Pages:
1
2
3
4 |
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Nitrogen Generator
I was thinking about distilling some ether, and I don't think doing it in air is such a great idea, so I thought I would try doing it in a stream of
nitrogen. I could use a nitrogen tank, but what about generating nitrogen using sulfamic acid and sodium nitrite solution? I could dry the nitrogen in
MgSO4 or molecular sieves.... I believe that this sort of setup could be useful for other procedures that require inert gas.... Is there any major
advantage to using a tank of gas instead?
|
|
Etaoin Shrdlu
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 724
Registered: 25-12-2013
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Insufferable
|
|
Ammonium chloride and sodium nitrite, even cheaper.
EDIT: Yes, there's an advantage to a gas tank, no scrubbing and less expensive all told.
[Edited on 12-19-2015 by Etaoin Shrdlu]
|
|
subsecret
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 424
Registered: 8-6-2013
Location: NW SC, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Human Sadness - Julian Casablancas & the Voidz
|
|
Distilling under nitrogen will help you just until your entire apparatus is filled with ether vapor. Then it won't make much of a difference over air.
I'd just flame-dry the glassware and distill with a drying tube.
Fear is what you get when caution wasn't enough.
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by subsecret ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Distilling under nitrogen will help you just until your entire apparatus is filled with ether vapor. Then it won't make much of a difference over air.
I'd just flame-dry the glassware and distill with a drying tube. |
That's fine, but my concern is actually oxygen, not water vapor.
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Etaoin Shrdlu ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Ammonium chloride and sodium nitrite, even cheaper.
EDIT: Yes, there's an advantage to a gas tank, no scrubbing and less expensive all told.
[Edited on 12-19-2015 by Etaoin Shrdlu] |
Cool - I don't happen to have any ammonium chloride, but I'll keep that in mind.
|
|
Amos
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
Mood: No
|
|
Just distill it in air; the boiling ether pushes out the air in the apparatus anyway, and unless you have a room full of nitrogen to distill it in
there's essentially no difference when you add a generator. Do the distillation outside, in a fume hood, or a very well-ventilated room. Use a warm
water or steam bath as opposed putting the boiling flask very close to any hot metal surface.
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
It does appear that it isn't absolutely essential to distill diethyl ether in inert gas, although it is sometimes recommended.
|
|
The_Davster
A pnictogen
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2861
Registered: 18-11-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: .
|
|
If you distill under a stream of nitrogen, the ether volatility will result in the loss of the majority of your yield from the collection vessel.
|
|
Texium
|
Thread Moved 20-12-2015 at 13:35 |
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by The_Davster ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | If you distill under a stream of nitrogen, the ether volatility will result in the loss of the majority of your yield from the collection vessel.
|
I think it would depend on temperatures. Anyway, this thread isn't really about ether.I would definitely prefer to distill it in nitrogen if that is
convenient, though.
Are there any good substitutes for sodium nitrite that are both cheap and easy to obtain?
[Edited on 20-12-2015 by JJay]
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3237
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
Stream of nitrogen? You're missing some key aspects here of distillation. Look up a nitrogen bubbler. That will keep everything inerted (after
initially inerting the setup) and will allow you to monitor the nitrogen flow. Producing the nitrogen in that way is an interesting way to approach
it. Your drying agent all depends on how dry you want your ether in the end. Most home chemists don't have the technique or transfer capabilities to
need it as dry as say magnesium perchlorate can get it.
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
I would probably prefer phosphorus pentoxide if I wanted things that dry. Also, I would probably use argon, but this discussion is about nitrogen.
|
|
ParadoxChem126
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 104
Registered: 5-4-2013
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Sodium nitrite is fairly cheap and easy to obtain online as a food preservative. Check Amazon, you can buy 2 pounds for fairly cheap, around 15
dollars.
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by ParadoxChem126 ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Sodium nitrite is fairly cheap and easy to obtain online as a food preservative. Check Amazon, you can buy 2 pounds for fairly cheap, around 15
dollars. |
It seems like most reactions that generate nitrogen gas require expensive reagents that are only available through chemical suppliers or sodium
nitrite.
I'm not sure that decomposing ammonia with bleach and bubbling the gas produced through sulfuric acid is such a great idea.
|
|
ParadoxChem126
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 104
Registered: 5-4-2013
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Of course, for significant quantities of nitrogen, an air separation diffusion membrane is always an option, but small ones are difficult to source.
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Mellor vol. 8 in the ScienceMadness library lists a large number of reactions that create nitrogen. Most involve the use of an oxidizer on an
ammonia salt, but one that caught my eye involves 200 mL 5% of sodium hypochlorite solution and 1.146 grams of ammonium sulfate. Apparently ammonium
chloride can be used too.
