Spartan
Harmless
Posts: 13
Registered: 26-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Detonator protected from ESD
Hey guys, i know that primary explosives are sensitive to human static. Is it possible a primary explosive go off from human body discharge when it is
inside an aluminum tube? If so, why commercial caps are made from metal and not from plastic? (as electricity can not pass plastic).
Also is it a good idea to cover aluminum tube with electrical tape?
Thanks guys and sorry for my bad english.
|
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2539
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
Metal tubes will cause electricity to flow through the metal and not the primary. Another reason for using metal is mechanical strength.
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
Static electricity will develop charges on the outer surface of the metal, because of charge repulsion --> never inside!
You should not expect thunder bolt inside a metalic box from external static electricity... a bit the same as Faraday's cage effect.
[Edited on 26-3-2015 by PHILOU Zrealone]
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
magneet
Harmless
Posts: 19
Registered: 30-12-2007
Location: on a forum somewhere
Member Is Offline
Mood: lurking mostly
|
|
Lets turn it upside down, would static build up from some type's of plastic detonator casing affect certain primairy's?
[Edited on 26-3-2015 by magneet]
[Edited on 26-3-2015 by magneet]
Hi,
|
|
|
Spartan
Harmless
Posts: 13
Registered: 26-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hey magneet, i'm not sure about this. Maybe yes if there is a very sensitive explosive to ESD like lead styphnate inside?
|
|
|
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by magneet  | Lets turn it upside down, would static build up from some type's of plastic detonator casing affect certain primairy's?
[Edited on 26-3-2015 by magneet]
[Edited on 26-3-2015 by magneet] |
If the primary is loose powder inside a plastic detonator that is prone to easily make static electricity build up...then yes shaking the detonator
vigorously will build up static energy potential and may result in initiation...just as much as the friction and shock of the primary crystals against
each other...so you may not be sure initiation comes from the static electricity!
If the detonator is done with due caution (against static when filling), well packed, with a plastic prone to static build up; then external friction
of the detonator will not propagate the static charges to the interior of the detonator... Static electricity remains on the external insulated
surface and this can remain very local area. You of course know the glass rod and paper experiment...when the glass rod is frictionated with wool at
the end...static remains on that end and doesn't propagate to the rest of the rod...
--> So there is no risk of initiation of the primer by external static.
If the plastic is not prone to static build up... there is even less chance for this to happen.
[Edited on 27-3-2015 by PHILOU Zrealone]
PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)
"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
|
|
|
magneet
Harmless
Posts: 19
Registered: 30-12-2007
Location: on a forum somewhere
Member Is Offline
Mood: lurking mostly
|
|
| Quote: |
Maybe yes if there is a very sensitive explosive to ESD like lead styphnate inside? |
I think it could be dangerous yes, when filling it with the wrong kind of dowel, (plastic prone to static) rubbing the inside when pressing
Hi,
|
|
|
Spartan
Harmless
Posts: 13
Registered: 26-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
A guy in an other topic named 'mabuse' put silver acetylide double salt in alluminum foil and then he shock it with the spark from a piezo electric
lighter and it fired as he said. Why can not happen the same with a spark from the human body?
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=17122&...
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Cardboard is amazingly good.
It is at the same time an insulator, and a weak conductor.
|
|
|
Morgan
International Hazard
Posts: 1694
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
"Any insulating material is likely to be static-generating. One problem with cardboard and paper is that they are very variable materials and their
electrical properties vary with air humidity by several orders of magnitude. Under humid air conditions they could be dissipative but under dry air
conditions they could be insulating and cause a problem. So, unless you have specific ESD grades, it is better to keep them out of the ESD Protected
Area."
http://electrostaticsolutions.blogspot.com/2007_10_01_archiv...
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
More accurately, better to use materials best suited to your local environment, and not to forget where you are.
