| Pages:
1
2
3
4
5 |
Quince
National Hazard
Posts: 773
Registered: 31-1-2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Has anyone here actually tried distillation of H2SO4 from drain cleaner? Would that remove the buffers? Would regular glassware suffice?
\"One of the surest signs of Conrad\'s genius is that women dislike his books.\" --George Orwell
|
|
|
Duster
Hazard to Self
Posts: 56
Registered: 19-7-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
From what I have read, many have tried, and while its possible to get some of the color or impurities out, most people still have the same color they
did before.
Some succeed somewhat... I belive it was somewhere here last night I read about someone distilling sulfuric acid drain cleaner, and while their
product was indeed clear, they lost a lot of it in some reaction that accidently took place...
Regardless, I have never heard of the color affecting any reaction that uses the acid. Sure it may look odd and may scare you, but I have never heard
of anything go wrong because of it... But then again who knows...
As for normal glassware to handle it, you'll be fine. No matter the concentration, H2SO4 simply can not eat away at glass... flourine on the
other hand....
Duster
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3253
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
It was the battery acid thread of all places that I posted on my distillation of drain cleaner. I used regular glassware but I did the distillation under
reduced pressure. I got very clean sulfuric acid from the process.
Of note is that I didn't use magnetic stirring and used boiling stones which is a no-no in a reduced pressure distillation as a result I would
get occasional flash boiling. Also when initially distilling water would condense in the still head and drip back into the very hot sulfuric acid and
would cause a poping in the flask shooting vapors and acid upwards, ruining my first attempt although I was more careful with my second attempt. If
you did this with an apparatus under atmospheric pressure it may have come off better though I would have had to have used a better heat source.
Maybe wrap the still head in Ni-Chrome to keep it over 100C so water would not condense. Also note that at such high temperatures I probably
shouldn't have used ice water in my condenser and I am somewhat lucky it didn't break, maybe use air instead.
|
|
|
Quince
National Hazard
Posts: 773
Registered: 31-1-2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Well, I could do reduced pressure, but the issue is how long it takes to reach temperature.
I don't have a problem with the color of the drain cleaner, it's very slightly yellowish. I have a problem with the bits of cloudiness in
it, which is either particulate matter (but probably easier to distill than find appropriate filter), or the buffers.
I assume with proper insulation around the still head, with the source flask in a heating mantle, it shouldn't be too bad. I'll probably
give it a try next weekend, and I'll post the results.
Any use to add a vigreux column, to help with the water issue?
[Edited on 21-8-2005 by Quince]
\"One of the surest signs of Conrad\'s genius is that women dislike his books.\" --George Orwell
|
|
|
Duster
Hazard to Self
Posts: 56
Registered: 19-7-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
From what I can recall, drain cleaner is about as close to pure H2SO4 as your likely to get, that is, the water has already formed its azeotrope with
water... In which case you wouldnt be seperating any water from the acid. All your doing here is just seperating your acid/water from impurities.
What a long way to say a fractional distillation wouldnt make any diffrence.
However, if it would be battery acid, or anything under 98% (I belive) then it may be *somewhat* benifical... Then again water boils sooner than the
acid anyway so...
Make of it what you will, but if your just going to get impurities out, then a quick and simple distillation should get the job done.
Duster
|
|
|
Quince
National Hazard
Posts: 773
Registered: 31-1-2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Will mineral wool (the kind used to insulate the walls of houses) be OK as a filter? I'm thinking filtration is much easier than distillation at
320*C.
\"One of the surest signs of Conrad\'s genius is that women dislike his books.\" --George Orwell
|
|
|
neutrino
International Hazard
Posts: 1583
Registered: 20-8-2004
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: oscillating
|
|
I don’t see how it would help. The acid has to be the same temperature to make it to the condenser regardless of what columns it has to pass
through.
edit: Two responses while I was typing, that’s unusual.
The wool should do, just make sure there is no plastic in it.
[Edited on 21-8-2005 by neutrino]
|
|
|
MadHatter
International Hazard
Posts: 1346
Registered: 9-7-2004
Location: Maine
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enjoying retirement
|
|
Rooto
I've never encountered problems using the Rooto sulphuric acid despite its yellow tint.
The stuff is great for producing nitric acid.
From opening of NCIS New Orleans - It goes a BOOM ! BOOM ! BOOM ! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !
|
|
|
((Blasta))
Harmless
Posts: 29
Registered: 3-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
wow...hot stuff!
I just found a place that sells Pro-Drain Opener. Its amazingly energetic stuff... it is thick and slightly amber colored and it fumes slightly. The
pro's say it is 93.5% H2So4... it does Nitration REALLY well. So no sense on trying to concentrate it. I just made some triNitromethane... using
the odd ball patent using Nitric Acid on Isopropyl Alcohol. Wow, can I say wow.
I post pics soon,
[Edited on 2-9-2005 by ((Blasta))]
use caution---explosives in transport
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8027
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Nitromethane from isopropyl alcohol? That sounds interesting. Can you explain this? What is the mechanism behind this?
|
|
|
Tacho
National Hazard
Posts: 582
Registered: 5-12-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Really interesting. Patent number is?
|
|
|
((Blasta))
Harmless
Posts: 29
Registered: 3-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
United States Patent: 4,122,124
read up and try it*  with rising fuel costs this might just be a money maker.