Hypochlorite isn't cheap, but it is completely OTC, as are ammonium sulfate and ammonium chloride... I wonder what side products might be produced by
this reaction.
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by ParadoxChem126 ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Of course, for significant quantities of nitrogen, an air separation diffusion membrane is always an option, but small ones are difficult to source.
|
Possibly several chambers could be set up separated by pinholes and evacuated... then air could be allowed to quickly diffuse into the apparatus and
the nitrogen enriched gas in the final chamber removed.
[Edited on 21-12-2015 by JJay]
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 7998
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by JJay ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | [...]Hypochlorite isn't cheap, but it is completely OTC, as are ammonium sulfate and ammonium chloride... I wonder what side products might be
produced by this reaction. |
To my opinion it is not a pleasant means of making N2. Side products are NH2Cl (chloramine) and NH2NH2 (hydrazine). Both are very toxic and hydrazine
is a known carcinogen. Both are soluble in ether and will contaminate your product.
If you really want to do this, bring up the pH, before mixing NH4Cl and NaOCl. Without added acid you may also make some NCl3, although I do not
really expect such quantities that it may result in explosions.
|
|
ParadoxChem126
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 104
Registered: 5-4-2013
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by JJay ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) |
Possibly several chambers could be set up separated by pinholes and evacuated... then air could be allowed to quickly diffuse into the apparatus and
the nitrogen enriched gas in the final chamber removed.
[Edited on 21-12-2015 by JJay] |
Most air separation diffusion membranes work on the molecular level, similar to molecular sieves. Pinholes would be too large to encourage the
separation of air into its constituent components.
[Edited on 12-22-2015 by ParadoxChem126]
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by ParadoxChem126 ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Quote: Originally posted by JJay ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) |
Possibly several chambers could be set up separated by pinholes and evacuated... then air could be allowed to quickly diffuse into the apparatus and
the nitrogen enriched gas in the final chamber removed.
[Edited on 21-12-2015 by JJay] |
Most air separation diffusion membranes work on the molecular level, similar to molecular sieves. Pinholes would be too large to encourage the
separation of air into its constituent components.
[Edited on 12-22-2015 by ParadoxChem126] |
False.
|
|
ParadoxChem126
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 104
Registered: 5-4-2013
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Really? Can you provide an example of pinholes being used to separate air? Diffusion membranes work on a much smaller level.
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Yeah, many Graham's Law problems in high school and undergraduate textbooks discuss using pinholes for purifying gases. I'm not saying it is the
approach I would favor, but it's certainly possible.
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by woelen ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Quote: Originally posted by JJay ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | [...]Hypochlorite isn't cheap, but it is completely OTC, as are ammonium sulfate and ammonium chloride... I wonder what side products might be
produced by this reaction. |
To my opinion it is not a pleasant means of making N2. Side products are NH2Cl (chloramine) and NH2NH2 (hydrazine). Both are very toxic and hydrazine
is a known carcinogen. Both are soluble in ether and will contaminate your product.
If you really want to do this, bring up the pH, before mixing NH4Cl and NaOCl. Without added acid you may also make some NCl3, although I do not
really expect such quantities that it may result in explosions. |
Sodium azide (and other azides) are said to be useful for producing highly pure nitrogen.
|
|
ParadoxChem126
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 104
Registered: 5-4-2013
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by JJay ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) |
Yeah, many Graham's Law problems in high school and undergraduate textbooks discuss using pinholes for purifying gases. I'm not saying it is the
approach I would favor, but it's certainly possible. |
I suppose. Due to their similar molecular weights, nitrogen and oxygen would be rather ineffectively separated by simple diffusion. It seems the very
low flow rates through pinholes would explain why this technique is not practical for reasonable amounts of air.
|
|
JJay
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by ParadoxChem126 ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Quote: Originally posted by JJay ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) |
Yeah, many Graham's Law problems in high school and undergraduate textbooks discuss using pinholes for purifying gases. I'm not saying it is the
approach I would favor, but it's certainly possible. |
I suppose. Due to their similar molecular weights, nitrogen and oxygen would be rather ineffectively separated by simple diffusion. It seems the very
low flow rates through pinholes would explain why this technique is not practical for reasonable amounts of air. |
Whether it is practical or not really depends on how bad you need the nitrogen....
|
|
vmelkon
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 669
Registered: 25-11-2011
Location: Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: autoerotic asphyxiation
|
|
Probably the cheapest way is to use iron + water. It will also react with the oxygen in the air and make Fe(OH)2. The left over gas will be mostly N2
and argon.
You can also heat some metal powder to react with the oxygen.
Signature ==== Is this my youtube page? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tA5PYtul5aU
We must attach the electrodes of knowledge to the nipples of ignorance and give a few good jolts.
Yes my evolutionary friends. We are all homos here.
|
|
Pages:
1
2
3
4 |