| Pages:
1
2 |
JJay
International Hazard
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Women in Chemistry
You often hear that there are few women in engineering fields. I have occasionally heard the same complaint about chemistry, though, but I'm not sure
if it holds true... I know several women who are chemists, and I remember noticing numerous women in my chemistry classes in college. This was not the
case in programming and physics classes. I don't know why programming and physics attract so few women, but I'm not sure if the same is true of
chemistry.
Is it true that there are few women in chemistry? If it is, is this a problem, and if so, what should be done about it?
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6335
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
There appears to be fewer women on this site. But I don't think that this site is reflective of chemistry in general.
However, I don't think there is a problem even if women are "underrepresented". I know of no law or rule of the universe that stipulates that both
sexes must be equally represented in all fields. It only becomes a problem if individuals find themselves unable to pursue the things they are
interested in pursuing. And that is quite a different piece of data -- not at all the same as the gender proportions within a particular vocation or
field.
I am quite sure that men are underrepresented in the fields of scrapbooking and quilting. But I don't think that is a problem either.
|
|
|
Sigmatropic
Hazard to Others
Posts: 307
Registered: 29-1-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
As you did, I too noticed quite some women in chemistry in college. Still less than what you'd expect based on the population but they're certainly
there. As with all things there must be an eye catcher moment before one gets interested in something and decides to study the matter.
I've been theorizing that there are more male chemists because of the sex appeal of "Feuer und Flamme, Schall und Rauch" - as a lecturer at The Royal
Instution put it - to young men. Myself probably included. This interest is innate and does not need encouragement. This has got me thinking what the
eye catcher moment is to women in chemistry? Maybe chemistry class can be tailored to more proactively show such eye catchers and in doing so
encourage women to study in chemistry?
|
|
|
Chemetix
Hazard to Others
Posts: 376
Registered: 23-9-2016
Location: Oztrayleeyah
Member Is Offline
Mood: Wavering between lucidity and madness
|
|
My wife recently attended a talk at the Women in Chemistry group, which is a affiliated group with the RACI.
https://www.raci.org.au/branches/vic-branch/women-in-chemist...
I think what you'll find is that there's not much in the way of backyard chemistry by women. My wife is an analytical chemist and she is more or less
perplexed why anyone would want to try doing things outside a safe regulated environment like a professional lab. Which causes some consternation for
want of a better word, when I want to try something at home occasionally.
[Edited on 14-5-2017 by Chemetix]
|
|
|
Praxichys
International Hazard
Posts: 1063
Registered: 31-7-2013
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Coprecipitated
|
|
I have two younger sisters. Both enjoyed chemistry growing up, usually under my influence. One is a master's-degree formulation chemist at a paint and
coatings company and the other went for biochem and is now a histotechnologist.
|
|
|
TheNerdyFarmer
Hazard to Others
Posts: 131
Registered: 30-9-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
From what I have seen, most women in chemistry seem to lean toward the biochemistry field. Being a high school student I talked to the director at my
local STEM building and she said that most girls lean toward the biochemistry side of the program in order to go into the field of medicine.
Not trying to stereotype women in chemistry here, this is just what I have seen.
|
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
It should be extremely clear to everyone reading this that statistical generalizations that might appropriately apply to large groups of people don't
usually say much about individuals. That said, it can be dangerous for an education director to make such statements.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6335
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
@ JJay
Who's the "education director"?
|
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
j_sum1: Huh? I don't know.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6335
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
You said it.
Quote: Originally posted by JJay  | | It should be extremely clear to everyone reading this that statistical generalizations that might appropriately apply to large groups of people don't
usually say much about individuals. That said, it can be dangerous for an education director to make such statements.
|
I was just trying to follow what you were saying.
|
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Oh, it appeared that you were asking a question about a specific education director. Feel free to clarify.
|
|
|
Corrosive Joeseph
National Hazard
Posts: 915
Registered: 17-5-2015
Location: The Other Place
Member Is Offline
Mood: Cyclic
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by TheNerdyFarmer | From what I have seen, most women in chemistry seem to lean toward the biochemistry field. Being a high school student I talked to the director at my
local STEM building and she said that most girls lean toward the biochemistry side of the program in order to go into the field of medicine.
