Pages:
1
2 |
Eclectic
National Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 899
Registered: 14-11-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: Obsessive
|
|
On the circuit above, the ground for the spark should be whichever coil terminal is connected to the secondary winding.
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1314
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
If you kill the back EMF with a diode you wont get anywhere near as much output volts. Adding a 100V Zener in series with the diode means your
primary voltage is now effectively 100V, not 12V, so your're output will be correspondingly higher.
The zener will get hot, so use a stud mount type, and give it a heatsink.
The 2N3055 has the collector connected to the body, base and emitter on the two pins. You will not be able to solder a wire to the body as it is
usually made of aluminium or stainless steel. Use a bolt, ring terminal, and star washer.
|
|
Pommie
Hazard to Self
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 70
Registered: 6-2-2005
Location: Australia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by Twospoons
If you kill the back EMF with a diode you wont get anywhere near as much output volts. Adding a 100V Zener in series with the diode means your
primary voltage is now effectively 100V, not 12V, so your're output will be correspondingly higher.
The zener will get hot, so use a stud mount type, and give it a heatsink.
|
I think you'll find that the output voltage is proportional to the rate of change of the primary current and therefore, killing the back EMF is
the best course of action.
Also the 2N3055 has a max Vce of 60v, so it would simply melt with a 100V zener and, the 100V produced would also fry the 555.
A better (more energetic spark) could be produced by putting a capacitor between the collecter and emitter of the transistor, making a resonant
circuit. But this would also fry the other bits.
Mike.
[Edited on 15-2-2005 by Pommie]
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1314
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
Quote: | Originally posted by Pommie
I think you'll find that the output voltage is proportional to the rate of change of the primary current and therefore, killing the back EMF is
the best course of action.
[Edited on 15-2-2005 by Pommie] |
I think I know how a flyback converter works.
Vce of 60V? OK, so lets use something with a bit more muscle, like a MJ15003, which will do 140V, 20A.
Adding a resonating cap can work really well, but is much harder to design, and really requires a switchmode controller chip.
There's also nothing wrong with the old fashioned trembler/points arrangement. The points are set up with a bit of iron in the magnetic path of
the induction coil, so that the points open when the coil energises. I built one using an old magneto coil many years ago, used to light petrol in a
paint can with it. I could get 2cm spark in air from it.
There may not be enough stray field from a modern ignition coil though.
|
|
Pages:
1
2 |