Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Beware! "Handbook of inorganic chemicals" by Patnaik
AsocialSurvival
Harmless
*




Posts: 43
Registered: 8-10-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

thumbdown.gif posted on 18-10-2014 at 14:00
Beware! "Handbook of inorganic chemicals" by Patnaik


A large part of this book is simply wrong. I've seen some people use it for Wikipedia reference. If this book is wrong, there's possibility that anything you calculated is wrong, and that wikipedia is wrong. Here's my current finding:

It says that atomic weight of Fluorine is 37.997, while it's on Wikipedia 18.9984031636.

Subscribe to this topic to stay updated of further wrong informationl
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Texium
Administrator
********




Posts: 4618
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline

Mood: PhD candidate!

[*] posted on 18-10-2014 at 14:02


They're probably actually referring to the mass of diatomic fluorine, as it would float around in gas form.



Come check out the Official Sciencemadness Wiki
They're not really active right now, but here's my YouTube channel and my blog.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
plante1999
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1936
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: Mad as a hatter

[*] posted on 18-10-2014 at 14:41


I also noticed many mistakes in this books, nothing major IRRC, though.

[Edited on 18-10-2014 by plante1999]

[Edited on 18-10-2014 by plante1999]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Jameson
Harmless
*




Posts: 4
Registered: 22-10-2014
Location: Cheyenne, WY
Member Is Offline

Mood: curious

[*] posted on 23-10-2014 at 00:04


Even if there's nothing wrong in a major sense with "Handbook of Inorganic Chemicals" those little minor mistakes can grow to a pile. And in such a scientific and detailed field as chemistry, physics, mathematics it's unacceptable. So it's a no-go from me.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
smaerd
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1262
Registered: 23-1-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: hmm...

[*] posted on 25-10-2014 at 04:06


Every book has mistakes in it essentially. Most 'new' books post an errata on the publishers website or something similar. I found more than 10 pretty noteable errors (not talking punctuation here) in the thermodynamics sections of the new Atkins physical chemistry book even (10th ed.). It just happens unfortunately. Inform the author you found an error, might help them along



View user's profile View All Posts By User
Oxirane
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 92
Registered: 19-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 25-10-2014 at 07:30


The mass for fluorine is essentially just diatomic. I have always hated it every time any of these are presented and no indication is made wether it is calculated in basis of single atomic element or as a molecular form. Then you've got to balance the equations and calculations just to check it out and find everything's ok so you're not dumping essentially half - or double - the amount required to the reaction.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
AsocialSurvival
Harmless
*




Posts: 43
Registered: 8-10-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 27-10-2014 at 23:00


OMG, it says: Titanium Dioxide Mohs hardness is 5.8 g/cm3 (anatase and brookite) and 6.2 g/cm3 (rutile). Hmmm... Those hardnesses are correct without unit. The density is 4.23 g/cm3, so it did not mean densities.

Btw, that for fluorine is wrong, nobody gives weight of diatomic gases. Values for H, O, N and all other gases are correct.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top