Pages:
1
..
3
4
5
6
7
..
10 |
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
No new news on the Newark passenger other than he was
running a fever and had been in Liberia. Apparently no other
symptoms were reported. This article has a lot of good
information including confirmation that the second nurse
from Dallas is improving:
http://www.northjersey.com/news/passenger-at-newark-airport-...
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
Newark passenger tested negative for the virus:
http://online.wsj.com/articles/airline-passenger-with-ebola-...
This leaves the contacts of the two dallas nurses
and anyone who is asymptomatic that has traveled
from Africa (like the chicago family in voluntary quarantine).
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
The horror of the disease ebola is illustrated by the story of a young mother who was nursing an infant, became sick with ebola and came to a clinic
in Sierra Leone seeking help, but died, leaving the infant who tested negative and was then cared for by a dozen nurses. The baby later developed
ebola symptoms and died, and eleven of a dozen nurses who were caring for the baby also became infected and most of them also died. It is like an
irony where no good deed goes unpunished. A dozen nurses have compassion and care for an orphan baby, who dies anyway, and 11 of the 12 nurses
became infected and also died. That is pretty horrible.
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ebola-virus-outbreak/when-c...
http://www.npr.org/2014/10/10/354888965/when-holding-an-orph...
This story illustrates pretty well how R nought doesn't tell you the whole story and can be misleading.
[Edited on 23-10-2014 by Rosco Bodine]
|
|
IrC
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline
Mood: Discovering
|
|
Even more misleading if there is even a small amount of truth in the following story. One would assume the value assigned to R nought would only be as
accurate as the honesty in the number of reported cases.
http://www.infowars.com/medical-professional-health-authorit...
http://www.infowars.com/missouri-doctor-suspected-ebola-pati...
http://www.infowars.com/hospitals-threaten-to-fire-workers-f...
Brought to you by the site many here love to hate. Myself I look at all things I can and study to see what can be verified regardless of peoples
opinion of the source. For example looking at the doctor mentioned in the story for useful grains of truth. Not hard if you ignore any bias by the
writer of the story and study only the useful information. Infowars may have far too many conspiracy theories on the part of the writers yet they do
discuss so many things you no longer see anywhere in mainstream media today. So many agendas exist on either side of the coin you must become expert
at filtering out the grains of truth which do exist.
[Edited on 10-23-2014 by IrC]
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
I think when you consider the federal law makes even research sample handling highly regulated and restricted to BSL-4 laboratory conditions for what
is listed on the CDC website as being a class A bioterrorism agent .......and realize that this level of security applies to samples in test tubes
.....the idea of a human subject walking around shedding virus is something unthinkable and unimaginably dangerous as a threat to public health, it is
really something terrible to ponder the implications and potentially catastrophic consequences.
When that has been pretty much accepted for decades is the "real story" then it becomes very suspicious when overnight an entirely "rewritten" risk
analysis and risk management is published by p.r. mouthpieces contradicting what is already good information well known. Political spin doctors are
attempting to write a new narrative saying things are not really so bad about something the real story is it is really pretty terrible is an old story
already very well known.
When people know they are being conned it doesn't inspire trust and confidence.
|
|
gregxy
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 421
Registered: 26-5-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
while the inforwars website may be full of crackpots, this article
http://www.infowars.com/scientists-ebola-can-spread-by-air-i...
(mentioned earlier by IRC) which talks about how ebola may be more contagious in colder areas, simply cites reliable references.
On the positive side the vaccines are coming along quickly. I hope this is not hype.
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
Uh Oh .....there may be a case in Harlem ......New York City is definitely not a good place for ebola
http://www.nydailynews.com/doctor-treated-ebola-patients-rus...
There are some similarities about HIV and ebola
http://www.westernjournalism.com/miraculous-liberian-doctor-...
Breaking News: The doctor in New York City has tested positive for ebola and he has been out and about town during the last twenty-four hours even
visiting a bowling alley and taking various taxi cabs around town. He was supposed to be self quarantined but like another doctor who works for NBC
news went off the reservation and breached quarantine. This is not good.
[Edited on 24-10-2014 by Rosco Bodine]
|
|
IrC
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline
Mood: Discovering
|
|
Just watched news alert the doctor tested positive for Ebola. 10 days of cruising around the city, going bowling the day before, shopping and whatever
else. Now I ask would not one expect a doctor who had been working with Ebola patients in Africa to be cognizant enough of the risk to self quarantine
under such circumstances? Is anyone foolish enough to believe they cannot spread it until the day obvious symptoms appear? If so I call bullcrap on
that. For all is known they could be spreading it 3 or 4 days before they start bleeding and vomiting. This PC madness of allowing people back in
until proven safe will kill us all. Did someone just come from infected areas especially if working with it? Then stay the hell on an island such as
Ellis for a month then call us. This is what people 100 years ago were smart enough to require and something as deadly as Ebola was not loose in the
world. Amazing how people in the 21st century think they are more advanced than Victorian society yet this generation is comprised of the most
ignorant morons history has ever known. More so because they had the information available and chose to ignore it.