In many places cardboard is OK. Other places not.
|
|
|
Morgan
International Hazard
Posts: 1694
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I vaguely remember reading something about static from two large sheets of paper. It was in some book, an old account from the 1800's or so. It was in
a book like "Homemade Lightning" or something like that dealing with static electricity and electrical phenomena before electricity was mainstream.
The very large sheets of paper were held next to a fireplace to get all the moisture out but I can't remember the details of the spark generation, if
the sheets were separated or what.
|
|
|
magneet
Harmless
Posts: 19
Registered: 30-12-2007
Location: on a forum somewhere
Member Is Offline
Mood: lurking mostly
|
|
| Quote: |
A guy in an other topic named 'mabuse' put silver acetylide double salt in alluminum foil and then he shock it with the spark from a piezo electric
lighter and it fired as he said. Why can not happen the same with a spark from the human body? |
Maybey the Al foil is so thin that the entry point of the spark into it locally heats up enough to initiate it?
Hi,
|
|
|
Spartan
Harmless
Posts: 13
Registered: 26-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by magneet |
| Quote: |
A guy in an other topic named 'mabuse' put silver acetylide double salt in alluminum foil and then he shock it with the spark from a piezo electric
lighter and it fired as he said. Why can not happen the same with a spark from the human body? |
Maybey the Al foil is so thin that the entry point of the spark into it locally heats up enough to initiate it? |
Yes, it may be the heat from the spark that initiates it, as the alluminum foil is so thin. As he said it was not a very scientific setup...
[Edited on 28-3-2015 by Spartan]
[Edited on 28-3-2015 by Spartan]
[Edited on 28-3-2015 by Spartan]
|
|
|
Spartan
Harmless
Posts: 13
Registered: 26-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hey guy after much thought i thought that if you have two detonators one with thin metal and one with thick metal, with the same primary explosive
inside and the same external electric spark, the primary in the thick metal tube is more difficult to detonate from external spark because a big part
of the electric energy absorbed through the thick metal, the thinner the metal the easier to detonate.
It's the same like you have a battery and a bulb, if you connect them with thin wires the bulb turns on, but if you use very thick or very long wires
the bulb doesn't turn on because a big part of the energy absorbed through the wires.
So i think that a primary is possible to detonate inside a metal tube from human static but it depends from the thickness of the metal, the type of
the metal and of course the type of primary explosive.
Here is a pdf with the sensitivity of the most common primary explosives to ESD,heat,shock and friction.
file:///C:/Users/dimitris/Downloads/9783642284359-c1%20(4).pdf
|
|
|
Oxydro
Hazard to Others
Posts: 152
Registered: 24-5-2004
Location: NS, Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: distracted
|
|
First of all you are completely wrong about the wires scenario. Thicker wires will always help transfer the electricity more easily. The only way in
your scenario that the bulb will not light is if you use very long and thin wires, with so much resistance in the wires that not enough current flows
to light the bulb.
The difference between thick and thin metal in this case is not really the electrical properties, but thermal. A very thin tube could potentially spot
heat to a high enough temperature to ignite what's inside, with a sufficiently strong spark, whereas a thicker tube will distribute the energy through
a larger mass, preventing the temperature from rising enough.
And by the way, you have included a local link to a file on your computer, not the file itself. Only someone on your computer could use that link to
open the file.
"Our interest's on the dangerous side of things" -- Browning
|
|
|
Spartan
Harmless
Posts: 13
Registered: 26-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Oxydro | First of all you are completely wrong about the wires scenario. Thicker wires will always help transfer the electricity more easily. The only way in
your scenario that the bulb will not light is if you use very long and thin wires, with so much resistance in the wires that not enough current flows
to light the bulb.
The difference between thick and thin metal in this case is not really the electrical properties, but thermal. A very thin tube could potentially spot
heat to a high enough temperature to ignite what's inside, with a sufficiently strong spark, whereas a thicker tube will distribute the energy through
a larger mass, preventing the temperature from rising enough.
