Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: High Pressure Steal Reaction Vessel Wanted
ryan81
Harmless
*




Posts: 9
Registered: 4-8-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-8-2015 at 17:19
High Pressure Steal Reaction Vessel Wanted


Is there a steal autoclave out there which can withstand very high pressure, at 450 C that one can part with?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Steam
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 238
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Minnesota
Member Is Offline

Mood: Triple Point

[*] posted on 4-8-2015 at 17:20


Have you tried ebay? Generally you can find a fairly good deal on such items with a bit of sleuthing...



DISCLAIMER: The information in this post is provided for general informational purposes only and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
ryan81
Harmless
*




Posts: 9
Registered: 4-8-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-8-2015 at 17:25


Yes sir. I have,

But I am still ambivalent they can reach the pressure and temp. I am looking for. It would be great to have a solid recommendation.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
careysub
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1339
Registered: 4-8-2014
Location: Coastal Sage Scrub Biome
Member Is Offline

Mood: Lowest quantum state

[*] posted on 4-8-2015 at 17:28


What is "very high pressure" to you?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
ryan81
Harmless
*




Posts: 9
Registered: 4-8-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-8-2015 at 17:32


65-150 MPA...not to high, but thats it
View user's profile View All Posts By User
ryan81
Harmless
*




Posts: 9
Registered: 4-8-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-8-2015 at 17:34


but yea, thats some pressure
View user's profile View All Posts By User
ryan81
Harmless
*




Posts: 9
Registered: 4-8-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-8-2015 at 17:38


60 MPA will work just fine though
View user's profile View All Posts By User
ryan81
Harmless
*




Posts: 9
Registered: 4-8-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-8-2015 at 17:47


looking for the holy grail of autoclaves without spending more than $9500
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Oscilllator
National Hazard
****




Posts: 659
Registered: 8-10-2012
Location: The aqueous layer
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-8-2015 at 23:45


I think the closest thing you're going to get is a steel diving cylinder (not aluminium obviously). Looking at the wiki page it seems you can get 300bar/30MPa cylinders. I suspect the cylinders will be significantly weakened at those kinds of temperatures though.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fulmen
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1716
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bored

[*] posted on 5-8-2015 at 00:11


Bhoy, that's a decent bomb if I ever saw one. I could probably design it, but it's not trivial work and you'd still need someone skilled to make it. I would strongly recommend a pressure vessel steel like A285, these are intended for temperatures up to 4-500°C.

Oscillator: Without knowing the actual steel used in a tank I would be very uncomfortable with elevated temperatures.

[Edited on 5-8-15 by Fulmen]




We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2734
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-8-2015 at 04:24


I would never use a vessel not designed for chemicals at those temps and pressures. That would be not only dangerous for yourself but also any neighbors. But steel pressure reactors do go on sale, and most have a model number which can be used to verify the pressures and temps that they are rated for. I have used several of them, and they are a pain to use, but work OK. But they should be used in a hood or similar space with a blast shield, in case the over-pressure vent gives way. I have only seen small glass pressure tubes fail, inside a shielded reactor, that was quite a spectacular amount of noise, but if a steel one does, it becomes a serious danger.

Parr Instruments makes many of those, so perhaps check there website for which models might work. Then check Ebay and other science auctions, there are plenty of labs closing in the US.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
careysub
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1339
Registered: 4-8-2014
Location: Coastal Sage Scrub Biome
Member Is Offline

Mood: Lowest quantum state

[*] posted on 5-8-2015 at 11:11


Ah, the glories of an earlier age - where individual ingenuity would devise makeshift solutions fearlessly! The glorious age of boiler explosions!

In reviewing the list you will note there are not many of these in recent decades, and most of the ones that have occurred recently were explosions of old equipment. There are 20 listed boiler explosions with double digit fatalities but the last one was in 1918.

IMHO: if you can't afford proper equipment for this you shouldn't be doing it.

Here is an old reference book charting the decline in annual boiler explosion deaths in Great Britiain from 1859 to 1893! It is quite impressive. Presumably in nearly every case of a fatal boiler explosion, the people operating the boiler probably thought they knew what they were doing.

[Edited on 5-8-2015 by careysub]

[Edited on 5-8-2015 by careysub]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
annaandherdad
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 387
Registered: 17-9-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-8-2015 at 11:33


Here's a video of a guy who has made supercritical CO2. He is a lot more competent that I am, but even so I'd be nervous about being around this thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gCTKteN5Y4




Any other SF Bay chemists?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
unionised
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5126
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-8-2015 at 12:20


A 1 litre vessel at 100MPa stores 100 KJ or so of energy.
That's about half a pound of TNT equivalent.
How big a vessel do you want?
If it's less that a centimetre on each side it might be realistic.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
careysub
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1339
Registered: 4-8-2014
Location: Coastal Sage Scrub Biome
Member Is Offline

Mood: Lowest quantum state

[*] posted on 5-8-2015 at 12:55


Quote: Originally posted by unionised  
A 1 litre vessel at 100MPa stores 100 KJ or so of energy.
That's about half a pound of TNT equivalent.
How big a vessel do you want?
If it's less that a centimetre on each side it might be realistic.


No, its about 25 g of TNT equivalent - but, hey, that's a lot!

This frag grenade:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V40_Mini-Grenade
contains 136 g of composition and is dangerous up to 300 M!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fulmen
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1716
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bored

[*] posted on 5-8-2015 at 13:38


Haven't done the math myself, but I do not doubt that the stored energy would be substantial. Personally I find the pucker factor of a 60MPa vessel to be way beyond my comfort zone, but to each his own.

As for the design I would have to do some digging for relevant standards, but the math itself isn't hard. A heavy walled pipe with welded flanges and bolted end caps would be my choice as it is simple and easy to modify. This design would also allow the bolts to act as a burst safety limiting the main danger to two directions.

It looks like ASME requires a safety valve at 1.1 MAWP, a 1.5 yield and a 3.5 ultimate tensile safety factor for pressure vessels.

[Edited on 5-8-15 by Fulmen]




We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top