Rosco you edited while I was quoting your post in it's original form. Oh well call it yet another notice of confirmation.
http://www.infowars.com/doctor-obamas-open-border-policy-fue...
http://www.infowars.com/u-s-army-ebola-goes-airborne-once-te...
http://www.infowars.com/will-media-ignore-doctors-reporting-...
http://www.infowars.com/white-house-emergency-alert-interrup...
[Edited on 10-24-2014 by IrC]
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
Yeah CBS and others are reporting they have confirmed ebola in NYC now.
Isn't cultural diversity and unrestricted travel grand? Ummm ....no.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ebola-outbreak-nyc-doctor-being-...
They are activating the emergency operations center in New York now so this is serious.
[Edited on 24-10-2014 by Rosco Bodine]
|
|
plante1999
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1936
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad as a hatter
|
|
If it degenerate in a apocalyptic scenario, all the prepers out there (sort of me included) will finally be able to show off if they can survive.
|
|
Amos
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
Mood: No
|
|
Honestly, I am happier that this guy decided to go and treat ebola patients than I am upset that he brought it back to the United States. The last guy
that came to the United States and had the disease took far less precaution than this man, who quarantined himself as soon as he suspected he had it,
and he only infected 2 poorly trained/informed people. New York's making sure they don't half-ass anything, and as a result, everything will most
likely turn out a-okay. Yes, it's great that we can be so multicultural and have free travel and still get off nearly scot-free.
Edit: Oh, and apparently Amber Vinson has already tested Ebola-free just 9 days after her diagnosis, and Nina Pham is in good condition, well on her
way to recovery. I can already feel our country collapsing.
[Edited on 10-24-2014 by No Tears Only Dreams Now]
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
When it comes to security concerns including public health threats it is sober realism and caution that is rational and prudent, not the Pollyanna
principle.
Ask anyone who has survived ebola if they would agree an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
The answer is going to be "affirmative".
And remember ebola is hard to catch. See it is because it is so hard to catch that the doctor who caught it anyway dresses in protective gear like
this at work. Here is a recent photo of the now infected doctor all dressed up in protective gear on account of ebola being so hard to catch.
Also four of the infected doctors friends have been quarantined and hundreds of other people are attempting to be identified and contacted, all of
this being done of course because ebola is so hard to catch. See, since it is so hard to catch there is really nothing to worry about, obviously.
![](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/10/23/1414093679233_Image_galleryImage_1044202_10152708294795993.JPG)
[Edited on 24-10-2014 by Rosco Bodine]
|
|
froot
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 347
Registered: 23-10-2003
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline
Mood: refluxed
|
|
It's removing that gear after a shift where the risk is greatest, especially after dealing with leaky patients.
We salute the improvement of the human genome by honoring those who remove themselves from it.
Of necessity, this honor is generally bestowed posthumously. - www.darwinawards.com
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
We gotta admire all these volunteer workers for epidemics without borders
|
|
Amos
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1406
Registered: 25-3-2014
Location: Yes
Member Is Offline
Mood: No
|
|
Yeah, they're probably all filthy liberals, too.
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
I'm sure the liability lawyers will sort it all out with the inevitable lawsuits.
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
Rosco> the doctors in Liberia only wish they had protective gear
like that picture has. Sierra Leon is apparently better but by
all accounts the situation in Guinea is worse from a supply
perspective.
Most people are dressed more like this:
http://simusa.org/data/sites/1/LatestNews/2014/04-03-14_Ebol...
The most dangerous time for spreading Ebola is apparently
when the vomiting and bleeding starts. Although the disease
is hard to get (ie. casual contact isn't likely to do it) working with
patients that have reached the most contagious stage has to
be scary. Anyone willing to try and help infected people is a
hero, including the two nurses in Dallas that were infected.
The doctor in NYC was quite selfish in violating 'self-quarantine'
assuming the reports are true. Keeping in mind they may not
be true. This situation is still evolving and only 3 people have been quarantined in relation to the doctor.
|
|
Rosco Bodine
Banned
Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: analytical
|
|
Where deadly contagious diseases are concerned it is reasonable that risk avoidance would create a corresponding riak aversion kind of mentality that
would place more emphasis on prevention. Just the economic unviability of the more risk tolerant view should tip the scales in favor of caution.
