xeneficus
Harmless
Posts: 7
Registered: 19-7-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
How do you decide what you want to synthesize?
I'm a new initiate into the dark order of the erlenmeyer flask, so this might be obvious to those more experienced.
Looking at all of the syntheses in organic chemistry, it feels like 90% of the compounds don't have a specific function, as far as I can tell from a
novice's standpoint. Inorganic chemistry has the sex appeal of high energy materials and precious metals; the goal is to make something that blows up
or is shiny. In organic chemistry do you decide what to synthesize for its use? If so, where do you find new, interesting compounds to synthesize? Or
is it just in the challenge of the reaction?
|
|
|
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
I dunno, organic chemistry has had its own sex appeal ever since Breaking Bad became popular. Now I regularly have people ask me "do you know how to
make meth as good as Walter White's in Breaking Bad?" Yes, it's an incredibly easy synthesis. In fact, Walter White was kind of an idiot for wasting
so much energy trying to steal methylamine, when he could have just gotten nitromethane racing fuel by the bucket, and reduced it in a one-pot
reductive amination. Also, what the fuck was that blue impurity? Nothing good, I'm sure.
Hell, tell most people that you can make methamphetamine by reductively aminating phenylacetone with methylamine, and they'll be impressed. "What's
phenylacetone?" "Oh, you know acetone? Like nail polish remover? Like that, with a phenyl group attached to one side."
Note: do not actually make methamphetamine. Right now I'm actually trying to make dopamine via the Henry reaction, using caffeine as the base
catalyst. None of it would be useful at all, but I'm not sure it's ever been done before and documented, and it seems a rather appropriate set of
reactants.
[Edited on 7/23/16 by Melgar]
|
|
|
Crowfjord
Hazard to Others
Posts: 390
Registered: 20-1-2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: Ever so slowly crystallizing...
|
|
A lot of people usualy have a goal molecule in mind, and will work toward that goal through a series of intermediates. Examples may include drugs (or
inactive analogs thereof), dyes, acid/base indicators, fluorescent molecules, or natural products of various classes.
Sometimes a chemist will want to perform particular reactions that they have become interested in, and will gather the most convenient reagents to do
so without any specific end product in mind. For example, if you wanted to try a Fisher esterifcation, you might use easily available ethanol and
acetic acid to make ethyl acetate, or perhaps salicylic acid (from aspirin) and methanol to make methyl salicylate. And so on.
Also, some operate from the point of what is on hand, and seeing how many products they could make from a particular compound. Many OTC medications
can serve as rich starting points. Quite a few products can be had from aspirin alone. Salicylic acid and its various esters, phenol, picric acid,
salicylamide, 2-aminophenol, and on and on.
|
|
|
CRUSTY
Hazard to Others
Posts: 139
Registered: 5-6-2016
Location: Nearby
Member Is Offline
Mood: High-Order
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Melgar  | Now I regularly have people ask me "do you know how to make meth as good as Walter White's in Breaking Bad?" Yes, it's an incredibly easy synthesis.
In fact, Walter White was kind of an idiot for wasting so much energy trying to steal methylamine, when he could have just gotten nitromethane racing
fuel by the bucket, and reduced it in a one-pot reductive amination. Also, what the fuck was that blue impurity? Nothing good, I'm sure.
[Edited on 7/23/16 by Melgar] |
I get asked stuff like that a lot. My friends have asked me before "how's your meth lab doing" (I don't manufacture any drugs, they just hear about
organic chemistry and jump to that  ). I also like the ability to tell people
about relatively simple and common things I do with OC and see the looks on their faces, like when I told them that I had to make half a liter of
chlorine gas (it was for a direct chlorination of an enol tautomer).
(As a side note about Breaking Bad, it bothered me that they focused so much on the acquisition of methylamine, but it was never really explained how
they got such a huge quantity of phenylacetic acid precursors, since it's just as important as MeNH2. Just my two cents)
I'd say that the way I usually go about syntheses is that I find something interesting and then go for it. I mostly just follow my interests, I wish I
had more of an interesting answer.
|
|
|
The Volatile Chemist
International Hazard
Posts: 1981
Registered: 22-3-2014
Location: 'Stil' in the lab...
