Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: octaazacubane
nathanwilefrazier
Harmless
*




Posts: 1
Registered: 17-12-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 17-12-2014 at 18:27
octaazacubane


If synthesis and stability were not such formidable issues, would a cube of 8 singly bonded nitrogen atoms form the most powerful chemical explosive (meaning the highest relative effect) that could be constructed from the periodic chart?

N-N bond lengths: 1.45nm
Cubic packing
Density: 24,000 mol/m3

N-N bond energies: 160 kJ/mol
N[triple bond]N energies: 945 kJ/mole
Steric strain from 109.5deg to 90deg
Energy: 1.86MJ/mole

Each cube detonates into 4 diatomic nitrogen molecules

So detonation of one spherical cubic meter (from the center) would yield 96,000 moles of nitrogen gas and 180 billion joules of energy (and, with a VOD of 15,000 m/s, about 3.6 quadrillion watts of power) :o

Without going nuclear, does it get any better than this? (No enhancements of detonations with electric arc or laser plasmifications either.)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bert
Super Administrator
Thread Moved
17-12-2014 at 19:49
Bert
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".

[*] posted on 17-12-2014 at 20:04


Look at the FAQ.

http://www.sciencemadness.org/madscifaq.html#2.1_Board_topic...

Quote:
It is okay to be ignorant when first arriving and posting. However, you must be willing to make an effort to learn. If you are unable to cite references in support of an idea or as background to your question, the post belongs in Beginnings. Questions that provide background information and show effort are more likely to receive good responses.


I have moved your first post to "beginnings" due to a lack of any links to your source materials or documentation of your own actual experimental work.




Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:

1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.

Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).

View user's profile View All Posts By User
Dany
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 482
Registered: 3-8-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 17-12-2014 at 23:18


Quote: Originally posted by nathanwilefrazier  
Without going nuclear, does it get any better than this?


Yes, theoretically you can get better detonation performance than N8 (octaazacubane). the N60 which is the nitrogen analogue of the C60 ( buckminsterfullerene) molecule has a detonation performance exceeding that of N8. At a density of 2.67 g/cm<sup>3</sup> the calculated detonation performance is [1]:

DCJ= 17.31 km/s, PCJ= 196 GPa. The estimated heat of formation of N60 is HOF= 546 kcal/mol.

Theoretically, one can have much more detonation performance by using what we call meta-stable clusters [2]. Examples of meta-stable clusters are the helium exited to the triplet state He2<sup>*</sup> and nitrogen N8 in the form of a boat (not a cube). The structure of meta-stable boat N8 is shown below:

The predicted density of helium cluster is 3.164 g/cm<sup>3</sup> while that of N8 is 3.186 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. The authors calculated the detonation performance of the two cluster using CHEETAH thermochemical code. The results shows astonishing detonation performance. For the N8: DCJ= 19.7 km/s; PCJ= 314 GPa (3.14 Mbar)

For He2<sup>*</sup>: DCJ= 42.8 km/s; PCJ= 1630 GPa (16.3 Mbar).

References:

[1] M. B. Talawar, R. Sivabalan, S. N. Asthana, H. Singh, Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves 2005, 41, 264-277.

[2] A. Kuhl, A. L. Kuhl, L. E. Fried, W. M. Howard, M. R. Seizew, J. B. Bell, V. Beckner, J. F. Grcar, Detonation of Meta-stable Clusters, 39th ICT Conference on Energetic Materials, 2008.

Dany.

[Edited on 18-12-2014 by Dany]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
CuReUS
National Hazard
****




Posts: 928
Registered: 9-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-12-2014 at 01:24


the idea is very good actually ,that you thought of the nitrogen analogue of cubane

recently i learnt that the most unstable compound was this

http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2013/01/09/things_i_won...

octa azacubane could be used as fuel ,rather than to make bombs :(
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top