....being sarcastic
--------------------------
Instead of using liquid Nitric Acid...I used the chemical reaction between Sulfuric Acid and Potassium Nitrate inside a glass flask. Then I pumped the
vapour into another flask containing warmed Isopropyl Alcohol. The product that condensed was yellowish and sweet smelling... yep, its pure Nitroform
or tri-Nitromethane. I estimate 60% yield... which isn't bad since it was my first attempt.
[Edited on 2-9-2005 by ((Blasta))]
[Edited on 2-9-2005 by ((Blasta))]
use caution---explosives in transport
|
|
|
The_Davster
A pnictogen
Posts: 2861
Registered: 18-11-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: .
|
|
Thats TRInitromethane, not just regular nitromethane which contains only one nitro group. Please note while messing with trinitromethane that it is
quite carcinogenic.
|
|
|
((Blasta))
Harmless
Posts: 29
Registered: 3-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
oh, really? Yikes. I bet triNitroMethane could be useful in making PLX or a variation of it, right?
use caution---explosives in transport
|
|
|
Quince
National Hazard
Posts: 773
Registered: 31-1-2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
What the hell? This patent is for making trinitromethane, not nitromethane. Can't you tell the difference between CH(NO2)3 and CHNO2? Rising
fuel costs? Talk about false advertising! Sheesh, just when I thought we had something interesting here.
Heh, I'm glad it's carcinogenic, maybe the fool will get cancer and stop spreading misinformation on this forum.
[Edited on 2-9-2005 by Quince]
\"One of the surest signs of Conrad\'s genius is that women dislike his books.\" --George Orwell
|
|
|
((Blasta))
Harmless
Posts: 29
Registered: 3-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I thought I had something interesting as well... well then again maybe I don't.
What use is triNitromethane then? I thought it could be used as a fuel of sorts with other chemicals? hummm... sorry guys
oh yea, in my origional post I did specifically state that this synthasis did create pure Nitroform/ tri-Nitromethane. Anyway what do I do with 120 mL
of triNitromethane...
??
[Edited on 2-9-2005 by ((Blasta))]
[Edited on 2-9-2005 by ((Blasta))]
use caution---explosives in transport
|
|
|
Quince
National Hazard
Posts: 773
Registered: 31-1-2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Further nitration to tetranitromethane for use in binary exlosives (but that's even more toxic, lethal in air is about 0.1 ppm). Check out
roguesci.
[Edited on 2-9-2005 by Quince]
\"One of the surest signs of Conrad\'s genius is that women dislike his books.\" --George Orwell
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 8027
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
That's a pity... I was really hoping to get some (mono)nitromethane in pure form  . The trinitro stuff is not interesting to me. Up to now I only succeeded in finding mixes with methanol or petroleum for model cars and karts, but
I need the pure stuff. The mixes I found only contain up to 10% or something like that .
|
|
|
Quince
National Hazard
Posts: 773
Registered: 31-1-2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Yeah, but it would have more wear on the engine. Most aren't made for more than 10%, and a lot of plane glow engines are intended for 5% NM.
Not to mention that the 2-cycle glow engine sprays non-fully burned fuel all over the place, as I found out the hard way...
\"One of the surest signs of Conrad\'s genius is that women dislike his books.\" --George Orwell
|
|
|
catfish
Harmless
Posts: 7
Registered: 28-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: high on life
|
|
Thunder-
you prolly smelled SO2 or SO3, and possibly saw water vapor leaving the solution.
|
|
|
Quince
National Hazard
Posts: 773
Registered: 31-1-2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
SO2 does not smell like "burning death", it smells like burned strike-anywhere matches or firework smoke or a package of dried fruit that
was just unsealed. The "burning death" description sounds more like the H2S, which as a far nastier stench than SO2, though I don't
see how that could have come from the reaction. Now SO3, I don't know what that smells like, how it compares to SO2, so those that are in the
know please describe it to us. Or maybe there was sulfur pollution in his water, as occasionally happens with tap water that's sourced from
wells, and that also has H2S smell.
[Edited on 3-9-2005 by Quince]
\"One of the surest signs of Conrad\'s genius is that women dislike his books.\" --George Orwell
|
|
|
neutrino
International Hazard
Posts: 1583
Registered: 20-8-2004
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: oscillating
|
|
I'm guessing that the smell was an H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> mist.
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
SO3 is rather hygroscopic, so it forms H2SO4 (of some percentage H2O, because it is also hygroscopic!) which just burns when inhaled. I haven't
noticed any smell from it where hot pyrolysis isn't involved (e.g. burning refractory sulfates like CaSO4 makes a lot of SO2).
Tim
|
|
|
Fleaker
International Hazard
Posts: 1252
Registered: 19-6-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: nucleophilic
|
|
Would it be possible to use a centrifuge to separate the dye from the acid? (referring the cheap black drain cleaner)
|
|
|
IPN
Hazard to Others
Posts: 156
Registered: 31-5-2003
Location: Finland
Member Is Offline
Mood: oxidized
|
|
If the dye is only as a very fine suspension then yes. Remember to use strong tubes, preferably made from thick PP. No glass.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2
3
4
5 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
