more.
|
While I do agree that things that have been peer reviewed are often more accurate, this not always the case. Check out the article by FiveThirtyEight
"Science Isn’t Broken" and a video by Sixty Symbols "Peer Review and Golden Chopsticks".
"Science knowledge only adds to the excitement... I don't understand how it subtracts."
|
|
|
Aria
Harmless
Posts: 5
Registered: 3-4-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks for starting this topic. I`m also interested in it
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3738
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
ficolas
Wikipedia is one of my primary resources.
The articles are easy to read, informative and mostly accurate as they are peer reviewed by multiple people.
Most importantly, at the bottom of the page, are links to references.
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
It really depends on what you are researching... some topics have boundless documentation of high accuracy and quality with easily verified and
repeatable results. Others do not.
Wikipedia is a start, but it is far from perfect for sorting the wheat from the chaff. In recent memory, I read a link from there that recommended
using calcium chloride to dry acetic acid (CaCl2 dissolves in AcOH, releasing free HCl).
The ACS tends put reputable articles in its journals and indexes reputable articles. I'm not exactly sure what they do to verify article quality, but
they are clearly doing something right.
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3738
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
As I am fairly new to chemistry (school + last 4 years) I compare my level of chemistry knowledge equivalent to when for my electronics hobby I used
to read Everyday Electronics, then Practical Electronics, followed by Wireless World then Uni.
Electronics hobbyists have massive advantages over chemistry hobbyists,
most significantly component manufacturers need us to use their products,
and because there are so few competitors, each tries to educate us as best they can.
Free samples everywhere.
Chemistry, being a much more established discipline seems to me to be built upon a culture of secrecy - since the days of alchemy.
And I never worried about legality or shipping for electronics..
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by JJay | | In recent memory, I read a link from there that recommended using calcium chloride to dry acetic acid (CaCl2 dissolves in AcOH, releasing free HCl).
|
That's not entirely wrong, since HCl will "salt out" the water layer at high concentrations. Seems like phosphoric acid (and probably sulfuric acid
too) would be a better choice. You'd have to distill though, I guess.
One red flag for me has been using scientific terminology to describe inconclusive or sloppy experiments. Or trying to put a positive spin on a
reaction that produces considerable amounts of more than one product, especially if it's clear that only one of those products is desired.
The first step in the process of learning something is admitting that you don't know it already.
I'm givin' the spam shields max power at full warp, but they just dinna have the power! We're gonna have to evacuate to new forum software!
|
|
|
sodium_stearate
Hazard to Others
Posts: 255
Registered: 22-4-2011
Location: guard duty at the checkpoint
Member Is Offline
Mood: No mask.
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Sulaiman |
Electronics hobbyists have massive advantages over chemistry hobbyists...
Free samples everywhere.
Chemistry, being a much more established discipline seems to me to be built upon a culture of secrecy - since the days of alchemy.
And I never worried about legality or shipping for electronics.. |
True overall. However, let us not forget that many chemical
companies do have rather aggressive samples programs.
It was due to this fact, that I was able to make my
first 200 cylinders using stearic acid samples obtained
from various manufacturers. In addition to the benefit
of having the material to use without cost, the greatest
advantage turned out to be one of being able to
test them all so that the best kind could be found.
"Opportunity is missed by most people
because it is dressed in overalls and it
looks like work" T.A. Edison
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