Member Is Offline
Mood: Copious
|
|
I don't do any ochem (successfully, at least) at the moment, but my targets are usually unique but don't require any complicated materials. For
example, the heterocycle "ethylene thiourea" requires very basic reagents to make. Same with citrazinic acid.
|
|
|
Herr Haber
International Hazard
Posts: 1236
Registered: 29-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Xeneficus, if you are wondering what to do next, I suggest you spend some time on YouTube or better yet: Woelen's site
I have a whole range of smelly experiments in mind. Both good smelling and some foul smelling 
And as for the "usual" questions I get from other people "Do you make explosives" or "Can you make drugs" I usually have fun with the first group
showing them pictures of the places I go to (Why would I make explosives when I can just pick them off the floor?) or toy with the second group using
the DHMO joke.
Actually, I was having a bit of fun with a girl who had no scientific background back in June and telling her how bad DHMO was. Then I got a stern
look and a "Hey wait, you think I'm an idiot?" She was actually listening and not thinking I was mad to have 10 liters of the stuff in my bathroom. We
ended up doing biology experiments for some weeks 
|
|
|
The Volatile Chemist
International Hazard
Posts: 1981
Registered: 22-3-2014
Location: 'Stil' in the lab...
Member Is Offline
Mood: Copious
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Herr Haber | Xeneficus, if you are wondering what to do next, I suggest you spend some time on YouTube or better yet: Woelen's site
I have a whole range of smelly experiments in mind. Both good smelling and some foul smelling
|
Good suggestion. youtube, surprisingly, has some good syntheses on it. Worth looking through, via YouTube accounts or keywords of some of the
chemicals you have.
|
|
|
NitratedKittens
Hazard to Others
Posts: 131
Registered: 13-4-2015
Location: In the basket with all the other kittens
Member Is Offline
Mood: Carbonated
|
|
Well I decide based on 3 things
Smell: Find something which smells nice then follow the yellow brick synthetic pathway to it
Color: Dye synthesis basically
Reaction: Just do the simplest/most classic example of fascinating reaction
Basket of kittens for you ........BOOM
|
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4619
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Well, I'm sure that they didn't want to make the meth-making look too easy on Breaking Bad... Adds to the entertainment value as well.
I choose my ochem projects using a combination of the methods described above- usually molecules that are colorful, good-smelling, or have an
interesting structure. I also try to find things that I already have the materials for, and if I come across a new reagent that I can get cheaply,
I'll look up what it's most commonly useful for (for instance, when I was able to get a large amount of 1-naphthol, I found that I could use it to
make Martius yellow and a lot of other dyes). For satisfying OC, you'll probably need to spend a good amount of time (and possibly money) accumulating
useful reagents, some of which you might not have an immediate use for. It's taken me a few years just to collect enough stuff to where I'm reasonably
confident that I can do most of the OC at home that I'm interested in. Now it's just a matter of finding the time!
OC is definitely a very different animal than inorganic, but I think it is more rewarding and interesting once you get into it (you wouldn't catch me
saying that a couple years ago). Also, I hate to say it, but it's hard to beat taking a couple semesters of OC at a university. Although you can
certainly learn a lot from our friends on YouTube, a class will give you a structured outline of all of the types of reactions and why they
work, which helps you apply it more generally and come up with ideas more easily. Reading through old OC textbooks can have a similar effect, but
requires a little more personal accountability, since you'll be tempted to skip the boring parts and just try the preps.
It's kind of like taking cooking classes vs buying a few cookbooks and following the recipes. The latter is easier and more immediate, but if you go
with the classes it's more rewarding in the long run and you'll internalize the information more.
|
|
|
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
Posts: 2757
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mildly disgruntled scientist
|
|
There are lots of non-illegal drugs worth making: aspirin, lidocaine, viagra, dariprim, and naproxyn have all been made as teaching exercises or to
demonstrate a new technique or principle. Dyes are fun to play with, I remember making fluoroscein years ago and how fun it was. I later used
similar work to make a tagged molecule for work. I have made luminol and some oxalate glow stick chemicals. And many esters smell great, the table
of esters and what fruit they smell like is an awesome way to pick one to make, just see what fruit smell you want to create.