Individuals can't be relied upon to exercise good judgement and act responsibly with something like ebola where even the medical doctors are showing a
kind of recklessness and irresponsiblity which has consequential dangers and/or damages for others who are not consenting to that imposition. There
really is a liability associated with actions that can reasonably be identified as reckless endangerment and it involves both liability at law as a
crime, as well as liability in equity as a tort. Individuals can't just weigh the risks for others and then make the decision on their own what it is
that they reckon to be acceptable risks for others. That is the kind of "selfishness" that is going on here when ebola or anything like it is being
trifled with as a matter left entirely in the realm of the administrative discretion of others. What they estimate may be their "power" to decide for
others over the objections of others is a dispute that is headed for a reckoning, and the reckless people who aren't enough risk averse are going to
get a reality check on how it's going to be. Go ahead and watch and see how this unfolds and see if the lawyers don't file the lawsuits that will put
a stop to this nonsense, where defective public health policies are subject to "product liability" lawsuits just like anything else that is a
dangerous and defective product, or even if it simply wrongly causes unreimbursed damages and/or even deprives others of peace of mind and happiness.
Lawyers are going to love filing all the lawsuits over damaged businesses, lost property values, emotional distress, and all the collateral damages
that reach far beyond just the suffering of those who are actually infected due to the negligence and depraved indifference of those who are liable.
They better have good insurance.
|
|
macckone
Dispenser of practical lab wisdom
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 2168
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline
Mood: Electrical
|
|
In most states you can't use the government for anything
beyond direct damages and in some state (Texas) even direct
damages are severely limited. In Texas for example damages
are limited to 100k and that applies per incident even if 20
people are killed. It also applies to anyone acting as an agent of
state county or local government. It also applies to hospitals
treating the indigent. Under federal law government employees
are immune to suit unless they violate agency rules.
The government itself is immune to suit except in cases of
gross negligence. Further lawsuits are limited to direct damages.
In Colorado hospitals themselves are basically immune to suit
but doctors are fair game. This varies a lot between states.
|
|
Chemosynthesis
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1071
Registered: 26-9-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I am really interested in what experimental treatments are being used in the U.S. cases, and when we may get enough data (Africa) to compare
palliative rehydration therapy with blood transfusion, plasma antibodies, and antivirals.
|
|
gregxy
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 421
Registered: 26-5-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Anyone have an opinion on if the lamivudine works? There is one hit on pubmed of it and ebola, but I can't read the article.
|
|
Chemosynthesis
International Hazard
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 1071
Registered: 26-9-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by gregxy ![](images/xpblue/lastpost.gif) | Anyone have an opinion on if the lamivudine works? There is one hit on pubmed of it and ebola, but I can't read the article. | There is absolutely no known mechanistic reason to expect any efficacy whatsoever. Ebola is an RNA virus, single stranded, similar
to retroviruses (I mistakenly missed a "like" earlier in the thread, calling Ebolavirus a retrovirus... it is a filovirus, which can mutate similar to
a retrovirus) including HIV, but it incorporates into the host genome differently.
The L protein is distinct from reverse transcriptase, which is lamivudine's target receptor in HIV and some hepatitis. There may be an off target
effect in play here, but it seems highly dubious. This is why a clinical trial would be necessary to statistically convince people to start the
process of radio ligand testing, purification, and/or assay development.
Antibody analysis for conserved sequences actually seems very promising from what I am reading. Some antibody regions appear conserved in all known
Marburg/Ebola strains, apparently.
|
|
gregxy
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 421
Registered: 26-5-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks for your response,
After more reading I see that ebola is a negative sense RNA virus.
Lamivudine is used to treat HIV and Hep-C which are positive sense RNA viruses. So the mechanism of integration into the host cell would be
completely different.
Influenza is a negative sense RNA virus, so antivirals for influenza would be a better fit, but still unlikely to work since ebola and influenza are
so different.
Developing an antiviral would be hard, but I guess more resistant to mutation since the enzymes that integrate the viral RNA into the cell would be
more conserved than the envelope proteins.
It seems like developing vaccines these days should be almost a "cookie cutter" procedure due to the development of the sequencing and synthesis
techniques. Yet there is no vaccine for HIV or Hep-C, i guess they mutate too fast? Does ebola mutate too fast to make a vaccine effective?
Looking for conserved sequences in the antibodies is really clever.
[Edited on 25-10-2014 by gregxy]
|
|
argyrium
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 123
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Pacific
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Russia
add this to the mix.
http://tinyurl.com/ozn93ve
|
|
gregxy
Hazard to Others
![*](images/xpblue/star.gif) ![*](images/xpblue/star.gif)
Posts: 421
Registered: 26-5-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I think they found the index 0 patient deep in Africa. While the Russians and probably the Americans worked with Ebola as a weapon, the outbreak
seems consistent with a wild virus.
At first it seemed short sighted not to have developed a vaccine or antiviral ahead of time. However without knowing the precise strain this would be
have been difficult to do.
Sarcasm:
The Haj finished on Oct 7th. If it didn't get spread there then we know the Israelis were not involved.
|
|
Pages:
1
..
3
4
5
6
7
..
10 |