And by the way, you have included a local link to a file on your computer, not the file itself. Only someone on your computer could use that link to
open the file. |
I am sorry the link is this:
https://www.google.gr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&a...
Yes you are right you can light a bulb with thick wires. Anyhow we agree that the thinner the metal the easier to initiate the primary with external
electric spark.
[Edited on 29-3-2015 by Spartan]
[Edited on 29-3-2015 by Spartan]
[Edited on 29-3-2015 by Spartan]
|
|
|
MineMan
International Hazard
Posts: 1004
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Static
I am very interested to anything else someone might like to add, as this is much harder to prevent and conceptualize than mechanical stimuli. I have
heard that if there is an air gap (even a micron) in the aluminum shell ( whether this be from foil, or fuse and aluminum contact) that static could
still find it's way in. Can anyone confirm this? Are there any inert materials that can be mixed with the primary to reduce the risk?
|
|
|
Spartan
Harmless
Posts: 13
Registered: 26-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by MineMan | | I am very interested to anything else someone might like to add, as this is much harder to prevent and conceptualize than mechanical stimuli. I have
heard that if there is an air gap (even a micron) in the aluminum shell ( whether this be from foil, or fuse and aluminum contact) that static could
still find it's way in. Can anyone confirm this? Are there any inert materials that can be mixed with the primary to reduce the risk?
|
Even metals can hold some static electricity, but not so much as plastic.I don't know if this static is enough to initiate a primary explosive.
I haven't heard that even one micron gap can cause static but it may be possible. Even if it is like that i think that this static is not enough to
initiate the explosive. I'm also interested if anyone knows something about this.
|
|
|
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
Posts: 1389
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Technion Haifa
Member Is Offline
Mood: old jew
|
|
Mineman, Spartan, Magneet. This is true, what he writes Philou Z and aga. My opinion is that you deal with nonsense. The big danger (always) is
pressing the detonator. A particular thorn removal. 10,000 times. Filled (closed) metal detonator explodes not. Certainly not from the human body
tension. Maybe, if you use the Van der Graaf generator. I have not heard explosions from hand contact after closed detonator. But from filling yes.
And not one more... ...LL
|
|
|
gregxy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 421
Registered: 26-5-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I would think the greatest danger form esd would be if you are carrying the detonator by its wires or fuse, you body is charged, and the detonator
case touches something that is grounded. The charge on your body will travel through the wires/fuse into the primary, through the case to ground
setting off the primary. I don't know if normal fuse is conductive enough for this to happen. Connecting one of the two wires to the case would
prevent it.
|
|
|
markx
National Hazard
Posts: 646
Registered: 7-8-2003
Location: Northern kingdom
Member Is Offline
Mood: Very Jolly
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov | | Mineman, Spartan, Magneet. This is true, what he writes Philou Z and aga. My opinion is that you deal with nonsense. The big danger (always) is
pressing the detonator. A particular thorn removal. 10,000 times. Filled (closed) metal detonator explodes not. Certainly not from the human body
tension. Maybe, if you use the Van der Graaf generator. I have not heard explosions from hand contact after closed detonator. But from filling yes.
And not one more......LL |
I agree on the part of pressing...the forces at play in this step are immense compared to anything the initiator may see in the following course of
its life. Any mishandling is a featherlight touch compared to the assembly pressing step. Hence I never press primaries on top of secondary, only
separate carriers that are joined with secondary afterwards without any strong forces being applied.
On the part of static being nonsense I strongly disagree...static is a devil in disguise and there is not really any reasonable means to cancel it out
completely. A lot depends on the particular primary used....silver compounds (azide, SADS) tend to be more suceptible to static. Grounding yourself
properly, wearing cotton clothes and avoiding work in low humidity conditions are your best allies against the danger of static, but still, accidents
can happen, so be prepared.
Exact science is a figment of imagination.......
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