As for "Inorganic chemistry has the sex appeal of high energy materials", most high explosives used to be made from nitroaromatics, I got started in
chemistry making a number of pyrotechnic mixtures and colored fire, which uses a good mix of inorganics as well as many organics.
And years ago when I had termites, I did some work to find out what chemicals were used, and was able to better understand what used to be used, what
was currently being used and what was still coming, which allowed me to choose the best things available. But I certainly did not make my own termite
agents, which would be not allowed by the EPA. But if you ever get termites, I can tell you want not to make... But I do miss chlordane. They say
diamonds are forever, but chlordane is a close second, you could treat a foundation with it, and not have termites for 40-50 years minimum.
|
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
I think Chem Player made a Grignard in an old wine bottle, just for giggles.
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4357
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
If I'm going to make an organic compound, it will be a) an ester with an interesting smell, or b) something I can use as a ligand.
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
Texium
|
Thread Split
8-3-2017 at 11:12 |
tsathoggua1
Hazard to Others
Posts: 335
Registered: 8-1-2017
Location: Beyond the pale
Member Is Offline
Mood: Phosphorescent
|
|
There are also interesting neuroactive agents. Nootropics are particularly interesting. I started off with targeting 1-propionylation of piperazine
selectively. And as an aside, discovered the opioidergic AP-237, 1-cinnamyl-1-(n)-butyrylpipiperazine. The propionamide, once alkylated with a
cinnamyl group possesses some activity also.
Also some of this class are D2 antagonists, although I believe the (n)-butyramide, the strongest opioid of this class is not. I am extremely
oversensitive to D2 antagonists. Can't even take domperidone, and that isn't even meant to cross the BBB much.
And theres interesting targets of all sorts in naturally occurring sources, and sometimes that can serve as inspiration, whereby to synthesize it
rather than extract it from the biological source.
'odd' compounds too or compounds that stand out as bucking trends in a series are also good targets imo.
|
|
|
Booze
Hazard to Others
Posts: 121
Registered: 26-2-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Melgar | I dunno, organic chemistry has had its own sex appeal ever since Breaking Bad became popular. Now I regularly have people ask me "do you know how to
make meth as good as Walter White's in Breaking Bad?" Yes, it's an incredibly easy synthesis. In fact, Walter White was kind of an idiot for wasting
so much energy trying to steal methylamine, when he could have just gotten nitromethane racing fuel by the bucket, and reduced it in a one-pot
reductive amination. Also, what the fuck was that blue impurity? Nothing good, I'm sure.
Hell, tell most people that you can make methamphetamine by reductively aminating phenylacetone with methylamine, and they'll be impressed. "What's
phenylacetone?" "Oh, you know acetone? Like nail polish remover? Like that, with a phenyl group attached to one side."
Note: do not actually make methamphetamine. Right now I'm actually trying to make dopamine via the Henry reaction, using caffeine as the base
catalyst. None of it would be useful at all, but I'm not sure it's ever been done before and documented, and it seems a rather appropriate set of
reactants.
[Edited on 7/23/16 by Melgar] |
I'd like to hear how that dopamine went. I just made some caffeine (well, like .001 grams, but I will use caffeine pills instead of coffee), and might
try that.
|
|
|
Booze
Hazard to Others
Posts: 121
Registered: 26-2-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by DraconicAcid | | If I'm going to make an organic compound, it will be a) an ester with an interesting smell, or b) something I can use as a ligand.
|
Make cadaverine.
|
|
|
tsathoggua1
Hazard to Others
Posts: 335
Registered: 8-1-2017
Location: Beyond the pale
Member Is Offline
Mood: Phosphorescent
|
|
The amount of times Tsath' has gotten the breaking bad themed comments, if he had a piece of lab equipment for every such remark made, by now he'd be
making CERN worry about updating their setup so as not to fall behind
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