Not trying to stereotype women in chemistry here, this is just what I have seen. |
I think this is the 'education director'.................
/CJ
Being well adjusted to a sick society is no measure of one's mental health
|
|
|
The Volatile Chemist
International Hazard
Posts: 1981
Registered: 22-3-2014
Location: 'Stil' in the lab...
Member Is Offline
Mood: Copious
|
|
Five year old neighbor recently told my sister she liked chemistry and asked (my sister) if she had taken chemistry in highschool yet. Needless to say
I was pleasantly surprised in the interest in chemistry of someone so young.
|
|
|
PirateDocBrown
National Hazard
Posts: 570
Registered: 27-11-2016
Location: Minnesota
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
There's a good number of female chemical engineers at the university where I went to undergrad. Most of the belonged to SWE:
http://societyofwomenengineers.swe.org/
|
|
|
Amos
International Hazard
Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
Mood: No
|
|
I'm in an engineering program where the gender ratio is about 3:1 male to female, but the individual Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering
departments are roughly equal. The departments that really suffer are Mechanical and Computer/Electrical engineering. The overall demographics really
vary widely for a number of different characteristics depending on which specific area of STEM you examine.
|
|
|
Alice
Hazard to Others
Posts: 111
Registered: 11-5-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
At the university it's pretty obvious, the ratio of women decreases from students to PhD students to post-docs, assistant professors, and professors.
|
|
|
tshirtdr1
Harmless
Posts: 31
Registered: 12-12-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Women in Chemistry
I don't have any hard data. (Perhaps I should start keeping some.) However, I teach chemistry at a small regional university in the US. Most of our
professional chemistry majors are probably male, however we do have quite a few female. The ratio is roughly 3:1. There are probably more female
chemistry majors overall, but most of them are planning to pursue pharmacy. I think the major difference I have noticed is most of that the female
professional chemistry majors don't seem to be too interested in really doing chemistry. They have chosen this field because they think it will be a
good, stable job, or they have a relative who was a chemist and they are following suit. I can offer to show students how to use the NMR, etc, outside
class, and I have only ever had one female student show up for that. That particular female student was exceptional and with her bachelor's can
probably run circles around 90% of PhD students. I am not saying women are not as smart, but that most of them aren't really interested in the
chemistry, but just getting a job. I am female myself, BTW, and I have always loved science. It is difficult for me to understand their lack of
enthusiasm.
|
|
|
Geocachmaster
Hazard to Others
Posts: 146
Registered: 5-3-2016
Location: Maine, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Corroded, just like my spatulas
|
|
Someone should do a poll of SM, to see the number of men and women that are here.
|
|
|
Aria
Harmless
Posts: 5
Registered: 3-4-2018
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
This is a legitimate question, women are more represented in social sciences. This gender segregation is a well known and accepted fact.
|
|
|
VSEPR_VOID
National Hazard
Posts: 719
Registered: 1-9-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fullerenes
|
|
females are just a myth
Within cells interlinked
Within cells interlinked
Within cells interlinked
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6335
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: At home
Member Is Offline
Mood: Most of the ducks are in a row
|
|
A better question is why females seem to be underrepresented here. I am not claiming an even split in the world of chemistry but I think things are
even more skewed on this site. Similarly my YT viewership is 96% male.
|
|
|
Daffodile
Hazard to Others
Posts: 167
Registered: 7-3-2016
Location: Highways of Valhalla
Member Is Offline
Mood: Riding eternal
|
|
I'm a chem major atm, at a university in British Columbia (UVIC, if anyone is curious).
The classes are balanced or have more females than males, except physics and computer science.
The administration/ various speakers still dish out lots of talks about equality and stuff however (remember that is it very hard for a women to
succeed in chemistry, tell them that they are awesome and never say bad stuff!!). Like they put up a little memo outside my chem lab at the start of
last semester that said that no one is inherently more likely to do better in chem based on race, sex, etc, and discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perhaps my own sexist view, but I have noticed that (at least at my level in lower years) females seem to have minimal sincere interest in chemistry
(when compared to the people on this board). Like I know a lot of dudes who are naturally curious or easily fascinated by scientific processes, but as
of now I have only met one or two females with that description (and they seem to be rare cases). Not sure why that is, it just seems that most women
seem to find chemistry a chore.
I don't mean that there is anything inherently wrong with women to make them this way, I think maybe the culture on campus can probably become
somewhat toxic, and dissuade women from pursuing or showing interest in natural sciences as they are often considered somewhat patriarchal or
masculine activities. I could just be bitter because I'm in some humanity electives where I am lectured on this stuff very often.
[Edited on 4-4-2018 by Daffodile]
|
|
|
Reboot
Hazard to Others
Posts: 141
Registered: 8-8-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I wonder.
Chemistry is inherently dangerous; perhaps that's an element that makes it more attractive to men (who tend to score higher on scales of novelty
seeking and lower on avoidance of physical danger.)
Chemistry is (at least for me) very much a 3D visualization process, which men seem to be somewhat stronger at than women.
It's hard to separate genetic from cultural factors. My suspicion is that in a society that was perfectly socially balanced and neutral we would
still see a trend toward more men in chemistry, but I can't claim that's more than a hunch.
|
|
|
Assured Fish
Hazard to Others
Posts: 319
Registered: 31-8-2015
Location: Noo Z Land
Member Is Offline
Mood: Misanthropic
|
|
Reeboot, you have to remember that cutural factors can over a long enough period of time become imprinted in our DNA.
The reason i find chemistry so attractive is that I have a bit of a fantasy of being some hooded dark character working away in a tall tower on the
edge of a mountain range all alone (not including my igor) with the monthly angry mob showing up with pitch forks and torches knocking at my door with
the intend of burning me alive, with me then responding by throwing 300mls of chloro acetone out the window over the crowd of angry citizens.
Chemistry and especially amateur chemistry is a somewhat daunting subject to much of humanity and likely scares most, I have often called it the
modern day equivalent to witchcraft but in actuality i suppose it may have also been responsible for much of the early day interpretations of
witchcraft.
Such a subject can often push you to the fringes of society as im sure many of us understand, I think perhaps woman are less inclined to becoming
outcasts by society.
This could be hypothetically atrabuted our genetic from the hunter gatherer times of our past where woman generally stayed home and cared for the
children and looked after the village/tribe whereas men would go out into the dangerous wilderness in search of food.
Thus an instinctual attaction to being isolated from the rest of society was something that could help the men cope out in the wilderness and find
some sense of enjoyment and solitude in the deep dark wilderness.
Like Reboot said an attraction to danger is also something that may make the hobby more attractive to men, after all there is nothing like distilling
Bromine without a fumehood.
I know im making alot of generalizations here but this is more of a statistical phenomenon and thus we must evaluate things as the mean.
I have honestly never met a female amateur chemist but im sure somewhere in the big blue yonder there exists atleast 1.
|
|
|
XeonTheMGPony
International Hazard
Posts: 1640
Registered: 5-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by JJay | You often hear that there are few women in engineering fields. I have occasionally heard the same complaint about chemistry, though, but I'm not sure
if it holds true... I know several women who are chemists, and I remember noticing numerous women in my chemistry classes in college. This was not the
case in programming and physics classes. I don't know why programming and physics attract so few women, but I'm not sure if the same is true of
chemistry.
Is it true that there are few women in chemistry? If it is, is this a problem, and if so, what should be done about it?
|
Why would it be a problem? should woman be forced to be chemists? Or sewage workers? Often you find people that seek out fields that interest them,
there is no gender check box for admission. Just greater majority of woman do not tend to be interested in the direct science and material handling
fields.
Some do but they are the exception to the rule, most prefer interpersonal jobs as statistics have shown, much the same with the wage gap myth that
just keeps getting recycled, when correctly measured it and chooses accounted for, most prefer personal time then dedication to work and thusly tend
to have lower hours on average (And I agree with them on that, I'll make do with less money as I value my time at home more)
We all ready have full equality of opportunity, but now days every one wants equality of out come, the Russians tried that in the early days, didn't
work out so well, as Venezuela is learning!
Communism is an idiots venture, and that's where that thinking leads, a room full of one gender, color can be divers, in thought, just as a divers
group of colors and genders, but the crucial thing is those people need to want to be there! No one likes to be forced into a position to satisfy some
one ells's fragile sense of self and ego.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
